Google to sell co-branded tablets directly to consumers through online store, sources say

“Google Inc., undaunted by a short-lived attempt to market and sell smartphones on its own, is now trying the approach with tablet computers in a quest to capture market share from Apple Inc.’s AAPL -1.26% iPad,” Amir Efrati reports for The Wall Street Journal. “The Internet search company will sell co-branded tablets directly to consumers through an online store like rivals Apple and Inc., according to people familiar with the matter. The move is an effort to turn around sluggish sales of tablet computers powered by Google’s Android software.”

“Like the Nexus One, some future Android tablets are expected to be co-branded with Google’s name, said people familiar with the matter,” Efrati reports. “The company is expected to sell devices from a variety of manufacturers. Google won’t make the devices and its existing partners such as Samsung Electronics Co. and AsusTeK Computer Inc. 2357.TW -0.90% will be responsible for the hardware, these people said.”

“By selling tablets directly to consumers, Google is upping the ante against Apple, which debuted its market-leading iPad two years ago. Android-based tablets made by Samsung and others have been slow sellers by comparison,” Efrati reports. “Last fall research firm Gartner estimated Apple would capture 73% of the tablet market versus 17% for Android… Google is seeking to increase adoption of its Android software so that its search, maps and other services—which generate the vast majority of its mobile revenue through the sale of ads—become mainstays in the mobile-device world.”

Efrati reports, “To boost the prospects of its new online tablet store, Google was considering subsidizing the cost of future tablets in order to compete on pricing with Amazon’s Kindle Fire, said one person with knowledge of the effort.”

Read more in the full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: Watch those patents now, ya hear?

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Ed B.” for the heads up.]


  1. I guest Google is reading the tea leaves at the local cafe. Their market is subject to the same forces that crippled Rim. The moment Apple goes into maps like google The vast flood of search data from Apple iOS devices is history. Say bye bye Google.

  2. so they give away android phones to get anybody to use ’em…
    they create a wide open app market for anybody to do anything they want…
    realizes their mobile ad revenue comes 80% from iOS users…
    and see apple is planning their own mapping program with loss of some of that 80% revenue likely to follow….
    come up with an idea to release a tablet to hold on to the current market of users who provide 20% of their revenue…
    …sit in meeting after meeting and finally decide..”golly, if apple has been so successful with the iPad, we sure can if we get our moles and folks to study how they did it…”
    …while apple steams ahead, leaving google and its’ android friends grasping for breath….and wondering what the next thing apple is going to do that they are going to have to react to.
    seems they’re a reactive company from stem to stern, proactive being an attitude they can’t get their heads around they’re so busy trying to stay relevant.

  3. A cheap-ass tablet that is subsidized by advertising… That sounds really appealing. 😉

    At least with a Kindle Fire, the user has the option to buy media content from Amazon or not. With this Google tablet, the ads will probably be there – no choice by the user.

  4. Oh, great. Have a problem with your counterfeit iPad and call Google. Assuming you ever get anyone on the line, they tell you to call Samsuck, Suckorola, or whoever built the POS, and then the builder tells you to call your carrier, and the carrier sends you back to Google. That’ll really win lots of loyal customers.

    They should adopt a little truth in advertising. I’ve even come up with a nice slogan:

    Android. Counterfeit iOS.

  5. “Google was considering subsidizing the cost of future tablets”

    So it appears that Apple remains the only company that is able to make a sustainable profit from selling tablet computers. Everybody else is either selling them at a loss as some sort of vanity project, or because of a huge miscalculation with regards to their product’s true worth, or because they hope to offset the loss by means of some other business, such as selling content or advertising.

    The longer term problem for all these companies is that they are in uncharted waters. Nobody knows if it’s possible to sustain a business selling tablets at a loss and relying on an associated revenue stream to make it profitable overall.

    Apple is in the unique position of making a tremendous profit on the hardware together with modest profits from content and advertising. It’s hard to see where the wannabe tablet distributers are going to make their money. If their content is priced too high, Apple’s content will become even more attractive, if the advertising revenue is overpriced, advertisers will move elsewhere. It really doesn’t leave a lot of wriggle room.

  6. About time google did this been waiting for a long time. U sad ppl out there compatition is good all u ppl ever do is complain about other companies it then lot making money and u lot arguing like girls, at the end of the day it the peoples decition what they want to buy and what they can afford,

    1. Maz-
      I’m guessing from the spelling and punctuation quality in your post, that what “you can afford” is about “$19.95” for a Giggles tablet (think Infomercial). Wait- that actually sounds about right given the surety that it will be crammed full of commercial advertising to subsidize the price…

    2. While I disagree with Maz’s opinion, it is clear he/she is a non-native english speaker/writer, so give them a break. I can’t vouch for his/her intelligence based their expressed opinion, though.

  7. I wonder if Google is trying to take some control back from it’s OEM’s and wireless carriers.

    If I have an iPad, it’s entirely up to Apple to decide if it’s going to get the next version of iOS. With an Android Tablet, Google has to release the software, then it has to be supported by the OEM AND the wireless carrier if its a 3G or LTE model!

    It’s all about the final consumer experience, something that a whole lot of people don’t seem to understand.

    1. No search engine. Thats the road to ruin. Check out Microsoft and Google. Microsoft has been subsidizing every market it has tried to enter since Office and Windows monopoly was established. It has drained innovation out of the business.

      Now too, Google, after achieving effective monopoly status in search, is desperate to extend and defend it, so rather than innovate, they are creating products the market doesn’t desire and having to subsidize them, Google+ and now tablets. Google is dead on the innovation end. They are 3-5 years behind RIM.

      One more leapfrog by Apple, and it’s game over for both Microsoft and Google. I’m just wondering if Steve left that one last leapfrog move with his team. Only time will tell.

      1. Try if you want a truly unbiased search engine. It takes you out of what’s called “the search bubble” and doesn’t track you.

        I stopped using Google a couple years ago when their results got so cluttered and unreliable I could never find what I wanted. I switched to Bing and then later signed up for Bing rewards so I could get free Xbox points. It’s not a bad deal, really. And I have only been dissatisfied with its performance a couple of times. You can sign up here, if you’re interested:

        I’m just waiting for DuckDuckGo to be available in Mobile Safari, or for Apple to release their own ad-free search engine (THAT would be the Google killer).

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.