Will.i.am debuts ‘Puls’ giant wearable cuff that makes phone calls

“American musician-cum-entrepreneur Will.i.am thinks he’s got a radical gadget to beat the band: a massive, app-infused wrist wearable that he says can do everything a phone can, and more,” Zach Miners reports for PCWorld.

“The self-proclaimed tech fashion guru unveiled the Puls on Wednesday, a smartwatch-type device designed to be worn throughout the day. It will run at least a dozen apps, handling everything from Twitter to phone calls to fitness and maps,” Miners reports. “The device will be sold this holiday season through a variety of channels, including physical AT&T stores, fashion stores and online sites, Will.i.am said during an interview with the press following the launch event. A firm price was not disclosed, but it will cost less than a smartphone by a big margin, Will.i.am said.”

“Will.i.am’s Puls will make phone calls without requiring smartphone tethering. In the U.S., users will need a data plan from AT&T; O2 is required for the U.K. Pricing details for those plans were not disclosed,” Miners reports. “The device will also have 1GB of memory, 16GB of storage, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity, a pedometer, and accelerometer. The Puls runs a proprietary OS, has a curved screen, and wraps around the wrist like a cuff. ‘This is not a watch,’ Will.i.am stressed during the event. ‘It’s a new type of communication on your wrist,’ he said.”

Read more in the full article here.

[protected-iframe id=”3b6c996735121ee245a5378140e29cdb-17146794-18685410″ info=”http://video-api.wsj.com/api-video/player/iframe.html?guid=FDBF8A78-F727-403D-A5EA-BA5CF7D9DCFC” width=”512″ height=”288″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no”]

Direct link to video here.

MacDailyNews Take: This ridiculous, amateurish mess is on the express train to the dustbin of tech history. (Yes, it has a freaking onscreen keyboard!!!)

We’ve developed a whole new interface specific to the challenges associated with a product this small. The Digital Crown is a remarkable input device. It fluidly zooms into apps. It enables nimble, precise adjustments. And, critically, you can use it without obstructing the display. – Sir Jonathan Ive, Apple Senior Vice President of Design

Related articles:
Apple Watch to grace cover of Vogue China’s November issue – October 9, 2014
Chinese model Liu Wen may be the face of Apple Watch’s launch campaign – October 4, 2014
The fashion elite crowd around Apple Watch at Colette in Paris – September 30, 2014
With Apple Watch looming, Pebble slashes price of smartwatch to $99 – September 30, 2014
Extensive Apple Watch hands on reveals iPhone downloads, manages Watch apps – September 30, 2014
Five things we learned about Apple Watch at Paris Fashion Week – September 30, 2014
Apple’s Jony Ive and Marc Newson show off Apple Watch at Colette event in Paris – September 30, 2014
Apple’s design team headed to Paris Fashion Week, likely for Apple Watch event – September 29, 2014
Can Apple disrupt the luxury watch industry with a $10,000 Apple Watch? – September 17, 2014
Jean-Claude Biver: ‘The Apple Watch cannot compete at all with European watches’ – September 15, 2014
What the Apple Watch says about Apple – September 15, 2014
Tim Cook of Apple Watch battery life: ‘You’ll want to charge them every night’ – September 12, 2014
Old school watch makers don’t get Apple Watch – September 12, 2014
Apple Watch, the world’s first real smartwatch, will be a massive hit – September 9, 2014
Apple iWatch designer Jony Ive: Switzerland is in deep shit – September 4, 2014

26 Comments

    1. Say what you want, it’s a wearable phone. People will like that.

      iWatch is an asinine name for a thing (good or bad still TBD) that is anything BUT a watch. There are six things on my desk right now that tell me the time and NONE of them is a watch.

    1. Yes, but I can almost forgive it because Will.I.Am is in essence a nice guy, you just love him and that is it.

      This cuff is not going to competition to anything, people will try and find out, why. But it is not harmful, let AT&T spend their crooked money. 😉

  1. this is what WATCH should have been. a stand alone product that does not require an iPhone on the user.

    I don’t know if this device does it, but I was saying long ago, the band should have a battery built in to it. this device, with the cuff instead of a band, looks like it could house a battery.

    I have feeling the WATCH is going to be a major bomb and Tim Cook’s downfall.

    1. FAN – Hmmm, I smell a rat. Something is fishy in your post. I also think Apple should have a stand alone watch with an optional phaser and teleportation device built in. Not having to carry a teleporter it in your pocket would be a game changer.

      You as an FAN should no that Apple will make its devices when the technology is ready. They don’t need to be first out of the gate just the best in class. The iWatch, I believe will be strong, people just need to realize why they need this. I remember when the iPad came out and no one could get past the idea of why we would ever need a gigantic size phone. How on earth could tablet even be relevant when netbooks will eat them alive.

    2. The Watch still has to prove itself, as does the entire computer-on-a-wrist market. But from what we know so far, the Watch is both functional and appealing. The Puls is not so much.

      As for the point of having a phone-on-a-wrist, I’m extremely skeptical of it becoming a ‘thing’. If quality phone hardware and a decent battery to support it can be stuffed into a watch thingy, there’s still the question of being able to hear and be heard. Any speaker on such a thing is going to be inadequate. That’s a given.

        1. Bluetooth for sure. But that’s more circuitry and antenna to be shoved into the phone. Maybe if it expanded into the watch band. I don’t know.

          What’s good is that lots of new things are being tried out in the R&D labs and in public. It will all get bashed into shape over time.

        2. You guessed correctly.. It seems from some articles I’ve read on the Puls that the internals for the device is spread throughout the band. Lots of physical space in relation to the Apple Watch. Space which I suspect they can work on compacting when they get it right..

      1. I’m thinking a bluetooth connection for calls sans wires since it seems to be a strong motivation for the creation of this device based on interviews I’ve seen so far. It appears to charge on an induction mat with a battery slightly smaller than proposed for the Apple Watch currently. I suppose if the price is right and it is focused strongly on what it is designed to do, it will sell well enough.

  2. Its interesting , but lets face it radiation comes with all these gadgets-doesn’t make a difference if its Apples or someone else’s. What are the health risks with these things that nobody is addressing yet. a cell phone is one thing , but wearing it on your body all day long can’t be good

  3. Man, his finger covers fully HALF the keyboard. I guess it’s supposed to be standalone, but wow. Maybe if it survives it’ll get better and get product placement in a new Dick Tracy movie.

  4. Just watched the whole video and I think his idea is good, just the execution leaves a bit to be desired.
    As far as wearing it all day, yeah, your phone isn’t necessarily on you all day, but if it’s on your hip or in your pocket all day, I see no difference, but then again I’m no doctor.

  5. I think it looks kind of kewl.

    But is it going to fit everyone’s wrist? It’s not going to have much software, that’s fur shur. We know nothing about the OS. We know nothing about the image and sound quality. We know nothing about the cell calling quality or distance. Lots of big unknowns. But it’s competition that tries something different! The more competition the better.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.