Apple iPod with real Wi-Fi networking? XM satellite radio?

“If a patent filing is any indicator, Apple Computer CEO Steve Jobs may have nothing to fear from Microsoft’s upcoming wireless Zune player and its media service,” Red Herring reports. “Apple Computer has filed a patent that could allow an iPod to record tunes from thin air, transmit samples of the songs wirelessly to a server that identifies associated media, and enable users to purchase and download them.”

MacDailyNews Note: Newsweek (Oct. 15): “Microsoft has announced its new iPod competitor, Zune. It says that this device is all about building communities. Are you worried?” Apple CEO Steve Jobs: “In a word, no. I’ve seen the demonstrations on the Internet about how you can find another person using a Zune and give them a song they can play three times. It takes forever. By the time you’ve gone through all that, the girl’s got up and left!”

Red Herring continues, “Apple’s filing specifies that a ‘portable media device’ could record a sample, transmit that sample to a server network to identify that sample, and provide the user of the device with numerous media types such as music and video, available for purchase… ‘Whenever you a see a patent like this with Apple it means that they’re working on something,’ said Enderle Group analyst Rob Enderle.”

MacDailyNews Take: Enderle is a genius.

Red Herring continues, “[Apple’s filing] also comes after an analyst came out and said that two models of iPhones are coming. ‘Based upon our early checks, we expect Apple to unveil two models of its widely anticipated cell phones,’ Prudential Equity Group analyst Jesse Tortora said in a research note on Monday. Mr. Tortora said the two phones will most likely be launched at the MacWorld conference in January. One of the phones, he said, will be a smart phone featuring an integrated keyboard, video, and music capabilities. The other will be a slimmer phone with music. One of them will feature Wi-Fi, he noted.”

Red Herring reports, “The patent filing, which refers to a wireless carrier, may relate to Apple’s iPhone as well. The patent filing contains a document reference: ‘AT&T Wireless: mMode phones and how to access your music and ring tones. ‘The AT&T reference could well mean they are going down the road with AT&T,’ Mr. Enderle said.”

MacDailyNews Take: Enderle’s genius continues its exponential growth. Rumor has it that Enderle also believes that since Apple prints “One Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA” on all company business cards, that could well be the actual location of Apple’s headquarters. It’s no wonder that media outlets continue to seek out Enderle for his broad and incisive insider knowledge.

Red Herring continues, “Analysts have long suspected that Apple would do business in a so-called mobile virtual network operator arrangement. With an MVNO setup, the computer maker would be able to better control its brand on phones and sell through Apple’s brick-and-mortar and online stores. Apple may also have a deal with XM Satellite in the works. The filing makes reference to documents covering MacXM, a program that allows Mac OS X to control an XM Satellite Radio device. ‘I think I’ve seen something on this filing,’ said an XM representative who declined to comment further.”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: If Apple does offer satellite radio, we’d hope they pick the more rapidly growing (and Howard Stern featuring) Sirius and not the stodgier XM (although, believe it or not, we wouldn’t mind having XM’s PGA Tour available for live tournament coverage – yes, we know, for most that’s a big yawner). Obviously, offering both (or maybe a choice between) Sirius and XM would be best, if at all possible. With the iPhone rumors ramping up yet again, do you think such a thing is finally coming?

Related articles:
Sirius shares spike in volume on ‘chatter of potential Apple partnership’ – October 18, 2006
Apple iPod+Sirius Satellite Radio? – July 06, 2006
Sirius would like to work with Apple; Howard Stern Sirius podcasts for sale via iTunes? – December 09, 2005
Apple iPod combined with Sirius Satellite Radio would be a music revolution – May 27, 2005
Sirius Satellite Radio CEO Karmazin discusses Sirius-enabled Apple iPod – May 25, 2005
Sirius CEO Karmazin looks to add satellite radio to Apple iPod; no deal – yet – February 10, 2005
Sirius has approached Apple on adding service to iPod – February 09, 2005
Analyst throws cold water on Apple iPod – Sirius Satellite radio deal – December 16, 2004
Analysts: Apple iPod + Sirius Satellite Radio ‘technologically unfeasible right now’ – December 15, 2004
RUMOR: Apple to add SIRIUS Satellite Radio (and Howard Stern) to iPod in mid-2005 – December 10, 2004

Apple’s taken iPod+iTunes to an entirely different level; iPhone will be like supertrain – October 21, 2006
RUMOR: Apple iPhone features leaked – October 19, 2006
Prudential analyst: Apple prepping two ‘iPhone’ models for Macworld Expo January 2007 release – October 16, 2006
Apple seeks rights to iPhone trademark – October 16, 2006
What would an Apple iPhone look like? – October 04, 2006
RUMOR: Apple iPhone to be Cingular-exclusive in US launch, O2-exclusive in Europe – September 26, 2006
Apple’s iTunes 7 contains iPhone clues – September 15, 2006
RUMOR: Apple ‘iPhone’ to debut at Macworld Expo in January 2007 – September 15, 2006
Apple ‘iPhone’ photo a fake, but potential buyers seem real – September 14, 2006
RUMOR: Apple’s ‘iPhone’ to be iPod nano-like candy bar form factor with choice of three colors – September 14, 2006
Apple’s iTunes 7 installer shows ‘iTunes Phone Driver’ as greyed-out option – September 12, 2006
Analyst: Apple could sell 12 million ‘iPhones’ next year – September 11, 2006
Analysts: Apple ‘iPhone’ design and business strategy more ambitious than expected – September 08, 2006
Analyst: Apple ‘iPhone’ finally ready for production – September 05, 2006
Apple CEO Steve Jobs talks up much-rumored ‘iPhone’ iPod mobile phone – August 11, 2006
Is this Apple’s iPhone? – August 03, 2006
BofA ups Apple Computer to ‘buy,’ expects ‘iPhone’ in 2007, shares rise in early trading – July 31, 2006
Not sitting around doing nothing: ‘iPhone’ could add billions to Apple’s revenue – July 21, 2006
Apple CFO on iPhone: ‘we’re not sitting around doing nothing’ – July 20, 2006
Merrill Lynch ups Apple rating to ‘buy’; UBS raises Apple target to $80 – July 20, 2006
Apple Q3 2006 Conference Call notes – July 19, 2006
iPhone, iPod messenger clues in latest iPod firmware update – July 17, 2006
Patent application shows iPod capable of live wireless video conferencing – June 13, 2006
Bear Stearns comments on Apple: ‘true’ video iPod, iPhone, multiple OS plans – May 17, 2006
Apple patent application filed for wireless iPod+iTunes distribution – May 04, 2006
Report: Apple Computer may soon launch its own music ‘iPhone’ – March 31, 2006
RUMOR: Apple ‘iPhone’ put on hold – March 30, 2006
Visiongain: Apple ‘iPhone’ launch imminent – March 29, 2006
BenQ exec: Apple’s iPhone ‘definitely coming’ – March 23, 2006
European patent application shows Apple ‘iPhone’ info? – March 21, 2006
Analyst: Apple ‘iPhone’ could put a dent in Motorola – March 20, 2006
Anayst: 75-percent chance of Apple ‘iPhone’ in next 12 months – March 16, 2006
Generator Research: Apple to Ship $4.2bn in Wireless iPods (WiPods) by 2010 – March 14, 2006
Citigroup tech analyst: Apple ‘iPhone’ is going to be a category killer – March 03, 2006
Motorola to make Windows Media phones, keep separate iTunes phone line – February 13, 2006
Review: Motorola SLVR Apple iTunes mobile phone ‘an incredibly slick gadget with some shortcomings’ – February 13, 2006
Ready for your wireless Apple iPod? – February 09, 2006
Wireless iPod? CSR and PortalPlayer to bring wireless connectivity to personal media players – February 08, 2006
Motorola and Cingular launch new SLVR L7 iTunes phone – January 31, 2006
Analyst sees new Apple iBooks by April, ‘media hub’ product, 1GB iPod nano, iPhone within a year – January 31, 2006
Analysts tackle Apple’s ‘Mobile Me’ patent, iPhone rumors, MVNO possibilities – January 19, 2006
The San Francisco Chronicle: Apple may link cell phone, iPod – January 17, 2006
Apple Computer getting into the mobile phone market? – January 12, 2006
Apple applies for ‘Mobile Me’ trademark – January 11, 2006
Morgan Stanley predicts Apple shares surge, Apple ‘iPhone’ in 2006 – December 16, 2005
Wireless Apple iPods coming in 2006? – December 09, 2005
Analyst predicts Apple-branded ‘iPhone’ with iTunes and terabyte iPod within five years – November 11, 2005
How Apple’s Steve Jobs snookered the entire cell phone industry – October 03, 2005
Motorola CEO Zander: Apple to build a smart phone, it’s only a matter of time – September 29, 2005
Apple may eventually introduce its own ‘iPhone’ cell phone-iPod combo and create Apple MVNO – September 12, 2005
If Apple isn’t working on their own iPhone, they’re making a stupid mistake – September 12, 2005
Does Apple need a mobile phone of its own design? – September 09, 2005
Piper Jaffray: Apple should develop ‘iPhone’ by themselves – September 06, 2005
Forbes: Apple Computer planning to become a phone company? – July 08, 2005
Wendland: Bill Gates is right, iPod will be replaced by smartphones – by Apple – May 13, 2005
Is Apple building ‘The Device?’ – December 10, 2002
Apple Registers iPhone Trademark in Australia – December 02, 2002

34 Comments

  1. Wow, Morgan thinks that MDN must be pro-Bush because it likes Howard Stern? I’m sure the Christian conservatives all like Howie–not! All I can say is just “wow.”
    Maybe we need a competition for the dumbest post ever…

  2. Jake, if you are a newbie here, you shouldn’t comment until you know what you’re talking about. Because otherwise you leave yourself open to winning the dumbest post ever competition.

    So an explanation, MDN takes are generally perceived to more often be pro-Bush. Morgan was implying how incredible (“!”) it is that MDN might actually like Howard Stern given that perception. Got it?

  3. I saw Enderle’s words featured in this month’s PCWorld. I can’t believe he gets his stuff published. Or, maybe I can.

    Too bad he didn’t realize AT&T Wireless is no longer. Of course, it is Cingular (or part of, etc) now.

    As for Sirius and XM…why not a choice between! That is great! Didn’t see that coming, and it’d be smart, eh?

    iPhone is going to be something.

    Also, thanks to MDN for the great stuff, as always.

  4. Enderle is still far from a genius as well as MDN (Golf? on the radio??!!! )

    Everything Apple patetnts does not make it to market simply because of a patent filing.

    MDN please find a clearer fashion to differentiate your multiple paragraphs of ramblings from the actual
    meat and potato(e)s of the real story.

    Heres an example where you headline the first paragraph with the “MDN take”. ie http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/11302/

    And the next paragraph is a continuation of you or are we back to the actual story. Indent or use a different font, anything.

    I’ll expect an MDN take on what an idiot I am.

    Wasn’t Dan Quale fun.
    Wonder what he moved (<<<
    MDN word) on to?

  5. P.S.
    Apple wants to be the content deliverer, not creator/provider, regardless of where the content comes from (the recording industry, the movie industry, Google/You Tube, and now maybe this). iTV will quickly evolve into on-demand content – anything and everything that you can possibly stream to a TV. All available instantly.

  6. “If Apple does offer satellite radio, we’d hope they pick the more rapidly growing (and Howard Stern featuring) Sirius and not the stodgier XM “

    macdailynews, stop being such an ardent stern fanboy. you’re such a hypocrite its unreal. the same skewed bullshit you call out people for you’re guilty of yourself.

    stodgier? no sir, that’s what you call a 50 something egotistical former radio personality who cant let go of his former fame..and is all but forgotten.

  7. Three quick points:

    1) If Apple chooses a slower growing service (XM, which is debatable depending on which figures you use, besides, faster growing doesn’t always equal profitability and sustainability), it has the opportunity to help grow their partner’s (XM’s) subscription base.

    2) By choosing one service to offer, they simplify the interface to the service, and lowers associated hardware costs by only having one receiver. The same argument can be said about why not let the users have a choice between subscription and a la carte downloads. Apple decides what works, and from their previous track record in this space, they seem to be right.

    3) By choosing one service, they can get a better rate for licensing terms, specifically if it is the slower growing service (see #1)

    Ok, not so quick, but still…

  8. and lo. I saw the great Enderle and he was all aflame yet was not consumed. He offered me a vessel containing exotic knowledge and analytical prognostications. there, upon drinking, I became of burning sack of shit. ….and as I said, lo! burning on MDNs front porch on Halloween night.

  9. It would be almost impossible to have both Sirius and XM radios in one device at this time. Each has a different decoding chipset. Moreover, you need a discrete antenna that can be pointed to different areas of the sky depending on which satellite you’re using.

    For music, both XM and Sirius encode music at approximately 64 kbps. I don’t even like the sound of ITMS at 128 kbps.

    XM has hockey and MLB. Nothing else really matters, so an iPhone with Sirius would be a waste for me.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.