McCain-Palin vs. Obama-Biden: Technology and the U.S. presidential election

The MacJury marches into dangerous territory by taking on the topic of technology and the United States Presidential election. While trying (and failing) to be objective, the panel discusses:

• The existence of a tech constituency
• The importance of tech savvy in a chief executive
• Both campaigns use of social networks

MacJury asks, “Are political campaigns held to different standards of privacy and perception than corporate marketing efforts? Are there dangers in being a vocal participant in the election debates? Why can’t you donate to either campaign with PayPay?”

All these and many more election tech topics are debated (MP3 audio, 57:33) by the panel (Joe Kissell, Tom Negrino, Dori Smith, Chuck Joiner) here.

309 Comments

  1. “”McCain totally destroyed Obama on the V.P pick.””

    If by ‘destroyed’ you mean picked a completely unqualified candidate based on her ability to pander to both women and extreme right wing fundamentalist religion voters, while putting this country’s security at stake, then yes, you would be correct.

  2. Obama? Seriously? The guy has no qualifications. He hasn’t finished a term as a senator. And he has Joe Biden, one of the Washington insiders. He’s been in the Senate since Julius Caeser…….

    Me, I’m for LESS government. I’m NOT for national health care, I’m FOR less taxes. I’m FOR securing the borders. So, I’m voting Republican.

  3. Wild-eyed Liberals.

    Keep denigrating Palin, it’s working perfectly.

    Obama’s comparing himself to Sarah Palin simply illustrates that he’s too inept to be elected.

    Obama’s claim to fame is running his campaign… into the ground!

  4. Like Lemmings to the shore, divide and conquer is the order of the day.

    Continue all this petty in-fighting while the real power sits back and laughs.

    Go back to sleep America, nothing has changed, and nothing will, as long as we are a polarized people. Remember, a house divided cannot stand.

    Now, back to our show!

  5. ” If McCain dies can you all really see Palin running the country? ” In a word, no. But that’s just fine with the neo-conservative right-wingers who run the country behind our current unqualified fake President.

  6. When did Obama compare himself to Sarah Palin?

    For the most part, he and Joe Biden have almost ignored her entirely and kept the focus on John McCain.

    Like most other GOP Operatives, you’re projecting your own hopes onto Obama. The hope that he’ll actually leave McCain alone and focus on the Palin sideshow act. Obama-Biden has kept their eye on the larger prize, however.

  7. The only focus on Palin I’ve seen is from the mainstream media and liberal blogs. Thankfully the Obama campaign is more disciplined than some of their whacky lib supporters who can’t put down that shiny new object.

    Palin is a joke. The ABC interview was a testament to that. The woman has had no interest in international relations and is being coached by former Bush advisors on how to be presidential. All she does is go from state to state recycling that tired convention speech. She really is the empty headed politician that the GOP claims Obama to be.

    That’s why it’s important to cast her aside and keep punching the old fish who wants to hide behind her. Let the cable news networks play with their shiny new toy, Barack Obama and Joe Biden are only interested in John McCain.

  8. From a foreigner who doesn’t belong to one party or another, it is very amusing to see the republican suporters actually believe their team has a chance. While I can sort of understand that (after all, country did elect their guy four years ago, agains better judgement of anyone with half a brain), observers from outside noticed how tremendously relieved democrats were after republicans announced their running mate. As it stands, it is clear to all of us who are objective and observe this match from the outside that, unless something extremely unpredictable happens, it will be a democratic landslide in November.

    Obviously, there are many on this forum who might find this offensive, as tye sincerely believe (in) their conservative candidate(s). My intention was not to offend anyone; just to present an outside view of an incredibly unusual presidential contest.

    America would do better to nominate people with better skills for the most important job in the world (that goes for both political parties). Narrow party ideologies tend to trump national interest by a wide margin. That is extremely irresponsible. Unfortunately, that’s the reality of the new millennium…

  9. Apart from the lies McCain-Palin tell, McCain claims he would build dozens of nuclear power plants. Oh, really? They go for $10 billion a pop. Where is the money going to come from? From lowering taxes? From banning abortions? From borrowing more from China? From having Sarah Palin “reform” Washington — as if she has any more clue how to do that than the first 100 names in the D.C. phonebook?

  10. “For the most part, he and Joe Biden have almost ignored her entirely and kept the focus on John McCain. “

    Really? I don’t think so….

    “Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency,”

    “Governor Palin shares John McCain’s commitment to overturning Roe v Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush’s failed economic policies. That’s not the change we need, it’s just more of the same,”

    “They’re shedding an awfully lot of heat but no light,” he said. “It almost defies the laws of physics.” (about Palin speech)

    “for someone who makes the point that she’s not from Washington, she looked very much like she would fit in very well there.”

    Sounds like the Obama camp is commenting on her after all…

  11. From where did they found that Palin?

    McCain was funny few days ago when he said that US is the leader in equal rights.

    He should go to the Sweden and let them teach some egual rights for him and visit Finland where we have a women as a president and then travel around the Scandinavia. That will teach him!

  12. “I’m just wondering what your vantage point is?”

    I’m not an American citizen; I have no interest, nor would any political outcome of this election affect my life one way or the other; if anything, where I come from, we would probably prefer status quo, since the previous administration was less favourable to us than the current one.

    Oh, and by the way, Predrag is a male name, therefore you would probably want to say PredragKing, if for some reason you were to add some royal title to it.

  13. “Apart from the lies McCain-Palin tell, McCain claims he would build dozens of nuclear power plants. Oh, really? They go for $10 billion a pop. Where is the money going to come from? From lowering taxes? From banning abortions? From borrowing more from China? From having Sarah Palin “reform” Washington — as if she has any more clue how to do that than the first 100 names in the D.C. phonebook?”

    No, no and no. It is done by allowing the private corporations that have been trying to do it for years to actually do it.

  14. because so-called conservatives have eliminated regulation that would have prevented fraud. They’ve allowed low wage labor into the country with H1B Visas while high wage jobs were shipped overseas.

    Want this to continue? Vote Republican. The party that wants to keep drilling US. Another way to get screwed: put the emphasis on drilling instead of alternative energy. That way, Big Oil makes even more profits while average Americans lose their homes.

  15. Unfortunately, Predrag, we don’t choose our presidents based on their skillsets, education, knowledge on international issues and policy differences. In America, we tend to vote based on qualifications like who’d we most want to have a beer with, who we can relate to, who’s as normal as the common man. That’s how George W. Bush got elected twice. It seems like the higher your education, the worse chance you have to become president. That’s why people like John McCain who graduated practically at the bottom of his naval class and Sarah Palin with her Bachelor’s degree in Journalism actually have a chance at becoming our leaders.

    We are an anti-intellectual society. We reward mediocrity.

    So yes, in the United States of America, McCain-Palin have a good chance at victory. Those of us Obama supporters who truly know America also knew it would be a close race. Don’t be surprised if they’re able to pull it off. This country can fall for anything.

  16. “Jesus was a community organizer while ponteus Pilate was a govenor!”

    That was one of the stupidest quotes of the election ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

    Jesus was not a community organizer, he was a little busy.

    As for the Governor portion….
    So was Bill Clinton
    Ronald Reagan
    and…
    Jesse Ventura…..”…just one of my outfits would probably buy your car…”

  17. Can you really see Obama running the country?

    He worked for Acorn, a community organizer, by helping get people register to vote (Acorn’s mission statement, “vote early, vote often”).

    As a State Senator he help Slum Lords in South Chicago make hundreds of millions of dollars off the government and poor. He wrote no bills. Then Obama had two years in the U.S. Senate, one of which he wrote no bills (or code sponsored any bills). The last years he has been running for president.

    The man is popular but not qualify to be President and people wonder about Palin?

    wmd

  18. Sorry kids. Personally I like McCain. I think he’s a stand up guy. I was even going to vote for him. But sadly I just don’t think his ideals and plans are what the US needs right now. And i firmly believe Palin is not a good person at all. None of the candidates have the qualifications you guys are looking for. But I can’t in good conscious vote for McCain this time around.

  19. “Typical Lib. Wishing doesn’t make things so.”

    I’m a foreigner; not a Lib, or Dem, or Conservative, or whatever they label people in the US.

    The online poll linked from a post further back looks exactly oposite from the one four years ago. When many were seeing a close race with Kerry edging ahead, most of us watching from the outside saw it clearly as a victory for the incumbent.

    Watching American presidential campaigns for the past 16 years (since Bush Sr. lost to Clinton), it became clear to me that the Americans themselves have a very hard time seeing the outcome or predicting it. Astute outside observers could always easily see which way it would go; even with Gore-Bush, it was clear that Gore would win, but Bush would end up getting it.

    I’m fascinated by the ability of American media to totally obfuscate the campaign issues and candidates’ skills to the point that everyone genuinely believes their guy will clearly win (and oftentimes, in a landslide).

    I’d love to be proven wrong sometimes (not for political reasons, since neither administration in the White House would make any difference to me), but it really looks all but clear that it will be a change of guard in Washington.

    My only hope (for the sake of America) is that the new guy doesn’t end up the same way as JF Kennedy did in the 60; young, charismatic, and dead a few years into the presidency…

  20. bjh,

    Obama doesn’t have years in Washington, something I actually consider a plus considering how corrupt the environment has become. Besides, experience when selecting a President is extremely overrated since there is no amount of experience that can prepare someone to be the President. The difference between Palin and Obama, besides the office they are running for, isn’t their experience but the fact that nobody has any idea what Palin actually stands for. Yes we know she’s a hockey mom, we know she’s willing to spew out right wing talking points, but nobody knows where she actually stands on the issues, including her I’m afraid (doesn’t know what the Bush Doctrine is??). Obama has been in the spotlight for nearly 2 years where we’ve been able to witness his temperament, positions, intelligence, capacity for judgement, as well as his weaknesses. Obama was elected by Democratic voters to represent his party, Palin was selected as a political choice that could potentially be disastrous for this nation. I really wish the right would wake up and realize how much damage the Republican party is doing to this once great nation.

  21. t seems like the higher your education, the worse chance you have to become president.’

    Except that George Bush graduated Yale
    Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar
    George HW Bush graduated Yale

    but yeah, you must be correct….

  22. “but the fact that nobody has any idea what Palin actually stands for.”

    Are you joking! Of all the things said here, this has o be the most ridiculous. What Sarah Palin stands for is quite obvious and staunch (like it or not).

    She is Pro-Life
    She is pro 2nd ammendment
    She is pro tax cut
    she is for fiscal responsibility
    she is pro war on terrorism
    She is pro drilling in ANWR

  23. MDN’s double standards here are terrible. They assail Obama for his stance on technology, but have no opinion on McCain’s lack of knowledge on technology. He doesn’t even care to learn how to send email, so how can he effectively make any decisions on tech issues? MDN is silent on that of course.

  24. Predrag,

    I appreciate your point of view, but I don’t concurr with the statement:

    “observers from outside noticed how tremendously relieved democrats were after republicans announced their running mate”

    It seems to me that Democrats really got trounced by the announcement and have been reeling since. Having said that, they seemed to have re-grouped since the off day for 9/11 ceremonies.

    They really need to act as if the pick does not matter…’cause, really, it doesn’t! That pick will NEVER get to be president unless the old man croaks…

    To my point:

    It would be mindless to suggest that all these three items will happen:

    1. McCain got elected and made it through eight years as president

    AND

    2. The VP gets the republican nomination for president in 2016

    AND

    3. Hillary Clinton is beaten in the 2016 election by the republican nominee

    Sorry, McCain fanbois, your man made a great momentum-changer pick, but he certainly did not select the first female president (unless he gets elected and then up and dies on us).

    By the way, my voting record:

    92 – Clinton
    96 – Dole
    00 – Bush
    04 – Bush
    08 – Obama

  25. @iWill

    Even though the lemmings thing is a myth…

    http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/lemmings.asp

    It is indeed a common visitor’s experience, that an unusual proportion of people in the U.S. have been conditioned to be polarized in almost everything they think and do – you’re either this or your that, for or against. Hence the media presentation of the “choice” as a two-party system (spin). This might work if the choices themselves were actually opposites but when they are the same it becomes an illusion of choice…like all of the other powerful ideas that are obediently reiterated rather than being tested and examined such as “the greatest nation on earth” “number 1” etc…

    http://the-united-states.net/numberone.htm

    http://www.theonion.com/content/node/38998

    However, the wealthy (those that supposedly have achieved the “American Dream”) are leaving the U.S. in increasing numbers…

    http://www.boom2bust.com/2008/06/13/are-rich-americans-leaving-the-country/

  26. Alright, Quad Core. Now draw up a list of items the Obama-Biden ticket has said about John McCain for comparison.

    She is the Republican vice presidential candidate, they can’t go completely mum. That’s why my words were, and I quote, “ALMOST entirely ignored her.”

    Considering the media frenzy over Palin the past few weeks, the fact that you have so few statements is proof that she’s gone virtually ignored. The ads are still directed at McCain, the stump speeches are still directed at McCain. She’s barely a whisper. In fact from the brief mentions I’ve seen and heard, Barack Obama cleverly doesn’t even refer to her by name.

    You guys desperately want to create the perception of the scary black man attacking the wholesome white woman, the “American woman” as Fox News refers to her. That’s not the case, however. Even today, the Obama campaign continues to smack McCain over the head with a sledge hammer. The Republicans will not be able to hide their 8 years of failure and disgrace behind Sarah Palin. You’ve got a great fundraiser and in the end that’s all she’ll be.

  27. Jimbo, the guy has nerve damage from the beatings he took in Vietnam. HE CAN’T TYPE, HE IS PHYSICALLY UNABLE TO USE A COMPUTER.

    I realize the Obama talking point memo didn’t mention that, but you really must pay attention to the facts.

  28. Quad Core,

    I think he’s referring to the current political environment in the US since your beloved neocons took over the country. They know they can’t win on the issues so they turn the elections into mockery where we vote on somebody based on whether or not their kids play hockey or if the candidate seems like a fun guy to hang out in a bar with. We don’t care if they were President of the Harvard Law Review, that’s elitist and out of touch with most Americans. Just so you know, McCain finish 894 out of 899 in his class at Annapolis. Experience or not, I’m tired of idiots running this country into the ground.

  29. Quad Core:

    Those are bullet points. You would need to fill five pages with text in order to contribute valuable (and necessary) information about what a candidate stands for.

    No wonder presidential elections in America are so easily predictable. People make decisions based on top-ten list of qualities a candidate has for becoming a presitent. Whoever makes a more appealing top-ten list wins.

    This time around, it looks better for Obama. McCain should have written a better top-ten list…

  30. “I’m for LESS government. I’m NOT for national health care, I’m FOR less taxes. I’m FOR securing the borders. So, I’m voting Republican.”

    National health care – You got that one.
    For less taxes – To be fair we need to add deficit as part of tax (tax deferment for government). If you take that into account our tax increased significantly in last 8 years.
    For securing the boarders – not sure what secure border means. Didn’t Democrates pass that dumb useless fence on south border?

    Conservatives who believe in fiscal responsibility and less government should follow Ron Paul and vote for Barr. Those interested in good health care should vote for Obama. Those for big government (brother) and fiscal inresponsibility (more deficit) should vote for McCain.

  31. (doesn’t know what the Bush Doctrine is??)

    Well that’s easy, there’s no such thing. There have been dozens of definitions of the supposed “Bush Doctrine”. Yet in the end none really exist.

    One definition: Pre-emptive military action….then why didn’t e go into N. Korea? And if pre-emptive action is the Bush doctrine, then explain the Vietnam and Korean wars?? Explain warring agains Germany? Vietnam, Korea and Germany never attacked us, and Bush wasn’t president

    WikiPedia Definition: “It may be viewed as a set of several related foreign policy principles, including stress on ending terrorism, spreading democracy,[1] increased unilateralism in foreign policy”

    Boston Globe Definition: “…not permiting the world’s most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world’s most destructive weapons.”

    So which one is it? Or is it one of the others.

  32. Obama is a walking-shaded-area-of-gray. He has never made a black and white quick, tough decision ever! He would make a great neighbor compared to McCain, but we are not voting for Cindy Crawford, we are voting for a tough black and white decision maker to protect our country.
    Obama thinks you can negotiate with a rattlesnake, just as Clinton flew a few planes over Iraq. Their is much unreported positive on the Iraq war, but the blame for it doesn’t fall on Bush, jr or Clinton. It falls on Bush, Sr. Terrible mistake he made to not finish the job.
    If my child was hanging off a cliff, I would choose McCain over Obama any day, regardless of the fact that he can’t lift his arms above horizontal and his age. McCain will make decisions quickly and Obama has proved he absolutely will NOT. McCain is all about the people and Obama is all about himself. Illinois should PUNT anyone who votes “present” that many times instead of “yes” or “no”.
    Yet again, Obama will actually “CHANGE” WHAT??? Where’s his real plan that is truly different?
    What kind of team will Obama put around him? THAT is the true decison making team that Obama will be spokesman for. Biden???
    He’s the DRM record-company loving guy who every ignored then and is ignoring now.
    McCain is at least smart enough to know his weaknesses where he lacks in visual, speaking, expression, age and many years on the inside and THAT IS WHY HE PICKED PALIN!! Obama had the election by picking Hillary, regardless of Bill, but it is all about HIMSELF and his career, not the people. He and Hillary were very much in agreement on most issues. Obama is about Obama, and again, change what? He spun and wouldn’t answer O’reilly on any question in detail, but he sure did look purty.

  33. @ eurotrash

    Yes, indeed, the Lemmings to the shore allusion was more to illustrate the mindless following of a people who seem to be too busy embroiled in partisan hackery to notice that they’ve been hoodwinked yet again.

    I can only imagine what this charade looks like from outside the American media bubble, which is designed to promote ignorance and deception, rather than balanced information and clarity.

    Please just wake me when its over (if ever).

  34. “Conservatives who believe in fiscal responsibility and less government should follow Ron Paul and vote for Barr. Those interested in good health care should vote for Obama. Those for big government (brother) and fiscal inresponsibility (more deficit) should vote for McCain.”

    Except for a few problems with your comments:

    1. Government health care does not equal good health care. Ask the British Government, or the Canadians who come here for major procedures.

    2. Except that McCain has not supported fiscal irresponsibility. He has voted against bills with earmarks and never proposed earmarks. He supports balanced budgets etc.

  35. “Alright, Quad Core. Now draw up a list of items the Obama-Biden ticket has said about John McCain for comparison.”

    She has only been on the ticket for a week! They have been campaigning against McCain for many weeks.

    She is the Republican vice presidential candidate, they can’t go completely mum. That’s why my words were, and I quote, “ALMOST entirely ignored her.”

    That just isn’t true. It took me 10 seconds to find those quotes. I didn’t have to do much scouring!

    there was also the “Palin is the lipstick” stuff, etc.

  36. “Those are bullet points. You would need to fill five pages with text in order to contribute valuable (and necessary) information about what a candidate stands for.”

    The original post said nobody knows what she stands for. My contention is that we know EXACTLY where she stands. I agree that the full details would take alot more than a bullet list, however, a bullet list answered the question at hand. It is up to everyone to look and find the details themselves…..most won’t

  37. Ron Paul, who will not win this election, has triggered a movement that will ultimately transform this country into a constitution-honoring, non world-policing, economically sound one. I’m not voting for Ron Paul, I’m voting for the Revolution!

  38. “1. Government health care does not equal good health care. Ask the British Government, or the Canadians who come here for major procedures.

    2. Except that McCain has not supported fiscal irresponsibility. He has voted against bills with earmarks and never proposed earmarks. He supports balanced budgets etc.”

    1. irrelevant – Obama’s health plan isn’t based on the UK plan.
    2. right – course, there’s that little bridge to nowhere issue.

  39. Quad Core,

    Yes I know the right wing talking points, that was my point. We haven’t had enough time to really find out how she thinks because she’s never been tested. On top of that they won’t allow anybody in the media, with the exception to Gibson, to interview her so getting real information to real questions is pretty hard to come by these days. What I’ve found on my own is she’s willing to ban books from public libraries that she doesn’t agree with, doesn’t think global warming is man made, and thinks the war in Iraq is God’s will. I’ve heard rumors that she doesn’t believe in evolution and thinks creationism should be taught in schools alongside evolution. Pretty scary but at least she’s a hockey mom which should be comforting for those who are worried about her someday possibly leading the most powerful country in the world.

  40. Apparently neocons are not reading the news (besided Fox News that is) nor care about facts. How about reading actual facts about Palin. Or don’t and keep your head up your a–. Your ignorance is dangerous.
    Obama/Biden

  41. I agree w/ Quad Core, we do know Sarah Palin:

    She is Pro-Life (And Pro-War).

    She is pro 2nd amendment (Except that sticky “well regulated militia” part).

    She is pro tax cut (Based on deficit spending).

    She is for fiscal responsibility (See above).

    She is pro war on terrorism (Meaning, Death to Towelheads).

    She is pro drilling in ANWR (Mostly because she loves greasy pork).

  42. “One definition: Pre-emptive military action….then why didn’t e go into N. Korea? “

    Oh, yeah, that’s why gas is so cheap. How much oil have we taken?

    Of course, if we chose Iraq because of oil, then that means my point about th Bush Doctrine is correct.

  43. Jimbo von Winskinheimer writes, “They assail Obama for his stance on technology, but have no opinion on McCain’s lack of knowledge on technology. He doesn’t even care to learn how to send email, so how can he effectively make any decisions on tech issues?”

    Yeah, keep repeating that rubbish. As JD points out, the injuries he suffered at the Hanoi Hilton make using a keyboard just too painful. It’s the same reason he has difficulty raising his hands. He *does* use email, and has for years, but relies on Cindy to help with the typing. (BTW, I think Cindy will make a great First Lady.)

    I should add that McCain, as minority head of the Commerce Committee, has been heavily involved with technology issues, including spectrum allocation, net neutrality, and the like. I’m confident he’s better versed on technology than most of the full-of-themselves posters here.

  44. “She is Pro-Life (And Pro-War).”
    Nobody is “pro war”. War is an terrible thing that is sometimes necessary.

    “She is pro 2nd amendment (Except that sticky “well regulated militia” part).”
    Yeah, because gun ownership isn’t regulated at all (sarcasm)

    “She is pro tax cut (Based on deficit spending).”
    Incorrect, Sara Palin has not participated in deficit-spending. Alaska currently runs a surplus.

    “Estimates of the budget surplus by early next year range from $5 billion to $9 billion, a huge amount in a state of 670,000 people. Spending it”

    McCain wants no deficit spending.

    She is pro war on terrorism (Meaning, Death to Towelheads).
    “If they are strapping bombs to themselves, yes.

    “She is pro drilling in ANWR (Mostly because she loves greasy pork).”
    No, how about because we currently rely to much on foreign oli, which raises gas prices, and allows foreign governments to have control over our economy. Furthermore, driling domestically will help curb environmental nightmares like like oil tanker disasters.

  45. Obama? McCain? The whole way this US campaign is so childish! Waow! When you see what people get enthousiastic for, it’s just pathetic!
    Coudn’t there be some non-republican AND non-democrate canditate to make a new style of president ? Obama could eventually give a better image of America to the rest of the world… but, when you see how much he’s having to act soooo damn conventional… just like the republican pro-war guy… Hopeless… Too sad…

  46. Saying the Republicans will lose because the whole world and the Democrats hate Bush is just ridiculous.

    Remember, the whole world and the Democrats hated Bush when he won his second term.

    Obama is a political lightweight. So is Palin.

    Either one ends up as President and either one could lead the whole world out of it’s economic slump.

    Either one could lead the whole world into World War III just as easily.

    Just like Kennedy they are both capable of great things and great big mistakes. People don’t remember that Kennedy damn near started WW III all by himself.

    As an outsider but a very close neighbour, I must tell you that the whole world has a stake in this election.

    Obama scares the hell out of me. Inexperience and a large set of balls is what nearly did in Kennedy and the rest of the planet.

  47. “We haven’t had enough time to really find out how she thinks because she’s never been tested.”
    Actually, she has. She was put in a position to oversee the oil business in Alaska. In that position, she stood by what was right and stood up AGAINST the corruption and the Republican Governor. This is what ended up getting her elected.

    “What I’ve found on my own is she’s willing to ban books from public libraries that she doesn’t agree with”
    Check again, that wasn’t even true! She never asked for any books to be banned. One of the books was Harry Potter….which didn’t even come out until two years later!

  48. “… and it will be the most disastrous administration since Nixon’s, even surpassing the debacle of the Reagan era.”

    Yeah because recovering the economy from record inflation, record gas prices, record interest rates, was a horrible thing. Not to mention that awful defeating communism thing.

  49. @Republicans will win…

    Where have you been the last 8 years? You don’t have to go back to Nixon, or even Reagan, to find the most disastrous administration in recent history. Neither of them started a war on lies. When you think about the implications of doing that, then you’ll realize how disastrous the bush administration has been for the US. If you think the nearly 3000 dead on 9/11 is bad, the latest number that I’ve heard who have been killed in the Iraq war is over 1 million, taken from a January 2008 survey. That’s a lot of mothers, brothers, fathers, sons, daughters, sisters, cousins, grandparents, nephews, nieces and friends that have been killed unnecessarily in our illegal war. I can’t imagine that has done a whole lot to bolster pro-american sentiment in the Middle East which is the only real weapon we have in our “war against terrorism”.

  50. Nixon continued and furthered a war based on lies; far more died in Vietnam than either of these BS Middle East campaigns. Sure, the “war on terror” is an abomination, but the body count is not even close to Vietnam.

    Not saying I like it – FAR from it – but Nixon was worse (despite his being vastly more intelligent than W).

    btw – has anyone noticed that hick twit Palin saying “nukuler power?” It just gets worse and worse.

  51. “Yeah because recovering the economy from record inflation, record gas prices, record interest rates, was a horrible thing. Not to mention that awful defeating communism thing.”

    Money, money, money – typical con$ervative. And if you still believe the crap about Regan “ending” the Cold War, then you probably think he deserved an Oscar for Bedtime For Bonzo. Plus, Communism still exists; only the Soviet Union is gone. But don’t let that stop you.

    I think we have record gas prices NOW, don’t we?

  52. It is ironic how this 1 million casualty count is quite a lot higher than was the total victim count under Saddam Husein’s regime. The dead (that is, vast majority of them) are as innocent today as were Saddam’s victims. Add to that the abundance of fresh recruits for the radical Islamist cause that the war has produced and that didn’t exist in the pre-war Iraq, the end result and bottom line of this effort is really impressive…

    Meanwhile, Osama Bin Laden is still hiding somewhere between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Seven years later. Is current administration waiting for Afhan government to capture and extradite Bin Laden the way Serbian government (finally) captured and extradited Karadzic? If that’s the case, I think they got it wrong; the two aren’t exactly the same.

  53. The only reason Palin didn’t expressly send the list of books she wanted burned was becuase she knew the librarian wouldn’t kowtow to her and follow orders like good conservative lemmings. She certainly did ask how one would go about banning books if one wanted to, which suggests she thinks banning books is an OK idea, as long as you have sufficiently subservient underlings… which for the most part she has gotten in spades, since she clearly believes in the other Bush doctrine, namely appointing complete hacks and incompetents to government posts because they were high school buddies and such. I don’t know how, but I think a McCain Palin administration would probably be able to find an attorney general even more incompetent than Alberto Gonzales and FEMA administrator more useless than “Heckuva Job” Brownie! But hey, incompentent hacks are the people conservatives want in government – it’s not a bug, it’s a feature! By putting in more hacks and party over country loyalists to every government post, letting the country go to hell and the middle class sink into poverty, we achieve the grand conservative dream – a government by and for the super-rich, with a huge pool of ill-educated poor laborers too scared to pipe up about the abandonment of the constitution and the destruction of the American dream.

  54. “Money, money, money – typical con$ervative.”

    Hmmm, you’ve made a good point. I reject my ways and will pray for poverty and starvation, much more noble.

    “And if you still believe the crap about Regan “ending” the Cold War, then you probably think he deserved an Oscar for Bedtime For Bonzo.”

    So, if Reagan didn’t win the Cold War, what happened?

    “Plus, Communism still exists; only the Soviet Union is gone. But don’t let that stop you.”

    Well, last I checked, there is now one Germany, and even in China they are practicing “Communist Lite®”.

  55. “The only reason Palin didn’t expressly send the list of books she wanted burned was becuase she knew the librarian wouldn’t kowtow to her and follow orders like good conservative lemmings”

    Oh, so your “facts” about people are based on your ability to read their minds, gotcha. Well since that is now in play…

    Barack Obama plans on turning the whitehouse into a giant statue of Che Guevara french kissing the Profit Muhammed, burn all copies of “Green Eggs and Ham” and ban pepperoni on pizza….I know this is true….still want to vote for him?

    “she clearly believes in the other Bush doctrine, namely appointing complete hacks and incompetents to government posts because they were high school buddies and such. “

    See, yet ANOTHER definition of The Bush Doctrine”. Let’s not also forget giving money to big oil, and no bid contracts to Haliburton.

  56. To those MDN readers not living in the USA:

    Please remember, those who post the most egregious political tripe on this board are a self-selected cadre of bigots for whom mindlessly spouting talking points substitutes for logical thinking. They endlessly repeat debunked “truths,” choosing to select their “facts” from dubious sources. Pray for us that our country can break free from this pestilence before our coming election.

  57. Biden-Obama bad for America. A disaster for Middle to Americans and the the working poor in the making.

    Keep Big Money, Big Spending, Votes for sell politicians out of the White House and support driving them out of Washington too.

    Obama showed what kind of “Change” he’s for by inviting Biden to be his running mate. Biden is not about change he’s about status quo in Washington. Obama talks change but with Biden he obviously doesn’t want change.

    Obama-Biden Fleecing American’s Freedoms and wallets.

  58. Ronnie was just in the right place at the right time; Soviet economy and infrastructure was already deteriorating at a drastic rate. And then, just in the nick of time, in comes Mr. Brylcream with his big guns and missiles (including nukes, which he was “morally” opposed to, but nevermind) to save the day! Gimme a break.

    I guess you could say it was all part of RR’s approach to making new friends: besides the Soviet Union, we made great pals with El Salvador, Chile, just to name a couple.

    Yea, good times; good times.

  59. @Quadcore

    To graduate from university and to be a Rhodes Scholar is like comparing little league to MLB. Pretty different. Anyone can graduate university. Even stupid people….I know, I see it all the time.

  60. I was reading today that Palin has been wielding guns since she was 8 and shot her first small live animal when she was 10. She can also skin a moose. She also won a beauty pageant. No wonder you guys want her for VP. I can’t think of better qualifications for it as it is practically a ceremonious post.

    However, if McCain craoks in office, I would be scared if I was an Iraqi.

    As Predrag says, it should be an interesting election. Funny though, I thought republicans looked down on women in office. Color me wrong I guess.

  61. I for one welcome the election of John McCain as President of the United States. If there’s anyone who’ll ruin this out of control country, it’s Johnny. The US empire will finally be ended. My only hope is that it doesn’t take the rest of us with it.

  62. R2: “hide their 8 years of failure”

    How was the last 8 years a failure?

    Currently we have a problem with the financial markets, this happened within the last 2 years (when Dems were in charge of congress,.. hmmm). Most of the problem was created by heavily government leveraged pseudo-private companies that are being bailed out by their crony crooked washington bought and paid for pals in congress. Where’s the Ken Leigh? Where are the heads rolling?

    We have high gas prices..

    Dems won’t let drilling anywhere, nor nuclear power, nor have they come up with a credible alternative to gasoline or nuclear. Oh yeah, they want magic energy!

    We have an unpopular war in Iraq.

    The Civil War was wildly unpopular, no wars are popular. But at least we seem to be winning this one.

    Sept 11.

    We got our worst attack on our soil, but nothing in the 7 years since, while Democrats have been trying to sabotage Bush and turn our national security into a political issue and stand on the side of suspected terrorists and against our country and our citizens.

    ..

    Bush brought us out of a recession left by Clinton who pardoned terrorists while he left office including one that helped his wife get elected senator. Bush has got no credit for keeping our country safe, no credit for the relative economic prosperity of most of his term of office, blamed because we haven’t caught Osama Bin Ladin when Clinton gets a full pass for not taking him when he was offered up during his presidency.

    Bush is far from perfect, he’s screwed up badly on protecting the southern border, he’s bloated the size of government and added a massive entitlement medicare prescription drug program, but he’s hardly satan. He’s not wildly popular but outside the kook fringe leftists he’s not hated either.

    The hyperbole from the left is just getting too hard to listen to. The way they are going after Palin is just another example of how far they have gone off the deep end.

    McCain won’t be perfect either, but at least if he wins we’ll have some sanity in the white house, and perhaps one that will listen to some common sense. Sadly we’ll have to continue to hear the howling of the left that will scream from the top of their lungs at every minor gaff that McCain makes.

  63. R2
    See all of the interview?
    Probably not.
    This shows what editing can do
    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/09/13/abc-news-edited-out-key-parts-sarah-palin-interview

    Still think Charlie (who I like) won?
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091202457.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

    How about those internet rumors?
    Good as gold, right?
    http://www.newsweek.com/id/157986
    ( I believe this has already been posted)

    No love for Palin from the left?
    How about a little respect?
    http://www.salon.com/opinion/paglia/2008/09/10/palin/

    Am I voting for Palin to be President? NO!
    But I am voting for McCain because he finally got a Conservative that can fire up the base, and pull him to the right.
    Hopefully, he will live at least two more years (if not longer) and Sarcuda, the Arctic Fox will be well established, as well as vetted, by then.

    I’m TowerTone, and I approve of this massage…..

  64. Re: what TowerTone said —

    YES! More, more, MORE, MORRRE!

    You’re right, McCain needs to be pulled to the right… MORE to the right!!! This is the dream! The right wing will finally bring America to touch the very right edge of the Right! In joyous ecstasy the rightwingers will touch with their very own hands, pure, unfiltered Right! How beautiful it will be…

    Meanwhile, the ultra wealthy elite will be leaving in mass numbers (as they are now). The country will be ruined and the grunts who elected them will have to pick up the pieces. Fitting.

  65. TowerTone: “Hopefully, he will live at least two more years (if not longer) and Sarcuda, the Arctic Fox will be well established, as well as vetted, by then.”

    Sarah is already kick ass, she’ll be sharpened to a razors edge by the end of a McCain presidency, and he’ll slice up whoever runs against her and serve them up with some ginger and wasabi.

  66. “Reagan” Ronnie was just in the right place at the right time; Soviet economy and infrastructure was already deteriorating at a drastic rate. And…

    Oh please, more shameless revisionist history. *rolls eyes*

    “Come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”
    http://www.reaganlibrary.com/reagan/speeches/wall.asp

    I think of the scene in Forrest Gump when Jenny runs out of rocks to throw when I hear all the shameless sleazy lies by a seemingly endless amount of liberals.

    “Sometimes, I guess there’s just not enough rocks.”

  67. Twighlight Moon, you fool…

    Think about it. Dream about it. You and TowerTone could be some of the exalted privileged few, who will live so close to the right wing, a wing so warm, so strong, so Right. So close that you will even touch it, caress it, kiss it. The music, sweet music of a thousand liberals screaming, can you hear it? You’re almost there, almost! But you need to hope, you need to dream! And some day, it will come true.

  68. Yesss! Twighlight Moon…

    The Soviet Union heard the great Reagan, how he bespoke unto them, and they heeded his call. His voice commanded, and they obeyed. Yesss… yess…!!! It’s that same voice that’s calling, calling you! Heed it, obey it… love it… succumb to it…

  69. “Obama 08!! Let’s vote for the smart guy for a change.”

    Who can errr…barely.. uhh.. speak without an.. umm uhhh TelePrompTer.

    Sarah Palin delivered a portion of her speech without a functional TelePrompTer, it broke down at the start of her speech, and was out of kilter at least 1 other time during it.

    Vote for uhh.. Obamahhhh..ummm for uhh President 08!!

  70. YESSS!!! TowerTone…

    FEEEEL it! Feel the POWER of the RIGHT racing through your blood!

    Feel the POWER of that voice, the voice that commanded Gorbachev to end the Soviet Union, feel it shaking your body, feel it rushing through you like the winds of a glorious light!

    Open you arms, embrace it… The Right is almost before you… Reach! Reach out! Touch it! Touch it!!!!!!!

  71. Tidlilight Moon,

    You must save America! Save it! Save it from the corrupting putrid influence of the vulgar “left”. Do not let the left taint your pure spirit. Expunge the vileness from your heart and your mind. Accept the Right as your light, your guide, your dreams… One day, it will be real and there standing right before you. A tear will come to your eye, and you will say, “It was all worth it.” The liberals will be silent forever more, and peace shall reign. All will sing to the glory of Right, and all will be joyous.

    But you need to try harder. The liberals are a sneaky sect, ready to undermine your pure unadulterated contact with the Right. You must defend yourself! Do not let any liberal streak veer you from your bold, uncorrupted journey straight into the realm of the Right! It’s there, it’s waiting! Bring all of America with you…!

  72. “Oh please, more shameless revisionist history. *rolls eyes*”

    Not revisionist history, just <u>complete</u> history. Keep on ignoring it, just like your little wet dreamgirl Sarah… the Earth is only 8000 years old, you know…

    Bet you want Ronnie on Mt. Rushmore, dontcha?

  73. Be honest: watch the ABC interview again, but THIS time, use your imagination (hard for you, I know) and pretend that you have NO IDEA who the person being interviewed is. Forget the convention, forget the speeches, forget Trig and Bristol and Track and Willow and Piper, forget all the praise, forget all the attacks, forget all the hype, just forget ALL of it; just watch the interview, and listen to it, and take it all in in an unbiased, rational manner.

    Still impressed? Then you may be EASILY impressed. Still think this person is ready to be the so-called “leader of the free world?” Then you could be in a sorry way.

    If NO to these, then you need to give some serious thought to who you’re going to vote for and why.

    Just a suggestion; take it or leave it at your discretion.

  74. “Still impressed? Then you may be EASILY impressed. Still think this person is ready to be the so-called “leader of the free world?” Then you could be in a sorry way.”

    Doesn’t seem like you’re being unbiased either. Her answers were fine, Charlie Gibson was trying to trip her up to impress his pals in the liberal media, nothing special. Except that he didn’t go after Obama very hard when he interviewed him in June 4, 2008.

    See for yourself, and remember, be unbiased…

    http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Story?id=5000184&page=1

  75. “Not revisionist history, just complete history.
    1. ie a lie.

    Keep on ignoring it, just like your little wet dreamgirl Sarah…
    2. ie your a misogynist douche-bag, get bent.

    the Earth is only 8000 years old, you know…
    3. …and a Christian-hater. yay *clap clap*

    Bet you want Ronnie on Mt. Rushmore, dontcha?”
    4. you wouldn’t be worthy to shine that man’s shoes. He doesn’t need to be carved on some rock, he already stands taller than any president in the last 100 years.

    Got anything else mr smartypants?

  76. If McCain/Palin win, at least we won’t have to listen to Republicans blather on and on about being the party of Traditional Family Values® and Fiscal Conservatism anymore – just like the nationalization of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae by the Bush government shows us who the real socialists are in this country: Republicans.

  77. If you’re a minority and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a “token hire.”

    If you’re a conservative and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a “game changer.”

    Black teen pregnancies? A “crisis” in black America.
    White teen pregnancies? A “blessed event.”

    If you grow up in Hawaii you’re “exotic.”
    Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, you’re the quintessential “American story.”

    Similarly, if you name your kid Barack you’re “unpatriotic.”
    Name your kid Track, you’re “colorful.”

    If you’re a Democrat and you make a VP pick without fully vetting the individual you’re “reckless.”

    A Republican who doesn’t fully vet is a “maverick.”

    If you spend 3 years as a community organizer growing your organization from a staff of 1 to 13 and your budget from $70,000 to $400,000, then become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new African American voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law
    professor, then spend nearly 8 more years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, becoming chairman of the state Senate’s Health and Human Services committee, then spend nearly 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of nearly 13 million people, sponsoring 131 bills and serving on the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran’s Affairs committees, you are woefully inexperienced.

    If you spend 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, then spend 20 months as the governor of a state with 650,000 people, then you’ve got the most executive experience of anyone on either ticket! You are the Commander in Chief of the Alaska military and are well qualified to lead the nation should you be called upon to do so because your state is the closest state to Russia.

    If you are a Democratic male candidate who is popular with millions of people you are an “arrogant celebrity”.

    If you are a popular Republican female candidate you are “energizing the base”.

    If you are a younger male candidate who thinks for himself and makes his own decisions you are “presumptuous”.

    If you are an older male candidate who makes last minute decisions you refuse to explain, you are a “shoot from the hip” maverick.

    If you are a candidate with a Harvard law degree you are “an elitist” and “out of touch” with the real America.

    if you are a legacy (dad and granddad were admirals) graduate of Annapolis, with multiple disciplinary infractions you are a hero.

    If you go to a south side Chicago church, your beliefs are “extremist”.

    If you believe in creationism and don’t believe global warming is man-made, you are “strongly principled”.

    If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress, and left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you’re a Christian.

    If you have been married to the same woman with whom you’ve been wed to for 19 years and raising 2 beautiful daughters with, you’re “risky”.

    If you’re a black single mother of 4 who waits for 22 hours after her water breaks to seek medical attention, you’re an irresponsible parent, endangering the life of your unborn child.

    But if you’re a white married mother who waits 22 hours, you’re “spunky.”

    If you’re a 13-year-old Chelsea Clinton, the right-wing press calls you “First dog.”

    If you’re a 17-year old pregnant unwed daughter of a Republican, the right-wing press calls you “beautiful” and “courageous.”

  78. double-standard

    If you’re a conservative and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a “game changer.”
    Biden is more qualified? Or Obama?

    Biden has sat and rotted in Washington for longer than McCain has been a senator but he’s so often wrong on foreign policy that you’d be better off getting a dart board and randomly selecting policy. He’s a decent family man and a patriot, but he’s ballot box poison and he’s just wrong on so many issues I wish he’d find a different line of work than politics.

    Obama is a joke of a candidate with less qualifications than the Easter Bunny, besides his amazing ability to give a TelePrompTer speech written by someone else.

    We’ll never get the best possible candidates in the US anyway, but it’s just not worth it to most people due to the savage nature of politics.

    Sarah Palin has accomplished far more than Obama in less time, and had actual executive experience, McCain has had leadership experience both from a long and productive career as a senator and leading military units.

    “A Republican who doesn’t fully vet is a “maverick.””

    You’ve been reading too many leftist blogs, there’s no proof he didn’t thoroughly vet Sarah Palin, candidates are not required to fully disclose the nature of their vetting process. Hint: it’s not a public process.

    Regardless, the implication that Sarah Palin is unqualified or a bad choice is laughable.

    If you are a Democratic male candidate who is popular with millions of people you are an “arrogant celebrity”.
    If you are a popular Republican female candidate you are “energizing the base”.

    Barack certainly is arrogant, he flipped Hillary off during one of his debates with her by innocently scratching his face. He’s called Palin a pig and McCain an old dead fish while simultaneously blaming McCain for calling him on it.

    He’s not the only politician who is arrogant tho, he’s just younger with less accomplishments to base his arrogance on than most.

    Sarah Palin has breathed more life into the Republican party than any candidate in a generation. Barack had that magic about him 6 months ago, but its gone now. He’s sounding more and more like an angry hack liberal Democrat with the exact same talking points that the party has been trying to sell for years.

    “if you are a legacy (dad and granddad were admirals) graduate of Annapolis, with multiple disciplinary infractions you are a hero.”

    You’re a steaming pile for belittling McCain’s heroic stand as a POW like that. Obama is Elitist because he’s a duplicitous two faced liar who trashes people behind their backs.

    You raise some semi-decent points, but a lot of your post is garbage, sorry.

  79. jake: ” Republicans blather on and on about being the party of Traditional Family Values® and Fiscal Conservatism”

    True conservatives are fully aware that the Republican party is a flawed choice, but they hold their nose and vote for them anyway knowing Democrats will be far worse.

    That’s the nature of having a 2 party system, you can have shit on a bun or you can have it with a side of bacon.

  80. Hi All:

    Following is some specific information that helps clarify all the “talk” you hear on the news.

    Check out the sources if you have the time.

    2008 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE COMPARISON TALKING POINTS

    ISSUE
    JOHN McCAIN
    BARAK OBAMA
    Favors new drilling offshore US
    Yes
    No
    Will appoint judges who interpret the law not make it
    Yes
    No

    Served in the US Armed Forces
    Yes
    No
    Amount of time served in the US Senate
    22 YEARS
    173 DAYS
    Will institute a socialized national health care plan
    No
    Yes
    Supports abortion throughout the pregnancy
    No
    Yes
    Would pull troops out of Iraq immediately
    No
    Yes
    Supports gun ownership rights
    Yes
    No
    Supports homosexual marriage
    No
    Yes
    Proposed programs will mean a huge tax increase
    No
    Yes
    Voted against making English the official language
    No
    Yes
    Voted to give Social Security benefits to illegals
    No
    Yes
    CAPITAL GAINS TAX
    MCCAIN
    0% on home sales up to $500,000 per home (couples). McCain does not propose any change in existing home sales income tax.
    OBAMA
    28% on profit from ALL home sales. (How does this affect you?If you sell your home and make a profit, you will pay 28% of your gain on taxes. If you are heading toward retirement and would like to down-size your home or move into a retirement community, 28% of the money you make from your home will go to taxes. This proposal will adversely affect the elderly who are counting on the income from their homes as part of their retirement income.)
    DIVIDEND TAX
    MCCAIN
    15% (no change)
    OBAMA
    39.6% – (How will this affect you? If you have any money invested in stock market, IRA, mutual funds, college funds, life insurance, retirement accounts, or anything that pays or reinvests dividends, you will now be paying nearly 40% of the money earned on taxes if Obama becomes president. The experts predict that ‘Higher tax rates on dividends and capital gains would crash the stock market, yet do absolutely nothing to cut the deficit.’)

  81. INCOME TAX
    MCCAIN
    (no changes)
    Single making 30K – tax $4,500
    Single making 50K – tax $12,500
    Single making 75K – tax $18,750
    Married making 60K- tax $9,000
    Married making 75K – tax $18,750
    Married making 125K – tax $31,250
    OBAMA (reversion to pre-Bush tax cuts)
    Single making 30K – tax $8,400
    Single making 50K – tax $14,000
    Single making 75K – tax $23,250
    Married making 60K – tax $16,800
    Married making 75K – tax $21,000
    Married making 125K – tax $38,750
    Under Obama, your taxes could almost double!
    INHERITANCE TAX
    MCCAIN
    – 0% (No change, Bush repealed this tax)
    OBAMA
    Restore the inheritance tax
    Many families have lost businesses, farms, ranches, and homes that have been in their families for generations because they could not afford the inheritance tax. Those willing their assets to loved ones will only lose them to these taxes.

  82. NEW TAXES PROPOSED BY OBAMA
    New government taxes proposed on homes that are more than 2400 square feet. New gasoline taxes (as if gas weren’t high enough already) New taxes on natural resources consumption (heating gas, water, electricity) New taxes on retirement accounts, and last but not least….New taxes to pay for socialized medicine so we can receive the same level of medical care as other third-world countries!!!

  83. Agreed Quad Core… “Jesus was a community organizer while ponteus Pilate was a govenor!” is a really stupid quote.

    Jesus was actually a carpentar and prophet, not to mention all of this while being the Son of God. I don’t think Obama has that qualification, although some feel he is the messiah.

    Besides, why would we listen to agnostic liberals who hate all religion one moment, then turn around and use Jesus as a comparison for Obama…

  84. Jesus showed tremendous moral courage when he decided to die for our sins when he had the opportunity to opt out, and not be tortured, not be killed, not go to hell.

    Obama has shown similar moral courage when? What has he done? What sacrifices has he made?

  85. @Buster (the fake one that is)
    ‘Obama proves that America should have kept slavery around’

    What kind of scum comment is that? Your mom shouldn’t have smoked and drank so much when she was pregnant with you. Be a man (or woman) and use your real name rather than pirating others. There are enough scary people on here is it is.

    Although I am a liberal, I do not mind McCain all that much. Palin scares the crap out of me no matter what side you are on.

  86. re: Ronnie: “you wouldn’t be worthy to shine that man’s shoes. He doesn’t need to be carved on some rock, he already stands taller than any president in the last 100 years.’

    HA. I’d sooner piss on his shoes, frankly.

    Reagan was a worthless piece of shit… wait, excuse me, a PUPPET made out of a worthless piece of shit.

    “Jesus showed tremendous moral courage when he decided to die for our sins when he had the opportunity to opt out, and not be tortured, not be killed, not go to hell.”

    Which sins? Technically he died for our “original sins”, i.e., the sins of Adam and Eve… so, you must believe that Creationist fairy story too. Believe everything your mommy and daddy taught you? Easier than thinking for yourself, that’s for sure.

    Anthing else, MISTUH SMAHTYPANTS?!?

  87. Let’s get back to technology. Did you know that Senator McCain invented the Blackberry?

    MIAMI — Move over, Al Gore. You may lay claim to the Internet, but John McCain helped create the BlackBerry.

    At least that’s the contention of a top McCain policy adviser, Douglas Holtz-Eakin. Waving his BlackBerry personal digital assistant and citing McCain’s work as a senator, he told reporters Tuesday, “You’re looking at the miracle that John McCain helped create.”

  88. A few stats are dated a couple of weeks, but the message remains clear…

    George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years. The first six years, the economy was fine.
    A little over one year ago:
    1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2-1/2 year high;
    2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
    3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%;
    4) the DOW JONES hit a record high–14,000 +;
    5) American’s were buying new cars, taking cruises, vacations o’seas, living large!…

    But American’s wanted ‘CHANGE’! So, in 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress & yep–we got ‘CHANGE’ all right!….

    1) Consumer confidence has plummeted;
    2) Gasoline is near $4 a gallon & climbing!;
    3) Unemployment is up to 5% (a 10% increase);
    4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS & prices still dropping;
    5) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
    6) as I write, THE DOW is probing another low~~11,300–$2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM THEIR STOCKS, BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS!

    YEP , IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE!…AND WE SURE AS HELL GOT IT!!!….NOW ‘BO’, the DEM’S CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT–AND THE POLLS SAY HE’S GONNA BE ‘THE MAN’–CLAIMS HE’S GONNA REALLY GIVE US CHANGE!!….JUST HOW MUCH MORE ‘CHANGE’ DO YA THINK YOU CAN STAND???…..

  89. @Change….it is nice how you found a scapegoat for GW’s ineptness. Truman said… ‘The buck stops here’. Any person with balls will take respoinsibility. Only whiners and incompetents do what you indicated….blame others.

  90. Quad Core – sorry you fail… In addition to the comments of the librarian herself, we have the following:

    ABCNews.com reported that the church Palin then attended, the Assembly of God, had tried to get a book called Pastor, I Am Gay out of local bookstores, according to author Howard Bess, a pastor of the Church of the Covenant in the nearby town of Palmer. "And she was one of them," Bess said. The book argues for churches to be tolerant of gays and lesbians.

    So Palin unquestionably feels that getting rid of books she doesn’t like is a good thing.

    Oh and here’s another fun one: apparently godly Ms. Palin doesn’t feel that the city should pay for RAPE KITS for victims of one of the most horrible violent crimes…

    When Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, the city billed sexual assault victims and their insurance companies for the cost of rape kits and forensic examinations.

    Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, serving as Sen. John McCain's vice presidential running mate, is drawing large crowds and generating excitement on the presidential campaign trail.
    (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)Palin had been in office for four years when the practice of charging rape victims got the attention of state lawmakers in 2000, who passed a bill to stop the practice.

    But I’m sure the women of this country will be happy to have a heartbeat from the presidency an insane religious thug who feels they don’t deserve help after being sexually victimized, the dirty little whores…

    Meanwhile, we have twilightmoon insisting that the financial collapse today is all the fault of the Congress in place for less than 2 years.. really? I suppose that’s why, when legislation was proposed back in the 90s to bring some of the madness of Enron and mortgage lenders under control, McCain’s economic adviser Phil Gramm and his wife (who went on to work for Enron) blocked it at every turn?

    <code>Phil Gramm, McCain’s top economic adviser, sponsored a bill that made the Glass-Steagall act much less than it was, by making it possible for large brokerage firms to act like banks, without the Glass-Stiegel regulations, leading to the chaos we have today. </a>

    In 1999, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed 1930’s legislation that had separated commercial and investment banks. Commercial banks, where people deposit their paychecks and do personal banking, have regulation. Investment banks didn’t have that “fettering” as Republicans saw it.

    John McCain voted for Gramm-Leach-Bliley. Joe Biden voted NO.

    This economic meltdown can be laid DIRECTLY at the feet of John McCain and Phil Gramm.

  91. I will not vote obama or mccain.
    Most likely will vote chuck baldwin if not him some other 3rd party. Was going to vote for barr but after he shunned all other 3rd parties and the chance to buck the system i am not to interested.

    Wake up people there are more then 2 parties in this country

  92. ericdano said…
    Obama? Seriously? The guy has no qualifications. He hasn’t finished a term as a senator. And he has Joe Biden, one of the Washington insiders. He’s been in the Senate since Julius Caeser…….

    Me, I’m for LESS government. I’m NOT for national health care, I’m FOR less taxes. I’m FOR securing the borders. So, I’m voting Republican.

    Obama has more experience than Abraham Lincoln had when he took office.

    Why does McCain and all politicians get govt health care and we dont? The benefits he enjoys ARE socialized health care…it already exists, and it needs to be provided to everyone, esp. children…you are extremely inhumane to think otherwise…Under Obamas tax plan, those making under $150,000 will see a tax break and those over that will see a tax increase…trickle down theory doesnt work, as evidenced by the Bush crime family’s last 8 years of plunder, destroying the value of the US dollar…and we are supposed to bail out these wealthy corporations??? Oh, i see, so WELFARE for corporate interests is fine, but WELFARE for struggling single-moms isnt. WAKE UP AMERICA! OBAMA IS OUR ONLY HOPE FOR CHANGE!!!!! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  93. The economic meltdown can be directly attributed to the democratic congress forcing mortgage companies to provide mortgages to people who had no business having a mortgage. Just wait for the coming credit card meltdown.

  94. @@Buster

    Just trying to give a different perspective to those who wear blinders…
    Judging from your post, propensity for name calling and cowardice for not posting your name, clearly you are one of them. It takes a mature confident individual to be the real captain of a ship. I lose respect for those who hide behind momma’s skirt.

  95. To my democrat and republican friends, what difference does it make who is elected, we are all fucked anyway!

    For the dems, regarding all the wonderful programs like health care that government should be doing–WE CAN’T AFFORD IT!

    For the republicans who want a mighty military and low taxes–WE CAN’T AFFORD IT!

    Since none of the candidates wants to slash 1/4 of the budget or increase taxes enough to pay for this 1/4 that is our deficit, what difference does it make who is elected.

    Look out 3rd world, the US is coming to join you.

  96. you are out of your freaking mind. everyone’s taxes are going to go up massively if Osama Obama gets elected. the guy is clueless.

    we can not afford not to keep up our massive military. the world is not a safe place 84.

    the democrat congress is the massive problem going on right now. that will change this year when they get voted out and McCain wins too.

  97. xbarf said:
    “u are out of your freaking mind. everyone’s taxes are going to go up massively if Osama Obama gets elected. the guy is clueless.

    we can not afford not to keep up our massive military. the world is not a safe place 84.

    the democrat congress is the massive problem going on right now. that will change this year when they get voted out and McCain wins too.”

    YOU ARE THE CLUELESS ONE. YOU HAVE YOUR FACTS WRONG. I SUGGEST YOU GO TO OBAMAS SITE AND READ HIS TAX PLAN BECAUSE U DONT KNOW IT.

    Under Obamas tax plan, those making under $150,000 will see a tax break and those over that will see a tax increase…trickle down theory doesnt work, as evidenced by the Bush crime family’s last 8 years of plunder, destroying the value of the US dollar…

    The democratic congress has only had a majority for less than 2 years and Bush vetoed everything so it has nothing to do with them.

    Politics has always been dirty and you are always picking the lesser of two evils…but the choice is clear…Obama is real change.

    Oh, and stop with the ignorant Osama comments…racism and hatred has no place in America’s future ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />

    WAKE UP AMERICA! OBAMA IS OUR ONLY HOPE FOR CHANGE!!!!! WAKE UP! WAKE UP!!

  98. @@xbarf
    ‘…we can not afford not to keep up our massive military. the world is not a safe place 84. ‘

    What? Iraq was a threat to you? Greneda? Nicaragua? Perhaps if you played more of a peace keeping role you could reduce military spending and help world peace. Ever consider that conundrum?

    Oh and by the way, I read how Palin gets preachers who believe in witchcraft to pray for her (to become govenor)….read below….

    The pastor whose prayer Sarah Palin says helped her to become governor of Alaska founded his ministry with a witchhunt against a Kenyan woman who he accused of causing car accidents through demonic spellsIt was during that these sermons that Mrs Palin, who was then preparing for her gubernatorial run, was anointed by Pastor Muthee. His intercession, she says, was “awesome”.

    Her June 8 speech was to mark the graduation of students from the Wasilla Assembly of God’s Masters’ Commission, which, as Pastor Ed Kalins explains, believes Alaska will be the refuge for American evangelicals upon the coming “End of Days”. After her speech, Mrs Palin was presented with an honorary Masters’ Commission diploma.

    If she becomes VP then I will personally pray for McCain’s health. If he falters, we will all be in DEEP dog doo-doo.

  99. @xbarf:

    Regarding your comment: “the world is not a safe place,” my response is:

    and we CAN’T AFFORD to make it a safe place.

    So as I said, unless you want to cut spending by 1/4 or raise taxes by 1/4, our country is slipping toward bankrupcy and neither candidate will change that.

    @xbuffed:

    You are certainly correct when you say we are always picking the lesser of two evils.

  100. Republicans are blinded by the cute cheerleader. They have all forgotten how much they used to hate McCain. If he wins, they’ll wake up from their Kool-Aid hangover, because the old McCain will be back – and he WILL raise taxes, be assured of that. Alan Greenspan told us as much a few days ago,

  101. You people are out of your mind. We can not afford to make it a safer place. What are you on? And the alternative is to kiss every scum countries ass and beg them to be nice?? What are you completely nuts. Go move to Canada. You would fit in perfectly there.

  102. “Doesn’t seem like you’re being unbiased either. Her answers were fine, Charlie Gibson was trying to trip her up to impress his pals in the liberal media, nothing special. Except that he didn’t go after Obama very hard when he interviewed him in June 4, 2008.”

    “HER ANSWERS WERE FINE”… wow.

    You’re a willfully delusional idiot. Agreed, Gibson’s interview of Obama was weak, but that has nothing to do with Palin’s own stunning inarticulateness. And your general characterization of Gibson… you’re reading too many conservative blogs.

  103. Yessssss! YESSSSSSSSS!!!!
    My lovelies, my childrens!!!!
    Come! to me…! COME to me!!!!
    Let me touch you, let me caress you
    let me hold you sweet tender neocon hands.
    Touch me, touch me
    For I am the Right Wing
    devoid of any taint of the vile left
    Liberals who touch me burst into flames
    as they deserve
    You can feel my warm glow
    BASK in my beauty, BASTE in my purity.
    My children, elves of the Right,
    cleanse yourselves of the putrid stench
    leave no liberal germ clinging to your body
    infecting your innocence,
    your raw naked spirit.
    You, my precious ones
    are the children of the Right.

  104. Beautiful children of the Right,
    darlings of political might
    a new moment of history is arising.
    The time is nigh.
    The reign of taxes will be forgotten e’ermore
    my children will ne’er need to give up a single penny
    the excess and evil grandeur of the liberal left
    shall be punished, yea, shall be a page of history,
    and we will burn the books, and we will forget.
    Any last vestige, any last contaminating germ
    of the liberals will disappear
    lost in the darkness,
    to suffer in their own disease.
    But we, the noble children of the Right
    shall o’ercome
    shall rid ourselves of impurity
    shall rid ourselves of entitlements
    shall rid ourselves of attention seeking vanitymongers
    shall rid ourselves of whiners and complainers
    shall rid ourselves of the unpatriotic
    shall rid ourselves of the betrayers
    shall rid ourselves of the stench of the left.
    It shall be done,
    the Right, so bright and so white,
    a light so pure and made of might
    deems it so
    and so it shall be done.
    Love me, the Right Wing,
    my children
    and you will live the dream, of a Left free world,
    pure, saturated freedom,
    bright and uncompromising:
    the Right.

  105. @The Right Wing

    “First they came for the Communists, but I was not a Communist, so I said nothing; then they came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew, so I said nothing. . .” and so on down the line, ending with: “then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to stand up.”
    -Niemoller

  106. Camille Bruce “Rush Limbaugh and right wingers finally have a feminazi of their very own.”

    Since you clearly do not listen to Rush’s show, or you would never have made such a fabulously ignorant statement, I suggest you not comment on it.

    It’s better to remain silent and be considered a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt.

  107. Rheinhard “Meanwhile, we have twilightmoon insisting that the financial collapse today is all the fault of the Congress in place for less than 2 years.”

    You’re mischaracterizing my views. I do believe Congress has a very strong role in the collapse of the capital markets, but there’s plenty of blame to go around. Fannie May and Freddie Mac were a giant slush fund for congress.

    Obama is heavily tied up in it with a major campain advisor as a former member of the board “A former member of Barack Obama’s VP search team, James A. Johnson, served as chairman of Fannie Mae.”
    http://news.muckety.com/2008/09/10/obama-and-mccain-both-have-ties-to-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac/4941

    McCain also has ties to it.
    “John McCain’s connections to the two mortgage companies are more numerous. His campaign manager, Rick Davis, headed the Homeownership Alliance, an advocacy group for the two lenders. His close adviser, Charlie Black, is a long-time lobbyist whose firm represented Freddie Mac.”

    The problem is that no one is asking for heads to roll like we did with Enron and Worldcom. Where’s the Ken Leigh of Fannie May or Freddie Mac? Why is Congress not immediately demanding a full investigation into the mess? Why is the government who created the problem now supposed to be trusted to run the companies?

    This is government at its corrupt worst.

    I won’t say I trust either side, but I mildly favor Republicans because at least they believe in some private enterprise and not full scale redistribution of wealth and socialized everything.

    Regardless of your political leanings you have to admit people are flawed, corrupt, and selfish beings. The more power you centralize in any organization be it government or anything the more chance there is for things to get screwed up and favor one group over another.

    It’s not a love for Republican party that makes me wary of Democrats or Obama, its a general distrust in massive centralized control over the country, because of my pragmatic views on human nature.

  108. “This economic meltdown can be laid DIRECTLY at the feet of John McCain and Phil Gramm.”

    By the way the “economic meltdown” is far more than 1 bill, even if that was a contributing factor. There was far too much money handed too freely to people who had no reasonable way to pay it back. This was essentially short sighted irresponsible behavior.

  109. xbuffed “Why does McCain and all politicians get govt health care and we dont? The benefits he enjoys ARE socialized health care…it already exists, and it needs to be provided to everyone, esp. children…you are extremely inhumane to think otherwise.”

    You’re going to pay for this health care out of your own pocket?

    If so bravo. If you’re looking to pull that money out of someone else’s pocket at the point of a gun that’s not having a heart, that’s thuggery.

    If I steal break into your house and steal all your things and give half of it away am I being “kind and generous?”

    Give me a break, true rights are what you can get without taking anything away from someone else. There’s nothing kind hearted about spending someone else’s money.

  110. jake “Republicans are blinded by the cute cheerleader. They have all forgotten how much they used to hate McCain”

    I can assure you, conservatives have not forgotten their feelings about McCain.

  111. Obama The Patriot – Removes American Flag From His Plane

    The Patriot Room
    Posted on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 8:11:07 AM by Bill Dupray

    Barack Obama recently finished a $500,000 total overhaul of his 757. And as
    part of the new design, he decided to remove the American flag from the
    tail…
    What American running for President of the United States would remove the
    symbol of his country? And worse, he replaced the flag with it with a symbol
    of himself…

  112. DO I HAVE THIS STRAIGHT?

    HIS FATHER WAS A BLACK AFRICAN MUSLIM FROM KENYA .
    WE HAVE SEEN PICTURES OF HIS AFRICAN FAMILY.

    HIS MOTHER WAS A WHITE AMERICAN ATHEIST FROM KANSAS . WHERE ARE THE PICTURES OF HIS AMERICAN FAMILY?

    HIS FATHER DESERTED HIS MOTHER WHEN HE WAS ONLY TWO YEARS OLD AND WENT BACK TO AFRICA BY WAY OF HARVARD UNIVERSITY .. HOW? WAS HIS FATHER WEALTHY?

    HIS MOTHER MARRIED AN INDONESIAN MUSLIM AND THEN MOVED TO JAKARTA WHERE HE WAS ENROLLED IN A MUSLIM SCHOOL ..

    WHEN HE REACHED HIGH SCHOOL AGE HIS MOTHER SENT HIM TO HAWAII TO BE WITH HIS WHITE GRANDPARENTS AND HE WAS PUT INTO AN EXPENSIVE PRIVATE SCHOOL. HE LATER WENT TO HARVARD UNIVERSITY . HOW? WERE HIS GRANDPARENTS RICH?

    HE LIVES IN A $1.4 MILLION HOUSE OBTAINED THROUGH A DEAL WITH A WEALTHY FUNDRAISER. HOW?

    HE ‘WORKED’ AS A CIVIL RIGHTS ACTIVIST IN CHICAGO . HE HAS NEVER HELD A PRODUCTIVE JOB OR RECEIVED A PAY CHECK THAT WAS NOT GOVERNMENT-FUNDED AND/OR TAXPAYER SUPPORTED.

    THE PRESIDENCY IS NOT A CIVIL RIGHTS POSITION, NOR IS IT SUBJECT TO AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SET ASIDES;
    ON-THE-JOB TRAINING WON’T CUT IT.

    HE ENTERED POLITICS AT THE STATE LEVEL AND THEN THE NATIONAL LEVEL WHERE HE HAS MINIMAL
    EXPERIENCE.

    HE IS PROUD OF HIS ‘AFRICAN HERITAGE’ (A FATHER WHO GOT A WHITE GIRL PREGNANT AND DESERTED HER).

    WHERE IS THE PRIDE IN HIS ‘WHITE HERITAGE’? (A MOTHER WHO FLAUNTED CONVENTION AND DID NOT BELIEVE IN GOD).

    SOME MIGHT THINK THERE WAS NOT MUCH TO BE PROUD OF EITHER WAY.

    HE BELONGS, AND HAS BELONGED FOR OVER 20 YEARS, TO AN ‘AFRO-CENTRIC’ CHURCH IN CHICAGO THAT HATES WHITES, HATES JEWS, AND BLAMES AMERICA FOR ALL THE WORLD ‘S PERCEIVED FAULTS. (INCLUDING CREATING THE AIDs VIRUS IN ORDER TO INFLICT IT ON AFRICANS).

    HE REPEATEDLY WHITEWASHES THE
    PASTOR, HIS CHURCH AND THE MEMBERS WHO CHEERED AFTER HEARING VITRIOLIC TIRADES AGAINST AMERICA .

    HE COULD NOT CONFRONT HIS PASTOR BUT HE WANTS US TO BELIEVE HE CAN CONFRONT NORTH KOREA AND IRAN ? YEAH RIGHT ! !

    DURING HIS VERY BRIEF TIME IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE HE HAS MANAGED TO AMASS THE NUMBER ONE ULTRA LIBERAL VOTING RECORD OUT OF THE ONE HUNDRED MEMBERS.

    HE HAS VOTED CONSISTENTLY FOR
    BIGGER GOVERNMENT AND HIGHER TAXES. HE HAS VOTED FOR BIG ENTITLEMENTS AND
    LEGISLATION THAT WOULD SEVERELY CURTAIL AMERICA’S ABILITY TO FIGHT TERRORISM AND TO PROTECT OUR BORDERS AND OUR NATIONAL INTERESTS AROUND THE WORLD.

    BUT, HE IS A GOOD ORATOR.
    ISN’T THAT A COMFORT?

    YEAH, I THINK I SEE HOW WELL HE COULD UNITE THE COUNTRY.

    I THINK THE TRUTH IS THAT HE HOPES NO ONE WILL PUT THE PIECES TOGETHER.

    LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, LET ME INTRODUCE YOU TO OUR NEW CHIEF PILOT. HE HAS NEVER FLOWN AN AIRPLANE, IN FACT HE HAS NEVER EVEN SAT IN THE COCKPIT, BUT HE SAYS HE HAS RIDDEN ON PLANES BEFORE. WE ARE SURE HE WILL GUIDE US SAFELY THROUGH THE STORMS WE MAY ENCOUNTER ON THIS FLIGHT.

    PEOPLE WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? HAVE YOU NEVER HEARD THE STORY ABOUT THE WOLF HIDING IN SHEEP’S CLOTHING SO HE CAN DESTROY THEM FROM WITH-IN? THE HAND WRITING IS ON THE WALL, DO YOU NOT HAVE EYES TO SEE IT?

    THINK LONG AND HARD BEFORE YOU VOTE FOR THIS GUY OBAMA !

  113. 2008 Democrat National Convention

    Schedule of Events
    7:00 pm OPENING FLAG BURNING

    7:15 pm PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.N.

    7:20 pm Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    7:25 pm NONRELIGIOUS PRAYER AND WORSHIP – Jesse Jackson & Al Sharpton

    7:45 pm CEREMONIAL TREE HUGGING – Darryl Hannah

    7:55 pm Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    8:00 pm HOW I INVENTED THE INTERNET – Al Gore

    8:15 pm GAY WEDDING PLANNING – Rosie O’Donnell

    8:35 pm Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    8:40 pm OUR TROOPS ARE WAR CRIMINALS – John Kerry

    9.00 pm MEMORIAL SERVICE FOR SADDAM AND HIS SONS – Cindy Sheehan and Susan Sarandon

    10:00 pm ANSWERING MACHINE ETIQUETTE – Alec Baldwin

    11:00 pm Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    11:05 pm COLLECTION FOR THE OSAMA BIN LADEN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT FUND – Barbara Str eisand

  114. 11:15 pm FREE THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS FROM GUANTANAMO BAY – Sean Penn

    11:30 pm OVAL OFFICE AFFAIRS – William Jefferson Clinton

    11:45 pm Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    11:50 pm HOW GEORGE BUSH BROUGHT DOWN THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS – Howard Dean

    12:15 am TRUTH IN BROADCASTING AWARD – Presented to Dan Rather by Michael Moore

    12:25 am Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    12:30 am SATELLITE ADDRESS – Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

    12:45 am NOMINATION OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA – Nancy Pelosi

    1:00 am Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    1:05 am CORONATION OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

    1:30 am Ted Kennedy PROPOSES A TOAST

    1:35 am Bill Clinton asks Ted Kennedy to drive Hillary home

  115. Maureen Dowd, winner of the 1999 Pulitzer Prize for distinguished commentary, became a columnist on The New York Times Op-Ed page in 1995 after having served as a correspondent in the paper’s Washington bureau since 1986. She has covered four presidential campaigns and served as White House correspondent. She also wrote a column, “On Washington,” for The New York Times Magazine.
    Ms. Dowd joined The New York Times as a metropolitan reporter in 1983. She began her career in 1974 as an editorial assistant for The Washington Star, where she later became a sports columnist, metropolitan reporter and feature writer. When the Star closed in 1981, she went to Time magazine.
    Born in Washington D.C., Ms. Dowd received a B.A. degree in English literature from Catholic University (Washington, D.C.) in 1973.
    WHERE DID OBAMA_S MONEY COME FROM???????
    Subject: New York Times Editorial
    By MAUREEN DOWD
    Published: June 29, 2008
    Go to Columnist Page _
    Certainly the most interesting and potentially devastating
    OBAMA_S TROUBLING INTERNET FUND RAISING
    Certainly the most interesting and potentially devastating phone call I have received during this election cycle came this week from one of the Obama_s campaign internet geeks. These are the staffers who devised Obama_s internet fund raising campaign which raised in the neighborhood of $200 million so far. That is more then twice the total funds raised by any candidate in history _ and this was all from the internet campaign.
    What I learned from this insider was shocking but I guess we shouldn_t be surprised that when it comes to fund raising there simply are no rules that can_t be broken and no ethics that prevail.
    Obama_s internet campaign started out innocently enough with basic e-mail networking , lists saved from previous party campaigns and from supporters who visited any of the Obama campaign web sites.
    Small contributions came in from these sources and the internet campaign staff were more than pleased by the results.
    Then, about two months into the campaign the daily contribution intake multiplied. Where was it coming from? One of the web site security monitors began to notice the bulk of the contributions were clearly coming in from overseas internet service providers and at the rate and frequency of transmission it was clear these donations were _programmed_ by a very sophisticated user.

  116. While the security people were not able to track most of the sources due to firewalls and other blocking devices put on these contributions they were able to collate the number of contributions that were coming in seemingly from individuals but the funds were from only a few credit card accounts and bank electronic funds transfers. The internet service providers (ISP) they were able to trace were from Saudi Arabia , Iran , and other Middle Eastern countries. One of the banks used for fund transfers was also located in Saudi Arabia
    Another concentrated group of donations was traced to a Chinese ISP with a similar pattern of limited credit card charges.
    It became clear that these donations were very likely coming from sources other than American voters. This was discussed at length within the campaign and the decision was made that none of these donations violated campaign financing laws.
    It was also decided that it was not the responsibility of the campaign to audit these millions of contributions as to the actual source (specific credit card number or bank transfer account numbers) to insure that none of these internet contributors exceeded the legal maximum donation on a cumulative basis of many small donations. They also found the record keeping was not complete enough to do it anyway.
    This is a shocking revelation.
    We have been concerned about the legality of _bundling_ contributions after the recent exposure of illegal bundlers but now it appears we may have an even greater problem.
    I guess we should have been somewhat suspicious when the numbers started to come out. We were told (no proof offered) that the Obama internet contributions were from $10.00 to $25.00 or so.
    If the $200,000,000 is right, and the average contribution was $15.00, that would mean over 13 million individuals made contributions? That would also be 13 million contributions would need to be processed. How did all that happen?
    I believe the Obama campaign_s internet fund raising needs a serious, in depth investigation and audit. It also appears the whole question of internet fund raising needs investigation by the legislature and perhaps new laws to insure it complies not only with the letter of these laws but the spirit as well.
    Maureen Dowd
    IS IT RIGHT FOR FOREIGN COUNTRIES TO HAVE AN INVESTMENT IN WHO BECOMES OUR NEXT PRESIDENT??? IF YOU ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THIS, PLEASE PASS IT ON.
    The fact that the NY Times allowed this to be printed is amazing in itself.

  117. Ah . . . Sorry to bother you Mr. Obama, Sir

    Excuse me Mr. Obama, I mean Senator Obama, sir. Um . . . know you are busy and important and stuff. I mean running for president is very important and . . . ah . . . I hate to bother you. I will only take a minute ok, sir?
    See, I have these missing pieces that are holding me up, and I was wondering sir, if you could take time out of your busy schedule and help me out. You know, no big deal, just some loose ends and things.
    Hey, you have a nice place here! The wife sees houses like this on TV all the time and says boy she wishes she had digs like this you know? Is that painting real? Really? Wow. I saw something like that in a museum once!
    Oh, sorry sir. I didn’t mean to get off the track. So if you could just help me out a minute and give me some details, I will get right out of your way. I want to close this case and maybe take the wife to Coney Island or something. Ever been to Coney Island ? No, I didn’t think so. . .
    Well, listen, anyways, I can’t seem to get some information I need to wrap this up. These things seem to either be “locked” or “not available’. I’m sure itâb™s just some oversight or glitch or something, so if you could you tell me where these things are . . . I . . . I . . . have them written down here somewhere . . oh wait. Sorry about the smears. It was raining out. I’ll just read it to you.
    Could you help me please find these things, sir?
    • Your Occidental College records
    • Your Columbia College records
    • Your Columbia Thesis paper
    • Your Harvard College records
    • Your Selective Service Registration
    • Your medical records
    • Your Illinois State Senate records
    • Your Illinois State Senate schedule
    • Your Law practice client list
    • A Certified Copy of your original Birth certificate
    • Your embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth
    • Your Harvard Law Review articles that were published
    • Your University of Chicago scholarly articles
    • Your Record of baptism

    Oh hey . . . listen! I know you are busy! Is this too much for you now? I mean tell you what. I will come back tomorrow. Give you some time to get these things together, you know? I mean, I know you are busy, so I will just let myself out. I will be back tomorrow. And the day after. .

  118. “John and I are related through our grandmothers. Katherine Vaulx McCain and Huetta Vaulx Boles, both of Fayetteville, Ark., were sisters. My side of the Vaulx family represents a long line of Democrats, but it is with no small amount of pride that we’ve followed the life and career of now-Sen. John McCain.[..]

    Although neither my father nor I have ever voted for a Republican, when John threw his hat in the ring in 2000, we were both very proud and encouraged, and not just because he’s our relative. This was the first Republican who, on a national stage, was saying things like, “If we repeal Roe vs. Wade tomorrow, thousands of young American women will be performing illegal and dangerous operations,” and, “Neither party should be defined by pandering to the outer-reaches of American politics and the agents of intolerance.” Wow!

    Here was a man who was not abiding by partisan lines, who was, instead, living up to his promise of “straight talk” and commonsense thinking. The right-wing Republican base may not have agreed with everything he said, but the rest of America certainly respected him for speaking his mind honestly.

    Jump ahead to the campaign Sen. McCain is currently running. Clearly, a lot can change in eight years. Our nation has gone from a time of unparalleled prosperity and peace to one marked by debt in the trillions of dollars, record foreclosures, and a global reputation for warmongering and neo-imperialism.

    So, where is the straight-talking, commonsense John McCain of 2000? I’m afraid he is long gone, replaced by a desperate version of himself who seems to contradict nearly everything he once stood for.

    What becomes apparent in his ideological about-face is just how out of touch McCain really is with America’s working families. [..]

    But, as he continually demonstrates in this campaign, my cousin John is long gone. “Straight talk” has been replaced with “flip-flop.” Saddest all, this is the same man who, when campaigning in 2000, told a crowd of supporters, “I don’t think Bill Gates needs a tax cut. I think your parents do.”

    My parents, John, need some help after the economic destruction Bush has wrought in the last eight years, but it’s clear you’re not the one who’ll give it to us. America’s working families no longer recognize you, nor does your own.”

    source: http://www.tampabay.com/news/perspective/article806980.ece

  119. Subject: The post turtle analogy

    While suturing a cut on the hand of a 75 year old Texas rancher, whose hand was
    caught in a gate while working cattle, the city doctor struck up a conversation with the old man.

    Eventually the topic got around to Obama and his bid to be our President.

    The old rancher said, ‘Well, ya know, Obama is just an ole ‘post turtle’.

    Not being familiar with the term, the city doc asked him what a ‘post turtle’ was.

    The old rancher said, ‘When you’re driving down a country road and you come
    across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that’s a ‘post turtle’.’

    The old rancher saw a puzzled look on the doctor’s face, so he continued…

    ‘You know he didn’t get up there by himself, he doesn’t belong up there,
    he doesn’t know what to do up there, and you have to wonder what kind
    of a dumb ass put him up there!

  120. “That will happen on the same day Palin faces ethics charges.”

    ROOOOOOOOOOOFLLLMOO!!

    HA HA HA ha ha ha.. are you seriously still clinging to the Tazorgate “Scandal”?

    I’m sure you’re totally fine with a drunken-while on duty and in uniform in his car, 10 year old step son tazoring 4 times divorced trooper patrolling your neighborhood.

    Just please don’t ever complain about police abuse of power.

    Ever.

    Seriously, do liberals *ever* actually research issues they spew on about?

  121. ” Fannie May and Freddie Mac were a giant slush fund for congress.” – twilightmoon

    In this regard you are correct. I know he’s an eeeevil librul and all, but if you really believe what you’re saying here then I would urge you to check out Dr. Lawrence Lessig’s current project, the “Change Congress” initiative. I got to see him speak on this subject at the “Netroots Nation” conference in Austin 2 months ago and it was awesome. You can watch it on his site or at this site (I added the latter because I can’t be sure from my work desk whether the link on Lessig’s blog still works), or you can download the talk for your iPod via iTunes (search for Lessig unser podcasts and get the Netroots nation keynote from 7/24/08). He cited Fannie and Freddie as one of many, many examples of the corrupting influence of money on the decision-making regulatory process. Despite being a liberal he criticized both sides. He gave one important example about telecom regulation – years ago Al Gore proposed combining DSL and cable broadband under a new title “Title VII” of the telecommunications act of 1996 to essentially deregulate them. After his staff took this idea to Congress, Congress said “Hell No – how will we raise money from telcoms if we deregulate them?!” So the question from this liberal for folks on the right is “How much extortion-enabling regulation is there?”

    However it is just as much a mistake to automatically assume all regulation is bad, as many extreme libertarians and “conservatives” do. This seems to be the straw man view you put forth when you say Democrats want “full scale redistribution of wealth and socialized everything” and “massive centralized control over the country”. I am a liberal (at least by the current definition of our media), but like FDR, recognize that capitalism is a model that works well within certain bounds (much like the Newtonian theory of motion works well within bounds where masses are finite and velocities are much less than the speed of light, but it breaks down outside those bounds).

    One metaphor the Democrats don’t use, that I think of over and over when I hear Obama speak about the need for regulation: the markets operate like team sports — like say, a football game. Team sports don’t operate well without referees, and that’s exactly what’s happened under the Republicans.

    We need referees here because history shows, as FDR understood, that left to their own devices our great financial institutions will jump lemming-like over the cliff every time. Whatver crazy investment scheme or bubble is hot, the wizards of Wall Street will jump on every time. Which would be OK if they were the only one in the hazard, but if the bank failure takes YOUR life savings with it, that is a threat to the country as a whole!

    Republicans can blame Clinton all they want — the fact is, the Republicans under leadership of such brain trusts as Phil Gramm have methodically removed the REFEREES from the games, and look what’s happened. One of the primary reasons investors shy away from putting money into third world countries is an ABSENCE OF REGULATION.

  122. Ah of course twilightmoon posted while I was composing my response on regulation…

    the thing that bothers me most about Troopergate is Palin’s decision to act just like Bush – the laws don’t apply to me, I don’t need to respond to duly authorized Congressional subpoenas or anyone. I do what I want, and don’t question it! Do you think we elect a president or a King every 4 years, twilight?

    The commision requesting information is composed of MORE REPUBLICANS than Democrats, yet it is somehow a partisan political attack? And even if you believe it is a partisan political attack, what the hell difference does that make? Where is it in the law that a duly authorized subpoena can be ignored if it is “partisan”? What if Bill Clinton had responded this way to the insanely partisan Lewinsky investigation? What business is it of Congress who polishes his knob? yet he supplied requested documents, volumes of documents, and testified before committee. Bush and Palin just keep replying “talk to the hand”! Our founders established checks and balances for a goddam reason, and I don’t want an OATHBREAKER (which is what Bush is and Palin will be, since the oath of office is to protect and defend the Constitution which he ignores repeatedly by ignoring the duly granted investigative powers of the Congress) put in a position to determine what laws he feels like obeying today!

  123. Just think how great a professional of any kind you could be with only 143
    > days of experience!!!
    >
    > People want change so bad maybe we should lower the experience requirement
    > for Dr.s, Lawyers, Airline pilots, Etc. This would cause some change!
    >
    > Obama’s 143 Days of Senate Experience.
    > Just how much Senate experience does Barack Obama have in terms of actual
    > work days? Not much.
    >
    > From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United States Senator, to the
    > time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he
    > logged 143 days of experience in the Senate.
    >
    > That’s how many days the Senate was actually in session and working. The one
    > single senate committee that he headed, never even met once. After 143 days
    > of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief,=2 0
    > Leader of the Free World, and fill
    > the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan.
    >
    > Think about it…….143 days — 20.4 weeks — 4.7 months.
    >
    > My grandchildren spent more time in pre-school getting ready for
    > Kindergarten.
    >
    > And people want to make him our next president? Gimme a break will ya!?
    >
    >
    >
    > Not to mention that for FOUR YEARS he’ll create massive government, pull out
    > of Iraq without declaring victory (a word that libs don’t know), raise
    > payroll taxes to cover free health care to everyone and anyone that comes into
    > this country, close down Guantanamo, double capital gains (this affects anyone
    > with a pension), “not opposed” (his words) to high gas prices, uses phrases
    > such as “take profits” (his words) funny I thought in America we can keep our
    > profits as private property, has a wife who thinks this country is “down right
    > mean” (her words). God, I can hardly wait.

  124. Why do people continue to support this racist man

    Think you know who this man is?
    This possible President of the United States!! Read Below and
    ask yourselves, is this REALLY someone we can see as the
    President of our great nation!!!!
    Below are a few lines from Obama’s books; In his words!

    From Dreams of My Father: ‘I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.’
    From Dreams of My Father : ‘I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother’s race.’
    From Dreams of My Father: ‘There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.’
    From Dreams of My Father: ‘It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.’
    From Dreams of My Father: ‘I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa , that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.’

    And FINALLY the Most Damming one of ALL of them!!!
    From Audacity of Hope: ‘I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.’

  125. ” Our founders established checks and balances for a goddam reason, and I don’t want an OATHBREAKER (which is what Bush is and Palin will be, since the oath of office is to protect and defend the Constitution which he ignores repeatedly by ignoring the duly granted investigative powers of the Congress) put in a position to determine what laws he feels like obeying today!”

    Well said, Rheinhard.

    Twilightmoon would laugh. He’s easily amused. Three hundred more posts from his OCD will set a thread record.

  126. “FINALLY the Most Damming one of ALL of them!!!
    From Audacity of Hope: ‘I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'”

    So “Real”… after 9/11 a lot of law-abiding American citizens that were Muslim were violently beaten, had homes and businesses vandalized, and I remember one store owner who wasn’t actually a Muslim but a Sikh (so he had dark skin and a turban which was good enough for most Rethuglican rednecks), being murdered! All this is, I assume, OK with you?

    Because the slimy asshole who wrote up the talking points that you’re copying in that post knew very well that that is what Obama meant, that if the populace gets rowdy in the case of an attack and wants to lash out at any Muslim, or any brown skinned person with an Arab name, for retribution, Obama will stand athwart the pitchfork-wielding mob shouting “Stop!” And I damn well would too. Unlike Bush and most dittoheads, I believe in counterattacking the people that attacked us, not any random person with brown skin we can get our hands on.

    But not you, patriot that you are… you’d burn that Sikh wouldn’t you, you racist asshole? Kill em all and let God (specifically the Southern Baptist Convention Jesus, the ballsy free-market Jesus, not the wimpy Unitarian peace-and-love fake Jesus) sort ’em out, right?

  127. My fellow Americans:

    As your future President I want to thank my supporters, for your mindless support of me, despite my complete lack of any legislative achievement, my pastor’s relations with Louis Farrakhan and Libyan dictator Moamar Quadafi, or my blatantly leftist voting record while I present myself as some sort of bi-partisan agent of change.

    I also like how my supporters claim my youthful drug use and criminal behavior somehow qualifies me for the Presidency after 8 years of claiming Bush’s youthful drinking disqualifies him. Your hypocrisy is a beacon of hope shining over a sea of political posing.

  128. I would also like to thank the Kennedy’s for coming out in support of me. There’s a lot of glamour behind the Kennedy name, even though JFK started the V ietnam War, his brother Robert illegally wiretapped Martin Luther King, Jr. and Teddy killed a female employee with whom he was having an extra marital affair and who was pregnant with his child. And I’m not going anywhere near the cousins, both literally and figuratively.

    And I’d like to thank Oprah Winfrey for her support. Her love of meaningless empty platitudes will be the force that propels me to the White House.

    Americans should vote for me, not because of my lack of experience or achievement, but because I make people feel good.

    Voting for me causes some white folk to feel relieved of their imagined, racist guilt.I say things that sound meaningful, but don’t really mean anything becauseAmericans are tired of things having meaning. If things have meaning, then that means you have to think about them.

    Americans are tired of thinking.It’s time to shut down the brain and open up the heart.So when you go to vote, remember don’t think, just do.And do it for me.

    Thank You.
    Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.

  129. I am continuously amazed how the level of intellect here has dropped down to chimp level.
    @@Buster…I am secure in my sexuality (as a father of 2). Clearly you are now. I am also resistant to taunts about my country, because your jealously reveals itself.

    I also noticed that the people who I do consider intelligent in these posts have left….so ta ta all. Time to raise myself out of the gutter and leave.

  130. Rheinhard “I would urge you to check out Dr. Lawrence Lessig’s current project”

    Thanks, I’ll check it out.

    I’d add that I’m not a goose stepping conservative nazi Republican any more than I’m a toe tag government knows best liberal. I have my very own views about just about everything and I’m more than willing to listen to both sides, and in many cases I think both Republicans and Democrats are both wrong, for example on the border issue.

    The reason I argue more strongly against liberals than conservatives is because they want to restrict MY rights more, from the neo-McCarthyism of “political correctness” to the assumption that spending someone else’s money for them is somehow “compassionate” to the disgusting slimy vitriol in the main stream liberal press which has completely lost any sense of credibility.

    Sure there are very religious conservatives who’d like to restrict rights, but I’m not as threatened by them as I am by liberals because they do not have the weight of the full main stream media behind them, nor do they come across as obnoxious and vitriolic as liberals do. The most extreme conservatives might be like that but not the majority of them, liberals all buy into the neo-McCarthy political correctness it’s become part of our popular culture to the point people have lost jobs due to it. Many people have.

    Bottom line is I’m far more threatened by liberalism than conservatism even tho my personal beliefs line up with some of each and neither in various cases.

  131. Buster, “Time to raise myself out of the gutter and leave.”

    I don’t think we agree much on political issues, but for the record I haven’t made fun of you, your country, your sexuality, nor your family, or if I have let me apologize.

    You’re welcome to share your views here. Sorry for some of the background noise mostly by cowards who won’t even log in and post under their own name.

  132. @Buster “Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. Noone except for liberals want to live in the frozen, backward, country of Canada”

    I have family members and friends who are gay, and I have a close friend that lives in Canada. I dare you to come over to where I live and say that shit to my face.

  133. Rheinhard “I remember one store owner who wasn’t actually a Muslim but a Sikh (so he had dark skin and a turban which was good enough for most Rethuglican rednecks), being murdered!”

    “Unlike Bush and most dittoheads, I believe in counterattacking the people that attacked us, not any random person with brown skin we can get our hands on.”

    I’d expect better from you than to lump all the main stream conservatives, George Bush, and Rush Limbaugh in with such mindless and racist mobs.

    Being rude to people without a damn good reason is wrong, regardless of political ideology. I’d be rude to OJ Simpson because he’s a murderer, but I would not mistreat a muslim or a Sikh unless they gave me a specific reason to be.

  134. Rheinhard “The commision requesting information is composed of MORE REPUBLICANS than Democrats, yet it is somehow a partisan political attack? “

    Are yo not aware that Palin displaced a number of WHITE MALE corrupt republicans when she took office? She has rubbed a lot of the “good old boys” the wrong way, and sexist pigs that they are both Republican and Democrat males are trying to find a way to undermine the upstart female that stepped into their country club uninvited.

    They’ll get back to tearing each other’s throats out after they get rid of the meddling woman.

    You have seen this happen before in your life I have no doubt if you’ve been paying any attention.

  135. To quote Dana Carvey as “the Church Lady”: How conveeeeeeenient!

    If the Palin ethics investigation is comprised of a majority of Democrats, it’s obviously illegitimate because it’s merely a political smear campaign in advance of the election (despite the fact that it was convened before McCain picked her)…

    If the Palin ethics investigation is comprised of a majority of Republicans, well it’s just payback for their being humiliated and are trying to undermine the “upstart”.

    So, as was desired, NO investigation of Sarah Palin can ever be legitimate under any circumstances! Hooray! Once again we have justified an executive who can just thumb their noses at legitimate inquries! Isn’t untrammeled power great?

    I’ll be sure to remember this justification should President Obama ever come up for some kind of Congressional inquiry (assuming of course that Republicans can regain a Congressional majority again in my lifetime…)

  136. “If the Palin ethics investigation is comprised of a majority of Democrats, it’s obviously illegitimate because it’s merely a political smear campaign in advance of the election (despite the fact that it was convened before McCain picked her)…”

    There’s no need for an “ethics investigation” for removing a political appointee. They are there at the pleasure of the person they serve under. Having an investigation AT ALL is automatically suspect.

    The fact that it’s conducted by her political opponents is even more fishy.

    The fact that they are pinning it on the fact that she wanted a dangerous, and out of control trooper who is STILL employed for no good reason, is even more disgraceful. He is still on duty even tho he’s been proven to be intoxicated while in his patrol vehicle while on duty in uniform. That alone should be enough to remove him, forget about the fact he tazored his 10 year old step son, that should land him in prison.

    The fact that this is even still being discussed is just sad. Don’t you liberals have anything better to talk about?

  137. Rheinhard: “I’ll be sure to remember this justification should President Obama ever come up for some kind of Congressional inquiry (assuming of course that Republicans can regain a Congressional majority again in my lifetime…)”

    Lucky you. We don’t need to wait that long, we already can’t find out anything about his background.

  138. @twilightmoon – Ah you seem not to realize there is a difference between a duly authorized subpoena from the CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES and the foot-stampings of Fox News pundits.

    This seems to be a common affliction among wingnuts.

    Though I will admit, Bill O’Reilly stomping his feet and whining like a bitch seems to get more results than Congress these days.

    And sorry, no, she wanted to get a civil service employee fired for entirely personal (and disputed) reasons. Now if as you say she could simply have ordered the commissioner to fire this cop, and he was so evil, why won’t she say she did so? Wouldn’t that make her look good, getting rid of a bad cop? No, she knows she was doing something unethical and wanted to hide the evidence by pressuring the commissioner to do her dirty work for her.

  139. Comments like that makes us conservatives look bad. Shut up. Canada is a great place where people give opinions which are respected. Your elitist attitude is a prime example why people hate americans abroad. it is this same belligerent attitude why they also hate germans as well. Self centered and flippant…generally it is a useless tool who spouts this crap. Unfortunately this election is about the one think few dare to talk about yet the world knows it…it is about race.

    McCain all the way.

  140. The first time I read this quote, I thought it was dangerously true. Then I really started pondering it and thought how would this apply to our own lives/careers? Let’s look at it again to see how absurd it is.

    You couldn’t get a job at McDonalds and become district manager after 143 days of experience.
    You couldn’t become chief of surgery after 143 days of experience of being a surgeon.
    You couldn’t get a job as a teacher and be the superintendent after 143 days of experience.
    You couldn’t join the military and become a colonel after a 143 days of experience.
    You couldn’t get a job as a reporter and become the nightly news anchor after 143 days of experience.
    BUT….
    ‘From the time Barack Obama was sworn in as a United State Senator, to the time he announced he was forming a Presidential exploratory committee, he logged 143 days of experience in the Senate.
    That’s how many days the Senate was actually in session and working.
    After 143 days of work experience, Obama believed he was ready to be Commander In Chief,Leader of the Free World, and fill the shoes of Abraham Lincoln, FDR, JFK and Ronald Reagan. 143 days?

    We all have to start somewhere. The senate is a good start, but after 143 days, that’s all it is – a start.

    AND, strangely, a large sector of the American public seems to feel comfortable with this and campaigning for him.

    We wouldn’t accept this in our own line of work, yet some are OK with this for the President of the United States of America?

    Come on folks, we are not voting for the next American Idol.

  141. Who Am I ?
    I am under 45 years old,
    I love the outdoors,
    I hunt,
    I am a Republican reformer,
    I have taken on the Republican Party establishment,
    I have many children,
    I have a spot on the national ticket as vice president with less than
    two years in the governor’s office.
    Have you ever heard of me before now?

    I am Teddy Roosevelt.

  142. “No FUD being spewed by conservatives.”

    You obviously haven’t read many of the posts on this thread. And yes, there’s plenty of trash talk from both sides. It’s sad.

    “Fannie May and Feddie Mac”

    You should at least learn to spell before spinning a lie. Your deceit would be slightly more convincing.

  143. To Those Who Try to Change Conservatives by Presenting Facts: Don’t bother.
    You need to read the article
    The Power of Political Misinformation

    From the article:
    Republicans might be especially prone to the backfire effect because conservatives may have more rigid views than liberals: Upon hearing a refutation, conservatives might “argue back” against the refutation in their minds, thereby strengthening their belief in the misinformation. Nyhan and Reifler did not see the same “backfire effect” when liberals were given misinformation and a refutation about the Bush administration’s stance on stem cell research. … Reifler questioned attempts to debunk rumors and misinformation on the campaign trail, especially among conservatives: “Sarah Palin says she was against the Bridge to Nowhere,” he said, referring to the pork-barrel project Palin once supported before she reversed herself. “Sending those corrections to committed Republicans is not going to be effective, and they in fact may come to believe even more strongly that she was always against the Bridge to Nowhere.”

    By the way, the Wash Post had become a very conservative newspaper well before GW took the Oval Office.

  144. 262 posts thus far!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Does ANYONE read the second (let alone third…) pages???

    Before any of you get all hot and bothered about all this, it is worth saying again that the country gets the leaders it deserves.

    A country’s government is a reflection of its people.

  145. Independent Voter “No FUD being spewed by conservatives.”

    You obviously haven’t read many of the posts on this thread. And yes, there’s plenty of trash talk from both sides. It’s sad.


    There’s racism spanning liberal and conservative divide. On the conservative side it’s widely shunned and condemned by main stream conservatives. On the liberal side it’s called political correctness and affirmative action and it’s widely praised, defended, and pushed into the popular culture.

    Main stream Democrats have been spewing venomous sexism since the moment Palin was the announced running mate for John McCain, desperate to push the Obama agenda shamelessly from all corners of the wildly partisan main stream liberal media.

    “Fannie May and Feddie Mac”

    You should at least learn to spell before spinning a lie. Your deceit would be slightly more convincing.

    I’ve spelled Fannie May and Freddie Mac that way. You’re right it’s Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.

    NoFUD is actually correct in saying that Obama is deeply in the tank for what’s going on with Fannie Mae:
    “A group called the Center for Responsive Politics keeps track of which politicians get Fannie and Freddie political contributions. The top three U.S. Senators getting big Fannie and Freddie political bucks were Democrats and No. 2 is Barack Obama.”
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2084551/posts

    This list here shows Obama as 3rd behind Dodd and Kerry, but the CfRP might be using a different time line. This is 1989 to 2008:
    http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/07/top-senate-recipients-of-fanni.html

    Barack Obama: $105,849

    Note that no heads are rolling at Fannie Mae, despite massive fraud and a huge tax payer funded bailout. No investigation, nothing just a hand out of money.

    You have to be at least concerned about this if you care at all about government corruption.

  146. Hm… “Republicans might be especially prone to the backfire effect because conservatives may have more rigid views than liberals”

    Republicans and conservatives are regularly called “right-wing” and “extremist” and “rigid” while liberals in the same media are rarely identified as liberal, and almost never “extremist” or “left-wing” or “activist”.

    Conservative views are not more rigid than liberals, unless you set your frame of reference for them to be so. If you assume liberalism is “correct” and conservatism is “wrong” then of course conservatives are going to seem rigid because they have the “wrong” views and won’t change them. The same thing works in reverse too.

    Liberals have been clinging to many false-hoods about Iraq, and more recently Palin.

    Sarah Palin was against the bridge to nowhere, she cut the funding for it and told Alaskans that if they didn’t want to pay for it there was no reason to expect the federal government to. She had options to keep the bridge alive and chose to cancel the project.

    Was this a reversal of an earlier stand? Yes, in part, but it is an example of the pragmatism and good judgement she has shown in her time as mayor and then governor.
    http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/577dmopp.asp

  147. I find it interesting that no liberals who still spew venom almost 40 years later about the crooked president Nixon who’s surrogates broke into the Watergate hotel, don’t seem to have the time to condemn whoever hacked into Sarah Palin’s private email account and posted the information online.

    Why is that?

  148. Rheinhard “And sorry, no, she wanted to get a civil service employee fired for entirely personal (and disputed) reasons. Now if as you say she could simply have ordered the commissioner to fire this cop, and he was so evil, why won’t she say she did so? Wouldn’t that make her look good, getting rid of a bad cop? No, she knows she was doing something unethical and wanted to hide the evidence by pressuring the commissioner to do her dirty work for her.”

    Wait is the “civil service employee” you are referring to here, the scary cop who tazers 10 year olds and drinks while in his squad car and in uniform? Or are you referring to the political appointee who serves at her pleasure?

    “This seems to be a common affliction among wingnuts.”

    I don’t believe I’ve used pejoratives against you, sad that you have to stoop to that level, it weakens your argument and cheapens you.

  149. “. . . sad that you have to stoop to that level, it weakens your argument and cheapens you.”

    Yes, it does. I agree. This is probably the only time that will happen.

    (Sep 16, 08 – 01:14 Comment from: twilightmoon)

    “your a misogynist douche-bag, get bent.”

    It must weaken your grammatical skills as well.

  150. “I find it interesting that no liberals who still spew venom almost 40 years later about the crooked president Nixon who’s surrogates broke into the Watergate hotel, don’t seem to have the time to condemn whoever hacked into Sarah Palin’s private email account and posted the information online.”

    Because it wasn’t devised, executed, and subsequently covered up by an elected administration?

  151. Superior, Nebraska “”your a misogynist douche-bag, get bent.”
    It must weaken your grammatical skills as well.”

    No, that statement didn’t weaken my argument, that was exactly my argument. I don’t agree with Rheinhard on a lot of political issues, but he at least overall makes good points. Others in this thread and the previous Palin thread were just mindless sexist trolls.

    Freeman @ R2 “(Palin looks like such a fraud)”

    Think what you will, politicians in general are phoney but Palin is less so than most by a wide margin. I guess you can’t see it because you don’t agree with her. Almost 90% of Alaskans like her tho, that’s huge approval ratings for a governor, she must know how to do something right.

  152. “Because it wasn’t devised, executed, and subsequently covered up by an elected administration?”

    If it’s found out that someone in Obama campaign was involved, I’m certain you’ll call for his immediate removal from office if he wins.

  153. “If it’s found out that someone in Obama campaign was involved, I’m certain you’ll call for his immediate removal from office if he wins.”

    Interesting response: I notice that you didn’t dispute my statement at all; perhaps because you realize it is correct.

    I will, however, respond to your sarcastic comment: yeah, I would, absolutely: if it is shown that Obama knew of and approved the hack, or later found out about it and covered it up, absolutely.

    All evidence (such as it is) points to this being some dumb-ass hacker kid who’d better get ready to feel the full brunt of the justice system come crashing down on him; it was a stupid, stupid stunt… as I’m SURE you would agree, had it been, say, Joe Biden or Obama who’d been hacked, correct? After all, you’re an intelligent person who looks at everything fairly, right?

  154. This settles the experience argument.

    Sarah Palin – 6 years as mayor, 1.5 years as Governor.
    Total = 7.5 years of elected experience

    Barack Obama 8 years as State Senator, 4 years as US Senator. = 12 years of elected experience

    The fact is, Obama has more experience than Palin in terms of years and also in terms of quality.

    6 years as mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, a town of 9000 people was a joke. It was also a part time job. Also, after a hiring/firing controversy there, Sarah was forced to turn over 1/2 the mayoral job to an elected Administrator. Look it up. The place is literally a ghost town. The current mayor admits that WEEKS GO BY without any work to do. WEEKS. She admitted most work is centered on hunting/fishing violations than anything else. LOL.

    The fact is, more people work in the Sears Tower in downtown Chicago than live in the entire city of Wasilla. LOL. That means the Sears Tower building manager has more “executive” experience than Palin – and more quality experience, as he has had to deal with REAL problems, like numerous terrorist plots and warnings re: his building!

    Sarah as Governor, Fact #2:
    There are more people in Ft. Worth, Texas than in the entire state of Alaska. Also more people in San Diego, CA. More people in Memphis, TN.

    This means the mayor of Memphis, TN needs only to be elected Governor of Tennessee for a year and a half before he is qualified to be President/VP. Think that’ll ever happen? LOL.

    According to Republican logic, loser/criminal Mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick, has more executive experience than John McCain. LOOLOOLOL!!! In fact, Kilpatrick is more qualified than Sarah, because his Mayoral experience extends to over a MILLION people – while Sarah only deals with 600,000.

    After all, if you say “executive” experience trumps legislative experience, then you have to say executive experience over millions is MORE IMPORTANT than executive experience over just 600,000. Right?

    Right???!!!

    ANOTHER FACT: Sarah received 900 votes to become mayor of Wasilla. 900 FREAKING VOTES. I received more than that at an event at my college.

    ANOTHER FACT: Obama ran a business as a community organizer. They took in millions of dollars and employed dozens of people. They made a profit AND they were successful in getting thousands of good, Midwestern Americans jobs – after they were fired. You don’t have to count this experience – as I don’t count Sarah’s years on the local City Council – essentially a volunteer job – but you can’t discredit Obama on this.

    FACT: Obama has run the biggest and best (in terms of money raising) campaign in American history. He has more directly-paid employees and a higher direct, hands-on budget than Sarah had in Alaska.

    FACT: As Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin WORKED FROM HOME for 300 days! In other words, she’s been working from home, the same place she was Mayor, and she’s done that for the MAJORITY of her term! AND SHE BILLED THE TAXPAYERS FOR PER DIEM FOR THOSE 300 DAYS AT HOME! EVEN THANKSGIVING!!!!

    The Alaska state Legislators used to wear “Where’s Sarah?” pins to the state Legislature! And by the way, the Alaska state government is the WEAKEST in the country! They only meet for 4 months out of the year! The rest of the year they’re FREAKING OFF!

    If you STILL THINK Sarah Palin has more experience than Barack Obama, you are sadly mistaken.

  155. FACT: Obama has written over 1000 bills as State Senator and over 800 as US Senator. He passed several MAJOR LAWS including Obama-Feingold – the BIGGEST LAW FOR CONGRESSIONAL ETHICS REFORM IN 25 YEARS.
    You know why lobbyists can’t give plane rides and other pseudo-gifts like travel and meals? Because of Obama.

    Obama also wrote a bill to give a year of job protection to Americans (mostly working parents) who were caring for the troops (usually a son or daughter) injured in Iraq or Afghanistan.

    Great bill, right? George Bush vetoed it.

    Obama passed another law barring pensions from investing in companies that do business with Iran. Another one for low-cost housing for the troops. Another one to secure SCHIP health benefits for middle-class Americans who were slipping into the lower class. Another one securing Russian’s nukes and guaranteeing a moratorium on new Russian ICBM nukes.

    So yeah. He’s qualified.

    FACT: Obama is a WORLD LEADER WHETHER YOU LIKE HIM OR NOT. He is the most loved politician in terms of the entire world right now – and this helps America. Period.

    He is on a first name basis with all the world leaders that matter – all the Europeans, the Israelis, and Iraq/Afghanistan – and he has met them all with the exception of Medvedev of Russia and the Saudis. He has, however, met Putin.

    He has their phone numbers. The Prez of Georgia also called him, in addition to McCain.

    He’s smarter than either Palin or McCain – objectively speaking. You can’t argue this. He was the #1 law student in the country when he left Harvard. YOU ALL KNOW he could have got a six-figure job right off the bat – but he went to Chicago to be a community organizer – for a salary of $11,000 a year.

    None of you here could’ve cut it at Harvard. And you darn well John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom of his class, and Sarah “Miss 5 colleges in 6 years” Palin can’t compete with him on this.

    Obama also graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard. And you guys have the nerve to say his resume is “thin????” Do any of YOUR candidates have anything on their resume where they were #1, or at least the cream of the crop? Come on.

    He has two Grammys, two bestseller, non-ghost-written novels, he pulled himself up by his own bootstraps – entirely a self-made man – he made his millions on his own and not from inheritance (like George Bush)or stock options (like Rudy Giuliani) or a lucky marriage (like John McCain).

    And BTW, John McCain voted AGAINST the new G.I. Bill, of which Barack Obama was a sponsor.

    Stick that in your pipes and smoke it. Name one accomplishment of Palin. NOT the Bridge to Nowhere, because that was a lie. NOT the pipeline she talks about – because it doesn’t even freaking exist. THERE’S NOT EVEN A SIGNED DEAL TO SPEAK OF ON IT. And the work-from-home Governor has original initiatives or laws that she came up with and cajoled the legislature into starting up. SHE HAS NOTHING.

    OBAMA HAS EVERYTHING.

  156. “Interesting response: I notice that you didn’t dispute my statement at all; perhaps because you realize it is correct.”

    I’m confused about what part of your statement I should disagree with?

    I still think you’re comment about Reagan being a piece of shit was contemptible, and notice I haven’t said anything similar about anyone on the Democrat or liberal side, you don’t have to make stupid statements like that to make a point.

    “as I’m SURE you would agree, had it been, say, Joe Biden or Obama who’d been hacked, correct? After all, you’re an intelligent person who looks at everything fairly, right?”

    If I knew someone who’d hacked Obama or Biden’s personal email and posted the information online I’d turn them in myself. It’s a despicable thing to do. I find it disgusting that the liberal media hasn’t been more critical of this action. It’s 2008 version of Watergate minus the elected official covering up anything.

    “Twighlight moon must be a homosexual. I don’t get it”

    I’m the type of homosexual that doesn’t like to have sex with men or look at them naked, is attracted to females, and loves sex with females and looking at them naked.

    Call me a non-practicing homosexual if you like.

  157. bobby lobb “Great bill, right? George Bush vetoed it.”

    The devil is always in the details. For example the Democrats are right now promoting a “comprehensive energy bill” which will allow for off shore drilling. Too bad the fine print says that the federal government will get all the revenues, which means no state will allow offshore drilling. It’s a cleverly disguised anti-off shore drilling bill disguised as a pro off shore drilling bill. Many bills have “poison pills” or problems in them which make them on the whole unacceptable.

    “SHE HAS NOTHING.

    OBAMA HAS EVERYTHING.”

    Keep comparing Obama to Palin, that will help him win!

    Basically you think Obama is a fantastic candidate and McCain and Palin are unqualified hacks. Fine with me, don’t vote for them. I hardly think you’re very objective about the situation tho, and while you’re hyperventilation was mildly amusing, it wasn’t very persuasive.

  158. “We cannot control these despicable liars in the McCain campaign. We can only tell the truth as fearlessly and as relentlessly and as continuously as we can until November 4. We must do our duty. And if the American people want to re-elect the machine that has helped destroy this country’s national security, global reputation and economic health, then that is their choice. But I am not so depressed to think that they will.”

  159. twilightmoon: “I still think you’re comment about Reagan being a piece of shit was contemptible, and notice I haven’t said anything similar about anyone on the Democrat or liberal side, you don’t have to make stupid statements like that to make a point.”

    twilightmoon: “your a misogynist douche-bag, get bent”

    So, your statment was OK, but mine wasn’t? There’s also your insult directed to me that I “wasn’t fit to shine [Reagan’s] shoes.” Both of these comments were directed not at public figures, nearly all of whom are worthy of some scorn, but at people you were engaged in a lively discussion with, and both of whom are on the other side of the political debate from yourself.

    We all stoop to name calling at some point. My comment was directed at the leader of – arguably – one of the most corrupt administrations of the 20th century (see Iran-Contra, Nofziger/Watt/Deaver, embracing Apartheid, et al for more details); yours was directed at semi-anonymous webpage comment postings. I prefer to spend my vitriol on those who truly deserve it, and it is MY OPINION that Reagan (and his administration) is fully deserving of that vitriol, and more. You, upon hearing that opinion, proclaim “you are dead to me.” This is an open mind?

    I understand where your sense of offense comes from, though: I don’t know how old you are – that is, if your were around for the Reagan era – but for many of us who are of age to remember (on both sides of the political fence, mind you), the canonization of RR by the right-wing conservative media over the last 15+ years is a truly lamentable phenomenon. He wasn’t NEARLY as popular while holding office, even amongst his own party, as he is now. I suppose one can blame 20 years of Clinton and the Bushes for that, not to mention the blowhards of conservative talk radio.

    But it is NOT revisionist history to assert the economic catastrophe that the Soviet Union was facing in the 80s; even RR himself acknowledged this fact. Sure, RR helped end the Cold War, perhaps even hastened it a bit, but he DID NOT “end communism”; the Berlin Wall didn’t even come down until 2.5 years after he gave his little speech.

    Sadly, we won’t be around to know how history will finally recognize RR… barring, of course, some miracle age-extension solution derived from stemcell research (not likely with this – and the upcoming – administrations). But rest assured: McCain and Palin, your guy and gal (I’m using familiar words for both genders here, lest I face your accusations of sexism) WILL win in November; unfortunately, it’s the country who will lose.

  160. @twilightmoon “I still think you’re comment about Reagan being a piece of shit was contemptible / twilightmoon: “your a misogynist douche-bag, get bent”

    “So, your statment was OK, but mine wasn’t?”

    Actually, neither statement was courteous, so in that sense we were both wrong. You made your point rather crudely as you could just has easily have said:

    “We all stoop to name calling at some point. My comment was directed at the leader of – arguably – one of the most corrupt administrations of the 20th century”

    At that point you’d have been making a point that could be debated, but calling someone you politically disagree with a “piece of shit” invites no discussion, it’s simply mud-slinging with crude swear words.

    I disagree with your views on Iran-Contra, and I don’t like Apartheid but just like China we don’t always have control over what governments in other countries do.

    “not to mention the blowhards of conservative talk radio.”

    Your bias is showing. An outlet for conservatives to speak their minds does not exist in the horrendously and criminally liberally bias main stream media which is shaming their duty as an outlet for truth and scrutiny of our government. They fail because they only look carefully at the failings of one side. Without conservative talk radio there would be zero broadcast examination of the failings of the democratic side of government.

    Scary to think that you’d likely support that and probably would like censorship in the form of the so-called “Fairness Doctrine.”

    “the Berlin Wall didn’t even come down until 2.5 years after he gave his little speech. “

    “Little speech” shows more bias from you. It was no little speech it was a widely criticized and courageous move on the part of Reagan to put Gorbechev’s feet to the fire on this issue. This speech was the end of the iron curtain.

    “But rest assured: McCain and Palin, your guy and gal”

    Meh, I hope McCain wins he’s a decent guy. I can assure you I will not agree with a lot of the things he’s likely to do as president but he’s worlds better than the socialist America hating alternative, Obama.

    Note, while I don’t like a lot of things about Obama, and Biden nor Clinton, Gore etc. I don’t call them names, I criticize their positions on issues, and general attitudes about policy and the nation. I liked Reagan when he was president, I know he was not perfect but he inspired the nation and moved us out of one of the worst economic periods since the great depression. Even the situation we’re in now is better than the condition of the country at the end of the Carter Administration. Although a trillion dollar bailout is going to hurt for awhile, no doubt about that.

    More socialism isn’t going to create more jobs or prosperity, more government command and control of the financial markets is not going to fix what went wrong.

    I suspect Obama will lose this election, and I further suspect that he and his supporters will try to turn it into a referendum on national racism, which is unfortunate because his ideas and policies are wrong for this country.

    The color of his skin is meaningless. But tell that to the 95+% of blacks who will vote for him.

    Imagine if 95% of whites voted for McCain?

  161. “We forget that McCain has no executive experience, just as Obama has no executive experience. But in terms of judgment, of selection of a running mate, of calm in crisis, of a smooth operation, it is McCain who is revealing his total inexperience and unreadiness for the job, not Obama. In fact, there is no comparison. One campaign is chaotic, secretive, impulsive, unpredictable and losing. The other is supremely well-run, as transparent as a campaign can be, unflappable, very predictable, and winning. I know which man I’d prefer to be runing the country in a crisis. Not hotheaded, mercurial, impulsive, gambling McCain.”

  162. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/23/biden.earmarks/

    CNN – one of those bastions of the so-called liberal, left-wing media – is reporting a story that is NEGATIVE to Obama/Biden: turns out they voted for the “Bridge to Nowhere” while in Congress. Don’t know if this was while Palin was for it or against it…

    See, twilightmoon? The liberal media isn’t NEARLY as biased as you conservatives claim. No spin on the story, it’s just laid out plain and clear. I’m sure the conservative pundits will be spinning this one like a frisbee.

  163. Peace & Prosperity
    • Home
    • Blog
    • About Me
    • Guestbook
    • Photo Gallery
    Agha Dilbar

    My Open Letter (Blog) has been sent Six Lak (600000) to International Community for the welfare of Humanity till today. I Agha Dilbar authorize Newspapers, Magazines, Internet, to Publish and Radio, T.V. Channels to broadcast this letter all round the World.
    Website: http://aghadilbar.webs.com
    Dear President Barrack Obama
    the Great Leader of the World
    I Agha Dilbar have sent Mr. President 100 registered research Letters (1000 new ideas to develop America and to Change the World for Peace and Prosperity)
    Through Embassy of USA Islamabad till today and also direct sent these registered Letters to Whitehouse Washington DC 20500.These letters have been written on the guidelines of CHANGE WE NEED. And these letters are about the Common Men Problems of respected American Peoples and their Solutions. To end, Economic Recession, Unemployment and to Finish War, all round the World for Peace and Prosperity. In these letters I have sent one thousand new scientific Planning /Suggestions, about every walk of life for Peace through Friendship Progress and Prosperity all over the World.
    My dear Barack Obama, the great leader of the world, my friend, my brother, provide an opportunity to Agha Dilbar to pay an official visit to America, that we two brothers sit together and by halting this horrible war.
    In this war 1-million people have died from 9/11 till today, if this war continues, it will become the 111- World War.200-Million people would die, if 111-World War is triggered) can take out 6.5 billion people of the World from abyss of destruction .We two brothers Barack Obama+ Agha Dillbar can put them on the road to Progress and Prosperity through Peace.
    Dear President Barrack Obama considers, from 9/11 till today, America has conducted many war operations in connection with War on Terror, resulting the circle of war has spread hundred times. Millions innocent persons have died.
    In this war. Many More have been rendered homeless. One Lak (10000) war affected youth joined the army of Al-Qaida and Talban by the help of anti American countries have begun gorilla war in a horrible manner. It is the result of wrong war strategy. I Agha Dilbar desire to solve all above mentioned problems in a meeting with President Barrack Obama by adopting new revolutionary planning by bringing an end to present gorilla war in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. In the result the World can enter in a peaceful, advanced and progressive world, May it be so.
    I Agha Dilbar have a new War Strategy to achieve success through Table Talk between Talban, Pakistan and American Gov. 90% of Talban that are fighting against Pak Army belong from Swat and Tribal Areas of NWFP. I can provide America all realistic facts in such manner that their implementation could convert these Talban into Patriotic Citizens of Pakistan.
    In this War Strategy Pakistan Gov will never send his Heavy Artillery, Tanks, Cannons and Air craft in war. In this way 5-million persons will never Displaced. In the end Talban by their will handover, their Weapons to Pakistan Gov, they will come to Table Talk and Suicide Bombing will come to an end in Pakistan. Through this War Strategy Pakistani and American Gov can save expenses on war. Through this planning American and Pakistani Gov can utilize their saving on war budgets for development of Schools, Hospitals, Colonies, Markets, Industry, Roads, Bridges, Dams, Canals of Swat and Tribal Areas of NWFP that are war affected.
    Due to wrong war strategies of the American and NATO forces.
    The war on terror is getting worst mainly due to use of air craft, tanks, Cannons.
    Because nine innocent people are killed for a single terrorist this way in these circumstances thousands
    of innocent people lose their life or properties and any other source of income.
    In the result many people join terrorist or become suicide bomber. As they think there is no other way to take revenge of the innocents killing of their relatives these are the basic reasons that hundreds of suicides are generated very quickly and easily in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq particularly who further kill thousands of other innocent public.
    On account of present war strategy, Billion Dollars are being wasted yearly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.