Consensus estimates project Apple to report approximately $138.4 billion in revenue for the December quarter (fiscal Q1 2026), along with both GAAP and non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) of around $2.67. These figures reflect at least 11% year-over-year growth in both revenue and EPS.
However, analysts have recently become more cautious on margins, adjusting forecasts downward despite positive momentum in iPhone sales and Apple’s AI initiatives.
In a client note, Morgan Stanley analyst Erik Woodring expressed confidence that Apple will surpass expectations, primarily due to stronger and more sustained demand for the iPhone. Citing supply-chain data and shipment checks, Woodring forecasts December-quarter revenue of $139.8 billion, with the iPhone contributing $80.2 billion, and services totaling $29.9 billion.
Aparajita Chatterjee for The Street:
He said iPhone 17’s “strength remains underappreciated by the Street.”
Morgan Stanley sees cost assumptions as overly optimistic. The firm forecasts March-quarter operating expenses about 7% above consensus and a gross margin forecast 30 basis points below consensus, driven by rising memory costs…
All things considered, Morgan Stanley believes Apple is positioned to outperform in 2026 as a wave of new products and AI-driven catalysts is set to shape the company’s growth trajectory. The firm particularly highlighted the relaunch of Siri in February and Apple Intelligence in June at Apple’s Worldwide Developers’ Conference (WWDC).
Some notable introductions expected include its most “innovative iPhone in 10+ years (Foldable)“, plus the first smartphone powered by 2-nanometer chips, part of the iPhone 18 family.
The firm sees greater benefits from share gains and higher average selling prices, with Morgan Stanley underscoring an EPS of $9.77 for FY2027, roughly 7% above Wall Street consensus.
MacDailyNews Take: Apple and, indeed, the entire U.S. economy, are primed to roar in 2026!
MacDailyNews Note: As usual, we’ll bring you Apple’s results as soon as they are released, right around 1:30 p.m. PT / 4:30 p.m. ET on Thursday, January 29, 2026 and then follow with live notes from Apple’s conference call at 2:00 p.m. PT / 5:00 p.m. ET.
Please help support MacDailyNews — and enjoy subscriber-only articles, comments, chat, and more — by subscribing to our Substack: macdailynews.substack.com. Thank you!
Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.
They’re forgetting about the significant currency tailwinds.
Huge bonus for Apple.
With the US dollar dropping so quickly, Apple’s international sales revenue will automatically be so much stronger.
Boom!
Regarding the US economy it should be noted that US job data continues to decline with recent numbers showing only 50,000 new jobs created. FTR a healthy number would be north of 200,000 new jobs. Cost of living continues to increase and Affordable healthcare is a thing of the past.
Have a great day everyone!
True, but buying power in places like Europe, India, Canada, and China are increasing. Apple’s going to do very well in all of these markets. (Canada added more jobs last year than all of these united states, combined!)
Huge win for Apple, if not for certain markets that have cooled.
Huh. So wat you’re saying is solid GDP growth, 50k added jobs, and millions of people who were in this country illegally have returned home? Sounds great.
Wall Street will continue to devalue Apple because the company didn’t spend tens of billions of dollars on energy-sucking A.I. data centers. This is despite the fact that most companies haven’t made any profits from those data centers, and many of those new data centers don’t have enough energy to be run at full capacity. We’ve just recently seen what snow and ice can do to an energy grid and how many millions of people don’t have electricity due to the recent snowstorm.
But, yeah, investors don’t like Apple because it doesn’t have a massive A.I. cloud infrastructure. I wonder where most of these investors live, since they have no concerns about electricity outages. I don’t know why any normal person would believe Jensen Huang’s claims that A.I. will solve everyone’s problems if there is enough compute power. Why hasn’t all this money been spent on developing nuclear fusion reactors, if that’s the case?