Piper Jaffray analyst sees Steve Jobs remaining as Apple CEO

“Steve Jobs is not only likely to suffer little pain from Apple Computer Inc.’s options backdating investigation, but without a doubt will remain as the company’s chief executive, according to Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster,” Rex Crum reports for MarketWatch.

“In a research note released Wednesday, Munster said that he believes Jobs is in the clear regarding the backdating of options at Apple because the company’s internal investigation revealed no misconduct on the part of any current members of Apple’s management team,” Crum reports.

Full article here.

Related articles:
Options scandal: is Apple’s Steve Jobs truly safe? – October 18, 2006
Apple Computer Directors may have had conflicts of interest in options investigation – October 11, 2006
Apple’s options disclosures leave plenty of unanswered questions – October 09, 2006
Apple shareholders await earnings restatements; Steve Jobs still not in the clear – October 06, 2006
Former CFO Anderson helped turn Apple Computer around – October 05, 2006
Wall Street unshaken by results of Apple stock options investigation – October 05, 2006
Is Apple rotten at the core? – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Anderson, Heinen may be former Apple executives responsible for irregular options grants – October 05, 2006
Analyst: Apple restatement due to options irregularities not expected to be significant – October 04, 2006
Apple’s special committee reports findings of stock option investigation – October 04, 2006
Google CEO declines Apple automatic stock option grant; plans to buy 10,000 AAPL shares instead – September 01, 2006
Google CEO Dr. Eric Schmidt joins Apple’s Board of Directors – August 29, 2006
Shareholders allege Apple execs reaped ‘millions’ in unlawful profits – August 23, 2006
How options-backdating irregularities can affect your Apple Computer stock – August 23, 2006
Apple’s options imbroglio: Mac-maker granted options at or near key events in company’s history – August 18, 2006
Apple added to Nasdaq’s list of ‘delinquent companies’ – August 18, 2006
Apple unlikely to be delisted by NASDAQ – August 16, 2006
Apple CEO Steve Jobs drawn into stock options scandal – August 15, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 11, 2006
As expected, Apple delays quarterly results due to stock-options grants review – August 11, 2006
Some stock options grant decisions were made by Apple board, and potentially, CEO Steve Jobs – August 10, 2006
Disney: no material impact from Pixar options – August 09, 2006
Pixar options draw scrutiny – August 08, 2006
Apple stock options scandal? What scandal? – August 07, 2006
Class action lawsuit over stock options filed against Apple Computer, Inc. – August 04, 2006
Wall Street forgiving of Apple’s stock option irregularities; CEO Jobs unlikely to be terminated – August 04, 2006
Apple’s stock option irregularities escalate into a scandal as world awaits Steve Jobs’ WWDC keynote – August 04, 2006
Apple warns of profit restatement dating back to 2002 – August 04, 2006
Apple loses 3.5% to $67.15 in premarket trading – August 04, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – August 03, 2006
Shareholder’s options suit against Apple alleges ‘striking pattern that could not have been chance’ – July 11, 2006
Apple announces update regarding stock option grants – July 05, 2006
UBS: stock options probe unlikely to hurt Apple – June 30, 2006
Apple joins growing list of companies entangled in stock option ‘irregularities’ – June 29, 2006
Apple to investigate stock option grant ‘irregularities’ made between 1997 and 2001 – June 29, 2006
Fred D. Anderson joins Apple Board – June 08, 2004
Apple CFO Anderson to retire on June 1, 2004; will join Apple’s Board of Directors – February 05, 2004

9 Comments

  1. Don’t get me wrong. I love Steve as much as the next guy/gal. But this is just a report from their internal investigators. We still have to see if the SEC wants a probe of their own. The dust hasn’t exactly settled yet. Also, don’t forget the shareholder lawsuits.

  2. Word on the street:

    “I didn’t do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can’t prove a thing.”

    – Bart Simpson

    This guy is SO guilty he makes O.J. look like a victim.

    . . .

    Oh, sorry . . . I thought we were talking about Gates and his predatory business practices. If he can’t be taken down, there’s no way the SEC or anyone else should be able to touch Apple.

  3. Munster is way too confident that SJ is in the clear. An internal investigation clearing a company’s current CEO is not that surprising. While I too would bet on Jobs surviving (I certainly hope so!), it is far from a sure thing. Keep in mind that Jobs admitted he was aware of the backdating, he just pled ignorance of the accounting implications.
    If that SOB Spitzer were at the SEC right now, you can be sure that Steve’s innocence or guilt would be irrelevant, not when compared to the media attention he could obtain by prosecuting Steve Jobs. These days, an indictment or even just a “criminal investigation” is usually enough to knock off a CEO and maul a company; a later conviction, or lack thereof, is not so important.

  4. The “internal” investigation was carried out by a 3rd party by the way. And, auditors don’t keep their jobs by letting people get away with things, if they did do that, the SEC would be after them as well.

  5. Screw that guy, he can’t get away with that, this is outrageous, he’s totally screwed over the company stockholders and brought shame on the brand, it’s a freak’n outrage….. huh? It’s not about Balmer? oh, sorry, never mind

  6. I don’t care – and most stockholders don’t care whether SJ actually made a “mistake” in this or anything else. When people buy Apple stock these days, they are more realistically buying stock in Steve Jobs. Apple stock prices would crash and there would be great uncertainty as to Apple’s future should SJ resign, That would hurt everyone over something that many people feel isn’t comparatively a big deal. SJ isn’t going anywhere. Those who think he should, should also provide their recipe for continued success at Apple after he went. I’m not sure such a recipe exists, with certainty, at the moment.

    He stays.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.