Oregon is mulling State Senate Bill 1596, a piece of right-to-repair legislation. Apple agrees with much of the bill, but has a major issue with the proposed legislation’s “parts paring” policy.
Brian Hetaer for TechCrunch:
“Apple agrees with the vast majority of Senate Bill 1596,” John Perry, Apple senior manager, Secure System Design, said in a testimony to state lawmakers this week. “I have met with Senator [Janeen] Sollman several times, and appreciate her willingness to engage in an open dialogue. Senate Bill 1596 is a step forward in making sure that the people of Oregon, myself included, can get their devices repaired easily and cost effectively.”
Apple’s major sticking point with the proposed legislation centers around a policy known as “parts paring.” [Apple] has staunchly defended the practice, insisting that the use of third-party parts could present a security issue for users.
“It is our belief that the bill’s current language around parts pairing will undermine the security, safety, and privacy of Oregonians by forcing device manufacturers to allow the use of parts of unknown origin in consumer devices,” said Perry. “It’s important to understand why Apple and other smartphone manufacturers use parts pairing. It’s not to make repair more difficult. It is, in fact, to make access to repair easier while also making sure your device — and the data stored on it — remain secure. Parts pairing also helps ensure your device’s optimal performance and the safe operation of critical components like the battery, after a repair.”
“Under SB 1596’s current parts pairing wording, Apple could be required to allow third-party biometric sensors to work in our devices without any form of authentication, which could lead to unauthorized access to an individual’s personal data,” the Apple employee noted.
MacDailyNews Take: Users who are concerned with their security and/or personal privacy should not want third-party biometric sensors or third-party front-facing selfie cameras.
Please help support MacDailyNews. Click or tap here to support our independent tech blog. Thank you!
Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.
If Apple’s main concern is for security/privacy, I don’t really see why batteries and cameras should require pairing. Any such issues for those types of components are at the software level so claiming that requirement makes me suspect a more financial lock-in reason.
Unfortunately it’s clear you don’t understand how you can manipulate and modify information as well as inject information coming off the focal plane arrays of a camera within the hardware/firmware (not software) that comes within a camera long before it gets to any software like Photos. No one should want to deal with such possibilities, but all too many people will do so to save a few dollars.
While possible, such manipulation will be extremely specific w/o SW support somehow bypassing Apple’s own API that the unit will have to use to communicate with other parts of the device. I highly doubt Apple has designed their HW to be so open internally given that they’ve to date taken the trouble of pairing.
Oh BS. sure it’ll protect their security when Gov/LE tries to hack your phone to get info off it, otherwise it hurts the consumer trying to get it fixed. I support R2R, Eff Apple.
Yep, putting unknown and unverified Chinese components in your iPhone is a genius idea. Go ahead.
How about a “Right to Repair Oregon?
Couldn’t hurt.😎
DOJ: Biden is too senile to prosecute for corruption and treason
Liburds: Is OK the let the lying, corrupt, racist pedophile dementia patient be a puppet in the White House.
Having a dementia patient running the government shows us just how little we need the government and how fuccing stupid libturds are.
—Just posting here to libturds’ noses in their own shiite