Apple to charge $1,000 for iWatch?

“Earlier this week, I discussed how CEO Tim Cook can’t afford to swing and miss on the iWatch. His detractors already believe his time is running out,” Richard Saintvilus writes for TheStreet. “But Cook must not get hasty. And if recent rumors are to be believed, Cook may, in fact, price Apple out of a potentially lucrative market.”

“According to KGI Research analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple plans to price the iWatch at $1,000. Cook once said that for Apple to disrupt the wearable market, the product has to be a ‘must-have’ and not merely a ‘want,'” Saintvilus writes. “The watch has been rumored to have health-related benefits, including the ability to alert wearers of a heart attack. But if it’s going to cost of $1,000, it needs to also drive the person wearing it to a hospital. Although Ming-Chi Kuo does have a strong reputation for accuracy, I don’t see how this price is going to work.”

“Granted, it’s still early. But if the iWatch does crack the $1,000 mark, in trying to preserve profit margins, Apple would have missed on this one as well,” Saintvilus writes. “Not to mention, Samsung, which released its Galaxy Gear last December, already has first-mover status. And unless the iWatch has the ability to save lives, the device will be dead on arrival by pricing itself out of a market that is yet to be defined.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Relax, Richie. Relax.

Related articles:
Apple’s iWatch said to come in two sizes, high-end model to cost several thousand dollars – April 10, 2014
Apple CEO Tim Cook can’t afford an iWatch flop or something – April 9, 2014

58 Comments

  1. This is the same nonsense analysts and pundits said about the iPod and iPhone: “It ‘ stop expensive” and “the market’s already saturated; Apple is too late to the game.”

    Nonsense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.