78 Comments

      1. I’ll agree with txmacsa. Beautiful design, and I’d love to see it as a poster, display it for the rest of the week on the Apple.com site, etc, but change the logo? No, and as others have said, Steve probably wouldn’t want it done, even as a tribute.

        Fantastic as the design is, Apple must move on from the present into its future, of which Steve Jobs — sadly — is not going to be a part.

    1. Agree; this logo would be great honour to Jobs, but Apple would betray his minimalism principles. Also, Jobs was usually humble in sense of inserting his name and/or images in even little credits, let alone the logo.

  1. As instrumental as Steve Jobs was to Apple, and how instrumental Apple has been to technology, to use this image as the logo would be to say that Apple is all about Steve Jobs. As touching as this image is, there has been a question about whether Apple was bigger than Steve Jobs even when reports of his cancer first came out, and to adopt this as the official logo would be to say the answer is no, and we all firmly believe the answer is yes.

  2. A non-starter. Jobs was always very concerned that all of Apple’s design elements would look clean under all their conditions of use. The small details required to represent Steve’s face would make this logo look like a jagged mess at smaller sizes.

  3. Steve will always be a beacon but also a shadow hanging over the company and this would unfortunately be exactly what the denigrators would seek, to claim that this is a one man business. This logo is a lovely way of honouring him but not as the official logo, the company need to prove it is unique leading the field with or without the Master. This would suggest they are looking backwards not forwards.

  4. I don’t think it should become the company logo.

    I would be all about buying some Apple merchandise with this image on it though.

    Some select Apple products released next year around the time of his passing as a Special Edition with the logo on it would be a nice tribute but as a permanent switch, no.

  5. Absolutely not.
    Steve always wanted forward thinking. Not hanging onto the past. It would fly against everything he stood for.

    It’s a beautiful wordless tribute symbol for the week. But that is enough for it.

  6. It does beg us to imagine how we’ll see Apple in a year or five.

    One wonders if Steve hasn’t built some Hari Seldon (Issac Asimov’s Foundation) device to come back at points in the future; give us guidance at crucial nexuses.

  7. I voted YES…but…..yeah it would be kind of strange and a little creepy as years go by.
    Other successful logo’s that use their founders as part of the logo would be KFC, Wendy’s. However with a high tech company it doesn’t kind of “rhyme”.

    I’d be open to some products having a commemorative kind of theme for a limited time though. For example I just ordered today a NANO with the inscription “Steve Jobs, 1955-Forever”. I’ll be wearing that as a watch. Also ordered 2 iPhone 4s’s and a bunch of other accessories….total value over $2K.

  8. Apple is the brand. Steve Jobs would have rejected it out of hand because it is all about the brand. I was for a good number of years an Apple VAR and there were strict rules in place to protect the band and only portray it in the appropriate light and space.
    Steve will be certainly be missed but he was but one person on the team at Apple. I am certain that Apple, having benefited greatly from Steve’s vision and inspiration, will continue.
    I have no doubt that Steve had done much to prepare Tim Cook, Phil Schiller and the rest of the management, development, and design teams for the transition.

  9. I think it’s appropriate for some per-determined mourning period, as a permanent change however, I don’t believer that’s not what Steve would have wanted. (BTW, how the hell would I know, I never met the man, but that’s my opinion)

    Remember his Stanford speech, “death is natures change agent, out with the old and in with the new”. I’m quite certain he doesn’t want Apple looking backward in any way.

    1. Maybe it could find its way into Apple University – since that was all about how to recreate Steve Jobs’ creativity and vision for a whole new generation of Apple executives (and how knows? Maybe other companies as well)

  10. @MDN: Thank you for finally having a poll with an article so you can leave comments about the poll. Please consider using another widget that allows comments for the polls, or always do it this way.

    It bothers me that he looks sad. If another one could be done where he didn’t look sad, that would be fine, but too hard to pull off in all the instances where the logo was really small. Steve would *hate* that.

  11. No.

    1) Steve would want Apple to be more than just him
    2) Apple wants to be Apple for ever with of without Steve
    3) Although a fun logo, Steve would never approve from a design stand point
    4) It is not a good logo

    It would make a great tribute T-shirt for a man that accomplished so much.

  12. Steve was not a byte.

    The idea is someone (Apple founders and users perhaps) has take a bite of Apple (Biblical or Snow-Whitey), defying authority for self-awareness and knowledge to betide. Steve is one of the enlightened ones to have taken the bite with humanity, not the bite itself.

  13. No don’t change it. Nice sentiment, but I hate those images where you look at it one way you see one thing and then look at it another and see something else. At quick glance one could look at the Apple and think that person has one heck of an overbite!

  14. It is a fitting tribute to Steve Jobs. However, I doubt Steve would have approved. Apple must now look to the future and remain as innovative and out of the box as Steve was. I think if there were a few special edition products folks could have an option to have this logo in them. RIP Steve. I thank you for all the apples I own and love (Ipod, Ipad, Iphone, IMAC, Macbook). I for one would love this logo on the IPad 2 I want to but.

  15. Just because Steve wouldn’t put his face in the logo, doesn’t mean that the company shouldn’t. It would be a wonderful tribute – memorialize the iconic man in the icon of his products.

  16. Not original at all, I first saw this logo in a printed edition of Time (August 1997) published after the Macworld Expo with Bill Gates on screen. Design is possibly even older. I still have that copy of Time.

  17. Definitely. It seems to show Steve still watching over the company. I’m sure he is. It never hurts to have a reminder around and years from now when kids don’t know who he is, this would remind them to ask. It would also remind the Apple folks to consider what Steve would have done as they make future decisions. I’m sure Steve would agree with that! šŸ™‚

  18. Put him on a stamp. Something to honor him, sure, but make it something that lasts months, not forever.

    Use this image on shop posters maybe, a commemorative range of products with a limited run-life or some simply give-away in the shops. But people in 25 years don’t want to be looking at something like this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.