Samsung to U.S. Supreme Court: Ruling in Apple’s favor would inspire a new breed of patent troll

“For the first time in more than 100 years the Supreme Court will take on a design patent case pitting the world’s two largest phone manufacturers against each other, a major legal battle that both sides say will shape the future of consumer technology and alter incentives for designers and engineers to create new products,” Hamza Shaban reports for BuzzFeed News.

“Next month, the Supreme Court will hear arguments from Samsung and Apple over how much money Samsung should be forced to pay for infringing on several of the iPhone maker’s design patents,” Shaban reports. “The design elements include the iPhone’s rectangular face with rounded edges and bezel, and a home screen populated by a grid of icons. Stemming from a lawsuit that began in 2011, Samsung was ordered to hand over $548 million.”

“In its latest brief filed this week, the final written argument before the two parties appear before the Supreme Court in October, Samsung argued that a ruling in favor of Apple would inspire a new breed of patent troll,” Shaban reports. “Samsung believes that it shouldn’t be forced to hand over all the profits from its infringing phones, but only a percentage… Apple maintains that the design of the now iconic iPhone was crucial to its success, and that Samsung’s copycat infringement was not merely ornamental. Last month, more than 100 design professionals including Calvin Klein and Alexander Wang agreed with Apple, writing in a brief to the Supreme Court that design is not just one insignificant aspect of a product, but — in the minds of consumers — represents the product itself.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: When Steve Jobs pulled the first iPhone out of his pocket, the cellphone industry had no response. After some months spent staring with mouths agape, the Samsung slime of the world decided their only recourse to going belly up was to rip off Apple’s IP and trample Apple’s trade dress with abandon.

The main reason why Samsung et al. were able to sell phones and tablets at all was because they made fake iPhones and fake iPads designed to fool the unwitting (who are now finally waking up in droves, by the way, and upgrading to iPhones in ever-increasing numbers) in much the same way as how Microsoft et al. profited wildly from upside-down and backwards fake Macs at the end of the 20th century. Google, Samsung, HTC, Xiaomi, et al. are the Microsofts, HPs, Dells, and eMachines of the new century.

Apple’s products came first, then Samsung’s:

Samsung Galaxy and Galaxy Tab Trade Dress Infringement

Here’s what Google’s Android looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:

Google Android before and after Apple iPhone

And, here’s what cellphones looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:

cellphones before and after Apple iPhone

People who buy Android phones and tablets reward thieves.

Dieter Rams, Norman Foster, and 100+ of the world’s top designers side with Apple in Samsung patent case – August 4, 2016
Apple to U.S. Supreme Court: Samsung stole our patents, should end its appeals and finally pay up – August 1, 2016
U.S. Supreme Court to hear Samsung’s appeal of Apple design patent case on October 11th – July 14, 2016
U.S. DOJ asks Supreme Court to overturn ruling that favored Apple over Samsung’s iPhone copying – June 9, 2016
Apple suggests Federal Circuit panel violated U.S. Constitution in patent fight with Samsung – March 30, 2016
Supreme Court to hear Samsung appeal in Apple patent case – March 21, 2016


  1. Yeah from Samsung’s perspective this “new kind of patent troll” is one trying to protect its patented inventions that they actually market. Or why we have a patent system to begin with. Disingenuous misdirection much Scamscum?

    1. A patent is like a deed to a piece of property. This deed is valid whether there is a house there, or even if the property is being used. Unlike a deed, after a period of time the property become public, until then that’s it, they can say “Get off my weeds”.

  2. Apple was awarded the money in a court of law.
    Trial was fair, open, no infraction of the law. Clearly there is nothing for the court to do but ask Samsung what did they mean by that threat.

  3. Finding Samsung guilty will wake up world governmental eyes to the fact that original IP must be protected or the ripoff con job companies win and the entire technology community is permanently damaged. This case is that simple and dangerous.

    Is this the future we want?
    Samsung suspends sales of Galaxy Note 7 after smartphones catch fire
    Korean manufacturer confirms 35 cases of newly launched devices exploding while being charged, and offers exchanges but stops short of full recall

    I don’t want cheap ripoff crap. Why would anyone? But if that’s all there is…

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.