Analyst ups AAPL estimates; says iPad killers ‘delayed, underwhelming or both’

Apple Online StorePhilip Elmer-DeWitt reports for Fortune, “Stifel Nicolaus’ Doug Reid raised his Apple (AAPL) price target modestly Thursday — to $360 from $350 — in a note to clients that poured praise on the company and scorn on its competitors.”

Advertisement: The iPad. With a 9.7″ touch screen & amazing new apps, it does things no tablet PC, netbook, or e-reader could. Starts at US$499. Shop Now.

“Reid sharply increased his estimate for iPad unit sales in Apple’s fourth fiscal quarter to 5.4 million from 3.6 million, citing ‘robust demand'” in the U.S. and Europe and supplies adequate to meet it,” P.E.D. reports. “Although Apple’s competitors are rushing iPad look-alikes to market, he says, only one is available for sale and all are likely to be, in his words, ‘disadvantaged by unsuccessful attempts to integrate first generation tablet hardware with mobile OSes (Android 2.2/3.0, Chrome) that remain either nascent or entirely unproven relative to Apple’s nearly 4-year old iOS.'”

Read more in the full article, which includes Reid’s iPod and iPhone estimates, here.

MacDailyNews Take: “Any product that is essentially a copy of something else… there’s something inherently less interesting about them. Because the companies that make them don’t lead, they follow.” – Paul Thurrott, March 19, 2009

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Dan K.” for the heads up.]

50 Comments

  1. I don’t expect a real iPad competitor until HP comes out with their webOS powered tablet. Palm is the company that gave Apple the biggest run for their money with the Pre, which still rivals and in a few areas surpasses iOS in elegance and ease of use (particularly multi-tasking).

  2. I don’t expect a real iPad competitor until HP comes out with their webOS powered tablet. Palm is the company that gave Apple the biggest run for their money with the Pre, which still rivals and in a few areas surpasses iOS in elegance and ease of use (particularly multi-tasking).

  3. iPad and other Apple products are great if you can stay within its narrow Apple sanctioned usage.

    The tablet line that provides the most versatility and user choice will be ultimately crowned the winner in the market place.

    I see a danger in companies like Apple and RIM who are locking users into their walled gardens.

    I think the ultimate winner will be Google’s Android, as their tablet software will remain independent of hardware, so a RIM or even a iPad user could eventually replace their native OS with Android and be compatible with the rest of the world.

  4. iPad and other Apple products are great if you can stay within its narrow Apple sanctioned usage.

    The tablet line that provides the most versatility and user choice will be ultimately crowned the winner in the market place.

    I see a danger in companies like Apple and RIM who are locking users into their walled gardens.

    I think the ultimate winner will be Google’s Android, as their tablet software will remain independent of hardware, so a RIM or even a iPad user could eventually replace their native OS with Android and be compatible with the rest of the world.

  5. Just as Apple has a consumer & Pro line in desktops & laptops, I don’t see why Apple might be working on a Pro Line tablet geared toward commercial/institutional use.
    iOS is still young as is the multitouch component & Apple has certainly got cards it hasn’t shown.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.