Consumer Watchdog calls for probe of Google’s inappropriate relationship with Obama administration

Consumer Watchdog’s press release follows, verbatim:

Consumer Watchdog today sent Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) a 32-page report detailing how Google has inappropriately, benefited from its close ties to the Obama Administration, including how NASA’s Moffett Airfield, near Google’s world headquarters, has been turned into a taxpayer-subsidized private airport for Google executives used for corporate junkets.

A growing fleet of jets and helicopters stand ready to ferry the company’s top executives near or far, for business or pleasure, for vacations or schmoozing, including at least three wintertime trips to the Caribbean and a trip by Google chief executive Eric Schmidt to the Cannes Film Festival. Humanitarian groups, by contrast, have been denied access to the airport.

Consumer Watchdog asked the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to investigate the relationship between Google Inc. and the US government as well as the Wi-Spy incident, and to call CEO Eric Schmidt to testify under oath.
In a letter to Issa, Jamie Court, Consumer Watchdog president and John M. Simpson, Inside Google Project director, wrote:

“An investigation by the committee of Google’s relationship to the Administration is particularly timely now in light of the way the Federal Trade Commission closed its probe of the Wi-Spy incident, and the Department of Justice’s current review of the pending acquisition of ITA Software.”

Read the full report here: http://macdailynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/googgovfinal012411.pdf
Read the letter to Rep. Issa here: http://macdailynews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/ltrissa012411final.pdf

The report, Lost in the Cloud: Google and the US Government, is drawn from records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and interviews. It found that Google’s ambitious quest for influence with the government is starting to pay off. Among other issues raised by the report are:
• Google’s close ties with the Obama White House have raised concerns about possible special treatment or conflicts of interest at the Department of Homeland Security, the US Patent & Trademark Office, the Federal Communications Commission and NASA.
• Officials at both DHS and the FCC have raised pointed concerns about weak privacy protections in Google products and whether Google’s well-documented difficulties with privacy protection could create big problems for federal agencies that use its services. Nonetheless no-bid contracts have been given to Google.
• A secretive relationship with the National Security Agency. The search giant has a legitimate need to cooperate with the government’s mammoth and secretive code breaking agency in its efforts to defend the integrity of US computer networks. But NSA also has legal power to force Google to hand over the private information of its users. How Google executives handle this potentially conflicted relationship is largely unknown: neither Google nor the NSA are talking.

One of the most visible signs of Google’s clout, the report said, is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Moffett Airfield, near Google’s world headquarters. When a deal between NASA and top Google executives to use the base was first disclosed in 2007, it called for only four jets to use the base.

But newly released government records show that the Google executive fleet has now grown to six jets and two helicopters, while at least 40 Google employees hold security badges at the base and all of the planes are supplied with Department of Defense jet fuel.

While the deal was originally struck between Google and NASA in the name of scientific research by the Google fleet, NASA documents show that precious little research has occurred. According to a set of emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, a fighter jet bought by Google executives in 2008 to perform the research was still being reviewed for air-worthiness in mid-2010.

Meanwhile, flight records show that the other jets parked by Google executives at the NASA field are often used for junkets, vacations and schmoozing. These include at least three wintertime trips to the Caribbean and a trip by Google chief executive Eric Schmidt to the Cannes Film Festival, where he hobnobbed with Mick Jagger and Hollywood stars.

“Our report only reveals only part of the picture,” said the letter to Issa asking for an investigation. “The House Oversight & Government Reform Committee has subpoena power if necessary. We urge you to use all the tools at the committee’s disposal to reveal the extent of Google’s influence on the government and how the Internet giant has unfairly benefited.”

Consumer Watchdog’s letter also noted:

“Several executive agencies have responded in a severely guarded and limited fashion to Freedom of Information Act requests on significant issues involving Google that the public deserves to know more about.

“In addition, there has been insufficient federal action on Google’s “Wi-Spy” debacle in which its Street View cars gathered private data from Wi-Fi networks in more than 30 countries.

“This is the largest wire tapping scandal in world history by one of America’s biggest and most powerful corporations, yet there has not been a single hearing on Capitol Hill. We respectfully submit that Google CEO Eric Schmidt should be asked to testify under oath so that the American public learns the truth about Wi-Spy.”

Consumer Watchdog has been working to protect consumers’ online privacy rights and educate them about the issues through its Inside Google Project. The goal has been to convince Google of the social and economic importance of giving consumers control over their online lives. By persuading Google, the Internet’s leading company, to adopt adequate guarantees, its policies could become the gold standard for privacy for the industry, potentially improving the performance of the entire online sector.

Source: Consumer Watchdog

38 Comments

  1. … is supposed to “take action on” “Google’s “Wi-Spy” debacle in which its Street View cars gathered private data from Wi-Fi networks in more than 30 countries.”? In the US, that I can see. Under what authority will it even question Google’s activities in 29 other countries? Unless they officially ask, that is.
    aaplsaur, MDN wrote the headline and included this text: “Google has inappropriately, benefited from its close ties to the Obama Administration”. Both are inaccurate, given that the original deal was struck by the Bush Administration. Both impugn the integrity of the Obama Administration. Rep. Issa has shown himself to be a pedant and an anti-Democratic bigot. Thus, this is more about attempting to smear the Obama Administration, falsely!, than attacking Google.
    That said, it IS “MDN’s” blog and he has a right to abuse it any way he sees fit. Regardless of fact or other consideration.

  2. … is supposed to “take action on” “Google’s “Wi-Spy” debacle in which its Street View cars gathered private data from Wi-Fi networks in more than 30 countries.”? In the US, that I can see. Under what authority will it even question Google’s activities in 29 other countries? Unless they officially ask, that is.
    aaplsaur, MDN wrote the headline and included this text: “Google has inappropriately, benefited from its close ties to the Obama Administration”. Both are inaccurate, given that the original deal was struck by the Bush Administration. Both impugn the integrity of the Obama Administration. Rep. Issa has shown himself to be a pedant and an anti-Democratic bigot. Thus, this is more about attempting to smear the Obama Administration, falsely!, than attacking Google.
    That said, it IS “MDN’s” blog and he has a right to abuse it any way he sees fit. Regardless of fact or other consideration.

  3. I often play golf at both the Shoreline and Moffett field golf courses. They are both adjacent to the runways. Not only Google but other private planes have been using Moffett field airport for years. How does this become an Obama thing, and how does this become a subject for MDN? Could it just be that MDN is full of tea party folks. It often seems like it to me.

  4. MDN tends to be very good at collecting source material from other’s publications. They are just a link site, nothing more. I do like that they create a nice collection of Mac related information in one new feed. However that is often tainted by their insistence in posting overly partisan articles that have nothing to do with Mac’s or Apple news.

    If you want Mac news that is devoid of political narratives I highly recommend MacNN.

    Better articles, Better grammar, and far less trolling.

  5. Terry…

    If a Marxist if one came up behind you and bit you in the ass, although I suspect you wouldn’t know the former and you’d probably enjoy the latter.

    Go and get an education or the closest equivalent in your particular region so you can enter into a real discussion that doesn’t rely on the same cliched response every time.

    By the way, the Macs you use were designed at a company whose CEO is a liberal and whose COO is most likely a liberal. Also – whilst you and people like you whine about government-this constitutional-that and socialist-theother, please be aware that you’re using an operating system based on FreeBSD much of came from the Free Software Foundation.

    FSF seeks to make software available to all on a not-for-profit basis – sounds pretty liberal to me.

    Also, MacDailyNews uses a Powered By Mac logo at the bottom of the page, which tends to imply that it is using the Apache open source webserver developed by people for the public good: again, a liberal “socialist” principle as opposed to good, strong, expensive “capitalist” software.

    And the Web itself was developed by two men working at a laboratory funded by multiple governments (all European and mainly left of what the US calls the centre).

    So the only reason that you’re able to post your asinine comments in the first place is because some “commie” Europeans decided to work together and pay a couple of hundred million Euros every year to discover how the universe works. It’s called science: which I know is an unfashionable concept in your circles as it contradicts with a belief that the Flintstones was a documentary series, but you really should give it a try.

    And if you think I’m insulting you: well done, I had no idea you were that smart.

  6. Issa is a thief- multiple times- and he is going to investigate. SOP for Rethugnicans- investigate the most specious bullshit in order to slow the other party down to a crawl answering inquiries and testifying before Congress, plus giving fodder to the Reich Wing noise machine.

    Kinda fully that Issa, who made the famous Viiper car alarm, is a car thief himself…

    Finally, I didn’t vote for Obama, do not plan on voting for him next year, am not happy with his governance. But this is such bullshit.

    We, as a nation, are in debt up to our necks. Our nation has a hollowed out economy that does not make much of anything and are getting our clocks cleaned in a whole list of ways.

    I am tired of the never ending campaign and would like our elected officials of whatever party to stop posturing for the next election and get busy getting things in order. The same voters that put the Teabaggers/Republicans in the Congress can turn them out in 2012.

    No, I’m not one of them either.

Leave a Reply to Terry Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.