“Huberty is leaning heavily toward the bull, offering three paths by which Apple hits $325 per share or more within the next 12 months,” Elmer-Dewitt reports.
“The Street, she believes, is only giving Apple a 5% chance of surpassing that $325 target,” Elmer-Dewitt reports. “She puts the odds at one in four.”
Full article here.
Apple said on Friday it had removed Meta Platforms’ Threads and WhatsApp apps from its App Store in China after being ordered to do so…
Apple is touting its Vision Pro spatial computing headset which was made available in the U.S. earlier this year to businesses…
Even if the iPhones looked good enough for resale, Apple’s contract with its recycler GEEP explicitly required that every product it sent be…
The “Delta” Nintendo game emulator launched Wednesday as one of the first officially approved iOS apps to emulate Nintendo consoles…
Apple TV+ announced Thursday that “Sunny,” its 10-episode mystery thriller with a darkly comic bent starring Rashida Jones, is set to…
Said with even less credibility than Al Roker.
I’ll go along with the 1/4 chance for the next 12 months. For the next 18 months, over 60 % chance
That’s based upon AAPL numbers, not real world market scenario numbers. Hedge funds use their top stock to sell to level out thelower pittance stocks in their clients portfolios in order to make them look better. AAPL is near the top of every list, so it doesn’t have a chance…it’s not AAPL’s fault.
If we ignore for the moment that this is the notorious Kathy Huberty (a person with a very questionable credibility), AAPL at above $300 per share means market cap greater than Microsoft. That alone should make it a difficult proposition, since Wall Street does not think rationally; they look at perceived strengths, and monopoly provides a powerful perception…
so whaddaya saying perk? is 325 conservative or gratuitous?
*I* am an analyst too! And I think there’s a 5% chance that AAPL will hit $750 in 10 months. There you go MDN – I just gave you a new article and more hits!
That’s a 75% chance they won’t!
Crazy article!!!
So does that mean there’s a 75% it could hit $324.99 per share or less?
Considering that the stock market is just a legalized ponzi scheme, this is just an effort by katy Huberty to get more people to put in money after her, so her firm can make more profits.
One of many excellent articles on this topic is here:
http://dangoldstein.blogspot.com/2002/11/stock-market-as-ponzi-scheme-faqs.html
Well for a ponzi scheme I sure as hell made out pretty good in my investment in AAPL.
For APPL to reach $300 it needs to become a necessity, not just a luxury…
Considering Apple is not just one variety of apple, software, operating system, hardware, mobile phone, mobile Internet, mobile software supplier, soon to be advertiser…why can’t the market cap exceed those of it’s individual competitors. Since apple’s growth is high (~25%) a PE of 2xgrowth is not unreasonable. Turns out to be $325.
I do not know about all of the stock speculation hype with Apple of late.
Analyst were predicting $250-$275/share, now speculation about
$300+/share. Apple stock is having trouble just staying around the $200 mark. It has not gone past its latest high of $205/share and it’s been hanging pretty steadily around the $196/share for awhile.
I bought stock when Apple was in the low $100/share.
Sounds to me like the hedge fund people are trying to artificially inflate Apple’s price so they end up being the big winners instead of its dedicated, long-term stock holders. Selling Apple on the short-term hurts its chances for long-term stock growth.
Not Apple’s fault, but come on. Sure, I,definitely, wouldn’t mind seeing Apple trend toward this direction, but I think it’s a little early to be forecasting this type of growth for Apple.
If I see Apple in the next year trending toward the $250-275 mark as some analysts said it would, then I’ll retract my previous statements.
@ HMCIV
Was reading an interview with Al Roker in TIME the other day. He defended meteorologists as being more accurate than economists. And as he said, it doesn’t affect your retirement account.
In the short term (up to 3 days), meteorologists are like 90% accurate. % days, 75%. Not so good you say? If you consider all the variables they have to consider, that’s damn good. Nature makes Wall St. look simple.