U.S. Federal Puppet Denise Cote: ‘Apple’s reaction to the existence of a monitorship underscores the wisdom of its imposition’

“Apple Inc’s various objections to a court-appointed antitrust monitor in a case involving fixing e-book prices only confirm the importance of his work, a federal judge said on Thursday,” Joseph Ax reports for Reuters.

“‘If anything, Apple’s reaction to the existence of a monitorship underscores the wisdom of its imposition,’ U.S. District Judge Denise Cote wrote,” Ax reports. “Cote’s comment came in a 64-page opinion explaining why earlier this week she had rejected Apple’s request to stay an order installing an external compliance monitor, after she found Apple liable for conspiring to fix e-book prices. The judge said she would allow Apple until Tuesday to file an appeal of her decision to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.”

“A lawyer for the company, Theodore Boutrous, said on Monday that Apple planned to appeal,” Ax reports. “A Justice Department spokeswoman said the government was pleased with Cote’s decision.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: That there’s one sonamabitchin, crazy-ass, cronyistic puppet!

Lady Elaine Fairchilde (left), U.S. Federal Puppet Denise Cote (right),or vice versa
Lady Elaine Fairchilde (left), U.S. Federal Puppet Denise Cote (right), or vice versa

For the whole sordid story in concise form, please read: Apple’s Star Chamber: An abusive judge and her prosecutor friend besiege the tech maker.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “David E.” for the heads up.]

Related articles:
In pretrial view, judge says leaning toward U.S. DOJ over Apple in e-books case – May 24, 2013
Lawyers have complained for years that Judge Denise Cote pre-judges cases before she enters the courtroom – August 14, 2013

Judge Denise Cote denies Apple request block her friend as ‘antitrust compliance monitor’ – January 13, 2014
Antitrust monitor Bromwich rebuts Apple accusations of ‘unconstitutional’ investigation – December 31, 2013
Apple seeks to freeze its U.S. e-books ‘antitrust monitor’ – December 15, 2013
The persecution of Apple: Is the U.S. government’s ebook investigation out of control? – December 10, 2013
Apple’s Star Chamber: An abusive judge and her prosecutor friend besiege the tech maker – December 5, 2013
Apple takes aim not just at court-ordered e-books monitor, but also at U.S. District Judge Denise Cote herself – December 2, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Judge Denise Cote assigns DOJ monitor in Apple ebook price-fixing case – October 17, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Judge issues injunction against Apple in ebooks antitrust case; largely in line with what DOJ wanted – September 6, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Judge Denise Cote says Apple needs third-party supervision after ‘blatant’ ebook price fixing – August 28, 2013
Apple e-book judge Cote makes short work of Apple’s list of nine evidentiary ‘errors’ – August 15, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Apple faces possible May 2014 trial on e-book damages – August 15, 2013
le-in-e-books-case/”>In pretrial view, judge says leaning toward U.S. DOJ over Apple in e-books case – May 24, 2013
Judge Denise Cote scolds Apple for being ‘unrepentant’ in e-book antitrust case – August 12, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: U.S. District Judge Denise Cote erred during e-books trial, Apple says – August 9, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Cupertino wants a stay in e-books case; DOJ claims publishers are conspiring again – August 9, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: DOJ seeks wide-ranging oversight of iTunes Store – August 2, 2013
Apple rejects U.S. DOJ’s proposed e-book penalties as ‘a draconian and punitive intrusion’ – August 2, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: DOJ wants to force Apple to revamp e-book practices – August 2, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: Cupertino could get smacked with $500 million bill in ebook case – July 25, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple verdict could end the book as we know it – July 11, 2013
U.S. DOJ unwittingly causes further consolidation, strengthens Amazon’s domination of ebook industry – July 11, 2013
Where’s the proof that Apple conspired with publishers on ebook pricing? – July 10, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple ruling could allow U.S. government to monitor, interfere with future Apple negotiations – July 10, 2013
Judge Denise Cote likely wrote most of her U.S.A. v. Apple ebooks case decision before the trial – July 10, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: NY judge rules Apple colluded to fix ebook prices, led illegal conspiracy, violated U.S. antitrust laws – July 10, 2013
In U.S.A. v. Apple e-books case, witness Barnes & Noble VP Theresa Horner was everything Apple could hope for – June 19, 2013
The Apple e-books trial takes a detour into the absurd – June 18, 2013
Steve Jobs, Winnie the Pooh and the iBookstore Launch – June 17, 2013
Apple set to present its defense in e-book antitrust case – June 17, 2013
Steve Jobs was initially opposed to entering the e-book market – June 14, 2013
U.S.A. v. Apple: DOJ’s last best chance in e-book case has passed – June 14, 2013
Obama admin trying to throw the book at Apple; U.S. DOJ goes after an innovator whose market entry reduced prices – June 13, 2013
Apple’s Eddy Cue denies price-fixing allegations at U.S v. Apple e-books trial – June 13, 2013
Apple fires back at DOJ with email Steve Jobs actually sent – June 13, 2013
Is Steve Jobs’ unsent email a smoking gun in Apple e-book case? – June 12, 2013
Winds shift toward Apple in U.S. DOJ’s e-book trial – June 12, 2013
Day 5 of the Apple ebooks trial: Publishing execs testify; Rupert Murdoch’s role – June 11, 2013
U.S. v. Apple iBookstore case could go to the Supreme Court – June 5, 2013
Apple accuses DOJ of unfairly twisting Steve Jobs’ words in e-book case – June 4, 2013
U.S. DOJ prosecutors accuse Apple of driving up e-book prices – June 3, 2013
U.S. v. Apple goes to trial; DOJ claims e-book price-fixing conspiracy with Apple as ringmaster – June 3, 2013
U.S. DOJ takes Apple to trial alleging e-book price-fixing – June 2, 2013
Penguin to pay $75 million in e-book settlement with US State Attorneys General – May 23, 2013
The hot mess that is Apple’s e-book legal fight with U.S. DOJ – May 16, 2013
Apple: Deals with publishers improved e-books competition – May 15, 2013
Apple tells U.S. DOJ of tough talks, not collusion, with publishers – May 15, 2013
EU ends e-book pricing antitrust probe into e-book pricing; accepts offer by Apple, four publishers – December 13, 2012
Apple, publishers offer EU e-book antitrust settlement – September 19, 2012
Judge rubber-stamps U.S. e-books settlement – September 6, 2012
Apple, four publishers offer e-books antitrust concessions, says source – August 31, 2012
Apple bashes Amazon, calls U.S. DOJ settlement proposal ‘fundamentally unfair, unlawful, and unprecedented’ – August 16, 2012
U.S. antitrust settlement with e-book publishers should be approved, feds say – August 4, 2012
U.S. Justice Department slams Apple, refuses to modify e-book settlement – July 23, 2012
U.S. senator Schumer: Myopic DOJ needs to drop Apple e-books suit – July 18, 2012
Apple’s U.S. e-books antitrust case set for 2013 trial – June 24, 2012
U.S. government complains, claims Apple trying to rush e-books antitrust case – June 21, 2012
Barnes & Noble blasts U.S. DOJ e-book settlement proposal – June 7, 2012
Apple: U.S. government’s e-book antitrust lawsuit ‘is fundamentally flawed as a matter of fact and law’ – May 24, 2012
Federal Judge rejects Apple and publishers’ attempt to dismiss civil case alleging e-book price-fixing – May 15, 2012
Court documents reveal Steve Jobs email pushing e-book agency model; 17 more states join class action suit – May 15, 2012
Apple vs. Amazon: Who’s really fixing eBook prices? – April 17, 2012
Apple: U.S. DOJ’s accusation of collusion against iBookstore is simply not true – April 12, 2012
Apple not likely to be a loser in legal fight over eBooks – April 12, 2012
16 U.S. states join DOJ’s eBook antitrust action against Apple, publishers – April 12, 2012
Australian gov’t considers suing Apple, five major publishers over eBook pricing – April 12, 2012
DOJ’s panties in a bunch over Apple and eBooks, but what about Amazon? – April 12, 2012
Antitrust experts: Apple likely to beat U.S. DOJ, win its eBook lawsuit – April 12, 2012
Why the market shrugged off the Apple antitrust suit – April 11, 2012
What’s wrong with the U.S. DOJ? – April 11, 2012
Macmillan CEO blasts U.S. DOJ; gov’t on verge of killing real competition for appearance of competition – April 11, 2012
U.S. DOJ hits Apple, major publishers with antitrust lawsuit, alleges collusion on eBook prices – April 11, 2012
U.S. DOJ may sue Apple over ebook price-fixing as early as today, sources say – April 11, 2012


  1. Mmmm the koh Cote is up for more. I betcha that puppet moving hand is wedged pretty far up there to make her do this song and dance.

    Keep going koh Cote, let’s see you rag on.

  2. 1. Amazon helps Obama campaign with internet resources.
    2. Apple enters eBook market.
    3. Amazon complains to Obama, calls in favor.
    4. Obama leans on Holder (DOJ).
    5. Holder leans on Cote.

    It’s really that simple and transparent.

  3. I have attempted to read 64 pages of diary notes by four yes four sides in the eBook monitor case. The four sides are 1 Apple 2 DoJ 3 Monitors 4 Judge.

    What I have found is crap repeat crap masquerading as legal argument. By some of the four.

    First the appointment of a monitor.
    In the first space shuttle disaster Nobel laureate Feynman was appalled at the poorness of scientific preparation for flights. But at least he was not a biologist who had no expertise in rocketry.

    But Cote used such a biologist with no expertise in antitrust cases. And to add insult to injury appointed and expert assistant to help the first monitor learn on the job his duty. $1100/hr for the dumb boss and $1025/hr for the expert assistant. Apples first objection lost in the crap and discarded by Cote was why not appoint the assistant as boss, and save $1100/hr dollars!

    “Apple submitted a letter objecting to both of the candidates. Its objection to Bromwich was brief, and essentially confined to the argument that Nigro was an antitrust specialist and that a dual-monitor structure was unnecessary. ” Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 437 Filed 01/16/14 Page 14 of 64 This is Comrade Cote speaking!

    Why would both DoJ and Cote accept and idiot in antitrust monitoring. ONLY as a political nepotistic act to run amok in Apple pulling Quote “ANY” unquote copying dumb-in-antitrust-law-Bromwich thought might have bearing on compliance. Great for Samsung to have access to Apple – Nokia agreement and just the thing for ignorant in antitrust law Bromwich to COPY ANY item he thought might have bearing. Great for Microsoft or Google to accidentally to come across these copyings when he leaves the item in their office.

    In the first complaint against dumb-in-antitrust-law-Bromwich ( this is not an insult — it is acknowledged by the court as being correct) by Apple where is the expert assistant Nigro to guide our learner of the procedures in antitrust monitoring? NO WHERE TO BE SEEN. WHY? THIS IS GROSS Negligence by both Bromwich and Nigro!
    Nigro in not supervising, Bromwich in acting as cop without any learned police skills!

    IDIOT Comrade Cote can’t even see a fault!!!!!!

    As the Wall St Journal said previously is Comrade Cote qualified at all in logic and law.

    Dumb-in-antitrust-law-Bromwich travels the corridors of Apple demanding instant interviews with everyone with a secret (?) copying device as decreed by the rules of engagement. Apple penchant for secrecy is exploded by one clause in the monitor rules. Any one through dumb-in-antitrust-law-Bromwich can now access Apple’s files provided dumb-in-antitrust-law-Bromwich gets his share!

    Apple’s only recourse as stipulated by Comrade Cote is to run crying to the DoJ and Cote immediately, who both feel that Apple is a hardened recidivist criminal because it is not contrite or acknowledges constantly its heinous crime of antitrust monopolistic practice.

    “ ….awareness of illegality or the danger of collusion by publisher defendants to raise eBook prices. There is no showing of institutional reforms to ensure that its executives will never engage again in such willful and blatant violations of the law.” Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 437 Filed 01/16/14 Page 8 of 64

    Here in Cote’s quote is the nub of the matter!

    Judgment without the facts!
    Judgment without economics!
    Judgment without accounting practices!
    Judgment without legal precedence.
    (I much prefer Monty Python’s Blackmail TV show! At least it was honest!)
    Judgment without the star witness AMAZON!
    Judgment by Cote pre-trial as well!
    Punish Punish Punish

    Who cares about facts? NOT USA DoJ. NOT TRIAL JUDGE COMRADE COTE.
    Perhaps post 9/11 USA has turned to those great Cold War Enemies, Stalinist CCCP, Maoist China, and the greatest printer of USA $100 bills – People Democratic Republic of North Korea for insights on how to conduct show trials and brainwashing skills.
    Apple must flagellate itself constantly to prove to the court its a sinner and needs a good wiping! Apple and its staff must wear sackcloth and chant socialist mantras to show remorse according to Comrade Cote. Otherwise how will dumb-in-antitrust-law-Bromwich know that Apple is reforming – perhaps Apple should go to Gitmo Cuba.

    AND why Apple feels innocent.
    Some unacknowledged facts by the prosecutors the DoJ and economic dunce Cote.

    The Publishers sold to Amazon for the price approx. $14 per copy!
    With Amazon the Publishers got 100% repeat 100% of the $14.
    With Apple the Publishers got 60% repeat 60% of $14 OR approx $9.
    So why would Publishers lose $5 and still be monopolistic?
    And Apple sould to the public eBooks for $14
    If Publishers lost $5 per eBook with Apple Why did they admit guilt to monopolist practices?

    Now the gorilla in the room – Amazon.
    How could Amazon make a profit buying an eBook for $14 from publishers and selling it for $10 to the public?
    Is this sustainable? Climate Change denier Comrade Cote thinks so, see quote below!
    Is this voodoo economics? Is this communist practices? Well yes to both – that’s why Communism collapsed because the prices were rigged. Amazon rigs the prices to get market share at the expense of the USA taxpayer YOU & Me! HOW? By subsidizing eBook prices for the Kindle from hard book sales but it even expands more so that profits remain low each quarter. It is from profits that Uncle Sam gets rich – tax. Look at Amazons profits $40 million on $2 Billion sales. That’s 2 cents in $10. USA gets $12 to $15 Million in tax on $2000 Million.
    It pays tax on $40 million yet earns income of $2Billion Some tax minimization here for the DoJ to look at.

    Questions for economic dunce Comrade Cote: how long can losses continue in the Book market?
    CCCP lasted 70 years without paying USA the $150 Billion ($1Trillion in today’s money) it got in military goods in WWII. And demanding products below cost of production from Warsaw state countries!
    This is what Amazon does – sells not a fair value but below cost.
    Apple’s crime was that it wanted to make a profit wanted publishers to make less of a profit wanted to give the public quality books with interactions, video, pictures, net conections etc.
    How many book sellers has Amazon shut down?
    Are Amazon acts monopolist?

    Quote Cote “ I want to protect the market, protect the consumer, encourage price competition*, and . . . allow this market to develop and change and prosper in ways we all can’t imagine today.”
    ( * In the Japanese TV dumping case in 70s Sony initially part of the conspiracy was then excluded by DoJ because they sold the most expensive TV in USA the Trinitron! This is “price competition” at its best, quality deserves a premium value something Comrade Cote with her socialist ideals can’t understand! I could go on about Apple’s eBook ideas here!)

    The quote is fantasy, unsustainable and ultimately a fundamentalist ignorant belief against reality!

    Just as Quantitative Easing by that Bromwich look-a-like Bernanke is fcuking USA at $1Trillion per year. So too Bromwich that Bernanke look-a-like will fcuk Apple with the help of DoJ & Cote.

    What is the most appalling in this case is how dumb the reporters and bloggers are. They can’t tell bullshit from heavenly manna! And follow any idiot like lambs to the slaughter.

    Join the has beens USA. Join CCCP and East Germany**. Become a failed state!
    ** NSA has taken a leaf out of the Ustaci spy book!

    I could critique more but in just two points you see politics not law practiced.

    1. The reason for the case is that Obama is punishing Apple and making an example of this. This is Chicago/Soviet thug tactics. He wants them to repatriate the big off shore money and the government 35% in taxes. Of course when you elect a guy who had clearly expressed in writing and his associations his preference for government control of the private sector this is what you get. Spread the wealth around, as he replied to Joe the Plumber. Yes, steal, plunder and seize assets via total regulation.

  4. I don’t understand the Government harassment of Apple. They are clearly being attacked on several fronts with the full power of the Federal Government and with no regard for the actual law. This treatment by Obama is normally only applied to citizens who have attended Tea Party events. What did Apple do to be treated like the evil Tea Party people?

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.