“Apple today announced its next-generation iBooks 2 for the iPad, which will include Textbooks for students to access engaging, high-quality and interactive content,” Zack Whittaker writes for ZDNet.
“Apple also announced the iBooks Author application for Mac that allows teachers, educators, publishers and students alike to create e-books from an iWork-style interface,” Whittaker writes. “Considering that the run-up to the announcement was fraught with concern for the publishing industry, who will win and lose out from today’s announcement?”
Winners:
• Publishers
• Rich schools
Losers:
• Amazon
• Windows users
• Poor schools
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: How much are these “poor schools” paying for regular old antiquated paper textbooks for each student? Quite likely, there paying more than the cost of an iPad plus digital textbooks for each.
Related articles:
Apple reinvents textbooks with iBooks 2 for iPad – January 19, 2012
Apple unveils all-new iTunes U app for iPad, iPhone and iPod touch – January 19, 2012
MacDailyNews presents live coverage of Apple’s ‘Big Apple’ education event – January 19, 2012
Winners:
Teachers
Kids
Students
The Education System
Losers:
Trolls
Kardashians
Simon Cowell
Thurrott, Paul
Amazingly funny. Thank u 😀
HAHAHAHA!!
+1
Saying that Windows users are losers: isn’t that a tautology?
Another loser today: BLN! Haw, haw. Of course, he’s just trolling for some laughs here.
Additional winners:
Home-school students who can now actually afford real textbooks.
Parents that can afford an iPad for furthering their children’s education in a school district that seems incapable of doing it properly.
“Poor” schools are losers? How?
I think they are thinking that textbooks will cost money so poor schools will not be able to afford them…
OF course, printed text books are free,,,,, right??
Sounds like an interesting idea. The implementation will be interesting.
I don’t know how much elementary, middle, and high school textbooks are, but if they’re anything compared to university textbooks, then yes, the iPad is a bargain.
On the other hand, it depends on the refresh rate. I was just about to say that they could give a kid an iPad and have them keep it through K-12, but then again, technology would update during that time, so they’d have to have the kids have versions that are compatible with the current version of iBooks.
I’m with you. An iPad costs less than five textbooks! It’s a money saver!
Grade school texts don’t cost as much as college texts, so the cost:benefit to switching to iBooks is less appealing if there is not much money. Also, even if it is cheaper in the long run, a large capital expenditure of several hundred (or thereabouts) iPads is just not feasible on a shoestring budget.
Also many schools own the textbooks and use the same ones for several years, effectively sharing the cost of a textbook between several different students. If each student needs his own iBook, it may not be cheaper at all.
So yes, despite this great leap forward by Apple, the poor schools will miss out, at least initially, if they are expected to take on most of the cost of iPad iBooks for each student. Families that send their kids to “poor” schools will also in general not be able to afford these costs, so it does pose a problem.
I think much of the focus and most of the success will be at the college level because of these issues. That is, after all, a more important market.
You’re forgetting the big advantage to iBooks: One purchase (to a school’s iPad) and it can be used for consecutive years (and thus students) and is updated as new material comes out. No more ripped pages, chocolate milk spilled all over it, or it simply wearing out or getting lost (Find My iPad).
The capital expenditure is real, but schools have an annual budget for textbooks. Plus, the use of iPads can be phased in gradually, adding a grade level or two each year to stay within the ordinary textbook budget.
looking at the way young kids treat textbooks (and school laptops for those who have them), the idea of cycling an iPad though several different students over several years doesn’t sound great. iPads are well built but I doubt they will survive that.
Ask yourself why schools that have a laptop program make the student purchase them (or include it in their fees) and use their own machine throughout. Also look at what type of schools are able to do this – its not the poor ones. The exact same reasoning applies to iPads, does it not?
I work as a laptop technician in a school district that has a laptop one-to-one program at the high school level in a so-called “poor” district. The students pay a small fee for the privilege of taking the laptop home, which is little more than an “insurance premium”. Damaged laptops are paid for at a reduced price, similar to a “deductible” and can also be paid with community service.
Some students opt not to take the computer home at all and are simply allowed to use them while at school, which means they pay no fee at all.
The cost of repair for damaged computers is much smaller than most would expect. iPads would be even cheaper, due to sturdier cases, lighter devices, and more ergonomic design. Sure, they would break, but the cost of repairs would still likely be insignificant versus the savings against textbooks.
I did some rough calculations based on the number of textbooks needed for a student per semester ($40-60 a book, depending on subject). If each student were to receive an iPad that they used for four years with their books on them, the district would save approximately $1100 per student. If the student had two iPads during their 4-year high school period, they’d still save $600 (assuming the cheapest currently shipping iPad was purchased).
That $600 per student would more than cover the cost of repairs for the devices, and money would still be saved. Trust me. This is a big deal.
Oh, and those calculations are VERY rough and it’s possible that the savings could be higher or lower than $1100 per student, over a 4-year period. It would simply depend on the number of classes taken that require textbooks.
Thank you for your report from the frontlines.
You are also acting as if iPads are unbreakable. No more ripped pages, sure, but what happens I you drop a book (everyone does)? Not too much. Now what happens when you drop your iPad (and render all your textbooks unusable until repair)? I also wouldn’t say iPads are immune to effects of spilled liquids – it is after all a complex piece of machinery and liquid can certainly access the internals.
What if they were fitted into plexiglass wedges like all Apple Store display iPads?
That would add a lot of bulk (granted, still better than a bunch of textbooks) and the wedge shape would be quite awkward when switching between portrait and landscape.
Could be redesigned for good variable ergonomics…
my 4 year old son has free access to our iPad for the last year…it has no case…and there isn’t a scratch on it. There are plenty of low profile cases out there that will be more than adequate.
Your child is the exception, being the grandson of God.
I’ve got a cheap case on my iPad1. I’ve dropped it 4 times at an average height of about 4 feet. No problems, scratches or chips.
iPads can be made kid proofed with a cheap case.
It’s called “risk mitigation”, it works better than hand wringing worry. You do not allow nonsense fears to trump progress and achievement.
Squaretrade offers a warranty for just these items, many SMART districts ad these to their ipads. A smart district, properly planning also has a help desk and hot spares ready to go to keep the students participating while theirs is fixed. Docs are in the cloud so they are not lost.
See no need to worry about that which can be managed…
this might be the answer to spills and drops:
Moxiware.com
Actually, depends on the textbook. most early texts, K-4 or so are Workbooks. Fairly cheap. Maybe $15-20
Most middle school texts are in the $50 range. High School textbooks are very expensive. $70 or more. And a typical kids has between 7 and a dozen texts. Half a dozen at $70, half a dozen paperbacks for English class, about $10, Maybe 3 to 5 workbooks at $15-20 each. Consider that typical Textbooks are often sent out for rebinding. Costing an additional $20 or so. This extends the life another few years. Good and bad… as now, kids are using Textbooks that are close to 12 or 15 years old. AND they are static. NOT interactive or live links to content online…
Because they think “poor” schools won’t be able to afford iPads. They fail to factor in the savings given by textbooks costing $14,99 or less compared to traditional textbook costs, which can be $50-$100. Plus, schools need to replace them every couple of years due to wear and tear or out of date material.
Plus, they fail to consider that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation would be happy to supply grants to purchase those iPads.
Apple has to do the same to publishing industy ie make a iMagazine Author app.
Then they have to change the iBook Author app so that you can publish manuals and training material inside companies so that companies can lock them so that they are used only inside the companies and if the person changes job he/she loses those materials.
This is an excellent day and good beginning.
+1
Remember the Amelio!
According to Uncle Walt, students would buy the books, not school districts. That book can not be resold. In the big picture, not sure how this saves money.
Second, say a teacher publishes a iBook for teaching 2nd graders what a hypothesis is. They publish it. Teachers all over the country start to use it. Does the teacher get paid for their work?
Eh …. I dont think you get it. A school can buy ipads, and load them with the books needed at each level, then lock the ipad down so that it can not be altered. No need to “resell”. Also, a committee determines which text books are to be used, not the teacher.
Here’s the story I read on AllThingsD.
http://allthingsd.com/20120119/apples-new-math-or-why-a-15-ebook-equals-a-75-paper-book/
Here’s what caught my eye.
“Under Apple’s new textbooks plan, though, McGraw-Hill will try something different: It will sell its books directly to each student (the student could either pay out of pocket, or the school could fund the purchase via a voucher/code), who will use the book for a year, then move on. They’ll be able to keep the digital text, but won’t be able to resell it or pass it along to another student, and McGraw-Hill anticipates that another set of students will buy new books the following year.”
Only if they charge a fee for the book. If they list it as FREE, then no one will get money
The teacher gets paid if they charge for the book (and someone buys it).
Reselling books is overrated. New editions come out every 2 years or so, and thus the old edition becomes worthless. I had far more books from college not be able to be sold again due to new editions being published than ones I could resell, and even then the price for resale was pretty low. Often not even worth standing in line to get.
$15 is the max price. Many will cost less. Some could be developed with grant money and distributed for free. Or funded with NFL money in exchange for naming rights (The Green Bay Packers Cheese Making Manual comes to mind, or the Dallas Cowboys Guide to Western History). Getting an iPad into every students hands is the challenge. At $500 a copy it’s doable with the political will. At $250 a copy it’s a no-brainer, even for US politicians.
Rich schools and poor schools? Are you kidding me? Throwing out private schools which have already been way ahead of public schools for a long time, I’m not sure where Zack “head up his arse” Whittaker is getting his information from. All 50 states have laws on the books about the money spent per student in the schools. My kids who happen to go to a school in a more affluent neighborhood in bum-f*ck central Minnesota use the exact same textbooks that kids in the inner city of Minneapolis get to read. These textbooks cost a lot of money and it is yet to be seen what the difference in cost between iPads/iBooks and traditional hardcover textbooks will be.
Trees. Trees are the big winners today.
Trees are liberal scumbags
That gets my first laugh of the day.
Treehugger!
Not a few hours have yet passed since the event, and people are already criticizing what’s bad about it. You don’t like their ideas? Go start your own company and do it yourself.
+1 Never amazes me the rocky chair pundits that never produced anything without supervision, know exactly what Apple should have done better.
so true…
Typical response to a new Apple service/product.
Check back again in a week, especially after people have had time to try iBooks Author.
This is all so very exciting..can’t wait to see my grandchildren toting their iPads to school: every book, map, film, song: literally, the intellect of the entire history of man at their fingertips…talk about the opportunity to “learn at your own speed”…man, this is IT.
I would add , , ,
Losers:
• ADOBE
Textbooks cost districts more than the initial purchase price would indicate. They have to be collected, inventoried, examined, manually replaced, shipped to and from warehouses, and distributed. This can alone cost districts millions of dollars. School districts will calculate this cost in any cost/benefit analysis.
In the middle school in which I taught in 2009, a math book would cost about $49.00. The teachers would be expected to do all the receiving, unpacking and inventory as well as stamping and prepping the books. In addition, we had to assess the condition of each book each year and send out notices for payment for damages to each student who mishandled his book. We were paid about a $75 one-time stipend to receive and prep about 150 new books each for our department. The books were used for 5 – 7 years so the cost per student per book was about $7-$10 for the life of the book including handling. The book selection was made by an unpaid committee and the books were shipped directly to each building from the publisher. So none of what you say was true in my school district.
Spot on. Instead of assuming, actually crunch the numbers and look at the actual behaviors of grade schools using textbooks. It’s not all that costly when reused. The problem of new revisions is much less of an issue at the grade school level – there is simply no money for a school to buy new revisions every couple of years.
HUGE Losers, College Bookstores and Textbook buy back companies
Textbooks average about $100 per book
In a middle school that is about $600 per student
Take a $499 iPad and add six $15 books and you have a wash year one
Year two you will see the cost savings
What happens when half the elementary school kids with french fry grease on their hands drops their iPads and shatters them? Just sayin…
Yeah, like there’s an epidemic of that going on. Show me your actuarials that indicate a problem, and I’ll show you a solution. Oh, there’s no solution, then there must not be a problem, otherwise someone would have devised a solution.
Don’t serve french fries as part of the school lunch program. Problem solved.
I imagine Apple would have an educational discount for the iPads a district would buy. The iPads would definitely need to be locked down or the theft would be crazy and even dangerous. I would also think there would be a huge opportunity for local iPad repair shops for all of the things that would happen to those ipads through out the year. Lastly, one concern is what happens when a kid loses/breaks their iPad, that is a lot of money for a parent of lower income families to come up with.
Rich kids are the only kids that lose iPads. Poor kids have never lost an iPad.
My reply is makes more sense than your post.
Does anyone have the TCO with device replacement data on the pilot k-12 iPad programs? The replacement data would cover damage, theft, device failure, etc. Any one have data on the effectiveness of these pilot programs on student performance? Just askin’.
First, middle school books cost from $50 to $80. Plus the school will use the book for 5 years or more so the cost is actually about $12 per book per student = about $72 per student per year or less.
No more so than being responsible for anything else their unsupervised child might break.
Its called taking responsibility for the conduct of your children. There are no economic limits to that responsibility.
I could be wrong. I’m pretty sure you an rent books too. School districts could change books more easy.
Winners… iPad users and textbook companies (and Apple).
Losers… People who have develop learning materials for an audience of non-iPad users.
loser:
chinese printing companies
A serious typo in an article on education . . . come on!
In MacDaily News Take: “… Quite likely, there paying more than … “, “there” should read “they’re”.
I don’t know that poor schools come out worse than they are already, but things in poor urban public schools are pretty bad. (1) Most of them provide textbooks to the students free of charge. (2) Most of them are forced to reuse very old textbooks or none at all. (3) Many of them are located in high-crime neighborhoods where an iPad wouldn’t survive the first trip on the subway. I applaud Apple’s new technology, but I think it’s a valid point that rich suburban sch
Loosers
Cnet
Some dimwit wrote a whole article there his this bad, because computers can break.
WINNER: Trees!
WINNER: iPad insurance companies
WINNER: Graphic artists who can transform boring text into interactive wonderment
In addition:
First off no school district will have to “buy” iPads. Chances are the iPads like much of computer hardware will be leased and those dollars will come from the school budgets which will trade paper textbooks for electronic. Second, after the lease is over, usually 3 years, the iPads are now owned by the district or returned and the process starts over. Next electronic textbooks will be cheaper than than the current model. Competition will see to that.
The next electronic textbook will be the then current model iPad. There are no other players in this ecosystem.
Loser:
Chiropractors due to kids’ backpacks no longer weighing 40 lbs.
Middle and High Schools are typically 3-4 years. Issue incoming students a new iPad for their duration through matriculation. Add the caveat that the parents are responsible for immediate replacement for any lost, stolen or damaged iPad during those years. Parents are already expected to pay the cost of books under the same circumstances. Costs of textbooks to schools is enormous. I’ve got to believe that their is economical model in which a move to iPads is a win. This author has not facts to back his assertions. And what is this about PCs being a big loser? Nobody uses PCs for textbooks now. How do desktop PCs even enter the equation. Kids and schools don’t author textbooks.
Problem: There is no demand for stolen textbooks. Stolen iPads somewhat a different story.
LOSERS:
Balmer’s kids. Sure the kids got their big *ss table and the courier notebook from Dad’s lab, but they won’t be using an iPad. What will the Gates Foundation be purchasing?