Enderle: Options backdating imbroglio ‘doesn’t look good for Jobs, evidence looks pretty damning’

Apple Store“As a celebrity CEO, Apple’s Steve Jobs is about as iconic as the iPods and iMacs that have become part of the global lexicon. However, for the last year, he’s been under a spotlight that’s been casting some dark shadows,” Darrell Smith reports for The Sacramento Bee.

Smith reports, “[Last] week, he got a bit of a reprieve when the SEC closed its civil investigation into the company’s stock options backdating troubles, filing lawsuits against two Apple officials, but not Jobs himself. The Securities and Exchange Commission even praised the Cupertino-based tech giant, calling Apple’s cooperation with the investigation ‘swift, extensive and extraordinary.'”

“However, the cloud over Jobs, who 30 years ago cofounded the company that gave the world Macintosh, iMac and the iPod, hasn’t lifted entirely,” Smith reports.

Smith reports, “There’s still a federal investigation and shareholder lawsuits against the company that could lead to Jobs’ stepping down or even his ouster.

“‘It doesn’t look good for Steve, no matter how you look at it. There’s a reasonable chance that he will get charged. The evidence looks pretty damning,’ said Rob Enderle, founder and principal analyst at San Jose-based Enderle Group, which analyzes the tech industry,” Smith reports.

“Not everyone feels so strongly that Jobs’ future is in doubt. “The case is either weak or the stakes are too low. It seems like there is a strong indication that not much is going to come of (the investigations),” said Christopher Null, a San Francisco-based analyst at Yahoo Tech,” Smith reports.

Smith asks, “However, if the Apple cart were upset, could the company survive without the jeans-wearing Jobs, the company’s public face and spiritual leader?”

Full article here.
When will reporters figure out that calling quote whore Rob Enderle for their articles makes them look as idiotic as Enderle himself? The good news is that if Enderle thinks Jobs is in trouble, then Jobs is almost certainly in the clear.

49 Comments

  1. Shareholders forcing out Jobs? I don’t see this happening.

    I give him 100% credit for moving Apple’s stock from around $3.00/share when they purchased NeXT to whatever it is today (I think around $100.00/share and this is after it split 2 or 3 times).

    Go ahead, force him out. Then watch your stock stagnate or drop.

  2. (Isn’t this where…)

    In other news, Ballmer thinks the iPhone will not be a huge hit.

    Why is it news that Apple is always given no credit. Sure it’s great to iCal these things and go back and laugh, but why so much mind-space for this drivel? If you want to make us out to be zealots, you’re doing a good job.

    (Am I a zealot by posting this? Hmmmm…)

    (…we cam in?)

  3. Uhm, what “evidence” is Enderle talking about? If he read the SEC complaint against Heinen and Anderson, I didn’t see any documentable “evidence” against Steve, otherwise, he would have been charged along with those two.

  4. This was a reply from a reporter named Jessica Guynn, a so-called reporter for the SF Chronicle when I asked her why they quoted a bozo like Enderle. “He’s a longtime analyst who is enough of a generalist that he can speak to a number of companies in different areas. Reporters often turn to him when they cannot find an analyst covering a particular company or trend. Hope that helps!”
    He is enough of a generalist to be generally wrong!

  5. What “evidence” has Enderle been given access? Who else has access to this “evidence”? How much of the evidence of Apple’s blundering is confidential and privileged, and how much is publicly available? How many of these pseudo-techno-wizards like Enderle have any substantial understanding of SEC rules and regulations?

  6. “‘It doesn’t look good for Steve, no matter how you look at it.

    Well we all know how he ‘looks’ at it. Clearly Enderle needs an oculorectomy….where they cut the nerve connecting his eyeball to his asshole. It will improve his shitty outlook on life.

    MW..analysis….I’m not kidding

  7. As an Apple shareholder, I have a message for Mr. Jobs:

    Nice work, Steve!

    Seriously, this is just hooey, and it should go to show that Steve is *completely* safe and probably didn’t do anything wrong at all. Enderle’s Seal Of Approval is enough for me. ;P

  8. Is there some event that will occur in the (hopefully) near future that will once and for all absolve SJ of any guilt in this? I thought that pretty much happened last week, but I guess not?

  9. Leave it to the nation’s other boy wonder to try to breath life into a otherwise dead and aging story line…

    And yes the other boy wonder is of course none other than G. W. Bush – who gets the credit for the nation’s ongoing nightmare!

  10. “Look Mommie, the monkey is talking again. What’s it saying?”
    “It says that Steve Jobs is in trouble because of the options issue.”
    “Oh Mommie, that’s not good. I’m scared for Steve Jobs.”
    “Don’t worry honey. The talking monkey has NEVER been right before. It’s not about to start.”

  11. Enderle, why are you such a fscking moron? Why don’t you just crawl under the rock you came from and shit yourself? You are an irresponsible nitwit of a journalist that does not have his hands on the pulse of the tech industry – not even close. If Apple’s former CFO got off the way he did why would they go after Jobs? In fact, the SEC already stated how impressed they were with Apple’s cooperation.

    Enderle, go fsck yourself into oblivion.

  12. In the Larry Niven/Jerry Pournelle book Inferno — basically a sci-fi rewrite of Dante Alighieri’s Inferno and a very good read — one of the “bolgias” of the 8th Circle of Hell is described as a trench where people trudge endlessly behind each other. Any time one of them opens their mouth to speak, sh*t comes out.

    The 8th Circle of Hell is the place for the Fraudulent and the Malicious, and this particular bolgia is where seducers and panderers are punished. Basically, this is the place for people who sold out their integrity in real life — people who would say anything, represent anything, regardless of whether it was true or whether they believed it, for a paycheck.

    The first bolgia was inhabited by smooth operators such as advertising execs and paid “celebrity spokespersons,” who persuade others into doing their bidding, usually against those others’ best interests.

    It is my fervent hope that Rob Enderle, our favorite scruple-less industry analyst for hire, will find himself in this bolgia, eternally spouting shi*t from his oral orifice every time he opens it, just as he did during his time here on earth.

  13. MacPinache:
    “It is my fervent hope that Rob Enderle, our favorite scruple-less industry analyst for hire, will find himself in this bolgia, eternally spouting shi*t from his oral orifice every time he opens it, just as he did during his time here on earth.”

    How is that different from now, exactly?

  14. They have already cleared Steve Jobs, so I don’t know what Enderle is talking about. And the board of Directors said Jobs was safe in there minds too. OLD NEWS Enderle!!

    Go play with your useless VISTA which is selling poorly.

  15. macPinche,

    I am still laughing my ass off about Enderle in the shit-spewing bolgia. I hope and pray he sees that. It’s so descriptive of his haphazard approach to tech journalism that it’s scary. “Any time one of them opens their mouth to speak, sh*t comes out.” Didn’t I see Dvorak down there as well?

  16. You know, Enderle is truly a tool. I have all the same negative opinions about him that the rest have shared above. But one the thing that is surprising and has been long forgotten is that he is the only one who consistently reported that Apple was going to move the Mac platform to Intel chips. Everybody total scoffed at him for this but he claimed he had inside knowledge that this was happening, and he regularly claimed it way in advance of the announcement. He hasn’t gotten a single thing right since then but, hey, he an MS shill.

  17. Thomas, the problem with giving him credit for the Intel chip move is about timing. When he said it, it didn’t make sense yet.

    Apple was at a point when they finally did switch where continuing to go with IBM didn’t make sense, and enough applications had moved away from Classic into OS X that they could realistically make the switch.

    Apple could not make the switch close to when they released OS X because they needed the Classic crutch to help older programs limp along until they were ready for OS X. Also Intel’s chips before Apple finally did make the switch were not very compelling.

    MDN ‘often’ as in Enderle is so often wrong that one correct prediction is like throwing darts at a board, eventually one will hit the bullseye. But if more than half of the darts miss the board all together, you still suck.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.