“Despite years of negotiations Sir Paul McCartney and iTunes still haven’t done a deal to make Beatles’ tracks available to download,” Dan Whitworth reports for The BBC’s Newsbeast. “‘To tell you the truth I don’t actually understand how it’s got so crazy,’ Sir Paul told Newsbeat. ‘I know iTunes would like to do it, so one day it’s going to happen.'”
“Sir Paul has claimed the delay is down to record company EMI,” Whitworth reports. “‘It’s been business hassles,’ he said. ‘Not with us, or iTunes. It’s the people in the middle, the record label. There have been all sorts of reasons why they don’t want to do it.'”
Whitworth reports, “McCartney has long insisted that he wants to make his old tracks with John, George and Ringo available to download.”
Full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Truly the never-ending story.
[Thanks to MacDailyNews Readers too numerous to mention individually for the heads up.]
Related articles:
Computerworld’s Elgan: Apple’s iPad will be the biggest cultural phenomenon since The Beatles – March 30, 2010
RUMOR: The Beatles to bow on Apple iTunes Store on December 15 – November 06, 2009
The Beatles release entire remastered catalog on limited edition USB stick (FLAC and MP3) – November 04, 2009
Yoko Ono says The Beatles coming to Apple’s iTunes Store, but EMI says not today – September 09, 2009
Will The Beatles debut on Apple’s iTunes Store at an event headlined by Rolling Stones lyric? – September 04, 2009
Analysts expect new iPods at Apple’s Sept. 9 event, but will CEO Jobs and/or The Beatles appear? – September 04, 2009
Report: Apple event set for Wednesday September 9; Music only (no tablet), The Beatles, too? – August 18, 2009
The Beatles release original catalog digitally re-mastered on CD; still no Apple iTunes Store deal – April 07, 2009
Apple Corps., Harmonix and MTV Games announce ‘The Beatles: Rock Band’ worldwide release set for 9/9 – March 05, 2009
McCartney: Record company holding up Beatles on iTunes – February 10, 2009
Entertainment Weekly: The Beatles’ absence on Apple’s iTunes Store is ridiculous – January 08, 2009
McCartney: Beatles on Apple iTunes Store talks ‘stalled’ – November 25, 2008
The Beatles finally on the way to Apple’s iTunes Store? – October 30, 2008
Apple iTunes Store to finally land The Beatles in 2009? – September 04, 2008
Neil Aspinall, The Beatles original road manager, former Apple Corps chief, dies at 66 – March 24, 2008
Report: No deal yet for The Beatles music on Apple’s iTunes Store – March 11, 2008
Report: The Beatles coming to Apple’s iTunes Store soon – March 07, 2008
Apple shares surge over 5-percent on new iPod, Beatles expectations – August 30, 2007
Ringo Starr catalog now available from Apple’s iTunes Store; Beatles next? – August 28, 2007
RUMOR: Apple to release Yellow Submarine iPod preloaded with full Beatles catalog – July 11, 2007
No Beatles via Apple’s iTunes Store until 2008? – June 02, 2007
Analysts: Having The Beatles on iTunes would be nonevent for Apple – May 11, 2007
McCartney: Deal for digital Beatles catalog ‘virtually settled’ – May 10, 2007
EMI and The Beatles settle royalty dispute; deal could pave the way for Beatles to join 21st century – April 12, 2007
Neil Aspinall resigns from Apple Corps, The Beatles on the way to Apple’s iTunes Store? – April 10, 2007
Reuters: Apple and EMI announcement not about The Beatles – April 02, 2007
Beatles + iTunes? EMI to hold media event on Monday with special guest, Apple CEO Steve Jobs – April 01, 2007
Circuit City ad shows Apple iPod with Beatles album art – February 20, 2007
Music’s online holdouts: The Beatles, Led Zepplin, AC/DC, Garth Brooks, and more – February 16, 2007
Report: No exclusive Beatles deal for Apple’s iTunes Store – February 12, 2007
Why Apple iTunes Store + The Beatles would be a very big deal – February 06, 2007
NPD’s Crupnick: Beatles-iTunes deal ‘almost certain’ – February 05, 2007
Apple Inc. and The Beatles’ Apple Corps Ltd. enter into new agreement – February 05, 2007
RUMOR: Apple to launch widescreen multi-touch iPod, Beatles deal via Super Bowl ad – February 03, 2007
Report: Apple to announce iTunes Store deal with The Beatles via Super Bowl commercial – January 17, 2007
The Beatles to share the love with Apple’s iTunes Store on Valentine’s Day? – January 16, 2007
Apple close to offering Beatles music via iTunes Store – December 05, 2006
Fortune: Apple close to landing exclusive iTunes Store deal with The Beatles – November 27, 2006
The Beatles stream ‘LOVE’ album for free online – November 17, 2006
The Beatles catalog to be available for download ‘soon’ – November 13, 2006
Apple will do ‘everything we can’ to lure The Beatles to iTunes Music Store – May 10, 2006
Apple Computer beats Beatles in trademark court battle, Beatles plan to appeal – May 08, 2006
Apple Corps confirms plans to offer remastered Beatles songs for downloading, ‘no firm date yet’ – April 13, 2006
Remastered Beatles catalog to be offered via Apple’s iTunes Store? – April 12, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple closing arguments; judge’s ruling due toward end of April – April 05, 2006
Settlement: Apple introduces The Beatles iPod Special Edition – April 01, 2006
Apple lawyer: ‘Even a moron in a hurry’ can tell difference between iTunes and Beatles’ Apple Corps – March 30, 2006
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple goes to UK High Court this Wednesday – March 26, 2006
Apple Computer and The Beatles’ AppleCorp should stop fighting in court and work together instead – July 27, 2005
Beatles vs. Apple Computer trial scheduled for March 27, 2006 – May 06, 2005
Beatles on alert? Apple reportedly in talks to acquire direct music distributor HipSolve Media – March 15, 2005
Beatles vs. Apple Computer: outcome is far from a lock for Beatles – September 30, 2004
Apple vs. Apple settlement to result in iTunes Music Store Beatles exclusive? – September 23, 2004
Apple’s iTunes Music Store to land exclusive Beatles deal? – September 20, 2004
Apple vs. Beatles could be solved with fat check and spinning off iTunes from Apple Computer – September 17, 2004
Apple’s settlement with Beatles could be ‘biggest settlement in legal history’ – September 13, 2004
The Beatles to sell songs via Apple iTunes Music Store? – June 08, 2004
Apple loses: Apple v. Beatles to be heard in Britain – April 06, 2004
Beatles’ Apple vs. Jobs’ Apple; 1991 agreement allows for ‘data transmission services, even music’ – February 26, 2004
Apple Computer to contest Beatles’ U.K. lawsuit in court today – February 25, 2004
Jobs: Apple vs. Apple ‘could drag on for years – it’s unfortunate because we love the Beatles’ – September 28, 2003
Forbes: Apple vs. Apple; iTunes Music Store just might end up with exclusive Beatles deal – September 12, 2003
Sosumi: more on the Beatles’ lawsuit against Apple Computer, Inc. – September 12, 2003
The Beatles sue Apple Computer over iPod, iTunes – September 12, 2003
The Beatles’ Apple Records could be gearing up for fight with Apple Computer – August 12, 2003
The Beatles gearing up for a fight over Apple’s iTunes Music Store – June 03, 2003
“… speaking words of wisdom, let it be, let it be ….”
Rock on, Paul!
‘You never give me your money
You only give me your funny paper
and in the middle of negotiations
you break down’
BOYCOTT EMI!!!
– C2
I’m glad to see McCartney speaking out against the record label, and understanding that Apple is not to blame. And EMI is being STUPID!!!
Duke Nukem sequel and the Beatles on iTunes…
Buy the CD, rip it & forget it. The quality is better.
…its time to hear from EMI. Preferably with a name (and email address).
-hh
Beattles…Who are they??? ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”smile” style=”border:0;” />
Maybe a Gawker “journalist” could email Steve Jobs at 2 in the morning while a little drunk and ask Steve what John would think if he was 20…..
This saga ended long ago on Lime Wire.
Fsck the Labels!
”I know iTunes would like to do it, so one day it’s going to happen.'”
Does even the biggest Apple fanboy have this kind of faith?
Why does anyone care, because….:”During the week of 4 April 1964, The Beatles held twelve positions on the Billboard Hot 100 singles chart, including the top five positions. Neither feat has been matched by any other artist to date. The songs were “Can’t Buy Me Love” (Capitol Records), “Twist and Shout” (Tollie Records), “She Loves You” (Swan Records), “I Want to Hold Your Hand” (Capitol), and “Please Please Me” (Vee-Jay).”
@-hh
Not since last year…
Fans of the Beatles most likely already own the CD’s and have them ripped. No huge need for iTunes to carry them.
Make it snappy, EMI
Hey, at least Beatallica is on iTunes!
Check it out, it’s a hilarious blend of Metallica and Beatles music.
With titles such as Sgt Hetfield’s Motorbreath Pub Band, Blackened the USSR, and Everyone’s Got a Ticket to Ride Except for Me and My Lightening, there is something for everyone! 😀
I guess we’re all shocked here. glad Paul came out and let people know it’s not HIM that’s backwards.
Freakin’ EMI – holding on to the last vestiges of profit.
EMI was bought by a bunch of venture capitalists a few years back that are purely in it to milk every last penny out of their back catalogue. The label has haemorrhaged artists and A&R;people, sales have halved, and virtually no money is going into the development or promotion of new artists. It’s all about living on past glories.
Don’t expect to see the Beatles on iTunes until after EMI changes ownership.
“his old tracks with John, George and Ringo”
-Understatement of the millenium!!
EMI was talking to Adobe and think that the future is in vinyls and 8-tracks.
EMI = Adobe = Fail.
Not that they shouldn’t release the albums on iTunes, but I wouldn’t give it some revolutionary fanfare. Most fans already have the songs on their computer. They’ve already released the songs digitally on that apple-shaped flash drive; what’s the holdup?
stupid record companies.
but HONESTLY…NOBODY cares anymore.
If Paul is telling the truth, then EMI must be run by imbeciles, which shouldn’t be a big surprise I guess.
So the question is: How does the middleman get to be in total control of what happens to the Beatles’ music. That’s insane.
“Fans of the Beatles most likely already own the CD’s and have them ripped. No huge need for iTunes to carry them.” —anypat
No need for a whole new generation of music fans to have online access to the music of one of the most influential music groups of all time? What a dumb thing to say!