Site icon MacDailyNews

Judge sides with Einhorn, halts Apple shareholder vote on Proposal No. 2

“A federal judge on Friday ordered Apple to halt collecting shareholder votes on a contentious proposal to change some of its corporate charter, handing a victory to the hedge fund manager David Einhorn,” Michael J. de la Merced reports for The New York Times.

“The ruling issued Friday touches on a fairly narrow legal point,” de la Merced reports. “But it signals a clear win by Mr. Einhorn, who has taken up a fight with Apple over using some of its $137 billion cash hoard to make additional payouts to shareholders… ‘Given the language and purpose of the rules, it is plain to the court that Proposal No. 2 impermissibly bundles ‘separate matters’ for shareholder consideration,. Judge Sullivan wrote in his order. His ruling orders Apple to stop accepting shareholder votes on Proposal No. 2, and comes just days before the company’s shareholder meeting next Wednesday.”

de la Merced reports, “The company will now likely have to break up Proposal No. 2 into its separate elements and resubmit them to a vote. The timing of that move isn’t clear.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related articles:
Einhorn says Apple ‘iPref’ stock would unlock pent up value – February 21, 2013
Greenlight’s Einhorn outlines his plan for Apple to return more cash to shareholders – February 21, 2013
Einhorn’s Greenlight Capital: Every Apple shareholder should get preferred shares ‘for free’ – February 21, 2013
Hedge fund manager Einhorn takes Apple campaign to shareholders via conference call – February 21, 2013
Einhorn’s lawsuit against Apple hangs on ‘irreparable harm’ – February 20, 2013
Greenlight makes case to stop Apple preferred-stock vote – February 19, 2013
Apple accused by Greenlight of breaking law by bundling – February 16, 2013
Judge approves Apple request to expedite Einhorn’s Greenlight Capital case – February 11, 2013
Apple’s cash return options: Pay U.S. tax man or incur massive debt – February 11, 2013
Bernstein’s Sacconaghi: Most important for Apple is a capital allocation plan – February 11, 2013
Evaluating David Einhorn’s proposal to Apple – February 9, 2013
The colossal gall of bad Apple investors – February 8, 2013
Cramer: By suing Apple, wrong-headed Einhorn has gone too far – February 8, 2013
Analysts: Apple may crack open its massive, bulging wallet for shareholders – February 8, 2013
Apple with $137 billion in cash considers preferred stock – February 8, 2013
Einhorn’s Apple lawsuit marks biggest investor challenge in years – February 8, 2013
Gamco’s Haverty: Apple’s cash is ‘shareholders’ cash’ (with video) – February 8, 2013
Apple shares surge following company response to Einhorn – February 7, 2013
Greenlight’s Einhorn sues Apple over plan to eliminate preferred stock, wants more cash distributed – February 7, 2013
Greenlight Capital urges Apple shareholders to vote ‘No’ on proposal 2 that would impede Apple’s ability to unlock shareholder value – February 7, 2013
Greenlight’s Einhorn sues Apple, ‘dissatisfied with capital allocation strategy’ – February 7, 2013
Legg Mason’s Miller: Apple stock would rise 50% on ‘sensible capital allocation’ alone – February 6, 2013
Gamco’s Haverty: Apple board can be sued over excessive accumulation of cash (with video) – January 28, 2013
Greenlight’s Einhorn: Apple ‘the best big growth company’; Fed stimulus ‘counterproductive’ – July 10, 2012
David Einhorn says Apple isn’t a below-average company, it’s just priced like one – May 30, 2012

Exit mobile version