Apple v. Samsung Live Blog: Trial opens with one juror gone, Samsung begging

Apple and Samsung “got their first chance to present arguments in their patent dispute to jurors in a San Jose, California, federal court today,” Connie Guglielmo reports for Forbes. “But before the jurors who were selected yesterday even got a chance to step into the courtroom, Samsung went on the defense, asking U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh to reconsider a request to allow exhibits the Korean company says shows that its smartphone designs were in progress before Apple introduced the iPhone in 2007.”

“Apple, which filed suit against Samsung in April 2011, accused the company of copying the designs for the iPhone and iPad. Samsung countersued in June 2011, saying Apple had copied some of its own designs,” Guglielmo reports. “Judge Koh dismissed the request, saying that she had already ruled three times on the exhibits and they would not be presented to the jury. That didn’t dissuade Samsung from continuing to push and even ‘beg’ that the court reconsider. ‘What’s the point of having a trial?’ John Quinn of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. ‘They want to create a completely false impression that we came up with this design after January 2007.’ As he continued to press, Judge Koh showed her annoyance. ‘Don’t make me sanction you,’ she said. ‘I want you to sit down please.'”

Guglielmo reports, “That wasn’t the only drama before the trial started. Judge Koh said one of the three women on the jury had asked to be excused after learning that her employer would not pay her while she did her jury service. Apple and Samsung allowed her to be dismissed, with leaves 7 men and 2 women now serving on the jury in what it expected to be a four-week trial.”

Follow the live blog from the courtroom here.

MacDailyNews Take: Apple’s products came first, then Samsung’s:

Samsung Galaxy and Galaxy Tab Trade Dress Infringement

Here’s what Google’s Android looked like before and after Apple’s iPhone:

Google Android before and after Apple iPhone

Related articles:
Apple attorney: Instead of innovating, Samsung chose to copy iPhone and iPad – July 31, 2012
Apple aims for total war, salted earth in Samsung patent infringement fight – July 31, 2012
Apple-Samsung jury picked to decide U.S. patent trial; Google engineer fails to make final cut – July 30, 2012
Samsung exec whines: Apple’s trying to patent the rectangle! – July 30, 2012
Apple: Google warned Samsung against slavishly copying our products – July 25, 2012
Apple v. Samsung jury to learn of Samsung’s destruction of relevant evidence – July 25, 2012
Now Samsung slavishly copies Apple’s Mac mini – June 1, 2012
Samsung Mobile chief ‘designer’ denies that Samsung’s instinct is to slavishly copy Apple – March 23, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung shamelessly steals Apple’s iPhone 3G design – again – January 3, 2012
Slavish copier Samsung uses girl actress from iPhone 4S ad for Galaxy Tab 8.9 spot (with video) – January 2, 2012
Now Samsung’s slavishly copying Apple’s iPad television ads (with videos) – December 30, 2011
Judge: Can you tell me which is iPad and which is yours? Samsung lawyer: ‘Not at this distance your honor’ – October 14, 2011
Why are Apple’s icons on the wall of Samsung’s store? – September 24, 2011
Apple to Samsung: ‘Blatant copying is wrong’ – April 18, 2011
Apple sues Samsung for attempting to copy look and feel of iPhone, iPad – April 18, 2011
Samsung’s ‘Instinct’ is obviously to make Apple iPhone knockoffs – April 1, 2008


    1. BS. First of all there is Blackberry and Windows phone. They are still kicking for now. Apple doesn’t need these other smart phone followers and knock offs to innovate and make good devices. Unless they show Apple what NOT to do.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.