Penguin offers to scrap Apple e-book deals to settle EU antitrust case

“British media group Pearson’s Penguin unit has offered to scrap e-book deals with Apple that imposed price restrictions on Amazon and other retailers, EU antitrust regulators said on Friday,” Reuters reports.

“The concessions, if accepted by the European Commission, would make Penguin the fifth book publisher to settle with regulators, ending a 16-month long investigation without any finding of wrongdoing or fine,” Reuters reports. “Apple and publishers Simon & Schuster, News Corp unit HarperCollins, Lagardere SCA’s Hachette Livre and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck, the owner of Germany’s Macmillan, reached a settlement with the Commission in December.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related articles:
Apple CEO Cook ordered to testify in U.S. DOJ’s e-books case – March 14, 2013
EU ends e-book pricing antitrust probe into e-book pricing; accepts offer by Apple, four publishers – December 13, 2012
Apple, publishers offer EU e-book antitrust settlement – September 19, 2012
Judge rubber-stamps U.S. e-books settlement – September 6, 2012
Apple, four publishers offer e-books antitrust concessions, says source – August 31, 2012
Apple bashes Amazon, calls U.S. DOJ settlement proposal ‘fundamentally unfair, unlawful, and unprecedented’ – August 16, 2012
U.S. antitrust settlement with e-book publishers should be approved, feds say – August 4, 2012
U.S. Justice Department slams Apple, refuses to modify e-book settlement – July 23, 2012
U.S. senator Schumer: Myopic DOJ needs to drop Apple e-books suit – July 18, 2012
Apple’s U.S. e-books antitrust case set for 2013 trial – June 24, 2012
U.S. government complains, claims Apple trying to rush e-books antitrust case – June 21, 2012
Barnes & Noble blasts U.S. DOJ e-book settlement proposal – June 7, 2012
Apple: U.S. government’s e-book antitrust lawsuit ‘is fundamentally flawed as a matter of fact and law’ – May 24, 2012
Federal Judge rejects Apple and publishers’ attempt to dismiss civil case alleging e-book price-fixing – May 15, 2012
Court documents reveal Steve Jobs email pushing e-book agency model; 17 more states join class action suit – May 15, 2012
Apple vs. Amazon: Who’s really fixing eBook prices? – April 17, 2012
Apple: U.S. DOJ’s accusation of collusion against iBookstore is simply not true – April 12, 2012
Apple not likely to be a loser in legal fight over eBooks – April 12, 2012
16 U.S. states join DOJ’s eBook antitrust action against Apple, publishers – April 12, 2012
Australian gov’t considers suing Apple, five major publishers over eBook pricing – April 12, 2012
DOJ’s panties in a bunch over Apple and eBooks, but what about Amazon? – April 12, 2012
Antitrust experts: Apple likely to beat U.S. DOJ, win its eBook lawsuit – April 12, 2012
Why the market shrugged off the Apple antitrust suit – April 11, 2012
What’s wrong with the U.S. DOJ? – April 11, 2012
Macmillan CEO blasts U.S. DOJ; gov’t on verge of killing real competition for appearance of competition – April 11, 2012
U.S. DOJ hits Apple, major publishers with antitrust lawsuit, alleges collusion on eBook prices – April 11, 2012
U.S. DOJ may sue Apple over ebook price-fixing as early as today, sources say – April 11, 2012

9 Comments

  1. “Apple and publishers Simon & Schuster, News Corp unit HarperCollins, Lagardere SCA’s Hachette Livre and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck, the owner of Germany’s Macmillan, reached a settlement with the Commission in December.”

    Apple did??

  2. peterblood71 and breeze, you may have missed that this article is talking about the European Commission – not the US DOJ. Yes, Apple DID settle with the EC back in December. The wrong-headed DOJ action is still proceeding, and hopefully will wind up in Apple’s favor. I’d also pray for embarrassment for the bureaucrats involved, but by the nature of things that’s impossible.

    1. I have concluded that the power of prayer does not extend to embarrassment, at least in the U.S., a land where shame seemingly lasts no longer than the public’s attention span. How else to explain the political re-emergence of Eliot Spitzer, Mark Sanford, and Anthony Weiner? And there were so many others…but I can’t seem to remember them…

  3. With luck and good fortune the US version of this will be found in Apple’s favor, and the outcome will be a binding settlement from the Government to bail Apple out following its pending collapse…
    /s

  4. “‘British media group Pearson’s Penguin unit has offered to scrap e-book deals with Apple that imposed price restrictions on Amazon and other retailers, EU antitrust regulators said on Friday,’ Reuters reports.”

    This is 100% bullshit! The contractual terms say ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about restricting the prices Amazon or any other retailer can put forth. The restriciton was that if they allowed Amazon or any other retailer to sell the book at price X then they had to let Apple sell the book at price X too. Amazon (nor any other retailer) would be able to cut a special deal with the publisher that Apple could not get. Apple was/is just forcing an even playing field.

    Hell, if the publisher let Amazon give the book away for free then Apple would have to be allowed to give the book away for free too. (This is an interesting case where Apple would actually lose money if they enforced the contract as stated.)

    The EU (and the U.S.) regulators are pursuing these investigations based upon inaccurate reporting by these media groups. They have it ALL screwed up and the regulators are just buying it hook, line and sinker.

    The truly sad thing is that the publishers, rather than sticking together and with Apple on this are thinking that it is just more cost effective in the long run to just cave in rather than do the right thing!

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.