Piper Jaffray: Apple’s 2009 earnings up nearly 44% with new accounting rules change

Philip Elmer-DeWitt reports for Fortune, “In a note to clients issued early Thursday, Piper Jaffray’s Gene Munster offered his estimated earnings per share under the new and old rules for fiscal years 2009 (which ends in two days) and 2010.”

• 2009 EPS: $8.21, up from $5.71 — a 43.8% increase
• 2010 EPS: $8.90, up from $6.00 — a 48% increase

“Apple wouldn’t be required to switch to the new accounting method until Dec. 2010, but Munster expects the company will start as soon as possible, probably with the new fiscal year that begins next week,” Elmer-DeWitt reports. “‘While this has been expected for the last month, we believe this will be a positive for shares of AAPL,’ he wrote, before raising his price target to $235 from $186.”

Much more in the full article here.

8 Comments

  1. Munster put out a research note just 10 days ago on the 14th, where he reiterated his $186 price target, so now, just 10 days later he ups his target to $235. That’s almost as lame as Katie Huberty who once downgraded Apple twice in a week, based upon a Changewave survey that turned out to be wrong.

  2. This is NOT a one-time gain, but an ongoing increase.

    I wrote a long Opinion piece after the last conference call, spelling out all the non-GAAP and GAAP figures, and sent it to MDN, but they never published it.

    You don’t have to take Munster’s estimates to figure out what is going on, you only need to read Apple’s last four earnings press releases and do a little math. This is what they said:

    GAAP Net Income
    2008Q4 = $1.26
    2009Q1 = $1.78
    2009Q2 = $1.33
    2009Q3 = $1.35
    Last 4 quarters GAAP Net Income was $5.69.

    Non-GAAP Net Income
    2008Q4 = $2.69
    2009Q1 = $2.56
    2009Q2 = $1.84
    2009Q3 = $2.14
    Last 4 quarters Non-GAAP Net Income was $9.18.

    Lo and behold, not far different that Munster’s estimates of this Fiscal Year’s results. I mean the only quarter missing is the current one. We have all the results from the other three quarters because Apple told us already what the non-GAAP numbers are.

    And, as far as I can tell, the Non-GAAP result is about 61% higher than the GAAP one. I don’t expect that to change too much with one new quarter to add.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.