“In a direct emulation of Apple’s iTunes LP and App Store, U2 and BlackBerrymaker, RIM, claim the new app, ‘invigorates the album experience for the digital age,'” Evans reports.
“Developed in collaboration with the band, the app promises ‘a rich visual experience with evolving content and an interactive dimension for the band’s current Number 1 album No Line On The Horizon,” Evans reports. “The application is now available for free on BlackBerry App World.”
Full article here.
MacDailyNews Take: Um, about that “current Number 1 album” bit from RIM’s press release: Not on any remotely current chart on this planet, boys. And a better name for it would have been: “The Forgettable Trifle.” We’re U2 fans (as remain so, regardless of this BlackBerry-only nonsense), but, come on, one time through that last album was more than enough; we never felt compelled to slog through the piece of shit for even a second time. Suffice to say: Not your best album, or business decision, by a long shot.
Lastly, Bono, you’re part of Elevation Partners. Aren’t you supposed to be wasting your time, energy, and money pimping ill-fated bundles for the Palm Pre instead?
Who was U2? Oh! Now I remember them. The delay thingy and the fire thingy back on Sunday Bloody Sunday.
Abunch of old guys still trying to make it. Gotta write hook songs, dudes.
It aint gonna happen. In this case, mass adoption of RIMs app store.
Big mistake jumping on BB and missing out on the new iTunes 9 goodies. I guess RIM is paying these boys some big money to jump ship and miss out on iTunes 9/Apple awesomeness.
U2 is all about the money nowadays, as they avoid paying taxes. Hypocrisy, given that Bono wants taxpayers to foot charity for Africa.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/business/yourmoney/04amster.html?_r=1&sq=u2 tax&st=cse&adxnnl=1&scp=2&adxnnlx=1253120475-JEMo64FtJXLMwNbLJHtRSA
Conspiracy Theory #7: U2 purposely took a mulligan on this album to sink RIM’s ace in the hole. Clandesdinely Delicious!
I read that U2’s the jump to RIM had more to do with the band wanting access to Apple’s R&D;, while at the same time Bono is a partner in Elevation Partners which basically owns Palm. I don’t blame Apple one bit for telling U2 to piss off.. Next in line for sponsor money was RIM looking for some semblance of hipness. Having seen the 360 tour twice in Europe I can tell you that, which the show is excellent, RIM is not getting much bang for their ad $$. And this new thing sounds like more RIM cluelessness.
Bono = Worlds biggest Turd.
Funny how all these holier then thou musicians preach to the masses about giving up possessions & $$$ but they will follow the ca$h like a hound follows a bitch in heat.
I have no problem with accumulating wealth, just don’t be a hypocrite about it.
U-WHO? Gimme a break.
I’ve never been a fan of their music, but their self-important posturing is a bit much.
It’s pop music boys. Here today, forgotten tomorrow.
Ms. Doubtfire and her band don’t matter anymore. U2 hasn’t been good since……well never. Who cares?
Paul David Hewson = Bono = dumbass extraordinaire! With all due respect, in the grand scheme of things (that is, the music biz), U2 and the Beatles are ‘way too full of themselves to be real or noteworthy.
Scroom both.
@ Telsa Spark – that’s a VERY good point. Considering how transparently Palm has been copying as much of Apple’s technology as it can get away with, who knows how much more they’d be copying if Apple had allowed Bono access to Apple R&D.
As for why U2 are spending so much time with RIM… well, based on the above, expect to see Palm suddenly come out with technology “borrowed” from RIM in future (assuming Palm doesn’t go out of business before that).
The U2 boys are building their retirement funds. Screw the music, its all about the money now, baby!
not to lessen their talent or contributions to the music world, but really who cares. you can get all the U2 content you want now on itunes, this isn’t gonna make anyone switch sides.
I’m sick of U2.
No matter who the artist was, on this website they were bound to get huge negativity just for not being with Apple.
U2 are an awesome band, reinvented themselves throughout their career and have contributed so much to the music industry.
I don’t think it was a good move for them to do that – think of all the loyal fans who own the U2 ipods… now they’re meant to switch to blackberry? Not good PR for U2. They’re entitled to make good business moves and make money, but ignoring customer loyalty is not a great plan. This weakens the U2 brand. Its like doing a pepsi ad then next year doing a coke ad – leaves fans seriously confused about their brand associations.