Apple plants seeds of doubt in appellate challenge of antitrust monitor Bromwich

“Apple’s aggressive challenge to an external compliance monitor’s investigation into Apple’s antitrust compliance policies may be planting seeds of doubt that Apple hopes will bear fruit in its appeal of Judge Denise Cote’s decision in United States v. Apple, Inc. that Apple conspired to raise e-book prices,” Allison F. Sheedy reports for Antitrust Today.

“On Tuesday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted Apple a temporary administrative stay of the monitor until a three-judge panel can rule on Apple’s motion for a full stay pending appeal,” Sheedy reports. “Judge Cote hand picked Michael Bromwich in September to serve as an external compliance monitor ‘to review and evaluate Apple’s existing internal antitrust compliance policies and procedures, and to recommend to Apple changes to address any deficiencies in those policies and procedures.’ Although Bromwich lacked antitrust credentials, he had longstanding ties to the Judge herself.”

“The question is why did Apple pick this fight? Is it only about the money? Certainly not: Apple is going to pay its outside counsel enormous amounts to litigate this issue,” Sheedy reports. “Is it about Apple executives being fed up with the breadth of the oversight? Perhaps. If Apple’s claims that the external monitor has roved well beyond his purview and has disrupted Apple’s business operations are accurate, Apple would have a legitimate gripe. But the best explanation may be fairly simple: Apple might be striving to create a record for the court of appeals.”

Read more in the full article here.

Lady Elaine Fairchilde (left), Judge Denise Cote (right),or vice versa
Lady Elaine Fairchilde (left), Judge Denise Cote (right),or vice versa

MacDailyNews Take: It’s also about the fact that Apple is innocent, did not collude to raise e-book prices, and Denise Cote is a vacant-eyed puppet manipulated by Jeff Bezos via a painfully clueless DOJ.

And, no kidding, Ally Sheedy? For real? 😉

Need input… More input, Stephanie!

Related articles:
In pretrial view, judge says leaning toward U.S. DOJ over Apple in e-books case – May 24, 2013
Lawyers have complained for years that Judge Denise Cote pre-judges cases before she enters the courtroom – August 14, 2013

U.S. Federal Puppet Denise Cote: ‘Apple’s reaction to the existence of a monitorship underscores the wisdom of its imposition’ – January 16, 2014
European Commission attempts to close corporate tax loophole – November 25, 2013
John F. Kennedy, tax policy, and Apple Inc. – November 22, 2013
Not in Taxes anymore: On site at Apple’s famous Irish ‘headquarters’ – November 2, 2013
Senators Levin, McCain say Ireland faces questions even as Apple tax loophole tightened – October 16, 2013
Ireland to close Apple’s tax loophole, but leave bigger one open – October 15, 2013
U.S. SEC ends review of Apple taxes, overseas cash – October 5, 2013
Obama, world leaders push big companies like Apple, Google to pay more taxes – September 6, 2013
G20 think tank OECD proposes blueprint for global crackdown on tax avoidance – July 19, 2013
Apple again faces scrutiny after paying no UK corporate taxes for 2012 – July 1, 2013
Bloomberg News’ awful reporting on Apple’s U.S. corporate taxes – May 30, 2013
Thomas Sowell on Apple, corporate taxes, and ‘the road to serfdom’ – May 28, 2013
Former Senator Sununu: Congress wrote the tax laws, so why blame Apple for obeying them? – May 28, 2013
Taxing Apple just taxes you – May 24, 2013
Don’t tax Apple, tax its shareholders – May 24, 2013
If Apple paid more tax, we might pay less or something – May 22, 2013
Apple CEO Tim Cook pounds another nail into the Keynesian coffin – May 22, 2013
Apple CEO Cook makes no apology for company’s tax strategy – May 22, 2013
Apple CEO Tim Cook charms Capitol Hill – May 22, 2013
Rush Limbaugh: ‘High-tech lynching: Senate attempts to crucify Apple’ – May 21, 2013
Nobody on U.S. Senate committee laid a glove on Apple CEO Tim Cook – May 21, 2013
Senator Rand Paul: Senate committee ‘should apologize to Apple for bullying one of America’s greatest success stories’ (with video) – May 21, 2013
Ireland: We have no special tax rate deal with Apple – May 21, 2013
Apple prepares for Washington onslaught: CEO Tim Cook isn’t taking any chances with senators looking to grandstand – May 21, 2013
Watch Apple CEO Tim Cook’s live testimony before U.S. Senate, starting at 9:30am EDT – May 21, 2013
U.S. Senate investigation found no evidence that Apple did anything illegal in avoiding taxes – May 20, 2013
Apple pays under 2% on overseas profits and it’s entirely legal – November 5, 2012
Google, Apple, eBay shouldn’t pay taxes – people should pay taxes – November 25, 2012
So how much did Apple really pay in taxes? – November 1, 2012
Apple’s showdown with the U.S. government over taxes on offshore cash – July 13, 2012
Apple‘s $74 billion tops list of U.S. tech companies’ overseas cash – July 9, 2012
Apple’s dividend move puts spotlight on foreign cash holdings, repatriation tax reform – March 20, 2012
Apple: Good start; and what about the overseas cash? – March 19, 2012
Apple’s foreign cash hoard piles up: $54 billion and rapidly growing – January 11, 2012
Senator John McCain eyes Apple’s $54 billion overseas cash pile – November 3, 2011
Google joins Apple in push for U.S. repatriation tax holiday – October 3, 2011
Apple lobbies Obama for tax holiday, wants to bring overseas bounty home – August 24, 2011
U.S Senate Democrat Schumer allies with Apple, other multinationals on repatriation tax talks – June 21, 2011
U.S. companies push for tax break on foreign cash – June 20, 2011
Apple, Oracle, Duke Energy, others organize lobbying blitz for tax holiday – February 17, 2011


  1. Not one iota of proof that Apple conspired . Got that Cotex?

    You and the DOJ are so out of line that your eyes are crossed. Apple will prevail on appeal and as much as wall street hates apple it will see to it that this kind of muzzle never get applied to free enterprise and american business interests . Bank on that.

    As for sanctions against the dimwitted biased Cotex – they are on their way judge – you will be judged and condemned and have a tarnished record forever because you are blatantly, by your own record and words condemned and pre disposed.

  2. One reason Denise Cote appointed the monitor was that Apple showed “no remorse.” This woman is not interested in justice, she decided Apple was guilty before the trial and wants Apple to grovel. Apple didn’t break any laws and doesn’t need an inquisitor roaming the halls of this highly creative company. This case is a travesty. The monitor is completely unnecessary to check “compliance” with her edicts. Apple protested because because he’s randomly poking around in the most ripped-off company in history, because his rates are unethical and because they didn’t do anything wrong. It doesn’t take a genius. My hope is the higher court wastes no time overturning Cote.

  3. I think this is the proper link to the original article. Nothing new really, but I’m sure more and more people up the echelon are realizing that Apple has done nothing wrong and that koh Cote, well what a tosser she is.

    1. A thank you to MDN for removing the link from my post and then using it to direct us readers to the appropriate site. That’s one of the many reasons I like coming here.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.