Okay, who wants a 60-inch Apple iMac?

“The obvious bets [for Apple’s “It’s Showtime” special media event this Tuesday] have been an iPod-enabled cell phone, and what I suspect is a gimmie: the already well discussed larger screened iPod combo with iTunes Movie Store download,” The Big Picture writes.

“Let’s fantasize a bit about what might be more intriguing options: Looking at their iMac line up, the 24 inch model with Front Row software got me thinking: Sure, that’s fine for a dorm room, but what about the rest of the TV consuming country? They want bigger and bigger screens,” The Big Picture writes.

“Here’s what I want: make me a 40″ version of an iMac. Bring this in so it only costs marginally more than other flat screens — figure $3500. (Eventually, roll out a 50 or even a 60-inch version for $4500 – $6000 clams),” The Big Picture writes. “Build in all of the Front Row software controls into a full function remote control — TV, DVD, music, etc. Then (just for laughs), build in a DVR or TiVo for that matter.”

The Big Picture writes, “Apple would have a break out hit, and take total control of the digital living room like no one else has been able to.”

Full article here.

Related MacDailyNews articles:
Crave at CNET: Apple’s gorgeous 24-inch iMac should tempt you to switch – September 07, 2006
Mossberg: Apple makes ‘best desktop computer on the market’ iMac even more attractive – September 07, 2006
Apple iMac line gets 64-bit Intel Core 2 Duo processors; pricing starts at $999; new 24-inch model – September 06, 2006
Digital Trends Review: Apple iMac 17-inch Core Duo ‘silent, beautiful, very fast and reliable’ – July 12, 2006
Seattle Times: Apple iMac is ‘so beautiful with its simple, yet elegant design’ – July 08, 2006
Wired names best media center: Apple 20-inch iMac with Front Row – June 08, 2006
Review: Apple’s new iMac Core Duo ‘an outstanding feat of engineering, a high-precision instrument’ – February 16, 2006
Apple iMac the finest, most reliable, stable, elegant and intuitive personal computer available – February 14, 2006
Review: Apple 20-inch iMac Core Duo 2.0GHz – February 06, 2006
BusinessWeek: Apple’s new iMac Core Duo is an iMac on Steroids – February 02, 2006
Thurrott: ‘I highly recommend Apple’s new Intel-based iMac’ – January 31, 2006
Thurrott: ‘Nothing on Windows approaches the quality of Apple’s iLife ’06’ – January 31, 2006
Computerworld: Apple’s MacBook Pro ‘fast, really fast – looks like a real winner’ – January 28, 2006
InfoWorld: Apple perfects the desktop personal computer with new iMac Core Duo – January 25, 2006
PC Magazine review gives Apple iMac Intel Core Duo 4.5 out of 5 stars – January 20, 2006
Mossberg: New Intel-based iMac the best consumer desktop with the best OS and best software bundle – January 18, 2006

59 Comments

  1. 60″ Screen? No way, still far too expensive. Dentists
    only at the mo.

    The runaway hit would be the multifunction device aka iPhone. Every trendy in the world is gunna want one of those. It’ll be the phone to be seen with at every bus stop in London and even elsewhere.

    New iPods and nanos.

    Film downloads.

    Apple is about lifestyle products for the masses…

  2. The 30″ Cinema Display is overwhelming for the first 30 minutes you actually use one…then it’s indispensable.

    Combine with resolution independence in Mac OS X Leopard and, well…it’s gonna happen.

    Although I think the 30″ and larger iCinema Displays w/ Macs built in will be the aluminum enclosure. No reason for the Leon chin at that size, plus, I bet the plastics they use for iMacs just won’t scale that big.

    MDN MW: “future”

  3. I’d love a 37″ iMac, and they might sell. But a bigger market would be to allow a retrofit to the huge numbers of people that already have a plasma or LCD, and that brings us back to the Mini. If Apple made an add on unit with larger hard drive and tuner with analog inputs or a stand alone with similiar specs, then yes they could easily set the standard.

  4. I’ve been saying this for about 3 years now. Apple isn’t going to take control of the living room until they have a real display solution, which means 42 inches or more. If Apple really wanted to knock the movie store out of the park, this needs to happen on Tuesday. It would require 3 things: 1) Available movies – a no brainer; 2) A wall mountable display for the living room; and 3) a universal converter of some sort that allows television signals to play on the display. My gut tells me this is exactly what’s happening. What would make a whole lot of sense is for the display to also have an iSight camera built into it so a user (or the whole family) could video conference with other users/families right from their living room (just like Back to the Future II). All of this is easily within Apple’s reach. Of course there will be an updated iPod, too, but this pales in comparison.

    Waiting with fingers crossed.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.