New Apple Mac Pro launched in Middle East

“Arab Business Machine (ABM), Apple’s independent marketing company in the Middle East, recently announced the regional launch of the new Apple Mac Pro,” TradeArabia reports.

“A quad Xeon, 64-bit desktop workstation featuring two new Dual-Core Intel Xeon processors running up to 3.0 GHz and a new system architecture that delivers up to twice the performance of the Power Mac G5 Quad, the new Mac Pro provides advanced performance, greater expansion, higher performance graphics options and unprecedented customisation, catering to the needs of the most demanding user,” TradeArabia reports. “The introduction of the Mac Pro marks the completion of a rapid and seamless transition for Apple, with the entire Mac family now using Intel’s latest processors.”

“‘We are delighted to announce the launch of the revolutionary Mac Pro in the Middle East. The new Mac Pro is a pioneering workstation designed on the latest technology from Apple, providing diverse user communities with a powerful tool to undertake various activities ranging from graphics and design to simple day-to-day computing tasks such as email and browsing. With several high performance hardware components and the latest OS from Apple, the Mac Pro is definitely the ideal computer for the performance-oriented user. As ABM and Apple continue to witness consistent success and growth in the region, I am sure that this latest release from Apple will also be quickly absorbed by Apple enthusiasts in the Middle East,’ said Elias Abou Rustom, general manager, ABM,” TradeArabia reports.

Full article here.

[UPDATE: 11:05am EDT: Changed “Mideast” to “Middle East” for the sake of worldwide clarity.]

Related articles:
Preview of Arabic Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger – August 15, 2006
Abu Dhabi MacStore Apple Center Grand Opening photos – May 11, 2006
Apple Centre Mac Store opens in Abu Dhabi Mall (w/ link to photos) – April 18, 2006
Middle East likely to get chain of ‘Apple Centres’ – May 19, 2004

69 Comments

  1. who cares-not to start a political comentary, but, those crazy people do not want to figure anything out. they want to kill us because we are not them. while i do not agree that the deployment of our troops to fight this asymetric war (sending an ghetto gang might be more effective), i do subscribe to the theory that if you leave them alone to plan their next attack, we can expect the train stations, financial & cultural icons here to start exploding soon and often. while our troops deployed in iraq are providing a convenient american target for the extremists to attack (and the media provides them a powerful political stage, it is at least reducing the risk to millions of americans at home. i respect everyone’s right to disagree and protest the war, but i also respect much more anyone who offers an intelligent alternative.

    this is not viet nam. there were no communists planning to blow up the golden gate. the only parallel i can make is the soviet nuclear threat of the cold war. while there we protests about nuclear weapons, they were about at the level of peta protests. our security was a dominant concern. the theory of mass mutual destruction was our iraq war back then. you, joe public, generally supported the strategy because it was cheaper for you than building a bomb shelter. the majority of the population has to get to an equivalent threat education level to put iraq in the proper perspective. don’t see this as any different than the cold war from a threat perspective. we just are behind it the same way.

    trying to get back on topic, the fundamentalists are fighting against the influence of western culture on their lifestyle. so opening a mcdonalds is just as much an invasion as sending in the 1st cav. their use of western technology to spread propaganda and incite jihad volunteers is justified in their minds because their are using it as a weapon not a cultural pillar. our ultimate weapon is to create viable “western” economies to change the culture of rich powerful families, supporting a religion that conveniently tolerates and sanctifies their existence keeping 90% of their population deperately poor.

    personally i’m not sure the sociological infrastructure exists in the middle east to support a “western” economy that creates a dominant middle class today. when bush says this will be a long war, he means it ain’t over until this happens. not saying there is not a desire to be middle class, but that the fear and stigma of the middle class being “western” is a real barrier. using technology, like the macpro to create content and run a small business, is on the path to create a middle class, but there is a long way to go.

    mw: industry….the middle east needs more industry and less fear and hate.

  2. hey! Who Cares

    Your ignorance is showing.

    The Middle East comprises of millions of people, and just like the US there are crazy people and average folks who seem powerless to correct the wrongs of a few.

    Once we start thinking more like one world and not territorialized we’ll beginning to sort out our problems. Taking sides has always lead to conflict.

    One World Bubba, in the beginning there were no boundaries and they were just one of us.

    Now go ahead and take sides to this argument and watch conflict arise.

  3. Now they will use the Apple to blow us up and use the screen grating to slit our throats.

    No need to, apparently – your own paranoia will already have scared you to death long before that…! ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />

  4. Hey Mackie and One World – My ignorance is NOT showing and YOURS IS! Have you seen what these people are doing over there? Open your GD eye holes and look at the real picture. Nothing good is going to come from over there, nothing. Lets come home and protect ourselves and save billions doing it. Can you imagine if we spent all that money on our own and not on a worthless cause? Get the HELL out of the “middle east” and leave them to themselves. If they want to join the civilized world then they can. Or they can stay the way they are and have been for the last 1500 years, losers. We will never force those damn idiots to do anything not even over the next 100 years. It comes down to freedom and they just don’t GET IT!

  5. The problem in the Middle East is not just a few “crazy people.” The main problem is most of the “average folks,” who respond positively to tribal/Arab/religious triumphalism. In addition, like most defective societies, they insist on blaming outsiders for their own problems, ensuring that these are not corrected. Western societies embraces public self-criticism, while the Middle East does not.

  6. It is very sad that mac users claim that they are (open minded) and then i read a very prejudice comments from most of them on a topic like this..

    You are not more open minded than any PC user … or any computer illiterate ..

    You are not any better than Bush … or Blair .. ( if his name is spelled right ) ..

    We forgive you only because we know how prejudice and biased the media around you is … and most of you are eating it …

    forgive my poor english .. it is just like your poor understanding ..

    ( open your mind ) …

  7. Apple?
    Isn´t the Apple of the religious symbols of the non-Muslim religion Christianity???!!!?? As in Eve bit into the Apple in the Garden of Eden…

    No Muslim will buy a product promoting the religion of the heathen dog infidel Christians!

    “O Prophet! Make war against the unbelievers [all non-Muslims] and the hypocrites and be merciless against them. Their home is hell, an evil refuge indeed.” (Koran, 9:73)

    “Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends.” (Surah 5:51)

    “Muhammad is God’s apostle. Those who follow him are ruthless to the unbelievers but merciful to one another.” (Surah 48:29)

  8. Use the Mac Pro as a blast shield whilst at work.

    Maybe now with the Mac OS, the extremists won’t be so angry all the time.

    PS: The arab world missed out on WWII, and now have to learn things that western civ has already dealt with — peace through democracy.

  9. The mideast is a worthless part of the world. They bring death and destruction to the world. All because of their EVIL god. 5% do the evil work. 50% agree with it and smile at the death and destruction of others. So what is that 50% worth– 5-10 billion people?? Liberals are just plain clueless to true evil.

  10. Who Cares? — You have serious problems.

    It is never okay to paint an entire people with a single brusque remark.

    It may be best for us to leave Iraq soon, but mostly because we’ve fcked up their country quite enough. How would you feel if Iraqi soldiers had been occupying your neighborhood for the past three years?

    Get a grip. There are decent, law abiding Arabs who would like computers to surf the internet, make videos, listen to music and generally make life enjoyable.

    Don’t begrudge them.

  11. ping,

    you’re quite right.

    What you’re saying basically – if I may paraphrase – is that there are a few really sick people posting here …

    … like ‘steve’ and ‘Who Cares’

    It amazes (and shames) me that there are such petty-minded, prejudiced people in the Apple community.

  12. Hey, let´s comment:

    “Nothing good is going to come from over there, nothing”

    > yeah, like Steve Jobs´ Dad for example ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” /> Or the oil you got in your truck.

    “I bet 40% of the wacos from the mideast would careless it your throat was cut”

    > I bet you wouldn´t care if your neighbours throats were cut – especially if you don´t know them. You would be scared for one month or less. Sad fact.

    “the arab world missed out on WWII, and now have to learn things that western civ has already dealt with — peace through democracy.”

    > wait. everyone who missed out on WORLD war II doesn´t know a cent on democracy? Like – hmm – Switzerland?????? You don´t really think so, do you?

    “The mideast is a worthless part of the world. They bring death and destruction to the world. All because of their EVIL god. 5% do the evil work. 50% agree with it and smile at the death and destruction of others. So what is that 50% worth– 5-10 billion people?? “

    > yeah. like the US of A killing approx 43000 people in Iraq alone is not evil. America has invaded Iraq without the worlds (UN for example) approval. America brings war in and they defend themselves. poor evil people.

    “Liberals are just plain clueless to true evil.”

    > best one. Republicans are. ^^

  13. Hey Shogun, Go fall on your sword. I am pissed off and have had enough of these “middle east” idiots.
    Hey Kreuzberg, You are an even bigger idiot. While I don’t agree with some of the things Pres Bush is doing I support him 100%. Why are people so eager to attack our own Pres when you have all of these other leaders in the world that are just plain evil. I don’t understand you liberal idiots. You are all GD IDIOTS!

  14. Kreuzberg: “Bush is the only American president in history who has sanctified torture.”

    Sanctify:
    1 : to set apart to a sacred purpose or to religious use : CONSECRATE
    2 : to free from sin : PURIFY
    3 a : to impart or impute sacredness, inviolability, or respect to b : to give moral or social sanction to
    4 : to make productive of holiness or piety <observe the day of the sabbath, to sanctify it — Deuteronomy 5:12(Douay Version)>

    Yes, Kreuzberg, you are an idiot. Want me to look that up for you, too?
    ——————
    Kreuzberg, I dare you to walk down any street in an Muslim country (Pakistan, Iran, Saudi Arabia) and start reading the Bible.
    Take off the left wing, “hate Bush” glasses and see the real world.
    Oh yeah, and Bush is not running for President again.

  15. Webster, I dare you to walk through small towns in texas being black. Or wearing a beard and a turban.

    What do you think is gonna happen to you wearing a swastika in Israel? Do you think they will ask you if you wear it by religious means? If you are hindu? I don´t think so. It has become a political symbol.
    And obviously, for some people, wearing the crux or reading the bible is a symbol, an offense. But do you really think being american (esp. looking like one) wouldn´t endanger you far more in arabian countries? But why? As much as people above stated “leave them on their own, they are not civilized”, muslims must have the right to say so too. We don´t understand / know their religion, their hierarchy, their lifes. And some of us even don´t accept all of this. Why should muslims do so?

    “Why are people so eager to attack our own Pres when you have all of these other leaders in the world that are just plain evil.”

    > Because NOT being “officially” plain evil (though 60 % of the worlds population might think so of pres bush) makes you a good leader. And when people elect leaders, they have not only the right, but also the duty to attack them, when they do shit. like:
    — if YOU don´t have a clean household, don´t tell ME how to clean things up —

    MW: lines. like – in the line(s) of fire

  16. wow, originally wanted to say something positive about these news. But I somewhat lost my appetite.

    I still find the evolution of things somewhat frightening, especially when I run into U.S citizens who almost always start a conversation by excusing themselves…for being Americans.

    Personally, I’ve spent lot of time in Dubai, Qatar, Abu Dhabi and Kuwait since my company has lots of clients in the region. Being a western European, I always find it amazing how well educated the people in the region are. They’re mostly pretty fluent in 2-3 languages, they know lots about foreign politics and, well, they really enjoy spending time with us, the foreigners visiting them. They love discussing and explaining everything we would like to know about their culture.

    I just wish some of you people, the ones who seem to believe that Arabs are born killing-machines with the priority to kill all cute americans, to encounter some of the people I’ve met. Even though the white man has peed on their culture and treated their people with enormous amounts of disrespect through ages – they will most likely smile and ask you if you want arabic coffee or maybe even a nice Shisha.

  17. They PEED on my culture. I don’t want to become a muslum!! They will kill all of us if we don’t covert to islam. I have yet to see the hindu religion cut peoples throats.

    Who the hell thinks the people here vote for bush because they think the mideast is full of religious
    mass murders I am a democrat that sees what is coming. Just look at all the anger when the Pope made a comment from a person hundreds of years ago. They killed a nun and millions freaked out.

  18. comment:

    From: Kate

    Sep 30, 06 – 12:36 pm

    The problem in the Middle East is not just a few “crazy people.” The main problem is most of the “average folks,” who respond positively to tribal/Arab/religious triumphalism. In addition, like most defective societies, they insist on blaming outsiders for their own problems, ensuring that these are not corrected. Western societies embraces public self-criticism, while the Middle East does not.

  19. Why isn’t anyone talking about the elephant in the room? The real problem here is religion itself. Fundamentalists killing because of some scribblings in some ancient book. That goes for religion in the middle east and america.

  20. James,

    Islam had about 500 years less to evolve compared to christianity. 500 years ago, If you would have criticized God, The Pope or what not mentioned in the Old or New Testament – you would’ve ended up losing your life under very unpleasant circumstances. If some external race would’ve invaded the christian community 500 years back, claiming their superior religion or culture, I’m sure the christians wouldn’t have been acting like “gee, thanks!”.

  21. Ashamed world citizen…

    If you are french or british, in 20 years you will have your paradise of a Muslim run france and UK.

    They are taking over your countries and you are too liberal to see it coming.

    Just saw they are now DEMANDING to teach islam in your public schools and you high brows will let them!

  22. Ashamed world citizen,

    I’m not criticising any particular religion. I’m condemning Religion itself as an absurd superstitious belief. Some people believe in fairies, unicorns, Thor or Yahweh — the onus is on you to say why you believe in it.

  23. Oh sheit, Sunday morning and a crapload of nationalism on the MDN-channel.

    By far the most backward country in the world is the US of A$$$$$$…
    I’m with you Ashamed World Citizen. Never seen any country being so intolerable, so self-centric and so pathethic as the US.
    If people don’t think like us, eat like us, shit like us, then we have to teach them. If not the soft way, then the hard way.
    What is it with all those idiots there, having the greatest technology, access to any information-source at any time, but to lazy or dumb to do a proper search in Google or any other internet source and READ some to form a proper, well informed opinion before you open your a$$.

    To James, (and supporting Ashamed World Citizen in that), ever heard of the Crusades? In the name of the holy, lets do some nice crusade. The USA is no different in that. All of the reasons can be related to similar ones 500 years back.
    1. Trouble at home, unemployment, poverty, grumbling lower and middle class.
    2. Military is in despair after loosing their lifetime enemy. Need some new to justify the money for new toys.
    3. Lots of money to be made, was it gold and jewels in ancient times, it is oil now.

    Being such a righteous christian as bush, he should read the bible and turn his other cheek to whom he’s been slapped by.

    MW: Single….It only takes one single step to change the world. That single step is from intolerance to tolerance.

  24. re: stickman

    I think I’ll have less of a problem learning to speak arabic than killing moslems – and this just because an incompetent government claims to fight for, what was it again? Right, Freedom and democracy.

    It’s a common misunderstanding that the moslems want to convert non-moslems. It is however true that they like their children to remain moslems – even if they’re forced to raise them in a non-moslem society.
    If you would be forced to leave your country, whatever, maybe you’re not even forced -would you want your children to convert?

    What makes me confused is your reaction towards these changes in European schools. Would you prefer a school system where people barely know anything about different cultures? I know, this might make morally worthless soldiers – it’s not as easy to kill when you’re well educated. Maybe this is the reason why the US Administration has been pulling their funds from so many public libraries – not to mention the closure of those 26 EPA libraries. Scientists are protesting – but hey, this will never get any headlines anyway, right?
    However, it’s a disgrace to see how the US wants other countries to open up – whilst their own citizens are getting their freedom and individual integrity being pulled, one by one.

    On a sidenote, and this is for the “evil cultures must be punished if they don’t obey to our superior lifestyle” kind of people. If evil would be based on simple mathematics; how come no one compares the amounts of bodybags caused by each culture or religion? Anyone here really believes that western culture or christianity wouldn’t take the lead? Honestly?

  25. Sorry Liberals, that the Mac community is not a bunch of hippies sitting in drum circles believing everything can be solved by the right words, and discussions.

    For negotiations to work you have to have good moral core on both sides to honor the policy decided on. Hitler Sadam, Osama: goal is power not a fair civilization–evil doesn’t honor treaties, it lies to buy time to do more evil to gain more power. Bullies only understand force, they are the people MOST unlike you liberals and you can’t mentally process the fact that bullies don’t rule dreaming your (or our) peaceful world dreams.

    I WAS a Democrat until they drove me our of it with blind stupidity of frequently not being able to see the hard facts of a situation. Home or abroad.
    AND….
    What’s wrong with any war being about oil? What the hell do you think this country/economy runs on. OIL YOU DUFUS! It is (unfortunately) the lifeblood of our economy–without it our economy crashes. I can’t think of a MORE important reason to go to war than over oil–until we wean ourselves off this stuff on to some fuel form that originates here (If that’s possible). That Liberal crap “no war for oil” is the dumbest thing–you can’t grasp what liquid Americans are relying on driving to work, flying, heating, recreation, farming, making plastics, shipping produce across country and the stuff you buy off e-bay with? DUH!! No war for oil showed me how stupid you all are.

    We need to smack every Liberal with a Clue Stick. Thank OUR God Liberals weren’t around in World Wars 1 or 2 or we NEVER would have won either of them. I agree Viet Nam was wrong. WW 1&2 and the Terrorists now are DIFFERENT folks it’s not Viet Nam. I know it brings back fun anti-war protest memories, but getting all sentimental is going to get us car bombs here and more dying on U.S. soil. We already had Pearl Harbor #2 at the World Trade Center. At least in WWII the Japanese had the moral character to attack a military base, not civilians! The Terrorists would kill your baby and your grandmother with not an ounce of regret. Wake up and stop fighting political parties and unite so this will end FASTER. Terrorists love you Liberals you give them the hope they desperately need when they wonder if they should keep killing because the U.S. doesn’t have the willpower to finish. You are supporting Osama’s very words. Hope your proud of yourselves.

    And the thing over the Pope! Muslims pissed off because their religion was called violent and murderous. So they protested with riots, violence, threatened to kill the Pope, and actually killed a nun. Gee, glad they set us straight on THAT misconception! F’n Idiots.

  26. And the thing over the Pope! Muslims pissed off because their religion was called violent and murderous. So they protested with riots, violence, threatened to kill the Pope, and actually killed a nun. Gee, glad they set us straight on THAT misconception! F’n Idiots.

  27. “Who Cares?” and others result to name calling and the typical approach to the Middle East. “Leave them alone and they’ll leave us alone”…. Well, that’s not going to happen. Leave them alone, and they will go about their business of planning ways to intimidate the world into their Islamic Domination theory. You folks on the far left need to get a reality check, as there is no way in hell that the Jihadists are going to leave anyone alone. Their objective is to take over weaker governments and their military arsenals until they get to the point where they can take over a country or negotiate for nuclear weapons. At that point, they will use them and they will threaten the world, if each country doesn’t convert to their religion or pay for their lives through a tax.

    All of this can be understood if you just look at history and understand the nature of the enemy. Now, it didn’t take any “right wing” upbringing for me to figure this out, because most of my family were die-hard Democrats…. However, they were Conservative Democrats, back in a time when such a thing existed. The problem with the LEFT today is they believe in Utopia, and my friends, Utopia doesn’t exist….

  28. “Who really cares about the middle east”

    the U.S. does, especially the oil we thought it would be so easy to steal

    “If they want to join the civilized world then they can”

    what planet is this “civilized world” on?

    by the way, would eiter of you have a prayer of passing a retard level test on Middle East geogaphy or history?

  29. they want to kill us because we are not them. […] the fundamentalists are fighting against the influence of western culture on their lifestyle.

    No they don’t and no they’re not, mackie. They’re fighting against US military forces occupying what they view as prized territory.

    like most defective societies, they insist on blaming outsiders for their own problems, ensuring that these are not corrected.

    Read a history book, Kate. You obviously have no idea about the roots of our troubles in the Middle East.

  30. We need to smack every Liberal with a Clue Stick. Thank OUR God Liberals weren’t around in World Wars 1 or 2 or we NEVER would have won either of them.

    Man, you’re an idiot. Wilson and Roosevelt were Democrats.

    Opposition to the Bush administration’s methods in the fight against global stateless terrorism is in pursuit of actually fighting it rather than distracting our forces in some unnecessary war instigated under false pretenses and resulting in more terrorist threats. Liberals actually want to fight terrorism, not use Iraq and terrorism as some political tool to ensure Republic domination of the US government.

    Terrorists love you Liberals you give them the hope they desperately need when they wonder if they should keep killing because the U.S. doesn’t have the willpower to finish. You are supporting Osama’s very words. Hope your proud of yourselves.

    Who cares what the terrorists think? Why do conservatives care so much about what the terrorists think?

    Dissent against the Bush agenda isn’t about whether or not we encourage or offend the terrorists. It’s about the moral fortitude of our country and ensuring we don’t become the enemy in pursuit of fighting the enemy.

  31. Sandy you must be a true genius. All conflicts are because someone cant get along with theyr neighbor. But i would love to see your list of those 22 conflicts anyway. Source please. I dont care if you took it out of miss Seventeen mag – just friggin pass the link. thx

  32. “They are taking over your countries and you are too liberal to see it coming”
    > already seeing green little people all around you? Scared of everything foreign?

    “Just saw they are now DEMANDING to teach islam in your public schools and you high brows will let them”
    > my goooodness. Considering that america is infested by that junk science / religion of “intelligent design”, I´m totally not scared of getting to know one of the important world religions – the Islam.
    My standpoint is even to completely discard religion classes (which of course includes christianity) from public schools. I mean it´s already happening here in Germany, and I think it´s good. Religion and beliefs have nothing to do with education.

    “Bullies only understand force”
    > yeah. Psychopathic mass-murderers even more. The more they don´t care about the dead, the more they are scared of foreign forces. Riiight. Pure. Logic. And you say the others can´t mentally process facts.

    “What’s wrong with any war being about oil?”
    > and they say the Islam was 500 years behind, when there are still people thinking so imperialistic. “Hey, they got oil. let´s kill em. it´s okay, cause we need it. and when they defend themselves, we´re sooo shocked and better kill their families too.”
    Oh, and I can live from alternative powers than oil too.

    “but getting all sentimental is going to get us car bombs here and more dying on U.S. soil.”
    > LORD! Dammit! You are at WAR! Your country is not at a peace mission, like others, it would be highly morbid, if only Arabs would be allowed to die, wouldn´t it?

    “We already had Pearl Harbor #2 at the World Trade Center. At least in WWII the Japanese had the moral character to attack a military base, not civilians!”

    > wanna take a history class and google up what America did afterwards? killed soldiers (like they would be the evil people)? Hmm.. Hiroshima anyone??
    “Their objective is to take over weaker governments and their military arsenals until they get to the point where they can take over a country or negotiate for nuclear weapons.”

    > Again, you´re drawing a black & white picture here. As Hitler was killing thousands of people in Europe, I guess it would have been okay for you to simply kill every german?? Cause every german wanted to kill everybody else and get nuclear weapons???? Don´t think so.
    Back then, it was common to wait for another country to attack you before going to war. Everything else is declared as “war of aggresion”, like Pearl Harbour was, like it is listed in Article 5.1 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (RSICC) as one of the four most serious crimes of concern to the international community. Funny that at the moment the International Criminal Court is taking measures to accuse the USA of such an “war of aggresion”

    “++OUT OF THE 22 CONFLICTS IN THE WORLD, 21 ARE BECAUSE MUSLIMS CAN’T GET ALONG WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS.++”

    > Do you get along with all of your neighbors? Is USA nowadays a muslim neighbor? Have I missed something??
    Or did you just try to count funny like in “there are 10 types of people who understand binary”??

  33. “Man, you’re an idiot. Wilson and Roosevelt were Democrats.”

    No shit Sherlock! Wilson and Roosevelt were in back when Democrats had logical, brains with common sense. That’s why my family were always Democrats. Now we’ve just about all switched parties. Voted Republican or Independent if there is anyone worth voting for.

    If you can’t see the crazy evolution of your own party you need to step back. The environment and pro-choice are the only 2 things I have in common, leftover from my Democrat days. Notice I didn’t say LIBERAL days. I was once a Dem, but never a Liberal.

    My definition of a Liberal: “A Liberal is a Democrat who’s mind is so open his brain fell out.”

    MDN word: “Shown” as in been shown the truth. Wake up fools!

  34. > wanna take a history class and google up what America did afterwards? killed soldiers (like they would be the evil people)? Hmm.. Hiroshima anyone??

    Yes, MY history class said we used a nuclear weapons, and it was terrible, but it was TO END (emphasis on END) A WAR, NOT START ONE! Big difference buddy! DUH again.

    Dropping nuclear weapons was our LAST RESORT, because the Japanese refused to consider surrender as an option and the Dem’s favorite past time: negotiations, were NOT working. The war would have gone on and on for more years and more death on both sides. Sometimes it is justified to do the toughest thing to END a terrible situation. You can’t always fight a surgical war and win, in fact it’s nearly impossible, careful of every little thing. Ideal, but not even close to practical reality. Couldn’t do it and win in Nazi Germany and couldn’t do it in Japan. We would have lost and the government we’d be saluting sure wouldn’t be an “open-minded” democratic one like you enjoy so much.

    Remember Democrats: if the Terrorists ever take over with their version of Muslim religion, your sex, and drug based Hollywood Liberal support core will be the first bunch these Terrorists would lop the heads off. And you can kiss Women’s Rights goodbye and start measuring for a sheet to wear. We are in dead serious times folks.

    MDN word: “Hope” as in hope you buy a clue.

  35. littering
    pepsi
    dell
    the-ill-awaited zune
    evil
    hate
    racist cowards
    planet raping
    absolute stupidity
    + bone-headed republicans
    ————-
    windows users

    recycling
    coke
    apple
    ipod
    good
    love
    tolerance
    global awareness
    intellect
    + thoughtful liberalism
    ————–
    mac users

    now, I’m not a preacher, nor am I particularly religious… but here’s a truism for y’all: racism, fear and hate are the cornerstones of all evil. some of the people here had better think their positions over before He returns (still waiting). y’know, sorta check their heads; grow some pubic hair. if there’s a heaven, do you really think good ole gw bush is headed there? stop and think about it now. don’t forget to think. think…

  36. Wilson and Roosevelt were in back when Democrats had logical, brains with common sense.

    How convenient for your argument, Watson. It’s no wonder neocons are so certain of their sanctimony. If anything contradicts their dissonant worldview, they just alter the facts to suit their arguments.

    And let me quote you again: Thank OUR God Liberals weren’t around in World Wars 1 or 2.

    My assessment of you still stands: you’re an idiot.

    Oh, and you also reveal how ignorant you are of Islam when you say “OUR” god. According to the superstition, Allah is Yahweh. Jews, Christians and Muslims worship the same invisible superhero in the clouds. Idiot.

    That’s why my family were always Democrats. Now we’ve just about all switched parties.

    Typical neocon. No follow-through. Always willing to throw the baby out with the bath water.

    if the Terrorists ever take over with their version of Muslim religion, your sex, and drug based Hollywood Liberal support core will be the first bunch these Terrorists would lop the heads off. And you can kiss Women’s Rights goodbye and start measuring for a sheet to wear.

    You watch too many bad movies. Please describe to me this fantastical set of events that would ever allow some ragtag crew of radical Islamic terrorists with their $12 IEDs to “take over” the US. Hell, I’ll go easy on you, describe how they would take over LA.

    We are in dead serious times folks.

    You are such a melodramatic pussy.

  37. Wait.

    “we used a nuclear weapons, and it was terrible, but it was TO END (emphasis on END) A WAR, NOT START ONE!”
    “Sometimes it is justified to do the toughest thing to END a terrible situation. You can’t always fight a surgical war and win, in fact it’s nearly impossible, careful of every little thing.”

    > Well so if it´s okay for you do terrible (not surgical) things to finally END a war, and say it´s okay as an LAST RESORT. I´ll tell you something:
    Why exactly do you think some woman in the mideast blows herself (and everybody around her) up? Why did the japanese this plane-goes-down kamikaze? As a LAST RESORT to END the war going on!! So you say thats okay? But above you said it´s not (when muslims do)?? I´m baffled.

    So how can it be that doing absolutely insane evil stuff like bombing civilians with nuclear weapons is okay, as long as your side does it? If Iran would bomb the US of A with nuclear weapons to end the war Americans are bringing over to Irans neighbors – where, where would be the difference? Please explain!

    And how can you say “LAST RESORT??????
    It´s not like Japan was close to do anything horrid to the world at that point! It´s not like you stabbing a robber who threatens your family in your house a last resort!
    I mean seriously, Japan had nearly no fleet and no planes left over, they only wouln´t surrender. Serious problem. I can see how endangered the rest of the world was at that point. Highly presumable that they could have taken the world afterwards. Jep.

    MDN Magic Word: lost. People like you musta lost their mind.

  38. Sumsa, you might want to go reread that section on Kamikaze pilots. Your assertion on their reasons for their actions is wrong. The Japanese dragged us into WWII, kicking and screaming. The Kamikaze pilots were a group of men who had been conditioned to fly themselves into their enemies whenever they had either run out of ammunition or suffered damage that made it impossible for them to continue their attack.

    The Japanese civilian population were told by their government that American soldiers would rape and torture them if they were captured. During the island campaigns Japanese civilians, sometimes entire families would commit suicide to avoid being captured by the Americans. PBS did a pretty good special on this, they had actual footage of a man and wife throwing their children off of cliffs before jumping off themselves. Terrible acts brought about by the lies told by their government. WWII was an especially brutal war. We (man kind) did horrrific things to one another for Nationalistic reasons. This is the nature of man – we’re all tribal in one way or another.

    I think we would all be happy to live and let live with our Muslim neighbors. I think many, if not most, of them feel the same way about us. Unfortunatley, again, we have been dragged into a war, kicking and screaming, by a group of very determined people who I’m not sure where prepared for our reaction. The problem is that our reaction came about 22 years too late and is too much like Israels reaction to the 1972 Munich massacre. Surgical strikes never work against a conditioned population. Perhaps if we would have delt with the Iranians in a more brutal fashion back in 1979, those would-be terrorists today would think twice about lashing out at us. The lessons they learned from that point on is that you can punch us in the nose and we will not fight back. I’m sure Jimmy Carter’s actions (or inactions) were meant to be construed as a sign of a civilized society however that didn’t translate and was seen as a sign of weakness which has plagued us ever since.

    So here we are, once again, divided on what to do and how to get along with these folks. Perhaps all the bickering is a good thing. Maybe through the infighting we’ll find an answer.

  39. “Sumsa, you might want to go reread that section on Kamikaze pilots”

    > I think I did not express very well what I meant. I wanted to express something similar to what you wrote – desperate people (in any war) consider better killing themselves than falling into the “wrong” hands. This is what I´d call “last resort” – when you´re feeling left with only one option – death. Still I have to annotate that people don´t need to be fooled by governments or public opinions into that feeling – it´s the inborn fear of losing your habits or structure. After WWII german people killed themselves and their families just because they feared getting linked to the nazi regime without ever supporting the nazis (as far as possible).
    Though I suppose that many of the japanese planes didn´t even have enough fuel to return to their bases, I think it was not that what made them commit suicide. It was plain desperation and fear like someone putting them a knife on their chest.
    And thats what I´d call “last resort”, not dropping A-Bomb while being the superior force in a war.

    “Perhaps if we would have delt with the Iranians in a more brutal fashion back in 1979, those would-be terrorists today would think twice about lashing out at us”

    > If people get abused in their childhood, they are by far more likely to hit back when their older. If any country would have invaded my land brutally 25 years ago, I´d be by far more likely to hate people of that country regardless of common sense.

    Just because (western) people tend to not understand foreign religious and hierarchical habits, it does not give them the right to hit / ignore / mistreat them just because they don´t understand them.

    For example I had a family reunion a few weeks ago in a public park within a area, where lot´s of muslims live. There were a lot of teenagers passing by, but they did not ask what we were celebrating, but who was the oldest, who was “chief” of the family, and were guessing which woman was married with which man. As we asked them to go, they did not leave – but we did because it started to rain. For us, it did not mean a thing at all, but they surely had a different view and propably felt like “winners”.

    For typical western people this would not make sense at all, but it´s a pretty common situation which discloses pretty good the different structures of civilizations.

    So I´d say that as long as we (or them) are not be able to really “negotiate” with them, we should train that and not bash them.

    What do you think?

    MW: plane …… nope, to easy…….^^

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.