Say hello to the ‘Apple Broadcast Network?’

“NBC head Jerry Zucker’s oft-repeated quote about trading analog dollars for digital pennies reflects the collapse of sponsor trust towards Internet advertising more than anything else. Publications that pulled $35.00 per thousand page views in 1998 were lucky to get $0.35 cents after the dot-com crash thanks to rampant abuse (click fraud, oppressive pop-ups, spam etc.),” Richard Menta writes for MP3newswire.net. “Nearly a decade later, Apple will attempt to elevate sponsor trust – and with it ad rates – with it’s new iAd concept. They will support it through no less than a model that TV execs like Zucker are familiar and comfortable with.”

“In 1959 5,749,000 television sets were sold in the US, bringing the cumulative total of sets sold since 1950 to 63,542,128 units. This number supported, through advertising, three national television networks, ABC, NBC, and CBS (a fourth, Dumont, folded in 1956) and numerous local independent stations. Television was big business by the start of the 1960’s,” Menta writes. “Now here are another set of numbers. As of April this year Apple sold 75 million iPhone and iPod touch units, devices capable of delivering video via Wi-Fi and 3G connectivity. Add to that figure 2 million iPads and counting. By the end of the year Apple should have about 90 million smart mobile devices in the wild.”

MacDailyNews Note: Apple CEO Steve Jobs just said during his WWDC 2010 keynote address that Apple would pass the 100 million device mark this month.

Menta continues, “That makes a proprietary amalgam greater than what the TV networks had in 1959 and one that easily serves as a foundation for a pending broadcast network that will be delivered not through tall radio towers, but through small wireless hubs and the Internet. Call it the Apple Broadcast Network. iAd is how Apple plans to pay for it.”

“Last April, Broadpoint AmTech analyst Brian Marshall mused that Apple could generate through a hybrid pricing model as much as $32 per 1,000 viewers. That’s pure speculation, but if Apple comes anywhere close to Marshall’s figure then it becomes just a matter of how large a cut Apple offers Zucker and his ilk to free up network programming,” Menta writes. “If that happens the Apple Broadcast Network becomes a reality. ‘If’ is the key word here.”

Full article here.

[Thanks to MacDailyNews Reader “Dow C.” for the heads up.]

24 Comments

  1. JustMe
    Low reading comp. skills? yes?
    The quote MDN corrected was “By the end of the year Apple should have about 90 million smart mobile devices in the wild.”

    That is stupid low as they have already sold 100M (what MDN said) by the end of the year that figure could (easily) be 150M.

  2. so no more 3g or cellular for our ipads and iphones in the future ?

    it will all be wi fi via the apple network , there’s loads of wi fi hot spots everywhere now !

    cant come soon enough for me

  3. In 1959, the population of the US was just over 150,000,000, median income was less than $3,000, and television sets cost $300-$1,200. TV cases were big wooden boxes, designed for table-top use or as standalone furniture. For those reasons, they were not personal devices. It was unusual for a household to have more than one, and hospital rooms generally didn’t have them. In 1959, I lived in a city where there was only one broadcast channels. There was no cable TV. My family couldn’t afford a TV until 1955, when my father got one from a friend who was a TV repairman.

    For an actor at the time, moving to TV from the stage or screen was bad career move. TV had yet to gain respect as a serious medium.

    I don’t think there is any way to make a valid comparison between TVs in 1959 and Apple products today.

  4. If Apple wanted to create a internet broadcast network they would need to first set up a BILLION DOLLAR SERVER FARM to support it. Yes, much like the one in North Carolina.

  5. The author is misusing the term “network”. A network is not a content host; a network finances and in some cases produces the content. Apple currently hosts content produced and financed by others on iTunes.

    If you say “Apple could stick iAds into this content and revenue share with providers”, sure they could, but that wouldn’t make them a network.

    Again, Apple has no interest in financing or creating the content. The same way Jobs admitted Apple didn’t know the first thing about spotting musical talent when asked if he considered starting an Apple music label.

  6. Maybe its only me, but I think it is ironic that the article states … “rampant abuse (click fraud, oppressive pop-ups, spam etc.)” …and that the word “pop-ups” then displays its own oppressive pop-up.

    I agree these are oppressive and a form of reader abuse. Why does MDN, which I otherwise love to read, imbed them in the articles? They serve no purpose except to aggravate, and can’t possibly generate any meaningful money.

  7. The biggest clog in the wheel at this point is the delivery network. Mobile phone networks can’t handle that kind of capacity right now. WiFi connections are too few and far between, or are locked to some kind of subscription requirement. And we saw what happened to the WiFi at WWDC when too many people were on it at once.

    Until WiFi hotspots become commonplace and virtually everywhere, or the mobile networks boost their capabilities to handle this huge data onslaught, Apple can’t implement its broadcasting vision.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.