PC World: Is Psystar’s judicial deathblow a win for consumers?

The New Mac mini “Mac-clone maker Psystar was dealt a deathblow on Saturday after a federal judge said the company infringed on Apple’s Mac OS X operating system copyright,” Ian Paul reports for PC World. “With Psystar on its way out of the Mac OS X game, Apple regains full control over its products, and for the foreseeable future only Cupertino will decide which hardware its operating system will run on.”

MacDailyNews Note: Please see related article: Apple wins sweeping victory, crushes would-be ‘Mac cloner’ Psystar in court – November 14, 2009

Paul continues, “How does Apple’s total control over its OS impact me? On the one hand, you know what to expect when you buy a Mac computer. You know you are getting a high-quality device that requires little maintenance and is ready to go just minutes after you take it out of the box for the first time. You also have a fantastic support service through Apple’s retail stores across the United States and throughout the world. But you’re going to pay a premium to take advantage of all the Mac has to offer. Apple’s cheapest desktop model that includes a monitor, keyboard, and CPU is the 21.5-inch iMac for $1200. Psystar’s base desktop bundle with OS X starts at $600, the same cost as Apple’s Mac Mini, which doesn’t come with either a keyboard or monitor.”

MacDailyNews Note: Actually, if you’re trying to get a Mac on the cheap, you get the Mac mini and any old monitor, keyboard, and mouse with acceptable specs and prices. You can get a monitor, keyboard, and mouse for very little, but let’s say $200 total for semi-decent examples of each. Those, plus the $599 for the Mac mini, costs $799 total, not $1200. Even better, Apple Certified Refurbished Macs are excellent quality and you can find some very, very good deals – especially around new and upgraded product announcements.

Paul continues, “And that’s really the crux of the whole debate. A lot of people may want to own a Mac, but Apple’s high prices make it hard to justify spending $1000 on a 13-inch laptop, when you can buy a similar Windows machine for two-thirds that price–albeit with downgraded specs.”

MacDailyNews Take: Sigh. Paul doesn’t get it at all. To illustrate: A lot of people may want to own a BMW, but BMW’s high prices make it hard to justify spending $35,000 on a 3 series sedan, when you can buy a similar Pontiac sedan for two-thirds that price–albeit with downgraded specs.

Paul continues, “Personally, I’m happy with my Mac computer and although I’ve had a few minor problems, I can’t really say I’m unhappy with Apple’s significant control over my computing experience. But then again, isn’t there something instinctively wrong about accepting a system or product, regardless of its quality, that reduces consumer choice?”

MacDailyNews Take: No, Ian, there is absolutely nothing wrong with buying and using a superior Apple Mac. To put it simply: If you can’t afford it and/or are unable to grasp the value equation, then an Apple Macintosh is not for you. You want the Pontiac of personal computers and any old Windows PC box assembler will do.

Full article here.

57 Comments

  1. Choice isn’t what its cracked up to be if it results in Windows, or Dell Service, etc.

    Apple’s product quality is a direct result of its control over the production and service support consumers depend on.

    The ONLY ones that will cry about this are uber geeks that must tinker with everything they buy, and those that truly can’t afford a Mac. There are far more of the former than there are of the latter.

  2. “Apple’s cheapest desktop model that includes a monitor, keyboard, and CPU is the 21.5-inch iMac for $1200. Psystar’s base desktop bundle with OS X starts at $600, the same cost as Apple’s Mac Mini, which doesn’t come with either a keyboard or monitor.”

    Actually, it is even cheaper to break into some retail outlet and steal a Mac.
    This is even better than a Psystar box, and cheaper!
    And it relies on the same principle as Psystar does. stealing.

  3. MDN take,

    “You want the Pontiac of personal computers and any old Windows PC box assembler will do.”

    Massive insult to GM in general and Pontiacs in particular.

    I would have compared a cheap PC box with Windows to a Yugo myself.

  4. Restrictions on Choice through history:

    Ford Model T: Any color you like so long as it’s black.

    Mac OS X: Any hardware you like so long as it’s Apple.

    Dell/HP: Any OS you like so long as it’s Windows.

    Coke Machine: Any soda you like so long as it’s Pepsi free.

    Republicans: Any congressional bill you like so long as it’s Pelosi free. ” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”wink” style=”border:0;” />

    Stalin: Any gulag you like so long as it’s Siberia.

    Archduke Franz Ferdinand: Any country you like so long as it’s <a href=”” width=”19″ height=”19″ alt=”grrr” style=”border:0;” /> (What? Too soon?)

  5. “…and for the foreseeable future only Cupertino will decide which hardware its operating system will run on.”

    How f-ing stupid. Who else should decide that? PC World?

    That’s like complaining about Burger King having an exclusive on Whopper sales. Just stupid.

  6. Wow, hard to believe someone can print this dribble!!

    If you work really and design a great product an some moron finds it “instinctively wrong” to pay your price then you should have to give your hard earned product to some other hack to sell.

    On what planet does that make sense??

  7. “Consumer choice” code words, for bash Apple, that MS has injected into the braindead.

    I wonder what these same braindead think when they are offered over 100k apps in the AppStore, and compare that with the few thousand in the WinMo/Zune Marketplace? Where’s all the consumer choice?

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.