Would Bush or Kerry be better for technology?

“Back in May, tech leaders such as John Chambers, chief executive officer of Cisco Systems Inc., and Michael Dell, chairman of Dell Inc., threw their support behind George W. Bush. John Kerry has industry backing of his own, including that of Apple Computer Inc.

253 Comments

  1. effwierd, mrs. bunghole,etc.

    you are a sickening group of slime balls. Thank god your french, flip flop, lying, low life candidate won’t get elected. You people are so transparent it’s pathetic. I can’t believe how much you liberals support terrorism and being taxed up the yin yang!

  2. No, Clinton awarding a no-bid contract to Halliburton in Yugoslavia was bad. The war in Iraq has cost 120 billion so far, not 87 billion. Serbia was a humanitarian crisis, Iraq was not.

    “Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists- good…
    Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator – bad… “

    Um, what? You ignore the liberation under Clinton but point it out for Bush? Who did Bush bomb?

    Clinton bombed terrorist camps, too.

    What felonies did Clinton commit while in office? Clinton was also wrong on Sadddam’s weapons capacity. Saddam was turned over for trial to the new interim Iraqi government. That’s bad. Why did we allow this? Because Bush & company are trying to portray the Hague as an illegitimate court.

  3. I fear for my country, I fear civil war in the U.S.

    Never have seen such divisive rhetoric from people and politicians.
    Name calling like children, and with the passions of madmen.
    And not a lot of reason on either side.

    Oh, except during the Viet Nam war. (And Yes, I was drafted into that one)

    And Yes, I was in Saudi during Desert Shield/Storm.

    I�ve met American Friendly French, (mostly),
    Parisians do hate everyone. (don�t take it personal, even the French think
    of them as foreigners).

    Muslim, and Christians both pray to the same God. And live on the same planet.

    Congress will negate any major movements (Right or Left) Trust me on that one.

    Have a little faith that your fellow man is also trying to do the right thing.

    And lets get bad to talking about what really matters, Mac�s vs PC�s

    RJ

  4. Well I won’t comment about either candidate since it is coming up to your election and as a foreigner I would find that poor taste.

    I must say though I certainly feel a sense of relief knowing that you will bicker so much amongst yourselves that you will leave the free world alone.

  5. Great come back effwierd you tool. I take dumps bigger than you, you little, tiny, peice of crap.

    And Iraq wasn’t a humanitarian crisis??????????? What the hell are you talking about. You liberal idiots are so simple minded. You always fail to see the big picture. A free Iraq is great for the middle east and by default the entire world. You guys know it, you just don’t want to give Bush credit. Of course it wouldn’t be easy at first. Look at past situations in Germany and Japan dick weeds.

  6. Keep the blinders on and sip that kool-aid, Jay! Don’t pay any attention to the presidential debates either, because Bush comes across just as I described before… but hey, it’s a free country (for now- just wait for Patriot Act II), so go ahead and vote for Chimpy McBunnypants. Your corporate overlords will appreciate it.

  7. I’m Jay Rice and I approve of this message:

    Jay Rice has to be one of the most illiterate ignorant posters on this site. The boy can’t spell. He has no knowledge of history. He’s a redneck thug. His 3rd grade education and his job at 7-11 make him mad at the world. He hates queers, rag heads, Frenchies, slant-eyes, blacks, Spics, WOPs and anyone else that is not white-bread corn-fed ‘merican boy.

    Grow up Jay. There are other people in this world that you have to get along with. Your president (not mine) won’t do it, but you need to learn to do it.

  8. U.N. Watchdog: Iraq’s Nuke Plant Materials Vanished

    “Equipment and materials that could be used to make nuclear weapons have disappeared from Iraq, the chief of the U.N.’s atomic watchdog agency has warned.”

    “The U.S. government prevented U.N. weapons inspectors from returning to Iraq — thereby blocking the IAEA from monitoring the high-tech equipment and materials — after the U.S.-led war was launched in March 2003.”

    George W. Bush has justified the war in Iraq in part by saying that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was on the brink of developing a nuclear bomb that he might use against the United States or give to terrorists.

    But a CIA report released last week by chief U.S. weapons inspector Charles Duelfer concluded that Hussein terminated his nuclear program after the first Gulf War in 1991″

    – So what little materials were left over from 1991 have gotten into the wrong hands. This has happened under George Bush’s watch, people. How the hell can you say he’s good for the safety of this country when materials were probably safer under Saddam Huesseins watch than ours?

  9. They are both out of tune with technology and don’t give a rat’s ass about it. They’re too busy worrying about whether to give old folks medicare or what special interest groups’ ass to kiss.

  10. mrs. bunghole, effqueer,

    what debates were you two tools watching? If you listened to Kerry the guy flip flopped over and over again. He may sound better when he speaks but his message is flip flopped all over the place. Not a leader in any sense of the word. Anyone who claims otherwise definitely has the blinders on. you left wing tools!

  11. Unfortunately, the big picture is that Iraq is heading towards civil war, Iran and North Korea have taken the oppurtuntiy afforded by our involvement in Iraq to go ahead and get nukes, and Al Queda is probably closer than ever to getting nukes of their own. The big picture is very bleak indeed as a result of our current presidents inability to adjust. His simple minded approach may appeal to simple minded people like Jay Rice who want to see the world in terms of black and white, good vs evil, but reality is quite different (and much more complex). The reality is that our country and the world is divided (didn’t he say he was a uniter?) and the world is a much more dangerous place. The big picture is that if we re-elect George Bush things will continue as they have for the past four years, which in case you haven’t noticed haven’t been very good.

  12. effqueer,

    the only thing Kerry the Frenchman has been consistent on is flip flopping. You know it you freaking liar.

    gstank – why aren’t Kerry’s buddies from the rest of the world doing anything about North Korea and Iran????? Is it sole responsibility of the US to police the world?? Why isn’t the scummy UN doing anything about it???? Because they’re all in on it with Iran and N. Korea. That’s why. You left wingers know it too. Stop playing dumb.

  13. it’s amazing how arrogant and nasty all of the liberal democrats are. it is a shame. John Kerry unfortunately is a gigantic hypocrite and so are most liberals.

    George Bush gets my vote!

  14. ohn Kerry finally realizes that global terrorism is not a law-enforcement problem. Instead, he thinks it’s a quality-of-life issue.

    Would he hand Osama bin Laden a desk-appearance ticket � just the way David Dinkins’ NYPD used to deal with the Willis Ave. Bridge squeegee-men?

    All of New York knows how well that worked out.

    Here’s how the Democrat who would be president puts it:

    “We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they’re a nuisance,” Kerry told The New York Times Magazine, when asked what it would take to make Americans feel safe.

    “As a former law-enforcement person, I know we’re never going to end prostitution. We’re never going to end illegal gambling. But we’re going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn’t on the rise. . . . It’s something you continue to fight, but it’s not threatening the fabric of your life.”

    Prostitution? Illegal gambling? Organized crime?

    Does Kerry think that Osama sent two dozen pimps, or numbers-runners, to bring down the World Trade Center?

    Dick Cheney yesterday termed Kerry’s words “naive and dangerous.” The vice president was charitable.

    Sensing a rhetorical disaster, the Democratic National Committee quickly charged that a new Bush commercial quoting those astonishing remarks had taken them out of context and “given a false impression of Kerry’s position.”

  15. Bradley, you are also mischaracterizing Kerry’s words. Kerry still thinks terrorism is a law enforcement issue. And it is. Terrorism is a crime, plain and simple. Dealing with it primarily as a military endeavor is misguided, especially when terrorists no longer require state sponsors. Read up on globalism, the Core and the Gap.

  16. Stephan, that’s it? You’re just going to insult me? Like I said to Jay Rice, I respond to ad hominem fallacies the same way: Fuck you!

    Unless you have something of substance to assert (not copied and pasted).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.