Apple releases Security Update 2005-009 for Mac OS X

Apple today released Security Update 2005-009 via Software Update which delivers a number of security enhancements and is recommended for all Macintosh users (Mac OS X 10.4 through 10.4.3, Mac OS X 10.3.9)

This update includes the following components:
• apache_mod_ssl
• CoreFoundation
• CoreTypes
• curl
• iodbcadmin
• OpenSSL
• Safari
• sudo
• syslog

For detailed information on this Update, please visit this website: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302847

Standalone installers are available here: http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/

Advertisements: The New iMac G5 – Built-in camera and remote control. From $1299. Free shipping.
Apple USB Modem. Easily connect to the Internet using your dial-up service. $49.00.
The New iPod with Video.  The ultimate music + video experience on the go.  From $299.  Free shipping.
Connect iPod to your television set with the iPod AV Cable. Just $19.00.

19 Comments

  1. For anyone tempted to smirk and giggle and point out that Mac OS X has to “patch holes” just like Windows, it should be noted that almost all of the “vulnerabilities” found in Mac OS X involve “privilege escalation”, not remote attack. In other words, the vulnerability could allow someone who already has access to your Mac to gain root access, but it couldn’t be used to gain access in the first place.

    This is in stark contrast to Windows, where hole after hole in security has allowed attackers to ownz0r your PC from halfway around the world. There just isn’t any comparison.

  2. Mactard (singular). The only remote attack was on Apache. HARDLY an Apple product: it affects any and every system using Apache.

    The weaknesses – now removed in Safari – were of the kind that could allow malicious URL execute arbitrary code. Quite serious but not virus-welcoming security holes.

    Curl, as for Apache. Not pertaining to OS X: it affected any and every system having curl installed, and was as for Safari issue.

    Looks like you lack the correct definition of REMOTE holes. If they need user intervention, ie users visiting malicious websites, they are not REMOTE attacks as the action is initiated locally.

    Remote, Mactard, pertains to attacks that infect your computer while you are busy getting screwed by your local Microsoft representative. They do not need user intervention in order to be effective.

    Caveat: also being screwed by Microsoft is not a REMOTE hole, as it is your local hole, the weakness is in your brain, and Microsoft needs user intervention in order to screw you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.