Apple iPod nano 32GB possible in second half 2006? Samsung unveils new flash memory NAND chips

“Samsung Electronics Co. on Monday unveiled a new flash memory chip it says will double storage capacity on portable music players and other mobile devices,” The Associated Press reports. “Memory cards containing multiple 16-gigabit NAND chips mean ‘you will be able to take your entire music and personal video libraries with you,’ Chang-Gyu Hwang, president of the company’s semiconductor operations, told reporters.”

“For example, the company said that by combining 16 such devices on a memory card with a density of up to 32GB it would be possible to store 200 years worth of an average-sized daily newspaper, 8,000 MP3 music files or 20 DVD movies,” The Associated Press reports. “The company said it plans to begin mass producing the chips in the second half of 2006.”

Apple’s iPod nano 4GB uses NAND flash memory from Samsung.

[UPDATE: 4:05pm ET: updated headline to clarify potential 32GB max. storage potential.]

Full article here.

Advertisement: Apple iPod nano. 1,000 songs. Impossibly small. From $199. Free shipping.

Related articles:
Apple iPod nano takes a beating and keeps on beating – September 12, 2005
Apple’s iPod nano: The ‘thin lady’ sings unwelcome iTune to competitors – September 09, 2005
Hands on with Apple iPod nano – September 09, 2005
Mossberg: Apple iPod nano ‘beautiful, incredibly thin, and exceeds Apple’s performance specs’ – September 08, 2005
Over 1,000 accessories now available for Apple iPod – September 07, 2005
Apple’s iPod nano will make competitors whimper, Motorola’s ROKR inexplicably bland – September 07, 2005
Tech pundit Enderle: ‘iPod Nano is a hit,’ Motorola ROKR ‘simply doesn’t have enough Apple in it’ – September 07, 2005
Jupiter analyst Gartenberg: ‘the market is going to go for Apple iPod nano in a big way’ – September 07, 2005
Analyst: iPod nano ‘could be Apple’s next home run’ – September 07, 2005
Video of Steve Jobs introducing iPod nano, ROKR iTunes phone now available online – September 07, 2005
Apple’s Steve Jobs predicts ultra-thin iPod nano ‘will become the highest volume iPod in the world’ – September 07, 2005
Apple introduces iPod nano – September 07, 2005
Apple’s iPod nano will make competitors whimper, Motorola’s ROKR inexplicably bland – September 07, 2005
Apple stomps competitors in flash-based MP3 player market – September 02, 2005
Analyst expects 3-6 million 4GB flash-based Apple iPod mini units to ship in second half 2005 – August 25, 2005
Apple to switch 4GB iPod mini from hard-drive to flash-based? – August 22, 2005
Apple’s iPod shuffle takes nearly 60 percent of US flash-player market in March – May 04, 2005

33 Comments

  1. “For example, the company said that by combining 16 such devices on a memory card with a density of up to 32-gigabytes it would be possible to store 200 years worth of an average-sized daily newspaper, 8,000 MP3 music files or 20 DVD movies.”

    iPod Video, here we come! At this rate, we won’t need hard drive pods for the video feat.

  2. Jeesh!

    It’s not that many years ago that I bought the first 1 gig hard disk drive in my whole school board of 30 high schools to use as a server drive for all the students in my school. It cost a bundle. The computer consultant for the board though I was off my rocker and had made a huge mistake. It was the size of a concrete building block and weighed at least as much.

    Now I carry 80 gigs around in my iBook all the time.

    I predict the end of mechanical media. (hard disks and optical disks)

  3. For anyone who didn’t see the end of Hard Drives coming from the birth of solid state memory, even RAM if you think of it, was down right foolish.

    No moving parts = practicality.

    You can buy high density storage tape from Sony that can do 1 TERABYTE for only $100 or less. But why does no one buy this? With the tape it takes too long to cycle through all the information, not to mention it can easily tear, and the tapes are not exactly pleasant to carry around… low practicality.

    Of course it will take time for solid state to reach the capacity that modern HD’s can do, and future HD’s will probably always have more storage than future Solid State, but a plateau will be reached when the mass consumer products are built using solely solid state, mainly, do to size and power efficiency.

  4. Has no one thought of the simple idea that the 4 gigabyte iPod nano may already have two of these chips in it (and the 2 GB iPod nano has one)?

    These chips are 16 gigabits (2 gigabytes). Two would make the 4 gigbyte for the iPod nano.

    The images I have seen of the inside of the iPod nano would imply extremely few memory chips. Two would be about the right number.

  5. cptnkirk & Dank:

    Don’t write of mechanical media (HDs, optical, tape, etc.) too quickly.

    People (especially the mythical “power users”) have gotten used to having 80-100+ GB in their laptops. It well be quite some time (think a decade or more) before solid state memory (e.g., flash) challenges in that range (especially on price).

    Will mobile platforms of all kinds eventually go 100% solid state? Absolutely. But don’t expect the high end systems (e.g., high end laptops) to go 100% solid state within the next decade.

  6. Samsung is simply raising the barrier and it’s not going to stop any time soon. I think you’ll be seeing laptops converting at some level in 3 to 5 years, with 5 years being at the outer limit.

  7. Now comes the usual “…or should I wait and buy the 32GB Nano later?” questions.

    Either or, Samsung is extremely pleased. Demand for Flash is increased, meaning more manufacturing plants and therefor more plentiful supplies and eventual lower prices and even larger storage capacities.

    So we are building up for a Nano-Notebook

    It may have

    1: Cool dual core Intel x86 based processors

    2: Flash RAM combination hard drive

    3: Long battery life, like a few days

    4: No internal optical drive, the iPod Nano will be used instead. Cheaper later of course. (optional external blue-ray dvd/cd burner)

    5: Twice as thick as a iPod Nano and “cool” as all hell.

  8. Not going to happen in my estimation. 32Gig of NAND memory is going to take up the same physical dimensions as a mini HD and cost a hell of a lot more.

    This does not mean that in the future, when Samsung is able to shrink the physical size of 32Gig (and lower the price) that Apple won’t produce a 32Gig Flash iPod. Just not in the foreseeable future.

  9. 32 GB iPod nano by next year ain’t going to happen, people.

    Why? The same reason the nano is 2 GB and 4GB capacities today, instead of the “reliable” rumors that Apple was going to introduce 4 GB and 8 GB flash iPods. Flash memory is still way expensive, and it’s the cost that limits how much you can practically cram into a device.

    Secondly, the nano’s unique form factor limits the space. Just because you can theoretically put 16 of the new memory chips on one card for 32 GB doesn’t mean you can fit that card into a nano. There’s barely a free millimeter of space inside the nano case.

    Let’s be realistic people. The nano is going to be super hot seller with only 2 GB or 4 GB. It will be 8-10 months before Apple will feel the need to update the nano to keep sales going. Does anyone really think Apple is going to go from 4 GB straight to 32 GB and miss out on selling devices with 8, 12, 16, and 20 GB capacities? It’s just not going to happen, no matter how cool such a device might be.

    The next update will most likely feature nanos at 4 GB and either 6 or 8 GB. 16 GB is still 2 years away simply due to cost.

    It’s nice to think of what’s possible, but all common sense seems to go right out the window sometimes, which leads to a frenzy of disappointment about what Apple was “supposed” to release. Learn from history, my friends.

Reader Feedback (You DO NOT need to log in to comment. If not logged in, just provide any name you choose and an email address after typing your comment below)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.