Adobe CTO promises Flash 10.1 Mac performance will be almost a good as Windows Flash

“Adobe’s chief technical officer, Kevin Lynch claims that Flash [version 10.1, still in beta] now runs at ‘almost exactly’ the same level of CPU usage on Mac and Windows systems, where previously the Mac suffered significantly,” MacNN reports.

“The v10.1 update is set to use CoreAnimation, which Lynch suggests could make Macs faster than Windows in some cases,” MacNN reports.

“Lynch concedes that video is still a major weakness, as a 480p video, running on a 1.8GHz Mac mini, uses 34 percent of the CPU in Mac OS X and just 16 percent in Windows,” MacNN reports. “Flash 10.1 is expected to cut CPU consumption in half.”

Full article here.

Lynch’s blog comment is here.

MacDailyNews Take: Adobe, since you still don’t get it, we’ll spell it out clearly: Mac users are quite accustomed to enjoying significantly better, not almost as good, experiences as anything the horrid Windows “experience” can offer. Therefore, you fail yet again and your shitastic Flash must die.

Adobe owes its very existence to Apple’s Macintosh. Sadly, lazy Adobe has long ago forgotten that fact.

Note to advertisers: Your Flash-based ads are no longer reaching the most well-heeled customers online: iPhone owners. They’re also not hitting iPod touch users. And, very soon, iPad users won’t be seeing them, either. If you care about reaching people with discretionary income, you might want to consider dumping your flash-based ads and moving to a more open format that people with money and the will to spend it can actually see.

MacDailyNews Note: Our switch from Google’s Admob to Apple’s Quattro for iPhone OS users is progressing. Visitors to the mobile version of MacDailyNews are already seeing the new Quattro ads along with the traditional – and lightweight – Google AdSense for Mobile ads. Users of the MacDailyNews app will see the switch to Quattro with our forthcoming app update (version 2.0 coming soon!) that will also bring new features that have been requested by our readers. We thank you for patronizing our sponsors as it allows for our continued operation along with ongoing web and mobile app development.


  1. After so many years of letting us suffer with instability, crashes, bug ridden resource hogging POS, you’re now telling us that is almost as good as the Windows version? ahahahahahahahahha…..

    NO THANKS you can keep it. I’m ready to move on and I’m sure Apple and the rest of its users feel the same way.

  2. Good news for Mac users.
    I’m still keeping my flash blocker in place on Safari, but still good news.

    BTW MDN- Please! Include variable sized text in MDN 2.0 app. Please!

  3. Whoa, wait a minute. Is this the same Adobe who’s been complaining for over a year that they can’t make Flash any better because its Apple’s fault not theirs?

    What? Did one of Adobe’s developers finally purchase a copy of “Programming Mac OS X for Dummies” books?

  4. This sounds like great news. Using CoreAnimation means that Apple has more control over Flash performance on the OSX. Also, the way I read it, video performance will be better on the Mac as well under 10.1, but maybe that’s not right.

    Perhaps they’ll be able to use CoreVideo for Flash.

  5. Maybe Adobe are angling for Apple to buy them out, just to sort out the Flash nightmare?
    That way Flash could be either ditched or replaced by something better.
    Maybe then we could get a Quark replacement that was affordable? ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grin” style=”border:0;” />

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.