Burger King TV commercial triggers Google Home devices to launch into ad spiel

“In the latest example of marketers entering the living room, Burger King will release television commercials on Tuesday that are intended to prompt voice-activated smart speakers from Google into describing its burgers — after the 15-second spots end,” Sapna Maheshwari reports for The new York Times.

“A video from one of the fast-food chain’s marketing agencies showed the stunt in action: ‘You’re watching a 15-second Burger King ad, which is unfortunately not enough time to explain all the fresh ingredients in the Whopper sandwich,’ the commercial’s actor says,” Maheshwari reports. “He continues, ‘But I got an idea. O.K. Google, what is the Whopper burger?’ Prompted by the phrase ‘O.K. Google,’ the Google Home device next to the TV in the video lights up, runs a search and states its ingredients.”

“It’s a novel but potentially invasive marketing tactic that comes as more Americans use smart speakers in their homes, a trend led by Amazon’s Echo device and its virtual assistant, Alexa,” Maheshwari reports. “The commercial, which will run Wednesday on networks like MTV and Bravo and late-night shows starring Jimmy Fallon and Jimmy Kimmel, provides another example of marketing on Google Home in the past month, though in this case, Burger King said Google was not involved.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Is it a home invasion if you’ve flung the door wide open and not only invited the invader in, but paid for the privilege?

SEE ALSO:
Edward Snowden: No matter what, do not use Google’s new Allo messenger app – September 23, 2016
Apple’s cutting-edge ‘differential privacy’ is opt-in – June 24, 2016
Apple’s cutting-edge ‘differential privacy’ offers unique option for technology users – June 20, 2016
Tim Cook gets privacy and encryption: We shouldn’t surrender them to Google – June 4, 2015
Apple CEO Cook: Unlike some other companies, Apple won’t invade your right to privacy – March 2, 2015
Edward Snowden’s privacy tips: ‘Get rid of Dropbox,” avoid Facebook and Google – October 13, 2014
U.S. NSA secretly infiltrated Yahoo, Google data centers worldwide, Snowden documents say – October 30, 2013

19 Comments

    1. Perhaps the worst ad idea since Mitsubishi aired a commercial (once) touting its cars as “from the company that brought you the Zero.” Puts the Jenner/Pepsi ad completely in the shadow.

      Perhaps United Airlines could run a campaign, “If we can’t beat our competitors, at least we can beat our customers.”

      Speaking of United, I understand that they are considering hiring Sean Spicer as their spokesman to the Jewish community.

      1. The “zero” and its variants set the benchmark for WWII fighters. If we hadn’t found one intact and snuck it home, American aviation wouldn’t have been the same. There is nothing wrong with bragging about good engeenering.

        1. BMW keep very quiet in the UK about German aircraft powered by their engines during WW2, even though the engineering was superb. The most famous was their 801 engine, which powered the legendary Focke-Wolf Fw 190

          During induction courses, BMW used to tell new staff that their logo was derived from a spinning propeller and showed vintage advertising material with early versions of that design. In recent years, they have changed this story and now say that the logo is actually derived from the State flag for Bavaria.

          Bavarians themselves are not convinced by this as although the colours are correct, the Bavarian flag has a blue and white pattern which is lozenge shaped, quite unlike the square corners within the BMW logo. It’s often taken to be a sign that the company is airbrushing it’s past, which is not surprising when Guenther Quandt who became the major shareholder in BMW, made a great deal of money during WW2 by exploiting slave and PoW labour to work in his factories and was very closely connected with the Nazi leadership.

          1. I’m not sure what you’re querying. The description of the spinning propeller logo is widely known and I personally heard it told many times during induction courses for newly recruited BMW staff in the UK about 15 years ago. The claim about the propellor being a myth is something that I’ve only heard relatively recently and if you search for an image of the Bavarian flag, you’ll see that it has lozenge shaped designs as I described rather than the right angles as seen on the BMW logo.

            Guenther Quanddt’s history is widely known and a typical brief account of his wartime activity is here –
            http://www.telegraph.co.uk/history/world-war-two/8796157/BMW-dynasty-breaks-silence-over-Nazi-past.html

            Just to make it clear, I’m not attacking BMW for their work for the German war effort, I’m just disappointed that they seem to be trying to airbrush it away. And just for the record, I’m married to a German woman and prominently displayed in our hall there are two pictures of her Great Grandfather in German military uniform, taken while he fought for his country in WW1 as a very young man and again in WW2. As an Englishman, I am very well aware of how the men in my family fought the Germans and how those on my wife’s side fought against the Allies. We are both proud of the way that our respective forbears served their countries. However that all happened long before either of us were born and there is virtually nobody alive these days who played a senior role in the war effort on either side or who can be blamed for what happened. It’s history, we are now living in the present but should remember our history without distorting it.

  1. So what’s the next step? The TV ad actually telling Google Home to order something?

    A Papa John’s pizza (never ordered one but have seen a few commercials) commercial comes on describing how great they supposedly are. Then says, “We know you want one!!!”
    Then….
    “OK Google. Order one extra large peperoni pizza from Papa John’s. Confirm.”

    Google Home then dials some 800 number and you have an unwanted pizza at your door in about 30 – 45 minutes resulting in an argument with the delivery guy about something you never personally ordered.

    Just one of many, many reasons while I’ll likely never have one of those devices in my home.

    1. From the first moment I heard about these Google devices with “always-on” microphones, I knew that I would never allow one in my home.

      The MDN staff and I have had our differences over the years, but this particular MDN Take® is spot-on perfect. When you actually choose to purchase a “Big Brother” device for your home, then you have no one to blame but yourself. This consumer rage is misplaced. It should be self-directed.

  2. “Is it ingenious or invasive?” asks the tweet above.

    Is this a serious question? The used someone’s device without permission. Invasive!

    Hi I’m just going to drive your car for an hour and bring it back. For an hour it was stolen.

  3. And apparently, it backfired.

    People went to Wikipedia and started editing the page, to show all sorts of ingredients, including cyanide; other edits said “worst hamburger in the world”, “cancer-causing”, etc. Soon enough, the “OK, Google” ingenious trick started producing very bad results.

    In the end, though, it’s all good for BK. As the saying goes “There’s no such thing as bad publicity, as long as they spell your name right” (attributed often to Mae West, although also to P.T. Barnum and others).

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.