Microsoft planning handheld music, video, game player ‘iPod Killer’ & music service ‘iTunes Killer’

“In a bid to capture the huge audience for handheld entertainment gadgets, Microsoft is designing a product that combines video games, music and video in one handheld device, according to sources familiar with the project,” Dean Takahashi reports for The Mercury News. “The Microsoft product would compete with Sony, Nintendo and Apple Computer’s products, including the iPod. And Microsoft has some of its most seasoned talent from the division that created its popular Xbox 360 working on it. Game executive J Allard leads the project, and its director is Greg Gibson, who was the system designer on the Xbox 360 video game console. Bryan Lee, the finance chief on the Xbox business, is leading the business side of the project.”

“By anchoring its entertainment device as a handheld game player, Microsoft is starting from its position of strength in the entertainment business that it hopes Apple cannot match, even with its iPod. The game press has dubbed it an ‘iPod killer,’ but its functions would likely more closely resemble Sony’s PlayStation Portable multimedia gaming device,” Takahashi reports. “Meanwhile, Microsoft’s efforts in PocketPC handhelds and Portable Media Players have fallen short in competition with the iPod. Last week, Microsoft unveiled Project Origami, a handheld Windows computer. But that device isn’t targeted on pure entertainment as the Xplayer is. The existence of these other projects suggests that there is still some infighting within Microsoft about its best approach to portable gadgets. The handheld project is still in its early stages. Microsoft is still figuring out which strategy to pursue in music technology, according to sources familiar with the matter. The code name for its music service, which would be the equivalent of Apple’s iTunes, is ‘Alexandria.'”

“It could be 2007 before the device hits store shelves. That gives rivals such as Sony, Nintendo and Apple considerable time to consolidate their position and come up with their own new gadgets in the meantime,” Takahashi reports.

More details in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: The number of iPod and iTunes “killers” currently sitting on death row is uncountable. All of them are tied to Microsoft in some way or another. The only true “iPod killer” and “iTunes killer” is Apple. We heartily encourage Microsoft to keep throwing their money away on a market they’ve already lost long ago.

Advertisements:
Apple’s brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
Apple’s new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
MacBook Pro. The first Mac notebook built upon Intel Core Duo with iLife ’06, Front Row and built-in iSight. Starting at $1999. Free shipping.
iMac. Twice as amazing — Intel Core Duo, iLife ’06, Front Row media experience, Apple Remote, built-in iSight. Starting at $1299. Free shipping.
iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.
iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.
Related articles:
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Sony’s Walkman Bean is cooked – February 13, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Dell dumps ‘DJ’ hard-drive MP3 player line – February 04, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: iRiver pulling out of Europe? – February 01, 2006
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Thomson gives up on MP3 player, CE markets – December 12, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: BenQ withdraws from MP3 player markets – November 28, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Olympus halts production of portable digital music players – November 09, 2005
More blood on Apple iPod’s Click Wheel: Rio is dead – August 26, 2005
Sony to combat music market ‘maestro’ Apple Computer with ‘Walkman Beans’ – August 18, 2005
Apple’s iPod has blood on its Click Wheel: Virgin Electronics is dead – March 08, 2005
Apple’s vs. Microsoft’s music DRM: whose solution supports more users? – August 17, 2005

58 Comments

  1. The Microsoft product would compete with Sony, Nintendo and Apple Computer’s products
    Good luck! M$ has showed on so multiple occations that it can not compete without resorting to unfair means. I guess anything that’s bad for M$ is good for us though ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />
    Bring it on!

  2. why is it so important to these also-rans to “kill” the iPod? why do all these “me too” companies seem to think that they are, in any way, entitled to any market share of anything Apple introduces? i’m so sick of everything remotely related to those di¢ks from redmond.

  3. It sounds like it is competing with the PSP not the iPod. But that headline wouldn’t sell as many papers or generate as many hits.

    “It could be 2007 before the device hits store shelves.”
    Can you imagine what the iPod (or PSP) will look like by then?

  4. “The code name for its music service, which would be the equivalent of Apple’s iTunes, is ‘Alexandria.'”

    Wait, I thought MS was developing a music service called URGE with MTV. Are they announcing that they are going to come up with a service that will compete with another service that they haven’t even launched yet? They really need to change their name to Vaporsoft.

  5. Makes sense, someone else invents it, MS makes a mediocre copy of it, throws a 1 billion dollar add campaign behind it, anf steals the show.

    I’ll be optomistic and say that, this time around the consuming public has had a taste of the good stuff for quite a while now, and whatever MS comes up with is going to have to be ACTUALLY, and IN REALITY, better. Otherwise conusmers are very likely to blow off any MS offerings that pale in comparison to Apple’s.

    Someday this will be true of the pc market as well.

  6. The bottom line:

    Microsoft will… Microsoft will…

    …fail with .Net …fail with Live …fail on Plays for Sure

    Little chance that anyone will get excited by ‘Microsoft will create iPod killer’

  7. Eric,

    “I think the only thing they have done right was the Xbox.”

    Isn’t the Xbox a money loser for Microsoft, i.e. selling bellow cost? I recall reading somewhere that they’re goal is to plant hard drives in everyone’s living room as a springboard to Home Entertainment Hub nirvanna. So they’re sacrificing current profits for future market domination in an adjacent market.

    Doea anyone here remember the source of that report? It was an analysis of Xbox unit costing I think.

  8. Gates’ upcoming announcement for this groundbreaking technology will have to include the following paradigm shifting innovations:
    1. Transparent album cover art
    2. An option to play music backwards to screen for Satanic messages
    3. A “secure” credit card account system for game and music purchases
    4. Allowances and gift certificates (Melinda’s idea)
    5. A PlaysForSure start-up chime in Dolby 5.1 engineered by a staff of over 300 during the last three years.
    6. Tetris
    7. A vibrating joystick that may shock you or burst into flames for extra graphic effect.
    8. A Mach 3.0 microkernel and FreeBSD services
    9. 4 Intel Core Quad processors
    10. 1,288 Installation Wizards and a pop-up animated X cartoon character to gently guide you through any help it thinks you need – loudly and at random.

  9. 6. Tetris

    So what?
    But wait! This version of Tetris is innovative and groundbreaking! It has transparent blocks, a soundtrack by the two remaining BeeGees AND drop shadows! Ooooooooo! ! !

  10. 1- Microsoft has a mature business with Windows and any new growth in the space will be incremental. In order for them to grow, they have to find new markets and niches.
    2- Over the last 5 years, while Apple has been maturing OS X and converting from PPC to Intel, Microsoft has made tremendous progress into the telematics (onboard automotive), embedded (non-GUI hardware) and PDA markets. Nobody was screaming as M$ has squashed Palm flatter than a Pancake, a la Netscape, Corel, etc.
    3- Windows Media- the MOST popular format on the internet, has made significant inroads in the emerging Digital Media formats (including UPnP) and has found traction in Pro Video. Not dominant, but now with a foot-hold.
    4- MSN is now a profitable business and with X-Box Live MS is well on it’s way to becoming a 2nd profitable IP-type business. Windows Live will just add to the fray.
    5-Microsoft has cash by the truckload to throw at any market it cares to enter. They will sustain huge, multi-year losses in order to gain a beachhead in a market. Ask Sony, AOL and others.

    If you are looking at Windows as simply an OS you have already missed the forest for the trees. Microsoft has evolved their platform from an OS to an ecosystem. Ten years ago it was an OS issue– not anymore. From Desktop to Laptop to Server to Embedded Device to PDA to Cell Phone to Game Console to Set-Top Box to UPnP Device to Car Telematics to Media– anyone entering the field has to be interoperable and compatible with MICROSOFT.

    That may not be what you want to hear, but that is the plain and simple truth. If Apple instantly gained a 90% client OS market share they would still have much of what their OS does defined by Microsoft protocols, codecs and technologies.

    Where is an embedded version of OS X? A PDA OS? An OS for Telematics? Cell Phones? True 64-bit Computing?

    (Sound of Crickets)

  11. The “iPod killer” project is named ” Longthorn” the original shipping date was 2007 but now it looks like it will slip to 2009 and a half. Who knows when is the actual ship date, just like Windows Vista, aka “Longhorn” also aka Windows XP SP3 or Windows 2000 SP 4. LOL

  12. I recently read a commentary on microsoft saying that all they do is play catch up. There is little ground breaking innovation . . .they strive to produce their version of a search engine, an iPod, an OSX, a playstation etc. The comentator’s point was that if all they do is try to emulate what is already out there, they are in trouble.

  13. And how many times have we heard this before?
    I’m sure the interface will be like learning scientific calculation to use it. And it will cost to much and it won’t be both PC/Mac compatible or iPod compatible which is where this will all go wrong.

    Bla,bla,bla,bla…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.