Time Magazine ‘Person of the Year’ cover uses Apple iMac

Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” cover uses an Apple iMac (at least its foot, the rest is covered by a mirror with a YouTube controller across the bottom) and an Apple keyboard to illustrate 2006’s recipient(s), “You… for seizing the reins of the global media, for founding and framing the new digital democracy, for working for nothing and beating the pros at their own game, Time’s Person of the Year for 2006 is you.”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: This is a nice subliminal ad for Apple. After all, if “you” are shown to be using an Apple iMac, the many “yous” who aren’t may at least begin to wonder why they aren’t. Technically, according to the illustration, Time’s “Person of the Year” is you, a Mac user.

Also note: from what we can see in the Time image, the white Apple keyboard retains it’s Command key “splats,” but the “open Apple” symbols appear have been photoshopped away.

83 Comments

  1. Time’s person of the year is “you”? Time’s having more and more difficulties choosing the person of the year. When they had some balls they could actually choose even someone like Hitler or Stalin when there was an honest reason for it. Now, political correctness seems to have taken over their Person of the Year policy.

  2. That’s clearly an Apple Computer. iMac or Power Mac does not matter.

    MDN is absolutely correct in stating that “This is a nice subliminal ad for Apple”.

    iMac, therefore I am – the “Time Magazine Person of the Year!”

    Steve Jobs will be the Person of the Year for 2007. Mark my words. So chill out on that subject.

    And to the anal-retentive grammar/spelling/punctuaion people:

    GET AN ILIFE!!! LOL.

  3. So TIME would have had to pay Apple for the rights to use the image of their logo on the keyboard, but since it was removed, they don’t have to pay for depicting the base of the iMac or distinctively designed keyboard?

    Interesting.

  4. Me:

    Neither is “Google” a verb. That doesn’t stop people from “Googling” for information.

    One of the marvels of the (at least American) English language is how it adapts to the needs of the time.

  5. Some can debated whether it’s an iMac or an Apple Monitor. No one can debate whether it’s a Hell, HP or a Mac!”

    If you personally know exactly like what an iMac base looks like, it looks like a different screen shape photoshopped onto the iMac or Mac monitor base.

    If you just look at it quickly you think it’s a stylized version of just about any PC monitor.

  6. Be careful with the liberal use of photoshop and its derivatives. Remember Photoshop is a copyrighted name and you guys have probably not bought a license to use it. Without a legitimate authorization key you could be accused of using Abode property without permission.

    Off topic: I saw a billboard from Rambus the other day. Their tagline us “license to speed” which is kind of a finger to everyone saying we’ve got the patents on this technology and we’re gonna screw you for as much as we can get.

  7. BBC World did a programme tonight on this years Nobel Laureates (mostly Americans), including short descriptions of their achievements – showing the scientists at their respective universities, which included Berkeley and Stamford.

    Two Macs came into view on serperate occasions in the background of the various shots, and then one of the laureates was filmed busily typing on a MacBook Pro.

    I think that sort of publicity is great for Apple. This programme was shown all over the world and suggests quite simply: Nobel Prize winners and acedemics at elite universities use Macs.

  8. I think they used the Apple elements simply because of good design, not to mention that Time has done quite a few glowing reviews of Apple’s tech. It looks the best on the cover, compared to Dell or HP products.

    As for the choice, some may say copout, but I say that it’s nice to recognize the general populace. Normally I’m cynical, but I’m feeling generous.

  9. So apparently the Person of the Year:

    1. Uses an iMac;

    “seizing the reins of the global media,”<i>

    2. accesses the Internet, has an iPod, and buys though iTunes;

    <i>”for founding and framing the new digital democracy,”<i>

    3. blogs;

    <i>”for working for nothing”<i>

    4. is employed at Wal-Mart; and:

    <i>”beating the pros at their own game”<i>

    5. rejects Microsoft and the Dilbert corporate clone culture.

    Did Time make a fully accurate assessment??

    I agree with earlier posts: where is Time’s ability to name an actual, single <i>person??

  10. @ Me:

    irregardless: |ˌiriˈgärdlis|

    adjective & adverb informal regardless.

    ORIGIN early 20th cent.: probably a blend of irrespective and regardless

    USAGE Irregardless, with its illogical negative prefix, is widely heard, perhaps arising under the influence of such perfectly correct forms as: irrespective. Irregardless is avoided by careful users of English. Use regardless to mean ‘without regard or consideration for’ or ‘nevertheless’: | I go walking every day regardless of season or weather.

    Dictionaries buddy, *dictionaries.*

  11. By the way, folks, “photoshopped” is a word according to Google, which defines it thus:

    “Photoshopping is the art and practice of digitally editing pictures with image editing software.”

    The Dictionary of American Slang also contains the word.

  12. Did you read the article?

    Quote “America loves its solitary geniuses — its Einsteins, its Edisons, its Jobses — but those lonely dreamers may have to learn to play with others. “

    Steve IS being mentioned and ranked up there with 2 of the most famous thinkers/inventors.

  13. me:

    “How To Serve Mankind” was the cook book written by hungry aliens in an old Twilight Zone episode. These intergalactic cowboys came to Earth to herd humans back to their home planet. What’s for dinner? You, me.

  14. @Jamie–“That’s gonna look great on my resume.”

    Too funny!

    @Mike–“No, it’s YouTube itself… the founders are nowhere near interesting enough to get a Time story…”

    Oh to be that dull but that freakin’ rich!
    I’ll trade places with them any day!

  15. Time has been irrelevant for some years. It’s been a while since they’ve admitted to “participating” in the news instead of merely reporting it, but it’s still the same old Time. We’re all the person of the year, huh? That’s just idiotic pandering.

    Oh, BTW, Bush is probably ten times more qualified for person of the year than the snarky leftists who post on MDN, who have nothing better to do than hate him. Guys, if you haven’t figured out that hatred makes you look small by now, I doubt you ever will.

  16. I’m a red-blooded male that just loves females…….does that make me a lesbian with equipment I don’t need to buy? What maccam said is right, “Coining usage like “photoshop” as a verb is the way language naturally evolves—either the term will thrive or it won’t.” I have to cut this short so lets keep it to the obvious. It is a Mac! YaHoo! Oh yeah isn’t yahoo a term used to describe people in Gullivers Travels. Now its time to go and take my morning Zune. The porcelain throne awaits.

  17. “I’m a red-blooded male that just loves females…….does that make me a lesbian with equipment I don’t need to buy? What maccam said is right, “Coining usage like “photoshop” as a verb is the way language naturally evolves—either the term will thrive or it won’t.” I have to cut this short so lets keep it to the obvious. It is a Mac! YaHoo! Oh yeah isn’t yahoo a term used to describe people in Gullivers Travels. Now its time to go and take my morning Zune. The porcelain throne awaits.” you post makes you sound more like a flaming queer. come out of the closet already.

  18. no queers here;

    Sounds like you got too many kisses from uncle Rudy or could it be uncle Johnny. Maybe it was your relationship with your cousin Tim. Either way your latent tendencies are starting to suface. Whatever you are is usually revealed in the things that make you angry. I believe it is a frustration thing. There is hope for you though

  19. “Sounds like you got too many kisses from uncle Rudy or could it be uncle Johnny. Maybe it was your relationship with your cousin Tim. Either way your latent tendencies are starting to suface. Whatever you are is usually revealed in the things that make you angry. I believe it is a frustration thing. There is hope for you though” hhmm. sounds like you are projecting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.