“Bug reports from the early builds were spotted in November and as early as December Mac OS X 10.7 signatures appeared in web logs from Apple-owned IP addresses,” Arnold Kim reports for Mac Rumors. “More spottings have been since reported, and we’ve found Mac OS X 10.7 signatures in our own web logs.”
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_7; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.7.1 (KHTM
L, like Gecko) Version/4.1 Safari/532.7.3
Kim reports, “John Gruber had said he had heard that Mac OS X 10.7 would be ready for developer release by WWDC this June.”
Full article here.
MacDailyNews Note: Beginning with 3 visits on October 29, 2009, through today we have had several hundred visits from an OS identifying as Mac OS X 10.7.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Lynn W.” for the heads up.]
I just upgraded Tiger to SL, now what?
Clouded Leopard right? Cool
I’m guessing it wll have dual interfaces… one for ‘docked’ os x, and one for ‘slate’ os x
Again, we’ll have to wait and see.
What ever it is, I’ll have to support it!
If it’s only $29, we should have a new major release every year.
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” /> Sooner rather than later would make sense for the next release, since Snow Leopard was marketed as an optimization of Leopard. Not that there’s anything wrong with Snow Leopard; I think its great, and I’d probably be happy using it for the next five years.
Even if it’s not imminent… I’m sure it will be snappier…
If Snow Leopard is considered an extension of Leopard, then I’d say June is likely for .7. Otherwise, I think it’s a bit of stretch to consider another OS X version only a year after Snow Leopard was released.
Now can we have 10.6.3, already.
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />
The next version of OS X will be known as “House Cat.”
“Gary
The next version of OS X will be known as “House Cat.”
Better known as “Kitten.”
Already!!?
Apple ough to donate part of the profit to saving these species
“…..the early builds were spotted….”
So, it’s another leopard then.
“If Snow Leopard is considered an extension of Leopard, then I’d say June is likely for .7. Otherwise, I think it’s a bit of stretch to consider another OS X version only a year after Snow Leopard was released.”
————————————–
The article is saying a DEVELOPER release may be ready by June, not a commercial release..
A commercial release would likely be 8-12 months after a developer release, so we are easily looking at mid 2011.
Ice cougar
Get ready because 10.8 will be called OctoPussy
@ Micro Me – LOL!!
Oh, paleeez, Mary! In Safari, if you have the Developer menu activated, you can create your own user agent. I just made mine…
“Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_0); en-us) AppleWebKit/626.09.0 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.8 Safari/605.00.07”
Why’s everyone so gullible?
It will be called Garfield.
Should be called Sylvester the Cat
Of course Apple has started development of 10.7. They always start it by the time the current OS is released. The build # will be something like 11A001 where 11 is the eleventh version of OSX (including the early betas and dev previews), A is the first major dev branch and 001 etc are the sequential builds. SL is currently at 10C540.
Whether we will see a dev preview in June is questionable. The time between OS releases are increasing as the platform has matured. The transition to Intel is complete and any major enhancements can be handled in the short term with new updates to SL.
Lion is an obvious name for OSX but Apple will probably keep that when Windows has finally fallen to pieces. There’s still Cougar, Ocelot, Lynx among others.
I tawt I taw a puddy tat
They can’t call it Cougar until it’s at least 40 years old…
@ken1w
It will not be $29.00 dollars. Of this, I can assure you. Snow Leopard was a maintenance release, per say. It really did not provide new features as so much as under the hood enhancements. 10.7 will be a full blown feature rich Windows 7 obliterating release.
@ninetimesoutoften
Cougar has been already used. I think it was 10.1
Will be called pussy…lol
I have run into countless PC > Mac switchers lately. This is going to be a huge year for the Mac, and everything Apple.
Why else would an unannounced OS be used to browse Apple rumor sites?
Controlled leaks. They’re pretty good with this stuff.
Getting closer and closer to OS XI.
MeTooSoft will soon be coming out with their next OS – Pussy.
Where you guys been?
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_1; en-us) AppleWebKit/631.21.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Safari/651.24.10
@Mac-nugget
If 10.7 adds lots of new functionality, then you may be right about expectations of higher pricing. Apple tagged SL with a cut-rate price because they wanted to get as many users as possible to upgrade, thus speeding the transition to 64-bitness and away from PPC at the same time. A rapid adoption also put more pressure on vendors to update drivers and such. Apple reduced expectations for SL and reduced the price commensurately.
It is also possible, however, that Apple has implemented a new strategy for differentiating itself from Microsoft and the rest of the Wintel crowd. Apple can afford to cut prices on the Mac OS X because it is subsidized by hardware sales (Macs, iPhones and iPod touches). If, by trimming the price of Mac OS X, Apple can increase Mac hardware sales and upgrades as well as revenues through other Apple products (e.g., iTunes, App Store, etc.), then it makes sense to do so. Low cost releases of Mac OS X updates keep people excited about Apple products, and make Windows look outdated in comparison. If new releases of Mac OS X facilitate the roll-out of new products/technologies (e.g., rumored iSlate, rumored cloud services), then it makes even more sense to use Mac OS X as a loss leader to boost user adoption and sales in other areas.
Mac OS X is the engine that drives the Apple product line. Rapid adoption of new versions of Mac OS X is the key to pushing innovation and feeding the bottom line.
Microsoft has less OS pricing flexibility than Apple because it primarily lives on the revenue from three sources – Windows, Office, and licensing/servicing of enterprise products. Its hardware products do not appear to be profitable, and Windows is not leveraged nearly as effectively as the Mac OS in the mobile arena.
It will come out just in time for the Democrats to lose their ass in elections. Pelosi, you are going to be history, known as the absolute worst House Speaker ever.
how cool would it be if obama mentioned apple in his state of the union? it would be a great (probably the best) example of a successful, innovative, american company. since he already pushed up his speech for the Lost premier the least he can do is mention apple.
@ Mac-nugget,
Nope, no Cougar. Version 10.1 was Puma.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X
Redmond we have a problem……..
@ KingMel
They’ll call it “Hello Kitty”, it’ll go big in Japan 😀
@ KingMel
Even at $129 OSX is way cheaper than Winblows so that differentiating factor was already there. Obviously $29 has even more impact.
One thing to consider is that Apple’s customer base is getting quite large. Assuming that ~30% of new mac sales in the last 5 years are to those new to the Mac Apple could easily have a user base of 50-100MM. Even if only 20% bought the new OS at an ASP of ~$100, they could realize revenue of $2BB. That’s not insignificant and could encourage Apple to keep price of the new OS high.
Here kitty kitty kat, here kitty kitty
First time poster, long time reader.
Dear “x”.
Keep your opinions to yourself.
People like you are what’s wrong with this country.
MDN, in spite of great comments by Ampar, TT, Chrissy, etc. you have lost another reader due to your anti-American view point.
Websites like yours is what’s wrong with this country.
Dear Sick of X,
You can’t tell someone to keep opinions to themselves and spout out an opinion at the same time. In addition, how is mdn ruining the country? I cannot stand people who make accusations without backing them up.
10.7? I’m still amazed at what my i7 iMac can do with 10.6!
_______
I think you could ask most American service veterans, and you would find that one of the reasons for their sacrifices, and those of their fallen brothers was to protect every American’s right to free speech.
However, I have to question if this is the proper forum for this “trolling” type stuff.
“Clouded Leopard right? Cool” And apt, I’m guessing.
. . . And well put, AppleJack.
Since it will be ‘the cat in the clouds’,
and launch the tablet (r)evolution,
I am still going with-
Mac OS X 10.7 “Kitty Hawk”
@Jack
You are 100%, absolutely right.
I apologize.
To you and to x.
But not MDN.
This place used to be fun.
It isn’t any more.
“Mac OS X 10.7 ‘Kitty Hawk'”
Flighty, but nice sentiment on the level. Wright?
Apple won’t wing it this time. Too much flap.
To Sick of x:
Your opinion is shared by many.
Yes, Amp, the tablet will propel Apple and its OS to soaring heights while MS has their head in the sand that they have pounded as the waves crash over the remnants of dissected Windows.
Sea?
It’s plane to me. Cirrus-ly.
: D
And I’ve just asked Chrissy to fly in.
She knows birds, maybe.
I thought OS X was all about the pussy?
Albatross?
Why isn’t ‘Lion’ ever considered?
Oh crap…I didn’t mean to bring in politics again…..sorry everyone
“To Sick of x: Your opinion is shared by many.”
Indeed it is.
Political crap on a Mac forum is the same as someone playing a boombox during a movie.
They must like your writing … or they are perfecting an Ad blocking system LOL (: