Adobe CTO likens Apple to 19th-century railroad

invisibleSHIELD case for iPad“Apple Inc.’s recent competitive behavior is similar to that of a 19th-century railroad company, Adobe Systems Inc.’s top technology executive said Wednesday,” John Letzing reports for MarketWatch.

“‘Apple’s playing this strategy where they want to create a walled garden’ around the Internet, Adobe Chief Technology Officer Kevin Lynch remarked at a tech conference in San Francisco. He then compared the company’s moves to the deployment of railways with varying gauges in the 1800s, which precluded compatibility with the trains of rivals,” Letzing reports. “‘If you look at what’s going on right now, it’s kind of like railroads in the 1800s,’ Lynch said.”

Letzing reports, “‘I don’t think it’s the role of the company to exercise that judgment over what people are making,’ Lynch said to a smattering of applause, while charging that Apple’s practices are ‘preventing healthy competition.'”

Full article here.

MacDailyNews Take: We liken Adobe to a software company run by lazy illogical ingrates.

69 Comments

  1. FAIL. I can’t just start Safari, Firefox, Opera, or even Internet Explorer and view Flash content without installing a plugin. When I can do that, then be can rant all he wants about a closed system. But for now, Adobe still doesn’t understand that Flash is the walled garden.

    Flash plugin = railroad gauge

  2. Adobe cancelled their mobile version of flash (development) a few years ago. Now they are bemoaning their bad decision and now trying to get folks to feel sorry for them. Kinda hope that Apple buys them when they become a penny stock company and build some good stuff.

  3. Apple’s train track isn’t the only one in town–it just skirts around the seedier parts of town. The parts of town a person would want to avoid–if he were smart.

    They’re not even telling other companies to stop building their tracks–just that their highly stylized, ultra-cool, expensive trains will no longer run on other companies lines.

    And who cares if it IS the only track in town–IT’S GOIN’ TO THE PROMISED LAND, BABY!!!

    I’d ride that train any day!…..except Thursday’s–that’s the day I give grandma her bath.

  4. @MEES

    Apple isn’t going to support their production and creative software they are still selling much less invent anything new.

    Apple is a mobile device company. The Mac and its OS are history.*

    *Source: Steve Jobs

  5. “‘Apple’s playing this strategy where they want to create a walled garden around the Internet”

    If this were true, Adobe would have a valid point.

    However, the truth is:

    “they want to create a walled garden WITHIN the Internet”

    The fact is that consumers know this going in, and there are numerous other choices if consumers do not like this arrangement.

  6. Adobe’s board and shareholders better put some muzzles on their management. Every time that they publicly comment on this subject they come off as self-serving boobs. Their analogies are lame and logic is completely non-existent. Adobe is clearly banking on the typical end user being totally ignorant on the issues involved in this debate.

  7. So Adobe, go and build your own Tablet and make it run Flash and whatever else you want it to. Quit crying about Apple.

    Does MS let it’s customers run Flash websites on the XBox 360? Oh, right, it doesn’t have a web browser. But that’s their choice. Are you going to claim that just because something has a web browser that they MUST allow you to pollute it with Flash?

  8. A “Smattering of Applause” ? Sounds like the audience is more sophisticated than Mr. Lunch. Certainly more polite! ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grin” style=”border:0;” />

  9. The issue here isn’t whether or not Flash is reliable, buggy, or just lazy. It’s does Steve Jobs get to play God and pick and chose what technology or what programs we are “allowed” to play with? He has created his garden, called us his children, and said, “Thou shall not eat from the tree of Flash.”

  10. This is why I despise analogies in almost all cases. The analogues are almost always selected in order to force an ideological viewpoint into a situation rather than illuminate the situation. Apple is not a monopoly in any way that matters in the cell phone market. That they have a massively successful store can’t possibly make them the only store. So drawing comparisons to said barons only serves to tie Apple’s image to that of an actual abusive monopoly and make emotional pleas to an innacurate portrayal.

  11. No one is forced to buy the iPad. If you don’t like the fact Flash is not available on the iPad go and buy one of the many other amazingly popular and successful tablets on the market that support Flash. Oh wait a minute there aren’t any others.

    Too bad you treated Apple like shit this past decade eh Adobe?

    Payback is a bitch.

  12. Payback a bitch, I can hardly wait for Steve’s response.

    I think they have it backwards, Adobe wants a walled garden with Flash while Apple wants an open internet with HTML5, … and control of their platform. Maybe Adobe fears the day when Apples market share is near 100%, then they might wall off the internet!

  13. What BS.

    Apple/Jobs wants open standards (== standardized tracks).

    What Adobe wants, are their own tracks beside the standard ones that only their engines can use. Apple retorts by disallowing Adobe’s engines that are modified to run on standard tracks (which do not run very well and use lots of coal).

  14. @Bartsimpsonhead
    “…Adobe – stand in front of a 200 mph express train and you’re gonna get run over!

    Nice!

    Adobe,…meet Microsoft, you’re gonna be sharing a room together for the next millenium.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.