“Opera Software expressed significant doubts it would continue producing a browser for the Macintosh operating system, illustrating a growing problem for third-party Mac developers as Apple Computer steps up its own application development efforts. Opera, based in Oslo, Norway, on Tuesday released Opera 7, its first final version of a newly rewritten browser. As usual, the company released a browser for Windows before making available versions for other operating systems. But this time, the company did not set a date for a Macintosh release, and instead questioned whether one would be forthcoming at all. The reason? Apple’s own launch of its Safari browser at Macworld in San Francisco earlier this month. Safari, now out in a test or “beta” version, is based on the open-source browser project KHTML. KHTML is part of the K Desktop Environment, an open-source graphical interface for Unix workstations. ‘I’m not a quitter, and our company isn’t a quitter, but it really is up to Apple,’ said Jon von Tetzchner, chief executive of privately held Opera. ‘The Mac platform may not be viable for us any longer.’ Specifically, Tetzchner said that he had asked Apple whether it would be willing to license Opera either to replace KHTML, or to supplement the current Safari version, which Apple said is a stripped-down affair with a minimalist interface and limited feature set,” reports Paul Festa for ZDNet. Full article here.
Previous Post
Xserve starting to find acceptance in enterprise6 Comments
Reader Feedback
Apple’s offer to open up NFC reportedly to be approved by EU next month
Apple’s offer to open NFC in iPhone to rivals is set to be approved by EU antitrust regulators as soon as next month after it tweaked some…
iPhone 17 Plus said to sport display smaller than 6.7-inches
Apple’s Phone 17 Plus will come with a smaller screen than the 6.7-inch display on the current-generation iPhone 15 Plus…
Taffy Brodesser-Akner adapting ‘Long Island Compromise’ for Apple TV+
Taffy Brodesser-Akner, will re-team with Susannah Grant and Sarah Timberman to develop “Long Island Compromise” for Apple TV+ with…
Apple in the running for NBA rights package
The NBA’s exclusive negotiating window with incumbent media partners Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery will likely pass without a deal…
Apple plans to spend more in Socialist Republic of Vietnam as it looks beyond China
As Apple and other global tech firms to look beyond China to secure their supply chains, cut costs, and open up new markets, Apple is…
I might actually be disappointed about this, if Opera didn’t SUCK SO BAD in the first place. Good riddance to bad rubbish. They made a craptastic browser and Mac users have rightfully stayed away from it in droves.
I question there reason for possibly dropping their Mac version. If this was the real reason then they would not be releasing windows versions. Does not MS release IE for windows? Plus MS also releases IE for Mac. Seems like its ok for one company to release a browser for their OS but it’s not ok for the other company to release a browser for their OS. A number of companys like this make a product for the Mac and then say they will drop their product when Apple comes out with a compatible product. Maybe if they made a high quality product then Apple would not feel the need to come out with their own. If you make a crappy product stay on the “pot” and don’t complain when someelse releases a much better product.
All of the above.
1) Opera Costs $, Safari is FREE for the taking.
2) Opera support for Mac is an afterthought. Apple puts Safari front & center.
3) Safari is and will be all the browser most of us need.
4) If Opera can make a better browser, then why haven’t they up until now?
5) If their business model is based upon people paying for something available for FREE-IE on WINTEL & Safari on Mac, they are in DEEP Sh#t.
Good ridance. Opera had that ported-from-the-PC look to it and the fact that they always released Mac versions after Windows makes it obvious where their loyalties lie.
Bye opera, happy to say we won’t miss you.
What a bunch of dolts.