Don’t blame Apple: U.S. corporate tax policies drive companies overseas

“The media spotlight has recently been on Apple Inc. for shifting profits overseas to avoid U.S. taxes,” Charles Kane writes for MarketWatch. “In its international tax strategy, though, Apple is no different from other American technology companies, which (like Apple) began moving manufacturing overseas starting in the early 1980s.”

MacDailyNews Note: Apple does not “shift profits overseas.”

“Initially, U.S. technology firms that went abroad during this period were drawn by the lower labor, sourcing, and procurement costs. They also found they could eliminate exchange-rate risk by producing and selling in the same currency,” Kane writes. “But these companies soon discovered another important advantage of being global: favorable taxation.”

Kane writes, “Foreign countries, eager to become part of the high-tech boom started in the United States, began courting U.S. companies with very attractive tax deals. Ireland, for example, sent representatives from its development authority to the headquarters of high tech firms in the United States. These emissaries offered qualified corporations a 10% tax rate — less than a third of the U.S. rate. Thus was born the Celtic Tiger.”

“There is plenty of blame to go around for this unfortunate situation. Both major political parties and a series of administrations contributed to the inefficient corporate tax structure we have today,” Kane writes. “We now have the highest tax structure in the industrialized world. As a result, many American companies, particularly in the technology sector, have created tremendous earnings and cash flow by locating manufacturing and services in locations outside the U.S.”

“We have thus created jobs overseas that could otherwise have been American jobs. And then there are the lost jobs that foreign companies might have located here if our tax rates were more attractive,” Kane writes. “The solutions are obvious. Don’t tax repatriated funds so long as they are being used to create American jobs. And going forward, we need a reduced corporate tax rate.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related articles:
Ireland in letter to Senators Levin and McCain: We did not cut any special tax deals for Apple – May 31, 2013
Bloomberg News’ awful reporting on Apple’s U.S. corporate taxes – May 30, 2013
Thomas Sowell on Apple, corporate taxes, and ‘the road to serfdom’ – May 28, 2013
Former Senator Sununu: Congress wrote the tax laws, so why blame Apple for obeying them? – May 28, 2013
Taxing Apple just taxes you – May 24, 2013
Don’t tax Apple, tax its shareholders – May 24, 2013
If Apple paid more tax, we might pay less or something – May 22, 2013
Apple CEO Tim Cook pounds another nail into the Keynesian coffin – May 22, 2013
Apple CEO Cook makes no apology for company’s tax strategy – May 22, 2013
Apple CEO Tim Cook charms Capitol Hill – May 22, 2013
Rush Limbaugh: ‘High-tech lynching: Senate attempts to crucify Apple’ – May 21, 2013
Nobody on U.S. Senate committee laid a glove on Apple CEO Tim Cook – May 21, 2013
Senator Rand Paul: Senate committee ‘should apologize to Apple for bullying one of America’s greatest success stories’ (with video) – May 21, 2013
Ireland: We have no special tax rate deal with Apple – May 21, 2013
Apple prepares for Washington onslaught: CEO Tim Cook isn’t taking any chances with senators looking to grandstand – May 21, 2013
Watch Apple CEO Tim Cook’s live testimony before U.S. Senate, starting at 9:30am EDT – May 21, 2013
U.S. Senate investigation found no evidence that Apple did anything illegal in avoiding taxes – May 20, 2013

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.