“We arrived at around 8.15am to be greeted by a very small turn out, we placed ourselves in the queue at around the 30 position and began snapping away! At round twenty to nine things started happening, beats started pumping from the store and staff led out through the doors handing out Grand Opening Visitors Guides,” World of Apple writes. They attended the Grand Opening of the Brent Cross Apple Store.
World of Apple reports, “The queue must have grown to around 70 people at this point as the staff looped the queue again cheering and giving high fives. 9am came and we promptly led into the Store, we were given t-shirts and more Visitors Guides, the store is long and thin but they’ve managed to cram a lot in. As you enter the store you have Intel iMacs to your right, iPods in the middle and a mixture of computers to your left (music based). As you move forward into the iLife section you have mini’s the right, iBooks in the middle and PowerBooks to the left.”
Full article with photos here.
World of Apple also has a more extensive photo gallery here.
Advertisements:
• MacBook Pro. The first Mac notebook built upon Intel Core Duo with iLife ’06, Front Row and built-in iSight. Starting at $1999. Free shipping.
• iMac. Twice as amazing — Intel Core Duo, iLife ’06, Front Row media experience, Apple Remote, built-in iSight. Starting at $1299. Free shipping.
• iMac and MacBook Pro owners: Apple USB Modem. Easily connect to the Internet using dial-up service. $49.00.
• iPod Radio Remote. Listen to FM radio on your iPod and control everything with a convenient wired remote. Just $49.
• iPod. 15,000 songs. 25,000 photos. 150 hours of video. The new iPod. 30GB and 60GB models start at just $299. Free shipping.
• Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.
Still amazing after 4.5 years that they get 70 people in a line for an opening.
Find me another retail operation that gets that.
Went to the new store today.
Could hardly move in there it was crammed.
Decided im gonna buy one of the new 20in iMacs!
Why Brent Cross ?
Yet another wierd choice from Apple Europe. If you are that close to the city – take the tube to Regent street.
Bristol / Bath – there a loads of more suitable choices for an Apple Store before a second in London.
Ho hum, another day in the Cult of Mac.
Apple better start thinking about a different marketing strategy now that they got the abundance of Intel processors.
This religion thing and Apple Stores looking like churches has got to go.
If Vista is secure, I’m switching to a PC
Screw this cult. It’s making me sick.
Thanks max, I was about to make an ignorant fool of myself and ask what state Brent Cross is in. Looking at the pictures, I was like, hmmmm…this has got to be somewhere that has a lot of very cold white people.
>>If Vista is secure, I’m switching to a PC
You ain’t goin nowhere then, buddy.
You think it’s hard to get out of Scientology? Wait till you try to leave the Mac.
A second store in London is a great idea!!
All the times i’ve been in the Regent Street store i’ve had to wonder around it for about 20 minutes before i could get on anything, a couple of times i’ve just given up.
I agree that they should build more stores away from London but customer satisfaction levels would start to drop without a backup to their prime UK location.
The Brent Cross addition, along with the coming (if not already here, i cant remember) store at Bluewater makes for some great store placement in and around the capital.
Magic word: money, as in, for the love of god spend some proper money on advertising OS X!!!!
Dear MacGrumpy:
Even if the commercial version Vista released in 2006 or 2007 is secure on Day 1, how long do you think it will be before it is observed that malware is circulating the globe?
Recall earlier reports and articles regarding current malware capable of infecting existing beta-versions of Vista. Based on recorded history, the security of Microsoft OS’s can be measure in hours, not years.
PC’s with Windows make great 35-pound paperweights if you want to spend the cash for one. There are other alternatives, however, for personal computers and desktop accessories.
In keeping with your religious theme, leave the congregatation for the temptations of Microsoft and be damned to PC hell.
Jehozaphat:
LOL
isn’t that the truth
“If Vista is secure, I’m switching to a PC”
wake up..more secure, Those lines of Spaghetti code ain’t goin nowhere
Oh and thank you Mr. Jobs for Atantic City store.
Dear MacGrumpy
Bye, bye sweetie, don’t let the door hit your idiot arse on your way out to Losertown.
I’m dead serious guys, I hear Vista is getting another revamp to look even better, it should be secure because they are copying Mac OS X security features.
I’m tired of Apple and this cult of Jobs, it’s cost me a fortune and I really have nothing to show for it but debt.
Windows Vista will have all the software and it will be running on the same Core Dual chips we use.
So what’s a interface anyway? It’s nothing if Vista looks just as good.
What’s hardware? Mac’s use the same hardware as PC’s now. Buy it ugly and cheap or buy it fancy and expensive, my choice. Not at Apple.
Microsoft is gearing up to release a Vista version for Mac’s, hundreds of hackers are trying to get XP to run on Mac’s now as it is.
Where’s Firewire 800 on the new Mac Book Pros?
Where’s the option for Firewire on iPods for Mac users?
Guys, I think it’s time to face the truth, Apple is getting out of the computer hardware buisness. They are switching to nitch devices like iPods and software.
Apple lost the desktop and hardware war.
I’m tired of being called a fag because my computer looks so much better.
I’m tired of being accused of platform supremecy because I never got a virus.
I’m tired of having little software and little hardware choice.
I’m tired of hussling for Apple and then my friends buy one and now they regret it.
I’m going to Vista if it’s good enough and secure
I need a change, I’ve worshiped Apple because their stuff “Just worked” and if Vista does the same then there is no need to remain loyal to the cult anymore.
Nobody wants to hire a Machead in the IT world.
I can’t make any money fixing Mac’s either.
There was nothing motivating Microsoft to fix anything, but Steve Jobs returned and that forced the issue.
IBM, “big blue” with more money than Intel and a heck of a lot more technology smarts than Microsoft has exited the PC market almost completly.
There’s no room anymore for Apple, the damage is already done. The big fish eat up all the little fish.
Steve Jobs is looking to sell Apple like he did Pixar, he’s getting old and will be retiring soon.
But first he will transition us to Vista, as proof Vista will use the same EFI as Mac’s.
So eventually we will just switch our OS and be done with it.
Phil said Apple will not prevent anyone from running Windows on a Mac.
That’s the message nobody wants to hear.
We all have our reasons.
If possible, would you run Windows on your Intel Macintosh?
Yes 48.3%
No 31.0%
Maybe 20.7%
http://www.looprumors.com/loopPolls.php
Proof right there, if Apple allows Mac users to install Windows they will lose about 1/2 of their OS market share almost instantly.
After Jobs’ presentation, Apple Senior Vice President Phil Schiller addressed the issue of running Windows on Macs, saying there are no plans to sell or support Windows on an Intel-based Mac. “That doesn’t preclude someone from running it on a Mac. They probably will,” he said. “We won’t do anything to preclude that.” – 06/06/2005 [10.3]
Phil Schiller, Apple’s senior vice president of worldwide product marketing, said in an interview Tuesday that the company won’t sell or support Windows itself, but also hasn’t done anything to preclude people from loading Windows onto the machines themselves. “That’s fine with us. We don’t mind,” Schiller said. “If there are people who love our hardware but are forced to put up with a Windows world, then that’s OK.” Schiller made the comments at Tuesday’s Macworld Expo, where Microsoft also said it had signed a five-year pact with Apple to develop versions of Office for Macs and announced plans to release a version of Office that will be compatible with Apple’s new Intel-based computers. – 01/10/2006
http://appleintelfaq.com/#10
Sure seems Apple is convinced Mac OS X will always be preferred OS than Windows that they are willing to gamble on it.
All that M$ has to do is fix Windows and make it good looking and there really isn’t a need to stick to a Mac anymore.
IMMO dasboard widgets were a desperate ploy at a OS upgrade, not many people really need them.
There really isn’t much room to grow or new ground to conquor in the desktop OS, M$ will beat Apple on a price war. Improvements can only go so far.
I’m dead serious guys, I hear Vista is getting another revamp to look even better, it should be secure because they are copying Mac OS X security features.
Seems like you do not understand even your own words. Vista cannot copy Mac OS X security features in that they are essentially Unix security features.
Vista ain’t Unix. Vista is going to be as secure as was XP when it was released “The reference in Windows security”. BTW, there are already viruses that affect developers beta version of Vista.
Hackers might try to get XP on Intel Macs but there is a problem: no BIOS available. Real hackers are not even trying: waste of time.
Vista will not use same EFI, but an EFI with a backward compatibility layer in order to run on existing PC hardware. Vista will use and need the layer and not available on the EFI used on Intel Mac. You will not be able to install Vista on Apple hardware.
Schiller statement “We don’t mind” is actually “We do not even NEED to mind”.
As a matter of fact, what hackers are actually trying to do is installing OS X on PC, not Windows on Macs. Get real.
Seems like you do not understand even your own words. Vista cannot copy Mac OS X security features in that they are essentially Unix security features.
And Windows doesn’t look like the Macintosh GUI right?
Protected memory, file permissions arre rather easy to copy.
Vista ain’t Unix. Vista is going to be as secure as was XP when it was released “The reference in Windows security”. BTW, there are already viruses that affect developers beta version of Vista.
For your info the “proof of concept” viruses only attacked a developer version that had extras not going to be seen in the actual release of Vista. Also there is plenty of time to fix things before release.
Hackers might try to get XP on Intel Macs but there is a problem: no BIOS available. Real hackers are not even trying: waste of time.
I’m not talking about XP, I’m talking about the future and that is Vista and onward.
Vista will not use same EFI, but an EFI with a backward compatibility layer in order to run on existing PC hardware. Vista will use and need the layer and not available on the EFI used on Intel Mac. You will not be able to install Vista on Apple hardware.
And you really trust M$ to not allow Windows Vista on a Mactel?
What are you STUPID?
Schiller statement “We don’t mind” is actually “We do not even NEED to mind”.
I would think he would mind very much that Microsoft will take what little market share Apple has left, but he’s not.
Either he’s delerious, or they intend to switch us over to Vista.
I refer you to the poll above where almost half of Mac users will install Windows on their hardware if given a chance.
As a matter of fact, what hackers are actually trying to do is installing OS X on PC, not Windows on Macs.
I am real, OS X has already been installed on generic PC’s.
Apple won’t release a OS X for generic PC’s. We know that.
But that doesn’t preclude Microsoft from releasing Vista version for Mac’s
Since Apple is doing nothing to stop it basically means they are resigned to the fact that they need to move their user base over to Windows.
Apple has to stop the apx. 50% of Mac users willing to install Vista on their Mac hardware, but they are not, they do not mind.
An the reason they don’t mind is they are switching us to Vista
Much like they switched to Intel chips.
It’s game over.
Ok, I was just playing devils advocate
Apparantly Phil must have come to his senses by now and realized what his statement means.
Maybe he didn’t want to give the impression of being vunerible and that they had to protect Mac OS X from Windows domminance.
But they will have to take steps to protect the OS user base or developers won’t code for it.
OSX users who will want to install Vista (or XP) on their Mac will do so if given the chance, mainly because they have applications that are not available for Macs. This doesnt mean they will stop using OSX and switch over to Vista.
If they wanted to do that they couldve done that anytime in the past.
And people who have always wanted a Mac but couldnt get one because they depend on XP for work or apps that are not on the Mac will be able to BUY a mac and run BOTH OS’s and use what they want when they want. So not only will Apple sell more hardware, they will increase there OSX users
Hey, MacGrumpy (as well as all your ghostnics in this thread): Maybe people calling you a fag has more to do with you being such a whiny, annoying drama queen than the fact that your computer never caught a virus. Just my guess.
(Hint: When you double-space between every sentence and put random sentences in bold, it’s a pretty distinctive writing style and it makes it very easy to tell that you’re conversing mostly with yourself in this thread.)
The vulnerability affecting Vista Betas is the WMF flaw; not a “proof of concept”. The Vista OS is built on Windows Server 2003, so most everything it has been vulnerable to, Vista will be as well. Microsoft is already showing off new ways that content “auto previews” in Vista without ever clicking on it. I guarantee this will be one of many attack vectors. Furthermore, the latest betas are using over 550MB of RAM just idling on an empty desktop as there are a TON of new services running in the background. It’s an absolute pig. Vista is XP with lipstick, nothing more. All the vulnerabilities & spyware will continue to plague it; the only difference being anti-spyware and anti-virus will now be built in, and Microsoft will charge you a subscription fee to keep “Windows Defender” definitions up to date. I manage 250+ MS servers for a living, and have had access to all the latest Vista and Office 12 betas. Trust me, your faith in Vista rescuing you from the Mac experience is unfounded.
Pete,….LOL
M$ is losing the OS war and…old Stevie boy is rolling out yet another major upgrade to the already VIRUS free OS before the ill fated Windoze in LATE December..lol XP is like system 7 in terms of technology.
http://xvsxp.com
will microsoft users ever learn that the Mac makes more sense??
We actually enjoy using our computers…….REALLY
MacGrumpy-you are a prick. Get lost in your virus infected windows, maggott infested world.
…This doesnt mean they will stop using OSX and switch over to Vista…
Yes they will dump Mac OS X for Vista because most developers won’t code for Mac OS X, our market share is too low for them to bother. People will want to run Halo3 for instance and the only option will be to boot Vista on their Mac’s.
It’s all downhill after that. You’ll get used to Vista, you’ll be running it more and more, and later you’ll be saying “Mac OS X is sure nice, but I got no choice”
And people who have always wanted a Mac but couldnt get one because they depend on XP for work or apps that are not on the Mac will be able to BUY a mac and run BOTH OS’s and use what they want when they want. So not only will Apple sell more hardware, they will increase there OSX users
But Vista is supposed to be pretty nice and secure, what’s the use running Mac OS X at all if all the software is written for Windows and the developers won’t code for it since all Macs will be able to boot Vista?
If I was a developer I wouldn’t spend more money to code for Mac OS X in addtion to Windows, why pay double?
“Just boot Vista” they will say.
Peopl automatically assume what they see today will always will be.
But see I have seen the early pictures of Vista (Longhorn) it was awlful, but now it’s looking good and the next update is supposed to be better.
So what happens if M$ fixes the security issues?
What advantages will Mac OS X have any longer over Windows?
All the developers will say a Mac can boot Vista so there is no need for us to code for Mac OS X.
Mac OS X users will be dual booting into Vista, getting used to it (like so many OfficeMac users do now) and they will slowly unload Mac OS X, much like most Mac users have dumped OS 9.
Apple already has taken the big step, switching to x86 processors. Dumping Firewire 800, adopting PC hardware standards.
The OS is nothing.
The only way Apple can survive is by getting all the Vista software developers to code for Mac OS X really dirt cheap.
Without those third party programs, games, etc., we are history.
MacGrumpy is right on many points (dodgy religion, expensive computers, Mac owning status frowned upon… etc. etc.)
However, the point that if Vista is secure he’s switching is a worry. Well, maybe he might, but for the wrong reasons. I couldn’t care if it was the most secure OS in the world… it’ll still be a total f*** (rhymes with duck) to use.
I thought Windows 2000 was supposed to be better than ever (compared to NT.) XP was supposed to be fan-bloody-tastic as well (compared to Win 2K). It goes on and on… it’ll never be any freaking different. In fact, I’d bet it’ll get even more difficult to use. But hey, at least it’ll look pretty. Each release is more and more like performing plastic surgery on a 95y.o…. it’ll look good on the outside (perhaps), but underneath you know it’s decrepit and falling apart.
ps Jehozaphat – very funny comments