“Jan. 9 marks nine years since Apple unveiled the first iPhone on the same date in 2007,” Aaron Mamiit reports for Tech Times. “Saying that the smartphone has come a long a way since then would probably still be considered an understatement.”
“On Jan. 9, 2007, Steve Jobs walked into a stage to give a keynote presentation on the iPhone, which turned out to be possibly the most important keynote that the late Jobs has ever given in his illustrious career,” Mamiit reports. “In the presentation of the first-generation iPhone, Jobs knocked down the keyboard and the stylus, features that were popular among the high-end mobile phones of the time by BlackBerry, Motorola and Palm, and replaced it with a multitouch interface.”
“The first iPhone only featured a 3.5-inch screen with 320 x 480 pixel resolution, a 400 MHz processor, 128 MB of RAM, a 2-megapixel camera and up to 16 GB of storage. It also only operated on AT&T’s EDGE networks instead of 3G, and was priced at $499 for the 4 GB model and $599 for the 8 GB model,” Mamiit reports. “Rumors are claiming that the next version of the smartphone will have an aluminum alloy or liquidmetal body, will be waterproof, and that the home button will be removed to better highlight 3D Touch.
“The iPhone 7 is also expected to be powered by 3 GB of RAM and Apple’s A10 chip,” Mamiit reports. “The smartphone will most likely be announced by Apple in September, when it will be adding one more chapter to the history of the iPhone.”
Read more in the full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Revolutionary.
By SteveJack
Here’s how I reacted to the iPhone on January 9, 2007:
Apple really only botched one thing with the iPhone – its name.
Oh sure, you can argue that the top model’s 8GB of storage is too small, but with 6 months to go that spec (and others) can and probably will change; Apple isn’t even taking pre-orders on the device, yet. So things can change. One thing’s for sure, Apple has frozen a nice chunk of the smartphone market, not to mention some of the iPod market, too.
Back to the naming issue: Apple’s “iPhone” isn’t really a phone at all. It’s really a small touchscreen Mac OS X computer, a Mac nano tablet, if you will. Here’s how misnamed the iPhone is: Some people are complaining that Jobs didn’t spend enough time on the Mac in his keynote! Folks, iPhone is not only a Mac, it’s the most radical new Mac in years! What’s to stop Apple from making a 12-inch model (and larger, and smaller) one of these days (use the headset for the phone, please) and calling it a Mac tablet?
It has an iPod built in, yes, so it can be used solely as a “true video widescreen iPod,” if that’s what you want. And even using it just like that, the price is about right. It also has a smartphone built in, too; except this smartphone’s UI actually makes sense and is usable. Even if you just use it as a smartphone, the price is right, too.
But, the main thing about the “iPhone” is that it’s really a pocket Mac. It has email, SMS, full-featured Web browsing, and much more. But, beyond that, it is a platform that’s just sitting there waiting for Apple to sell software for it. Just imagine games with the large multi-touch display and the built-in accelerometer!
Imagine all of the other software possibilities, too. Given Apple’s history with the iPod (closed to third-party developers), today I’d have to guess that they’ll keep the iPhone under tight control, too. Maybe that will change in the future, maybe not. Still, Apple could do a lot with the platform all by themselves. What about ringtones sold via Apple’s iTunes Store? With Wi-Fi onboard these things could beam data between each other like crazy. The possibilities are endless.
No matter how you look at it, for all that it can do even now, the device is very well priced and should fly off the shelves regardless of its name.
Maybe Apple named it iPhone because of all of the free publicity and buzz that name has already garnered. Maybe they want this trojan horse to slip into the market first under the guise of being the best smartphone available and they’ll exploit its capabilities as a full-fledged platform later. Perhaps it’s easier to explain and sell as a phone first. It probably would have been even easier to just have called it iPod (6G) and listed “iPhone” as a new iPod feature – that’s how they sold video, right?
I also have to wonder what will happen to Safari’s market share after the iPhone starts shipping. All of those iPhones hitting sites with their Safari browsers are going to have an impact if they’re counted properly. What about Mac OS X market share? Each iPhone is technically a Mac, right? If so, Apple will at least double their Mac shipments in the first year alone. Let’s hope IDC and Gartner count them all!
So, yeah, it can be a phone, even the very best smartphone, but it’s so much more and holds so much promise that the name “iPhone” hardly does it justice.
SteveJack is a long-time Macintosh user, former web designer, multimedia producer and a regular contributor to the MacDailyNews Opinion section who also basically called the iPhone over five years before Steve Jobs unveiled it.
SEE ALSO:
The only thing really wrong with Apple’s iPhone is its name – January 9, 2007
Apple debuts iPhone: touchscreen mobile phone + widescreen iPod + Internet communicator – January 9, 2007
Is Apple building ‘The Device?’ [revisited] – January 9, 2007
Is Apple building ‘The Device?’ – December 10, 2002
