“On September 24, 2010, China’s Patent and Trademark Office officially published a series of new Apple Industrial Designs wins,” Jack Purcher reports for Patently Apple.
“In this report we cover two things,” Purcher reports. “The first is Apple’s iPad Camera Connector and the second is a new iPad design which clearly illustrates that at least one future iPad model will sport a new FaceTime – face side camera.”
Purcher reports, “The design surprisingly confirms that there might not be a back side camera as most had anticipated.”
More info in the full article, including patent application illustrations, here.
official my ass
official my ass
Great! But I have the IPad 64gb 3G now. Plus the new IPhone 4. So I’ll pass on it. No new retina display for it the new model. So my old IPad will do..
I’ll just use my facetime on the
IPhone. Buy if you get the retina display on the iPad. I’ll upgrade!
Great! But I have the IPad 64gb 3G now. Plus the new IPhone 4. So I’ll pass on it. No new retina display for it the new model. So my old IPad will do..
I’ll just use my facetime on the
IPhone. Buy if you get the retina display on the iPad. I’ll upgrade!
No need for a backside camera. Would anyone really hold up an iPad to film the stuff around them. Microsoft and HP and the others might add it, but it doesn’t make any sense.
No need for a backside camera. Would anyone really hold up an iPad to film the stuff around them. Microsoft and HP and the others might add it, but it doesn’t make any sense.
With apps like “camera A” and “camera B” you don’t really need a camera for ipad.
After iOS 4.2 maybe we can use our itouch for a FT cam! After all apple has shown one set up that way in past patent applications.
FT being an open standard means some app dev should be right on it.
With apps like “camera A” and “camera B” you don’t really need a camera for ipad.
After iOS 4.2 maybe we can use our itouch for a FT cam! After all apple has shown one set up that way in past patent applications.
FT being an open standard means some app dev should be right on it.
Yes……what I’ve been waiting for. Now that we know the design is registered, or whatever, just build the thing!!!! The sooner the better.
Yes……what I’ve been waiting for. Now that we know the design is registered, or whatever, just build the thing!!!! The sooner the better.
No need for a backside camera. Who would want to film video or take pictures by holding up their iPad?
No need for a backside camera. Who would want to film video or take pictures by holding up their iPad?
You don’t need a backside camera, all you need is another iPad to use as a mirror.
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />
You don’t need a backside camera, all you need is another iPad to use as a mirror.
” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />
Who’d want a camera that can only take pictures of backsides?!
Who’d want a camera that can only take pictures of backsides?!
This article headline is misleading, since the article asks if it’s a camera or a light sensor. It does not confirm it’s a camera.
Just saying.
This article headline is misleading, since the article asks if it’s a camera or a light sensor. It does not confirm it’s a camera.
Just saying.
Why have a backside camera?
Because there’s apps for that:
Bar Code scanning
Adding photos to an inventory database
Adding photos to a sketching program
Scanning and OCR-ing documents
Amazing Virtual Reality views
Why have a backside camera?
Because there’s apps for that:
Bar Code scanning
Adding photos to an inventory database
Adding photos to a sketching program
Scanning and OCR-ing documents
Amazing Virtual Reality views
@Birzzarro
Actually, I don’t turn on my iPad at all. I just spend the whole time checking myself out in it, such is my wonderfulnessness.
When is that ‘iLove’ app coming out?
Or possibly ‘iSolipsism’ for the philosophically ‘minded’.
@Birzzarro
Actually, I don’t turn on my iPad at all. I just spend the whole time checking myself out in it, such is my wonderfulnessness.
When is that ‘iLove’ app coming out?
Or possibly ‘iSolipsism’ for the philosophically ‘minded’.
This behavior from Apple is starting to get rather stale. I.e. Ship a product with glaring feature omissions, wait a few months and ship “2.0” with a couple of those features added, have a press conference, act like you just invented indoor plumbing or something, and watch us nerds and fanboys line up, to the lovingly appreciative sounds of the Mossberg & Pogue duet.
Bite me Steve.
This behavior from Apple is starting to get rather stale. I.e. Ship a product with glaring feature omissions, wait a few months and ship “2.0” with a couple of those features added, have a press conference, act like you just invented indoor plumbing or something, and watch us nerds and fanboys line up, to the lovingly appreciative sounds of the Mossberg & Pogue duet.
Bite me Steve.
A remote camera that can link to the iPad would be a major item. Would be better than a back/front side camera. Yep they have these aps. But would be very handy.