Canalys: Apple’s global smartphone shipments vault 130.8%

Smartphone volumes continued their climb in Q1 2010 as volumes reached 55.2 million. The sector weathered the period of economic uncertainty well, and growth has fully rebounded at 67% year-on-year, which is the highest growth rate seen since the end of 2007. Nokia led the market once again, with a new smart phone volume high of 21.4 million units shipped, around twice the volume of nearest competitor RIM.

Nokia showed strong growth across all regions, with Latin America the highest growth market, but with the lowest volume. Notable growth came from APAC, which reached just under 10 million units and saw 70% growth year on year. The Greater China area alone has seen nearly 90% growth compared with a year ago, reaching 5.7 million units. The upcoming N8 flagship model will run Symbianˆ3, bringing a much needed platform refresh and important user interface improvements. But the update is not a dramatic leap forward. With Symbian^4 devices now not expected until 2011, Nokia will need to deliver some strong and attractive product propositions in H2 2010 if it is not to lose momentum and risk falling behind in terms of innovation, as Apple, Google, RIM and Microsoft release updates to their respective platforms.

RIM was another vendor to forge ahead, particularly on the back of its impressive performance in Latin America where it saw 297% growth in Q1 2010. It also enjoyed a strong performance in APAC with 215% growth, driven primarily by the markets of Southeast Asia. RIM is continuing to demonstrate its growing appeal among consumers worldwide, and its ability to build new operator partnerships and effective channel strategies in developing markets.

While the top two vendors performed well in terms of volume, their market share is still under pressure from Apple, which has made share gains over the past year, climbing from 11% a year ago to 16% in Q1 2010. Volumes have been helped by the ending of operator exclusivity arrangements in some markets, as Apple caters to the pent-up demand among customers of other networks.

Other notable performers with triple-digit growth among the top 10 vendors were Sony Ericsson and Palm, which saw 292% and 129% year-on-year growth respectively. Sony Ericsson successfully delivered its first Android-based devices at the end of the quarter, but its boost in volumes came instead from its Symbian platform products, the Vivaz and the Satio, which performed well in APAC and EMEA.

Palm has done well to add AT&T and Verizon Wireless to its initial Palm Pre and Pixi US launch partner Sprint, and is continuing to expand its operator footprint in Europe. ‘Under HP’s ownership, Palm will have a better opportunity to make webOS devices a success,’ noted Canalys Senior Analyst, Pete Cunningham. ‘The combined assets of Palm’s webOS platform and innovation culture, with HP’s geographical reach, extensive and loyal channel partnerships, and solid financial position, will form a formidable force in the future. The success of other vendors, such as Motorola and Sony Ericsson, undoubtedly means stiffer competition. But growing consumer awareness and demand for smart phones and associated services will provoke substantial volume increases over the next two years worldwide, bringing many opportunities.’

Source: Canalys

MacDailyNews Take: Canalys’ definition of “smartphone” is looser than a Vegas…

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Fred Mertz” for the heads up.]


  1. yeah…. and Moto’s jumped even HIGHER 136%..

    Look at the numbers people… with the exception of Nokia and RIM, they are all clustered around the same figures, more or less

  2. Yes, but iPhone shipments are full priced sales.

    Blackberry shipments are 2 for $100 sales.

    Nokia shipments include free, 2 for $50 sales and shipments back to Finland.

  3. I had exactly the same take as MDN before I got down to see what they wrote. Anyway, back to share of market: Nokia and RIM both down about 3%, Apple up about 4%. HTC and Motorola up a tad, but way back. Don’t look back, someone may be gaining on you (Satchel Page?).

  4. Wrong as usual. Apple gets the largest subsidies out there so they are not full priced sales. And vendors don’t offer 2 for 1 deals, carriers do. So the vendor gets full price for every sale. Elementary stuff there fella. Get educated…or just keep posting wrong stuff to make yourself feel better. After all, that’s the mdn way!

  5. @big al

    I think you missed Big Al’s point. Most of us understand that carriers pay the vendors full price and make their subsidy back on the contract. The point is, if carriers are having to offer phones to the customer at fire-sale prices, that doesn’t say much for the demand for that device, now does it? It also means that it takes that much longer into the contract for the carrier to break even. Think the carrier is going to continue to offer that particular device as it becomes more and more difficult to get their money back? Eventually, the vendor has to start offering the device to the carrier at a lower price. See where this is going?

  6. “Palm has done well to add AT&T;and Verizon Wireless to its initial Palm Pre and Pixi US launch partner Sprint.”

    Personally, I’d directly thank Sprint for the death of Palm. Whoever made the idiotic decision to go with the very worst of all possible mobile providers should be shot. Let’s hope HP see the light and give Sprint the boot, in the bollocks please.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.