Mafiasoft? Microsoft to roll out anti-virus subscription protection racket

“Microsoft Corp., the world’s largest software maker, unveiled on Thursday plans to launch a computer subscription service that would include anti-virus and security updates for personal computers,” Reuters reports.

“The Redmond, Washington-based software giant said it would initially distribute the service, called ‘Windows OneCare,’ among its employees this week and would offer a trial, or beta, service for PCs running Windows later this year. Users would pay a yearly subscription fee,” Reuters reports.

The Reuters report also contains this gem, “Apple Computer Ltd., which recently launched a major update to its Macintosh computer operating system, has long offered an anti-virus subscription service for its users.”

MacDailyNews Note: First of all, it’s really Apple Computer Incorporated, not Limited. Second of all, Apple used to offer their .Mac subscribers a free Anti-Virus application called Virex 7.5 from a third party, McAfee Security, much like Apple also once offered a free download of the game Marble Blast. One major difference between the two freebees was that Marble Blast actually did something, however trivial, for the user. There is no such offer for Apple current operating system, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger. So, obviously, any actual research by Reuters would have revealed that Apple Computer Inc. has never offered an anti-virus subscription service for its users. Mac OS X has never had a virus, by the way.

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: There’s a tried and true name for people that will pay Microsoft for Windows and then pay them extra for some promise of protection: “suckers.” Hate to break it to you this way, but if you’re that stupid, you deserve to use Windows, and only Windows, for the rest of your life.

“A protection racket is an extortion scheme whereby a powerful organization coerces individuals or businesses to pay ‘protection money’ which allegedly serves to purchase the powerful organization’s protection services against various external threats, whereas the actual threat comes from the powerful organization itself. Those who do not buy into the protection plan are targeted by the powerful organization and are harassed to try to force payment of the protection money.” – Wikipedia

[UPDATE: 1:21pm ET: Added “Mafiasoft” to headline. Thanks, “FromSicily.” Added “MDN Note.” Edited “Related articles” below.]

Related MacDailyNews articles:
There are no viruses for Apple’s Mac OS X – May 13, 2005
Microsoft Windows Sober.P worm shows ‘epidemic’ spread; Macintosh unaffected – May 03, 2005
Apple touts Mac OS X security advantages over Windows – April 13, 2005
New ‘highly critical’ Office flaw embarrasses Microsoft – April 13, 2005
97,467 Microsoft Windows viruses vs. zero for Apple Mac’s OS X – April 05, 2005
Symantec details flaws in its antivirus software – March 30, 2005
Motley Fool writer: ‘I’d be surprised if Symantec ever sells a single product to a Mac user again’ – March 24, 2005
Symantec cries wolf with misplaced Mac OS X ‘security’ warning – March 23, 2005
Symantec’s Mac OS X claims dismissed as nonsense, FUD – March 22, 2005
Symantec warns about Mac OS X security threat – March 21, 2005
Apple’s Mac OS X is virus-free – March 18, 2005
68,736 Microsoft Windows viruses vs. zero for Apple Mac’s OS X – March 12, 2005
Microsoft tries to turn its own security flaw into commercial gain – February 25, 2005
Cybersecurity advisor Clarke questions why anybody would buy from Microsoft – February 18, 2005
Microsoft’s Gates espouses homogenous operating system environments for better security – February 07, 2005
Windows’ mounting security problems make some consumers eager to purchase Macs – January 03, 2005
Windows Media songs and videos found to carry Windows malware payloads – December 30, 2004
Anzae/Inzae worm affects all Windows versions after 3.1; Macintosh unaffected – December 28, 2004
Unlike Windows users, Mac OS X users surf the Internet without a care in the world – December 28, 2004
Multiple unpatched Windows holes crop up; Windows systems compromised within minutes in experiment – December 24, 2004
Windows spyware mess is out of control, get a Mac and surf with impunity – December 21, 2004
New Microsoft Internet Explorer exploit spoofs Web sites on fully patched Windows XP systems – December 17, 2004
Microsoft may charge extra for Windows spyware protection software – December 16, 2004
Detroit Free Press: Windows malware problem getting worse, it’s time to get a Mac instead – December 16, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware headaches? Get a Mac and surf the Internet freely – December 13, 2004
Mossberg: Windows PCs plagued with problems, Apple’s Mac is ‘rock solid, elegant and affordable’ – December 09, 2004
Security expert: Don’t use Microsoft Windows, Office, Outlook, Internet Explorer – December 09, 2004
Security test: Windows XP system easily compromised while Apple’s Mac OS X stands safe and secure – November 30, 2004
Sick of spyware, adware infecting your PC? Don’t fret, just get a Mac – November 01, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Spyware plagues Windows users while Mac users surf Net with impunity – November 01, 2004
Ballmer blames Windows users for not upgrading systems as Microsoft’s biggest security problem – October 22, 2004
Windows users line up to pay for spyware removal; Mac users surf Web with impunity – October 18, 2004
Microsoft: The safest way to run Windows is on your Mac – October 08, 2004
Windows users’ security woes spark interest in Apple’s secure Mac OS X – October 06, 2004
Windows desktop monopoly threatened by secure, safe Apple Mac OS X – October 04, 2004
Even Bill Gates can’t avoid Windows malware; Mac users surf the Web freely – October 03, 2004
Cyber-security adviser uses Apple Macintosh to avoid Windows’ security woes – September 27, 2004
Information Security Investigator says switch from Windows to Mac OS X for security – September 24, 2004
Mossberg: Apple iMac G5 ‘powerful, affordable, virus-free with better, more modern OS than Windows XP’ – September 23, 2004
USA Today: people are switching from Windows to Mac because of security issues – September 21, 2004
Windows besieged by hackers; number of Windows viruses soars by more than 400% – September 20, 2004
USA Today columinst angry about Windows viruses, adware, spyware – September 15, 2004
University of Chicago recommends all students patch Windows at least once a day – September 14, 2004
Windows XP worm speaks to users as it deletes their files; Macintosh unaffected – September 13, 2004
Security is top priority in Apple’s Mac OS X – September 12, 2004
Millions of Windows PC’s hijacked by hackers, turned into zombies; Macintosh unaffected – September 08, 2004
Mossberg: Dump your Windows machine and get an Apple Macintosh to free yourself of spyware – August 25, 2004
Tired of patching patches to patch Windows patches? Writer suggests getting a Mac – August 03, 2004
Windows ‘Scob’ virus designed to steal financial data, passwords; Macintosh unaffected – June 26, 2004
Gartner: Worms jack up the total cost of Microsoft Windows – May 07, 2004
Spyware, adware plague Windows users online; Mac OS X users surf freely – April 19, 2004
SmartMoney: Long-suffering Windows users can only dare to dream of Mac’s ease-of-use – February 12, 2004
Mac OS X has no viruses; what’s wrong with Windows? – February 11, 2004
Gates: Windows ‘by far the most secure’ system; tries to use ‘Mac OS X secure through obscurity’ myth – January 27, 2004
Columnist tries the ‘security through obscurity’ myth to defend Windows vs. Macs on virus front – October 1, 2003
New York Times: Mac OS X ‘much more secure than Windows XP’ – September 18, 2003
Wall Street Journal’s Mossberg on making the switch from Windows to Mac – September 18, 2003
Fortune columnist: ‘get a Mac’ to thwart viruses; right answer for the wrong reasons – September 02, 2003
Shattering the Mac OS X ‘security through obscurity’ myth – August 28, 2003
Is Mac OS X really inherently more secure than Windows? – August 26, 2003
Chicago Sun-Times columnist: Windows ‘many holes in its security’ but ‘none of my Macs have ever been affected – August 26, 2003
Sick of worms and viruses? ‘Move to Mac OS X’ suggests Chicago Tribune columnist – August 25, 2003
Virus and worm problems not just due to market share; Windows inherently insecure vs. Mac OS X – August 24, 2003

56 Comments

  1. “Sure Virex isn.t NEEDED AT ALL, and .Mac offers many other features, but it still always seemed a little shady to me especially because my mom got suckered into buying it for that protection alone (windows switcher)…”

    One of the features of that virus protection is that it also finds Windows viruses and eliminates them. No big deal for the Mac user but a big deal for all the PC users that would receive a frowarded email with that virus attached.

  2. I remember when news like this would affect me, but since i work for Apple now and not Dell, replaced my Dual proc Precision workstation with badass Dual proc powermac G5….use post production software made by apple….with an awesome OS, things like this just make me laugh…..i do turn my dell on sometimes to get online just for kicks, but turn it off quickly after i get bombarded with spyware……..took me a while to let go of the pc, i defended it like a battered wife…….no longer..

  3. I remember when news like this would affect me, but since i work for Apple now and not Dell, replaced my Dual proc Precision workstation with badass Dual proc powermac G5….use post production software made by apple….with an awesome OS, things like this just make me laugh…..i do turn my dell on sometimes to get online just for kicks, but turn it off quickly after i get bombarded with spyware……..took me a while to let go of the pc, i defended it like a battered wife…….no longer..

  4. I remember when news like this would affect me, but since i work for Apple now and not Dell, replaced my Dual proc Precision workstation with badass Dual proc powermac G5….use post production software made by apple….with an awesome OS, things like this just make me laugh…..i do turn my dell on sometimes to get online just for kicks, but turn it off quickly after i get bombarded with spyware……..took me a while to let go of the pc, i defended it like a battered wife…….no longer..

  5. Everyone has a certain amount of ‘want’ in their ‘heart’. But, Microsoft’s level of greed is sad.

    When will Microsoft have enough money? It would be great to know.

    Maybe we all could have a whip-round to help ‘poor’ Bill and Ballmer out! ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”tongue wink” style=”border:0;” />

  6. > MacDailyNews Note: First of all, it’s really Apple Computer Incorporated, not Limited.

    Well, if MacDailyNews’ world view was larger than, um, the country in which you live, you would see that the Reuters article is from the UK (.uk domain and UK logo on the page), in which there are no “Inc.s” but rather “Limiteds”.

    Yes, I agree that Microsoft is doing some ridiculous things here, but your tone is so 12-year-old-ish it’s embarrassing.

  7. Like a car company not putting locks on its doors.
    Then to stop people from breaking on your car, the car company will sell add-o, after market locks (at an outrageous price,)plus theft insurance….

    ———

    Or stove maker that makes stoves that catch on fire, then goes into the fire extinguishing business…

    ———–

    Or food maker sells food that makes people sick, then starts selling medicine for those that get sick….

    ———

    Or every time you go to the doctor he injects you with a new sickness so you can come back he will fix you right up for that sickness, while giving you a new one….

    ———-
    more examples anyone…..?

  8. Here’s the thing that really pisses me off:

    In the one-on-one meetings with the Reuters article, some flunky from MS dropped in that line.

    MDN is correct that they are clueless, so clueless they would of never known to put that line in unless some shill from Microsoft fed it to them.

    I expect it from Microsoft. They are shit.

    But the media is just a bunch of stenographers.

  9. Maybe you should consider this “consider this”….

    maybe it wasn’t Apple the influenced your mother into buying .Mac for the virus protection… maybe it was her extensive and painful experience with using Windows that made her believe that all OSs were as vulnerable.

    If you slowly raise the temperature in a room, you never realize how hot it’s become until you step outside into a normal environment. I think Microsoft way have raised the temperature a little too quick on this new plan.

    I am a .Mac subscriber and never have once felt the need or the benefit from using the anti-virus software that comes with it. It’s just not necessary for me or the majority of Mac users.

    For Gackle the Great,

    very politically incorrect statement to follow:

    Or a crack whore starting to sell her Johns the cure for AIDS..

  10. so MicroSnot iis now going to sell you vaseline with sand included. What a royal scr3wing – anyone who goes for this is either a charter member of the masochist’ society or just flat out deserves what they get.

    mw – income as in- just think of the income MS is going to get from all the idiots

  11. Only Microsoft could turn a feature in Windows 95 into a series of massive vulnerabilities in Windows 98, 2000 and XP and then into a revenue stream in Windows XP and Longhorn. They will kill off all of their Anti virus rivals then let the product die like IE did.

  12. Anybody who goes for this deserves what they get!

    I deleted Virex from my Mac a long time ago. It seemed cool to get a free virus checker when I first got .mac. But then I came to my senses. Why should I tax my processor even a little to protect dimwit Windows users from themselves?

  13. I have a builtin anti-virus in Mail. It is called BOUNCE.

    “PC sucker: Hey, I sent you an email and it came back with a virus. My PC is all bonkers now”

    “Sorry sucker, I have a Mac. Dontcha know viruses bounce off Macs? You sent it, you got it back. It is all yours. Enjoy your Wintel PC.”

  14. Gackle the Great wrote:

    “Like a car company not putting locks on its doors.”

    There’s a major car company that makes vehicles with mediocre-to-putrid crash-test ratings, and offers these vehicles with a subscription-satellite service that summons help when you’ve been in a crash. Um, if the vehicles were built better I might not NEED help automatically dispatched….

    smegdude wrote:

    “do you think microsoft might start writing viruses that only affect non-subscribers?”

    They might try, but it takes years to get any code out the door so PC users have a while yet.

    The biggest danger is subscription-only licensing for future Windows versions (again, assuming any see daylight). You check in with the mother ship and pay up, or your PC quits working. Wouldn’t that be sweet….

  15. What is really sad about all this is that all the other security/anti-virus companies out ther trying to make an honest buck are now competing with Microsoft.

    The VERY bad news for all these companies (including Mcafee, Symantec, Sophos etc) is that in a couple of years time they are gonna out of business!

    This is bad for everyone – but as usual it’s Microsoft using it’s monopoly to get in a market and totally destroy it.

  16. Note to MDN,

    As a PC user who finally made the switch (converson?) to Apple this week let me offer a piece of advice:

    Don’t insult PC users (eg. by calling them suckers); all you’ll do is alienate them and make them dig their heels in even more. They are not the problem – Microsoft is.

    However, insult Microsoft all you want.

    Mac Mini rocks by the way. iPod Halo Effect? It exists all right – I’m living proof.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.