Leaked photo shows Apple.com’s ‘Macbook Touch’ splash page? (with photo)

“Allegedly this is a leaked pre-release shot of Apple’s website featuring the new MacBook Touch tablet device,” Touch User Guide reports.

Touch User Guide reports, “Notice the little tab under the video player, could this be the new ‘Cocktail’ feature that everyone is talking about right now?”

Full article, with larger photo, here.

MacDailyNews Note: Real or not, you decide. All we know (beyond the fact that that capital “T” on “Touch” gnaws at us), is that 13 months ago we reported a rumor that Apple’s secret product is ‘MacBook touch’. Said our source — the same one who tipped us to wireless iTunes Store sales direct to iPod and iPhone a week before Apple debuted it — in staccato fashion:

Think MacBook screen, possibly a bit smaller, in glass with iPhone-like, but fuller-featured Multi-Touch. Gesture library. Full Mac OS X. This is why they bought P.A. Semi. Possibly with Immersion’s haptic tech. Slot-loading SuperDrive. Accelerometer. GPS. Pretty expensive to produce initially, but sold at “low” price that will reduce margins. Apple wants to move these babies. And move they will. This is some sick shit. App Store-compatible, able to run Mac apps, too. By October at the latest.

Our source subsequently told us that “the SuperDrive will not be part of the finished devices, ‘It was just in some of the prototypes for various reason(s).'”

Maybe our source was one October ahead?

63 Comments

  1. The design of the MacBook Touch correlates with the MacTablet picture that was published a few days ago on the following page:
    http://www.nowhereelse.fr/enfin-une-authentique-photo-de-la-mactablet-itouch-22919/

    There seem to be differences in the edges of both pictured devices (one is metal, the other plastic) but that could indicate one of the two is a prototype. I am more interested by the same placement of the ‘Home’ button in the same location on both devices.For me that detail gives some more credibility to both pictures.

  2. fake im afraid, what is it? arm or intel, they would both mean very different things with regards to apps etc and it shows both, and also if it is running normal safari / osx, it might need a menu in the menu bar dont ya think (it is the top application as it has highlighted close butons

  3. There are simply too many things about this image that do not make sense.

    It’s just an iPhone stretched out with screen shots piled on top of each other. It’s not very creative at all.

  4. Fake. This just doesn’t make sense from a usability standpoint. Portability would be no better than a MacBook and lack a keyboard in favor of one that would obliterate half the screen while providing no tactile feedback which is very important to efficient typing. Others are right, there’s no need for a Home button when there’s a dock and the concept opens up a whole bag of worms as far as basic usability is concerned. Who wants a big-ass iPhone???

  5. Fake. The design is just an iPhone made a bit taller and a bit wider. All the design is recycled from existing designs. If it were real there would be something new in it. The web page would require us to believe that this was accidentally thrown up on Apple’s main web site and nobody else noticed. It’s not even a screen shot, it’s a digital camera photo of a screen. It’s rather lame, actually.

  6. Hmmm. 9to5Mac.com had this same thing posted earlier today, but it was removed from the Web site after a few hours.

    This also looks similar to the mock-up of a proposed Mac tablet that one of the Gizmodo guys had created several days ago, and which disappeared suddenly from the Giz site shortly after its appearance.

    So…it will be interesting to see if Leaked photo shows Apple.com’s ‘Macbook Touch’ splash page? (with photo) disappears from MDN later.

    Not saying this image isn’t fake, but could it be close enough to make Apple pick up the phone?

  7. Fake.

    “iPhone Apps & OS X living in perfect harmony”

    Rubbish. The iPhone runs OS X too anyway, and Apple definitely knows that.

    If the fakers hadn’t been as amateurish as they obviously are, they would have known that an explicit “Mac” reference would have been called for, not “OS X” which runs on both Macs and iPhones equally – on the one hand in its iPhone OS X incarnation and on the other as Mac OS X.

    Besides: It is simply not feasible to run both iPhone and Mac apps on the same compact battery-powered device to any satisfactory extent with current or near-term plausible technology.

    One of the worst fakes in recent memory.

Reader Feedback

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.