Ownership of Apple iPhone on verge of crossing line into AIG-like excess and arrogance?

Tom Kaneshige reports for InfoWorld, “The iPhone, the tech symbol of the ‘in’ crowd, is on the verge of crossing the line into AIG-like excess and arrogance. ‘I’m not sure, under the current economic conditions, that it’s a great statement to make,’ says Rob Enderle, principal analyst of the Enderle Group. ‘You may not want to flash it.'”

MacDailyNews Take: The real question is where do you hide the BMW amidst the myriad soup lines of “The Great Depression II?”

“Yet the iPhone’s cultural impact is much more than just another wedge separating the haves and have-nots; the iPhone changes how people interact with each other and their surroundings. Traditional cell phones and iPods already audibly isolated people in their own little worlds, and iPhone’s visual carnival pushes that isolation further,” Kaneshige reports.

Kaneshige reports, “The visual nature of the iPhone can be a big distraction. Will consumers, walking around with their heads down as they play a game or look at a map on the iPhone’s mini-screen, collide with each other like pinballs?”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “scopie” for the heads up.]

Kaneshige’s deadline must have caught him by surprise.

56 Comments

  1. Good grief, Charlie Brown. This nitwit is equating a $200 phone to those AIG execs who went on the $400,000 spa retreat after the government bailout? Oh, but Rob Enderle agrees, so it must be right. Rob doesn’t have any ulterior motive for bashing Apple, now does he? ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

    P.S. GO PHILLIES!

  2. $200 minimum for an iPhone vs $200,000 minimum salary – yeah I can see the parallels in excess… not.

    You don’t need to ‘flash’ the iPhone, you just use it and the reaction is in the others around you: a good reaction, not a “what a w@^ker” reaction.

  3. Once again, if you can’t beat an Apple product by actually making a better product, the paid-off surrogates for iPhone’s competition will come up with some ridiculous stuff.

    Remember when it was obvious that Mac OS X had much better security than Windows XP, it was “Mac OS X is not secure because Apple has not hired a ‘security czar’ to promote security.” Or Mac OS X will have just as many viruses as Windows (or at least one), if its market share number rise above 2 or 3 percent.

    Or when the iTunes Store “locked you in” while most people who buy and use iPods play music ripped from their CDs or obtained “elsewhere.”

    When the competition has to resort to such measure (that have nothing to do with the products themselves), you know they are really desperate.

  4. Well, I guess diamond wedding rings are going to take a real hit now that this article has hit the street. LOL ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grin” style=”border:0;” />

    Just a thought.
    en

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.