“Steve Jobs has had much to celebrate lately. But the Apple CEO was particularly happy in February when he announced that the iTunes Music Store had sold its billionth song, to a teenager in Michigan who had bought a copy of Coldplay’s ‘Speed of Sound.’ That milestone is all the more impressive when you remember that Apple has numerous competitors in the digital music world. Yahoo Music Unlimited and the legal incarnation of Napster are gunning for iTunes customers. Sony and Samsung are trying to create iPod slayers,” Devin Leonard writes for Fortune. “And the field is only getting more crowded. By summer, Amazon may launch a digital music service with a branded MP3 player, possibly made by Samsung. It is already being referred to in the industry as the aPod. Amazon won’t discuss its plans, but sources tell FORTUNE that Amazon is targeting people over 40 years old–it refers to them as ‘the NPR crowd’ –who aren’t as likely to own iPods as MySpace users.”
“Yet Apple’s challengers all face the same problem: Jobs’ company will no doubt dominate the digital music market for years to come. That’s because Apple has learned its lesson about closed systems,” Leonard writes. “With the iPod, Jobs created a closed system with mass appeal. Fulcrum Global Partners estimates that iPods now account for 73% of the 30 million MP3 players currently in use in the U.S… Jobs cut a deal with the Big Five record companies in 2003 that locked up his device. The music companies wanted to sell songs on iTunes, but they were afraid of Internet piracy. So Jobs promised to wrap their songs in Apple’s FairPlay–the only copy-protection software that is iPod-compatible… That satisfied fearful music companies, but it means none of the songs sold by those services can be played on the wildly popular iPod. Instead, users of the services had to rely on inferior devices made by companies like Samsung and SanDisk that supported Microsoft’s Windows Media format.”
“The situation has been a disaster for Apple’s competitors. iTunes holds a commanding lead over its rivals, selling more than 75% of all digital songs, according to NPD. The second-place digital music store, eMusic [9%], can’t sell any major label hits because it refuses to copy protect them,” Leonard writes. “Poor Microsoft. Nearly every music service and MP3 player maker other than Apple supports Windows Media and its copy-protection software. But not enough music lovers want to use them. It’s a far cry from what happened in the desktop wars. It’s no fun when you’re outside of the closed system looking in.”
Full article here.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Jim” for the heads up.]
Advertisements:
• Apple’s brand new iPod Hi-Fi speaker system. Home stereo. Reinvented. Available now for $349 with free shipping.
• Apple’s new Mac mini. Intel Core, up to 4 times faster. Starting at just $599. Free shipping.
• MacBook Pro. The first Mac notebook built upon Intel Core Duo with iLife ’06, Front Row and built-in iSight. Starting at $1999. Free shipping.
• iMac. Twice as amazing — Intel Core Duo, iLife ’06, Front Row media experience, Apple Remote, built-in iSight. Starting at $1299. Free shipping.
• iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.
• iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
• Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.
Related article:
Apple’s vs. Microsoft’s music DRM: whose solution supports more users? – August 17, 2005
So why again, am I being treated like a criminal?
Wow, that persecution complex of yours must be suffocating. DRM-laden music is treating you like a criminal? Do you think child-proof pill bottles means Procter & Gamble is treating you like a child, you sniveling whelp?
Those of you who support the DRM apparently need it to control your own need to pirate. Why? Because you say that because I’m against the DRM, I probably get my music from illegal sites anyway. Totally wrong. I have bought music from iTunes. I have the ability to burn a CD, reimport as an MP3 and then share the songs. So why don’t I? Because I have no interest in it. I paid for the song. If I could purchase the song free of DRM, it doesn’t mean that all of a sudden I’d want to share it illegally. Of course, maybe thats why some of you support the DRM. It keeps you under lock and key.
People only accept Apple’s DRM because there is no DRM-free alternative. I guarantee you that if Apple made an album available that was DRM free and also had DRM, 90% of people would choose the DRM free one. The other 10% wouldn’t know the difference.
I’ve used allofmp3.com and my Visa card is still intact. There are two reasons I use this service.
1. There’s no DRM
3. The can select the bit rate you want.
I can’t stand DRM and copyright software it just stinks. Likewise I want downloaded music to be cd quality I will no accept an inferior product.
The site says they pay an organisation who pay remittances; I dunno about that. However this is the only site I use nowadays and at two to four dollars per “cd” I can’t complain.
Anyway money you deposit into your allofmp3 account is done via Cronopay and there’s as legit. as Paypal. It just works.
Using iTunes on an Orsalami would not be as easy to do as using an iPod.
Any bets that Origami will fold?
Those of you who support the DRM apparently need it to control your own need to pirate. Why? Because you say that because I’m against the DRM, I probably get my music from illegal sites anyway. Totally wrong. I have bought music from iTunes. I have the ability to burn a CD, reimport as an MP3 and then share the songs. So why don’t I? Because I have no interest in it. I paid for the song. If I could purchase the song free of DRM, it doesn’t mean that all of a sudden I’d want to share it illegally. Of course, maybe thats why some of you support the DRM. It keeps you under lock and key.
It’s always easier to burn a straw man than it is to argue a real point with a real person.