Microsoft’s Longhorn fantasy vs. Apple’s Mac OS X reality

“After months of speculation, Microsoft has released XP Service Pack 2 in order to fix problems in its operating system. Amid reports of problems and some successes, I recommend prudent users continue to wait before deploying this service pack. It has security holes and its own set of problems. Meanwhile, the company is pulling features from its next operating system, code-named Longhorn, in an effort to get it on the street by 2006,” Charlie Paschal reports for The State.

The Register has reported, “Two mainstays of Windows Longhorn will be ‘decoupled’ from the 2006 release, with Microsoft dropping the WinFS storage and query system. Originally intended to be a full-blown replacement for the NTFS file system that put a database at the heart of Windows, WinFS will now be available as an add-on no sooner than 2007 for Longhorn, XP and Windows 2003. Or to be more precise – and here is another new piece of jargon for Redmond watchers – WinFS will be released as an ‘out-of-band add-on pack.’ Got that?”

“A cut-down version of Avalon, minus the compositor and the new device driver model will be backported to Windows XP too. Microsoft had already pledged to backport the next generation of middleware APIs, code named Indigo, to XP. All of which has left developers questioning the necessity of a ‘big bang.’ ‘If WinFX (including Avalon and Indigo) are going to be available for WinXP and Win2003.


  1. again..whenever longhorn best it will be equivalent to jaguar

    except for one thing…

    when they first started talking about LH.. they were talking about building a new OS from the ground up.. not based on MS DOS or based on Win2000 or any of this stuff…

    but… now they’re talking about LH being an XP upgrade in stages…

    so they’re using XP as the base code…

    what a freakin’ waste of a good/logical idea..

  2. first po… oh, never mind

    Despite the fact that, once again, a respected publication slams M$ for tardiness, incompetence, megalomania, whatever, when the horribly inefficient product finally ships the press will go ape-shit over it, praising it to the heavens and imploring everyone to buy it.

  3. Longhorn with an intact Avalon, at best could’ve hoped to be compared to Mac OS X 10.0. Windows XP is still worse than Mac OS 9, for Steve’s sake!

    People who think Shorthorn (even in its pre-gutted vapor form) will compare to Mac OS X 10.3 ‘Panther’ give Microsoft far too much credit and have never used Mac OS X.

  4. Just think…..

    theres an off chance, that if / when this bloated cow finally DOES ship…that LongHorn MIGHT be as stable as….. say …
    Mac OS 7.6 !!…

    Hey, it COULD happen !!

    Let’s all give Billy Gates some benefit of a doubt !!

  5. “Some in the industry believe that Microsoft could learn from one of its rivals — Apple Computer Co. The Mac maker does a great job of keeping both its new hardware and software under wraps, then thrilling its fans with whizzy breakthroughs — something it did once again in late August with the unveiling of its gorgeous new iMac computer. In contrast, when Microsoft doesn’t deliver on its promises, it loses credibility with PC makers, software publishers, and customers.”

    In some ways this seems true, but I tried to find “Longhorn” at but all I could find was some hyped up press release. At Apple, I easily found Tiger by clicking on the large “Mac OS X” tab and then the very noticeable “SNEAK PREVIEW Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger” icon at the top.

    Microsoft seems to make hyped up promises then runs and hides. You have to dig and dig just to find any facts. But don’t depend on those facts because they seem to change daily, and never for the better.

    Apple promises. Apple delivers.
    The introduction of Apple’s “Spotlight” and the demise of Microsoft’s “WinFS” could not have been timed any better.

    And in terms of technology, where is Microsoft’s equivalent to this… …or this… …?

    How can any software developer create ANY software for such vaporous OS such as Longhorn? Are these developers forced to sit on their hands and wait? My advice is to develop software for the Mac platform. You will have a loyal user base and access to the latest innovations in hardware and operating systems.

    The only innovation Microsoft seems to have created is a new word, “neo-obsolescence”; becoming archaic before it is created.

  6. What is everybody talking about???

    Longhorn is comming…

    I am using an alpha of Longhorn every day on my computer.

    It is called Panther (OS X 10.3).

    ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

  7. From Thurrot’s article referenced above:
    “Microsoft works better when it tackles projects in small steps…development time and complexity is just too much to ask of customers. In the future, Microsoft will need to work off of a stable base, adding features on a yearly basis.”

    Hmmmm, I seem to remember PC people crowing about how Apple releases these “minor” (even though they are not) updates on a yearly basis that we Mac fans are crazy to continually pay for. No matter how much these analysts try to put down Apple, the more they talk about how Microsoft “should” be, the more they describe how Apple is. They just don’t seem to be smart enough to recognize it.


Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.