Microsoft may charge extra for Windows spyware protection software

“Microsoft Corp. disclosed plans Thursday to offer frustrated users of its Windows software new tools within 30 days to remove spyware programs secretly running on computers. But it might cost extra in coming months,” Ted Bridis writes for The Associated Press. “In a shift from past practice, the world’s largest software manufacturer said it may charge consumers for future versions of the new protective technology, which Microsoft acquired by buying a small New York software firm. Terms of the sale of Giant Company Software Inc. weren’t disclosed.”

“Spyware is a category of irritating programs that secretly monitor the online activities of Internet users and can cause sluggish computer performance or popup ads,” Bridis writes. “Microsoft, whose Windows operating systems have often been criticized for lax security, traditionally has given consumers – at no charge – separate programs to improve security. It also has increasingly built other protective tools, such as firewall software, into Windows to repel hackers.”

“Microsoft’s tool, expected to be available within 30 days, initially will be free but the company isn’t ruling out charging for future versions. ‘We’re going to be working through the issue of pricing and licensing,” Nash said. “We’ll come up with a plan and roll that out.’ Microsoft’s disclosure that it may eventually charge extra for Windows protection reflects a recognition inside the company that it could collect significant profits by helping to protect its customers,” Bridis writes. “Some experts blame Microsoft for Windows vulnerabilities that help spread spyware. Microsoft and some others, meanwhile, said blame should be directed instead at spyware manufacturers.”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: There’s a tried and true name for people that will pay Microsoft for Windows and then pay them extra for some promise of protection: “suckers.” Hate to break it to you this way, but if you’re that stupid, you deserve to use Windows, and only Windows, for the rest of your life.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Virus and worm problems not just due to market share; Windows inherently insecure vs. Mac OS X – August 24, 2003
Sick of worms and viruses? ‘Move to Mac OS X’ suggests Chicago Tribune columnist – August 25, 2003
Chicago Sun-Times columnist: Windows ‘many holes in its security’ but ‘none of my Macs have ever been affected – August 26, 2003
Is Mac OS X really inherently more secure than Windows? – August 26, 2003
Shattering the Mac OS X ‘security through obscurity’ myth – August 28, 2003
Fortune columnist: ‘get a Mac’ to thwart viruses; right answer for the wrong reasons – September 02, 2003
Wall Street Journal’s Mossberg on making the switch from Windows to Mac – September 18, 2003
New York Times: Mac OS X ‘much more secure than Windows XP’ – September 18, 2003
Columnist tries the ‘security through obscurity’ myth to defend Windows vs. Macs on virus front – October 1, 2003
Gates: Windows ‘by far the most secure’ system; tries to use ‘Mac OS X secure through obscurity’ myth – January 27, 2004
Mac OS X has no viruses; what’s wrong with Windows? – February 11, 2004
SmartMoney: Long-suffering Windows users can only dare to dream of Mac’s ease-of-use – February 12, 2004
Spyware, adware plague Windows users online; Mac OS X users surf freely – April 19, 2004
Gartner: Worms jack up the total cost of Microsoft Windows – May 07, 2004
Windows ‘Scob’ virus designed to steal financial data, passwords; Macintosh unaffected – June 26, 2004
Tired of patching patches to patch Windows patches? Writer suggests getting a Mac – August 03, 2004
Mossberg: Dump your Windows machine and get an Apple Macintosh to free yourself of spyware – August 25, 2004
Millions of Windows PC’s hijacked by hackers, turned into zombies; Macintosh unaffected – September 08, 2004
Security is top priority in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 12, 2004
Windows XP worm speaks to users as it deletes their files; Macintosh unaffected – September 13, 2004
University of Chicago recommends all students patch Windows at least once a day – September 14, 2004
USA Today columinst angry about Windows viruses, adware, spyware – September 15, 2004
Windows besieged by hackers; number of Windows viruses soars by more than 400% – September 20, 2004
USA Today: people are switching from Windows to Mac because of security issues – September 21, 2004
Mossberg: Apple iMac G5 ‘powerful, affordable, virus-free with better, more modern OS than Windows XP’ – September 23, 2004
Information Security Investigator says switch from Windows to Mac OS X for security – September 24, 2004
Cyber-security adviser uses Apple Macintosh to avoid Windows’ security woes – September 27, 2004
Even Bill Gates can’t avoid Windows malware; Mac users surf the Web freely – October 03, 2004
Windows desktop monopoly threatened by secure, safe Apple Mac OS X – October 04, 2004
Windows users’ security woes spark interest in Apple’s secure Mac OS X – October 06, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Windows users line up to pay for spyware removal; Mac users surf Web with impunity – October 18, 2004
Ballmer blames Windows users for not upgrading systems as Microsoft’s biggest security problem – October 22, 2004
Spyware plagues Windows users while Mac users surf Net with impunity – November 01, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware infecting your PC? Don’t fret, just get a Mac – November 01, 2004
Security test: Windows XP system easily compromised while Apple’s Mac OS X stands safe and secure – November 30, 2004
Security expert: Don’t use Microsoft Windows, Office, Outlook, Internet Explorer – December 09, 2004
Mossberg: Windows PCs plagued with problems, Apple’s Mac is ‘rock solid, elegant and affordable’ – December 09, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware headaches? Get a Mac and surf the Internet freely – December 13, 2004
Detroit Free Press: Windows malware problem getting worse, it’s time to get a Mac instead – December 16, 2004

33 Comments

  1. Damn! Was that the crack of a whip or just a rush of fresh air I just heard after reading that MDN Take?

    (My MDN Magic Word: “church.” Draw your own inferences.)

  2. I dont know about anyone else but as the owner of a PC repair shop here in Portland, I can say that I’ll never buy that crap from MS. They’ve had what? Over a decade to make a STABLE SECURE OS? They cant do it in a decade what makes anyone think that they’ll make a spyware protection tool that will work?

    And pay for it? Please. I use Spywareblaster/ Spybot S&D and Adaware. They give about 99% coverage and protection, and they’re all FREE!

    I just finished watching IRobot, and in the words of Will “Get Jiggy Wit’ it” Smith

    “You so need to die.”

  3. microsoft would have some nerve charging extra for a program to get the junk off a users system. Maybe the programs would get Microsoft to remove itself since it is the root cause of the infestation. I have more sympathy for those stuck with WIndoze though. I’ve managed to get two people here to buy Macs – two down 95% of the world to go!

  4. I TOTALY AGREE WITH MDN!!!

    You gotta be realy slow to pay to protect the pruduct you just bought. This isn’t the same as and ext. waranty, an os should work when you purchase it. (for at least 12-24 months)

  5. Buy something that practically causes spyware, then pay them more to plug up their own holes. How stupid.

    To Microsoft’s credit, it’s good business practice. They aim to make a lot of money off of a product they really need. But the real issue is that they need to deal with spyware makers. If Microsoft has a way to find spyware on their operating system, they can certainly build it in, fix up the security of the platform, and that would really be a threat to Apple.

    I think Microsoft is sitting on a huge opportunity that we’re lucky they’re not taking. Imagine if they did plug the spyware fixes and made a secure OS…

    -Russ

  6. Look at it this way, if they are successful selling it, they will have reasons not to improve their OS and that will be the root of increased competitivity for Apple.

    If they do give it away for free and improve their lame OS people will have less incentives to switch.

    I say, sell it!!!

  7. In related news, Microsoft recently filed for a patent on something called “air”. The patent application was submitted shortly after they filed for a patent on “water”.

    Microsoft plans on charging licensing fees to anyone who wants to “breathe” or “drink”.

    A$$holes.

  8. This will sell like crazy. Hundreds of millions flying out the door. It will make the iPod freenzy look pale. Buy Microsoft stock now, which is low, and make a million off these suckers.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.