“Setting up a battle for the future of computing, engineers from IBM, Sony and Toshiba unveiled details Monday of a microprocessor they claim has the muscle of a supercomputer and can power everything from video game consoles to business computers,” Matthew Fordahl reports for The Associated Press. “Devices built with the processor, code-named Cell, will compete directly with the PC chips that have powered most of the world’s personal computers for a quarter century.”
“Cell’s designers say their chip, built from the start with the burgeoning world of rich media and broadband networks in mind, can deliver 10 times the performance of today’s PC processors. It also will not carry the same technical baggage that has made most of today’s computers compatible with older PCs. That architectural divergence will challenge the current dominant paradigm of computing that Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp. have fostered,” Fordahl reports. “The new chip is expected to be used in Sony Corp.’s next-generation PlayStation game console in 2006. Toshiba Corp. plans to incorporate it into high-end televisions that year as well. And IBM Corp. has said it will sell a workstation with the chip starting later this year.”
“Beyond that, companies are remaining coy about where it might be used and whether it will be compatible with older technology,’ Fordahl reports. “Cell is comprised of several computing engines, or cores. A core based on IBM’s Power architecture controls eight ‘synergistic’ processing centers. In all, they can simultaneously carry out 10 instruction sequences, compared with two for today’s Intel chips. The new microprocessor also is expected to be able to run multiple operating systems and programs at the same time while ensuring each has enough resources. In the home, that could allow for a device that’s capable of handling a video game, television and general-purpose computer at once.”
“‘It’s very flexible,’ said Jim Kahle, an IBM fellow. ‘We support many operating systems with our virtualization technology so we can run multiple operating systems at the same time, doing different jobs on the system.’ Cell is said to run at clock speeds greater than 4 gigahertz, which would top the 3.8 GHz of Intel’s current top-speed chip,” Fordahl reports. “Cell’s designers said they are running a variety of operating systems on the processor at their lab in Austin, Texas. But they would not say whether Microsoft’s Windows is one of them. In fact, they only confirmed running Linux, the open source environment.”
Fordahl reports, “The PC industry has seen a long line of chips attempt to usurp the x86 architecture pioneered by Intel that dominates today’s computers. But all have failed, and Intel remains the world’s largest chip maker. In the 1990s, IBM, Motorola Inc. and Apple Computer Inc. pushed the PowerPC architecture. Though it’s still used by the Apple Macintosh as well as IBM workstations and servers, it failed to dethrone Intel.”
Full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: It would be more accurate to describe the PowerPC as having “thus far” failed to dethrone Intel. Until the PowerPC is discontinued, it cannot be accurately described as having “failed,” unless you assign some artificial time limit. Who’s to say where the finish line lies? Or as Yogi said, “It ain’t over, till it’s over.”
People today talk shortsightedly about Microsoft and Intel having “won” and Apple having “lost.” That also depends heavily upon your definition of the word “won.” After all, Windows users are all using the basic Mac user interface concepts that Apple introduced to the world with the Mac. Remember, too, that in 1929, Ford held just over 61% of the U.S. market for automobiles. General Motors’ market share stood at just 12%. Ford was thought to be invincible, with GM regarded as a niche auto maker. But, in 1936, just seven years later, Ford held 22% of the market for new automobiles while General Motors held a 43% share. No company is invincible. Not even Intel or Microsoft.
Related MacDailyNews articles:
Apple Mac mini, iMac G5 models hold 5 of top 6 spots in Amazon’s Desktop Computer Top Sellers list – February 08, 2005
Georgia school district to propose 63,000 Macs for students and teachers – February 07, 2005
Will Apple take advantage of powerful new ‘Cell’ microprocessors? – February 07, 2005
Anecdotal evidence points to Apple Mac popularity gains – February 07, 2005
We’re all using Macintosh computers right now – February 06, 2005
Why does Windows still suck and why isn’t everyone on a Mac? – February 04, 2005
I hope they put this in the iPod. I could really use a 256 Gigaflop iPod to listen to 7,500 simutaneous 5.1 Digital music streams in extended aac format.
I thought Yogi said “Let’s get some of the Ranger’s pic-i-nic baskets!”
To quote one of Steve’s favorite singers, Bob Dilan, “the times, they are changin'”
What is this new chip going to do for the advancement of A.I. ?
Apple, if Cell is for real, SHIP IT!!!!!
If Mac OS X does need major reworking to take advantage of Cell, get working on it right here and now. Make it an important part of Mac OS X 10.5 (or at least 10.4.5).
I’ll be one of the first in line for the PowerMac G8 (for the eight “centers” in Cell).
If you build it, we will come.
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />
A Cell PC would be a tempting prospect, provided that it will not be running any version of Windows. An even better prospect would be a Cell Mac.
Nice post Viridian. Some clarification, what you are describing as CELL
” Data is broken up into objects that actively seek the resources on which to run, i.e. the next available vector unit, and migrate to it, even across networks, including the Internet.”
is essentially (or part of) what GRID is (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grid_computing). So it sounds like the way of the future. No need to have all computing (or data) resources in the one box. With wireless connectivitity (with various bandwidths) we could be using resources in a more flexible and robust way.
Magic word is theory, as in “sounds good in theory!”
Thorpedo,
It is indeed a grid, although I didn’t get into it. The Register article provides a more detailed explanation, including how grid-computing as a utility is likely to change things. Think out-sourcing CPU cycles, even to offshore utilities.
“sounds good in theory”
Truer words were never said. There are enormous software hurdles to overcome before CELL becomes viable.
expected to be able to run multiple operating systems…