Swiss watch makers in deep shit, as Apple Watch designer Jony Ive predicted

“The numbers are in and it’s not great news for the Swiss watch industry. The Q3 figures, published by the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, reveal an 9.9% drop in watch exports for September, leading to an 8.5% slide for the quarter overall,” Hugh Langley writes for TechRadar. “It’s a big slide – the biggest quarterly drop since 2009 – so it’s understandable why flags are being raised. But what’s most interesting is that the original report suggests the Apple Watch ‘could finally be taking a bite out of the Swiss industry’s stake.'”

“According to the data, watches residing in the low to mid-segment, the domain where the Apple Watch Sport currently competes, were hit the hardest. It’s reasonable to speculate that smartwatches are eating into the cheaper end of the market,” Langley writes. “A September 2014 New York Times column claimed that Apple Chief Design Officer Jony Ive had said Switzerland was in trouble thanks to the Apple Watch – “though he chose a much bolder term for ‘trouble.'”

“‘Traditional watch makers are coming under pressure,’ Ben Woods, Chief of Research at CCS Insights, told us. ‘It would be naive to think the Apple Watch has not impacted the traditional market in some form. Watchmakers are reticent to acknowledge that’s happening because it’s not in their interest,'” Langley reports. “The reason the higher end of the market isn’t feeling the burn right now, claims Woods, is obsolescence. Where premium makers market their watchers as an heirloom to be passed down to the next generation, the technology inside the most expensive Apple Watch will probably be obsolete in a couple of years time. ‘Those high end companies can’t ignore smartwatches completely, but they are more likely to go down a path where we see intelligent bands,’ said Woods.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: As we’ve suggested previously (see below), Swiss watch makers, especially high-end Swiss makers, need to make wearing “two watches” into vogue: The heirloom traditional watch armed (pun intended) with a smartwatch band. Your jewelry is displayed in it’s traditional spot and all of the real work is done by turning your palm up to see the “smartband.”

Apple would do well to produce an Apple Watch smartband (Apple Watch Band, available in a wide range of colors, styles, and materials) that can be affixed to traditional wristwatches. It’s basically an Apple Watch that sits in the inside of your wrist where the traditional buckle is now (ergonomically easier to use and atop better veins from which to gather biometric readings, by the way) while allowing for your traditional watch to sit where it’s always been.

Apple Watch Band. Shots of California and Apple Watch uses interspersed with images of Switzerland and a traditional watch being glanced at and slipping under a suit cuff. Tag: “The best of both worlds.”

The watches do not need to communicate; that’s not the point.

In fact, it’s already been done: Nico Gerard’s Pinnacle timepiece (US$9,300, Apple Watch included in purchase) includes a special attachment that allows users to affix an Apple Watch to its strap, creating a two-faced wearable. Obviously, Apple could offer Apple Watch Bands starting at much more affordable prices. Users add their own traditonal wristwatch.

[protected-iframe id=”168de43539d726647a07f75c7ca6eafb-17146794-18685410″ info=”https://player.vimeo.com/video/134956951?byline=0″ width=”570″ height=”321″ frameborder=”0″ webkitallowfullscreen=”” mozallowfullscreen=”” allowfullscreen=””]

 

Nico Gerard PINNACLE. This classic timepiece shows the world you have an affinity for discerning tastes, and provides you with the technology that respects you to the core of your being. The 41mm case exudes style personified. Inside the case lays the mechanical wonder of the NG2824A movement, certified by the Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres, the Official Swiss Chronometer Testing Institute, and is rated to 100-meter depths for pressure. The bracelet mechanics meld fine, Swiss-watchmaking traditions with the support of the 38mm Apple Watch.
Nico Gerard PINNACLE. This classic timepiece shows the world you have an affinity for discerning tastes, and provides you with the technology that respects you to the core of your being. The 41mm case exudes style personified. Inside the case lays the mechanical wonder of the NG2824A movement, certified by the Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres, the Official Swiss Chronometer Testing Institute, and is rated to 100-meter depths for pressure. The bracelet mechanics meld fine, Swiss-watchmaking traditions with the support of the 38mm Apple Watch.

 

We do not foresee anyone wanting to take off their Apple Watch in order to wear a “jewelry watch.” Apple Watch is not just a watch to be replaced with another regular watch. Maybe wearing two watches in come into vogue for special occasions?MacDailyNews Take, April 16, 2015

Here’s what makers of Swiss or any other watches should do: Push the idea of wearing of two watches, one on each wrist or two on one wrist, into vogue. Because once people start using Apple Watch, they aren’t going to want to leave it at home. Ever. They won’t want to go to dinner parties without their Apple Watch. And that’s bad, bad news for watchmakers not named Apple. Watch and see.MacDailyNews Take, April 16, 2015

SEE ALSO:
Apple’s Jony Ive: Switzerland is in deep shit – September 4, 2014
LVMH’s Jean-Claude Biver sees tougher 2016 for Swiss watch industry – September 29, 2015
Swiss watch exports decline most since 2009 – August 20, 2015
I own two $6,000 Swiss watches, but I wear my Apple Watch most of the time – August 14, 2015
Swiss watch exports hit worst slump in five years as Apple Watch debuts – June 19, 2015
As Swiss watchmakers dismiss Apple Watch, Swiss National Bank increases Apple holdings by 60% – May 10, 2015
Apple Watch Edition is poised to disrupt the classic Swiss watch – April 16, 2015
Jean-Claude Biver changes his tune, calls Apple Watch ‘a fantastic product, an incredible achievement’ – January 20, 2015
TAG Heuer plans smartwatch as honcho Jean-Claude Biver changes mind as Apple Watch looms – December 16, 2014
Apple Watch starts countdown on face off with Swiss industry – October 31, 2014
The fashion elite crowd around Apple Watch at Colette in Paris – September 30, 2014
Jean-Claude Biver: ‘The Apple Watch cannot compete at all with European watches’ – September 15, 2014
Jean-Claude Biver: Apple Watch ‘too feminine; looks like it was designed by a student in their first trimester’ – September 16, 2014
Barclays: Apple Watch could crush companies like Fossil – September 16, 2014
Jean-Claude Biver: ‘The Apple Watch cannot compete at all with European watches’ – September 15, 2014
Old school watch makers don’t get Apple Watch – September 12, 2014
Apple Watch, the world’s first real smartwatch, will be a massive hit – September 9, 2014
Apple iWatch designer Jony Ive: Switzerland is in deep shit – September 4, 2014

Swiss watch exports post biggest quarterly export drop since 2009 – October 20, 2015

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Dan K.” for the heads up.]

42 Comments

    1. Don’t knock it until you’ve tried it. I’ve bookmarked this page so that I have your comment for the future. It will be funny to refer to when Apple does exactly as MacDailyNews suggests.

    2. That’s some shortsighted, in-the-box thinking you’ve got there, squiggles. What do you do for a living? Let me guess, you’re not on Jony Ive’s design team at Apple. Government worker, perhaps?

      1. Jony Ive would never suggest a person wears two watches instead of one.

        that’s the very type of clutter Jony Ive and Apple have spent the past several decades doing away with.

    3. Agreed. As I’ve said before, trends don’t happen like that. People were already listening to music in their ears, computers were already around, and cars…we already drive. Apple isn’t a a trend setter in that way. Stupid…two watches. On the same band?—now, that’s much better. I think that is catchy–always have an analog mechanism. Have it face out for jewelry purposes.

    4. I agree. Sounds and looks like a terrible idea. Some people will continue to prefer a standard watch, while others will make use of additional features a “smart” watch can/will/might provide. Then again, obviously from article and comment above, there are some that like wearing two watches.

  1. I’d rather wear something on both wrists than a strap with a watch unit on either side. People wear a watch and bracelet(s), why not a watch as a jewellery piece then a smartwatch?

  2. what flavor is kool-aid you drink? … everyday i see the smile at the blatanty blind devotion to apple in this article and finally had to comment.

    i have a “iwatch” but still doesnt compare to my IWC? i only got it so i could get email notifications and look at my mtgs for the whole day while im in a mtg with my phone back at my desk.

    Apple watch is “ok”. i dont know that i’d buy it again if i had a chance – unlike my iphone (that i gladly replace every year) or my tower version of the mac pro or my ipad… wellim seriously looking at SP4… so tired of no folders.

    Jonny Ive delusions of grandeur are peeking through. starting with the ui changes and software (over) complexity that’s showing up in every new release. The watch shows hes really over-reached. The gold version goes away from Jobs original statement of getting apple devices in everyones hand.

    An apple watch will ever replace a patek phillipe.
    and no apple car will ever replace a ferrari or a rolls royce … maybe a tesla .. but judging by CR latest review not a high bar.

    1. Anyone who is clueless enough to post “kool-aid” drivel on this forum and expect a true Apple enthusiast to take you seriously should go elsewhere. As soon as you use that language, we know what type of person you are, and it isn’t the type of person with a useful opinion.

    2. I think we all need to step back and put the Apple Watch into perspective. I’ll start by saying I haven’t taken mine off since May 24th, the 1st day I got it…, except to charge it every 36 – 48hrs. It has embedded itself very tightly into my daily routine, so much so that I can’t imagine life before or after Apple Watch. That being said, AW is not intended to replace the stalwart, artisan timepieces, of which I own a few, and admire them for a few moments daily, but they are just that, works of art. The practical usefulness of AW far outweigh that of these timepieces. But, just as moving pictures did not relegate still photos to the trash bin, AW will not relegate those artisan timepieces to antiquity. They will coexist in the same manner that color photos coexist with black & white photos, each bringing it’s own space and beauty at the users or owners behest.

      1. the “point” is the article simply shows correlation but can’t prove causation and so makes conclusions that don’t hold up … unless you drunk a lot of kool aid.

  3. Watch sensors are meant to work when the back of the watch is next to the outside of the wrist. So the PINNACLE is meant to be worn showing the Watch and hide the Nico Gerard? Yeah, that’ll work.

  4. This is kind of what I don’t understand about the top end Apple Watches. For people where spending that much money on a watch is an extravagance you want something that you would almost wear regardless of function, that will last you for years and that you could pass on. A smartwatch of any kind just isn’t that, the technology is going to be outdated, it will stop being updated, the battery will die. Eventually it will become essentially useless, and as good as it looks, it’s not something you would wear as jewellery in its own right.

    For the few who have money to burn and can easily drop thousands on an Apple Watch you would think they would want something more unique, more bling, more expensive. If there is a genuine market for solid gold watches why don’t Apple make iPhones the same? They’re going to last about as long.

    Obviously there is a lot of research Apple have done, maybe it’s not about actually selling lots, but being seen to be able to make them, to be targeting a higher end customer. I don’t know. It’s interesting.

  5. Maybe it is just like when digital watches came out. After a while everyone was wearing them. Then analog faces came back into fashion.
    So this is a transition in the industry and the high to mid-end manufacturers may want to consider that the LCD display with multiple functions is what the general population will want.

  6. People are trending away from watches. Plus the vast majority of people can’t afford both an iPhone and apple watch, never mind upgrading both on a regular basis.

    Until the apple watch can become independent and not need an iPhone the sales will become stagnate. However, when it becomes an independent device I can see it replacing the phone for a lot of people.

    I stopped wearing a watch when I got my first cell phone and I don’t see myself going back to one but who knows what might happen as technology progresses.

    1. I agree with Greg- I haven’t worn a watch since getting my first smart phone. While I see the Apple Watch as an interesting product from a technology perspective, I also see it as an awfully expensive iPhone accessory. The bottom line is that’s what it is.

  7. It will be interesting to see how good AppleWatch sales actually are. I’d be somewhat surprised if consumers were actually buying AppleWatches in quantity. They’re nice but don’t really seem like a necessary device for the average consumer to buy. There’s so many people I see not wearing watches but carrying a smartphone. I’ve always worn watches and still do although now I mostly wear a fitness band for activity tracking.

  8. The Fate of Swiss Luxury Watches-Becoming Antique

    Those who value the luxury, status, and prestige of expensive Swiss watches, timepieces, and Certified Chronometers are a dying breed; literally. Those that grew-up with mechanical watches are those that value them most.

    When it comes time to pass on a heritage timepiece to someone accustomed to the daily usefulness of an watch, what will happen?

    I expect the timepiece will be looked upon with a certain awe given to antiques of superb craftsmanship that still function. I also expect, that except on rare occasions it will go unworn and unused. Like an antique Model T Ford driven only in parades.

    I expect the heritage watch will end up in a jewelry box or drawer, or perhaps a special display place on a mantle or shelf.

    watches were designed, styled, and fashioned such that people want to wear them. Technology on your wrist that won’t embarrass and brand you as a tech nerd. Watch Sport for everyday wear, Watch for business, or as dress watch, Watch Edition worn for status and prestige. watches, useful fashion beyond timekeeping.

    The watch is in a class by itself. The watch is a computer, communications device, and an iPhone complimentary device. “Watch” gives people a familiar frame of reference. Maybe in the future Apple will rename it.

    Presently iPhones are being passed down to family members as newer models are purchased. I see no reason why this trend will not continue with the watch. Doing this extends the effective useful life of the watch. I don’t see the watch being passed on to others as a “heritage” watch, however, the expected life of solid state circuitry is about 1,000,000 hours. 🖖😀⌚️

Leave a Reply to quiviran Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.